Print Report

A3368 Pinus albicaulis Forest & Woodland Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: These high-elevation forests and woodlands are dominated by Pinus albicaulis or codominated by Abies lasiocarpa and occur near treeline in the interior northwestern U.S. and adjacent southwestern Canada.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Whitebark Pine Forest & Woodland Alliance

Colloquial Name: Whitebark Pine Forest & Woodland

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This subalpine forest and woodland alliance occurs locally in the mountains of the interior northwestern U.S. and adjacent southwestern Canada from the central and northern Rocky Mountains, Klamath Mountains and Cascade Range. These forests are characterized by a coniferous tree canopy, 10-20 m tall, that is dominated by Pinus albicaulis or codominated by Abies lasiocarpa. Other tree associates, if present, vary by geography and elevation zones. Species include Picea engelmannii in more mesic stands, Pinus contorta and Pseudotsuga menziesii in the lower subalpine, Tsuga mertensiana in the Cascades, and Pinus flexilis in southern stands. A sparse shrub layer may be present consisting of juvenile trees and other woody species such as Juniperus communis, Ribes montigenum, Shepherdia canadensis, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, and Vaccinium scoparium. The herbaceous layer is typically sparse, but ranges from nearly absent to a moderately dense cover of graminoids with scattered forbs. Characteristic species include Achillea millefolium, Antennaria microphylla, Arnica spp., Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, Festuca idahoensis, Poa nervosa, Potentilla diversifolia, Solidago multiradiata, and Xerophyllum tenax. Elevations range from 1750-3400 m depending on latitude and geography. Landforms include ridgetops, mountain slopes, glacial trough walls and moraines, landslides and rockslides, and cirque headwalls and basins. Sites may be nearly level to steep-sloping on all aspects. Subalpine stands typically occur where disturbance such as avalanche or fire has temporarily reduced more shade-tolerant tree species, whereas at treeline they are found in mesic, protected pockets away from the extremely harsh environmental conditions. Substrates are generally lithic, well-drained, coarse-textured soils such as shallow, gravelly sands or loams derived from colluvium, glacial till and residuum.

Diagnostic Characteristics: High-elevation forests and woodlands of the central and northern Rocky Mountains and eastern Cascades dominated by Pinus albicaulis or codominated by Abies lasiocarpa. Shrub layers are not typically well-developed and herbaceous cover may be sparse to moderately dense.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Pinus albicaulis-dominated associations were formally classified into forest, woodland and mixed-conifer woodland alliances, which was considered confusing and were therefore combined. There is overlap in the amount of tree cover and relative dominance of tree species among stands in the different alliances. In British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, Achuff (1989) has also described a Picea engelmannii - Abies lasiocarpa - Pinus albicaulis - Pinus contorta forest and a couple of other Pinus albicaulis types that are related and need to be reviewed. However, woodland stands are generally more common on sites where high-elevation, rocky substrate or xeric habitats limit the tree cover, or occur on less xeric sites that are early-successional, where an understory of Abies lasiocarpa has not developed into a tree canopy. Forest stands typically occur at lower elevations below the forestline and need disturbance to establish and maintain them or they will succeed to more shade-tolerant subalpine tree species after 100-120 years. The mixed Abies lasiocarpa - Pinus albicaulis woodland stands typically are mid-seral and occur on less xeric sites with shade-tolerant trees. As the exotic pathogen white pine blister rust or epidemics of mountain pine beetles reduce or eliminate Pinus albicaulis from these stands, species composition and cover will be affected dramatically.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Vegetation included in this alliance has a closed tree canopy that is typically 2-20 m tall with cover ranging from very open to completely closed. The canopy is dominated by evergreen and deciduous needle-leaved trees. Sparse cover of cold-deciduous and evergreen, broad-leaved or scale-leaved shrub or dwarf-shrub species may be present. A sparse to moderately dense herbaceous layer dominated by perennial graminoids or forbs is also present.

Floristics: These forests and woodlands have a coniferous tree canopy 2-20 m tall that is dominated by Pinus albicaulis or codominated by Abies lasiocarpa. In some cases Pinus albicaulis is the only canopy tree species present. Other associated tree species vary by geography and elevation zones throughout the alliance''s range. In the lower subalpine, Pinus contorta and Pseudotsuga menziesii are present to codominant. In mesic stands in Canada and elsewhere, Picea engelmannii may be present to codominant. Tsuga mertensiana may be found in mesic stands in the Cascades. Near the southern range extent, Pinus flexilis is often present. The undergrowth is typically sparse because sites are often dry. There may be a sparse shrub layer consisting of juvenile trees and other woody species such as Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Juniperus communis, Ribes montigenum, Ribes viscosissimum, Shepherdia canadensis, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, and Vaccinium scoparium. The herbaceous layer is typically sparse and ranges from nearly absent to moderately dense cover of graminoids with scattered forbs. Characteristic species include Achillea millefolium, Antennaria microphylla, Arnica spp., Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, Festuca idahoensis, Lupinus sierrae-blancae (= Lupinus laetus), Poa nervosa, Potentilla diversifolia, Solidago multiradiata, and Xerophyllum tenax.

Dynamics:  Pinus albicaulis is a slow-growing, long-lived conifer that is common at higher elevations in the upper subalpine zone. It typically occurs in a mosaic of tree islands and meadows where it often colonizes sites and creates habitat for less hardy tree species. In lower subalpine forests, it is a seral species, establishing after a large disturbance such as stand-replacing fire or avalanche, or it is restricted to dry, rocky ridges where it competes well with shade-tolerant tree species. Without disturbance it will be overtopped in 100-120 years by faster growing, shade-tolerant species such as Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Tsuga mertensiana. Although crown fires and hot surface fires kill Pinus albicaulis, it tolerates low-intensity surface fires that will kill the shade-tolerant understory. Fire intervals range from 30-300 years.

Birds and small mammals often eat and cache the large, wingless pine seeds and are responsible for the dispersal of this species. Most important is the Clark''s nutcracker, which can transport the seeds long distances and cache them on exposed windswept and burned-over sites. This results in the regeneration of pines in clumps from forgotten caches (Eyre 1980, Steele et al. 1983, Burns and Honkala 1990a, Schmidt and McDonald 1990).

Pests include the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae), which has killed many mature trees in the past, during epidemics where populations of the beetles build up in lower elevation Pinus contorta stands, then move up into the Pinus albicaulis stands (Steele et al. 1983, Burns and Honkala 1990a, Schmidt and McDonald 1990). The exotic pathogen white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) is attacking and killing Pinus albicaulis trees in many parts of the interior northwestern U.S. It is especially destructive in more mesic habitats that favor infection of its alternate host Ribes spp. Pinus albicaulis is very susceptible to this disease, and the only real hope is propagating individuals that have high genetic resistance to blister rust (Steel et al. 1983, Burns and Honkala 1990a, Schmidt and McDonald 1990).

Environmental Description:  Forests included in this subalpine alliance occur locally in the Rocky Mountains in Wyoming, Montana, Idaho and adjacent Canada west to the Cascade Range in Oregon and Washington. Elevations range from 1750-3400 m depending on latitude and geography. Climate is mostly semiarid, temperate continental with maritime influences in the Cascades and western Rocky Mountains. Winter temperatures range from very cold in the Rocky Mountains to moderately cold in the Cascades. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 60-180 cm occurring mostly in the winter. Snowpack is often deep, especially in the western ranges and may linger into summer. Some sites have little snow accumulation because of high winds and sublimation. Summers are cool and typically dry from July to September. Stands typically occur below the subalpine forest where disturbance such as avalanche or fire has temporarily reduced more shade-tolerant tree species, or in protected areas at treeline. Above the continuous forestline, these woodlands occur as a mosaic of tree islands or patches separated by subalpine meadow or rock outcrops. Landforms include ridgetops, mountain slopes, glacial trough walls and moraines, landslides and rockslides, and cirque headwalls and basins. Sites may be nearly level to steep-sloping, on all aspects. Some stands occur at treeline in mesic, protected pockets away from the extremely harsh environmental conditions. Substrates are generally lithic, well-drained, coarse-textured soils such as shallow, gravelly sands or loams derived from colluvium, glacial till and residuum from a variety of volcanic, igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. Parent materials include basalt, gneiss, granite, andesite, sandstone, and limestone. Soils may be calcareous and alkaline, but are more typically non-calcareous and acidic. Calcareous soils are more common in more mesic northern stands.

Geographic Range: This alliance occurs intermittently throughout the northern and central Rocky Mountains and in the Cascade Range. Stands are reported from Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Wyoming and Montana, north to British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, and south to northern Nevada.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, BC, CA, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available

Type Name Database Code Classification Code
Class 1 Forest & Woodland Class C01 1
Subclass 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass S15 1.B
Formation 1.B.2 Cool Temperate Forest & Woodland Formation F008 1.B.2
Division 1.B.2.Nb Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Division D194 1.B.2.Nb
Macrogroup 1.B.2.Nb.5 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce - Whitebark Pine Rocky Mountain Forest Macrogroup M020 1.B.2.Nb.5
Group 1.B.2.Nb.5.g Whitebark Pine - Subalpine Fir - Subalpine Larch Northern Rocky Mountain Woodland Group G223 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Alliance A3368 Whitebark Pine Forest & Woodland Alliance A3368 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000128 Whitebark Pine - Subalpine Fir Woodland CEGL000128 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000129 Whitebark Pine / Ross'' Sedge Forest CEGL000129 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000131 Whitebark Pine / Grouse Whortleberry Forest CEGL000131 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000751 Subalpine Fir - Whitebark Pine / Kinnikinnick Woodland CEGL000751 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000752 Subalpine Fir - Whitebark Pine / Grouse Whortleberry Woodland CEGL000752 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000753 Whitebark Pine / Pinegrass Woodland CEGL000753 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000754 Whitebark Pine - (Subalpine Fir) / Geyer''s Sedge Woodland CEGL000754 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000755 Whitebark Pine / Idaho Fescue Woodland CEGL000755 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000756 Whitebark Pine / Common Juniper Woodland CEGL000756 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000757 Whitebark Pine / Gray''s Licorice-root Woodland CEGL000757 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL000758 Whitebark Pine / Smooth Woodrush Woodland CEGL000758 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL002326 Subalpine Fir - Whitebark Pine / Common Juniper Woodland CEGL002326 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL005836 Whitebark Pine - Subalpine Fir / Rusty Menziesia / Common Beargrass Woodland CEGL005836 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL005837 Whitebark Pine - Subalpine Fir / Thinleaf Huckleberry / Common Beargrass Woodland CEGL005837 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL005838 Whitebark Pine - Subalpine Fir / Grouse Whortleberry / Common Beargrass Woodland CEGL005838 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL005839 Whitebark Pine - Subalpine Fir / Grouse Whortleberry / Smooth Woodrush Woodland CEGL005839 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL005840 Whitebark Pine - (Engelmann Spruce) / Eight-petal Mountain-avens Woodland CEGL005840 1.B.2.Nb.5.g
Association CEGL007314 Whitebark Pine / Greenleaf Fescue Herbaceous Vegetation with Sparse Trees CEGL007314 1.B.2.Nb.5.g

Concept Lineage: This alliance is the combination of three former alliances: Pinus albicaulis Forest Alliance (A.132), Pinus albicaulis Woodland Alliance (A.531), and Pinus albicaulis - Abies lasiocarpa Woodland Alliance (A.560).

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Picea engelmannii - Abies lasiocarpa - Pinus albicaulis - Pinus contorta forest (Achuff 1989) [Other Pinus albicaulis types are related but need to be reviewed.]
? Pinus albicaulis (Whitebark pine forest) Alliance (Sawyer et al. 2009) [87.180.00]
>< Pinus albicaulis-Abies lasiocarpa Woodlands and Parklands (Chappell et al. 1997)
>< Pinus albicaulis Series (Steele et al. 1983)
>< Pinus albicaulis Series (Johnston 1987)
>< Pinus albicaulis Zone (Barrows et al. 1977)
>< Whitebark Pine Forest (#86600) (Holland 1986b)
>< Whitebark Pine-Lodgepole Pine Forest (#86220) (Holland 1986b)
>< Whitebark Pine-Mountain Hemlock Forest (#86210) (Holland 1986b)
>< Whitebark Pine: 208 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): B.C. Johnston (1987); C. Chappell et al. (1997)

Author of Description: M.E. Hall

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-08-14

  • Achuff, P. L. 1989. Old-growth forests of the Canadian Rocky Mountain National Parks. Natural Areas Journal 9:12-26.
  • Barrows, J. S., E. W. Mogren, K. Rowdabaugh, and R. Yancik. 1977. The role of fire in ponderosa pine and mixed conifer ecosystems. Final report, Cooperative report between the National Park Service and Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 101 pp.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  • Chappell, C., R. Crawford, J. Kagan, and P. J. Doran. 1997. A vegetation, land use, and habitat classification system for the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of Oregon and Washington. Unpublished report prepared for Wildlife habitat and species associations within Oregon and Washington landscapes: Building a common understanding for management. Prepared by Washington and Oregon Natural Heritage Programs, Olympia, WA, and Portland, OR. 177 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Holland, R. F. 1986b. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. Unpublished report prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame-Heritage Program and Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento. 156 pp.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Schmidt, W. C., and K. J. McDonald, compilers. 1990. Proceedings-Symposium on whitebark pine ecosystems: Ecology and management of a high-mountain resource. March 29-31 1989, Bozeman, MT. General Technical Report INT-270. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 386 pp.
  • Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.