Print Report

A4057 Andropogon gerardii - Sorghastrum nutans - Coreopsis palmata Central Grassland Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This mesic tallgrass prairie alliance occurs mainly in the glaciated midwestern United States and southern Ontario where the tallgrasses Andropogon gerardii, Panicum virgatum, and Sorghastrum nutans dominate the moderate to dense vegetation cover.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Big Bluestem - Indiangrass - Stiff Tickseed Central Grassland Alliance

Colloquial Name: Central Mesic Tallgrass Prairie

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This mesic tallgrass prairie alliance occurs mainly in the glaciated midwestern United States and southern Ontario with outliers in north-central Kansas and adjacent Nebraska. Tallgrasses dominate the moderate to dense vegetation cover. Andropogon gerardii and Sorghastrum nutans are the most widespread and common species. Panicum virgatum, Schizachyrium scoparium, and Sporobolus heterolepis are frequent associated grasses. Forb composition tends to vary more than the grasses with a wide variety possible. Aletris farinosa, Coreopsis palmata, Dalea candida, Eryngium yuccifolium, Helianthus pauciflorus ssp. pauciflorus, Liatris pycnostachya, Liatris spicata, Oligoneuron rigidum, Ratibida pinnata, Rosa carolina, Rudbeckia hirta, and Symphyotrichum ericoides are a few. Amorpha canescens, a sub-shrub species, and Salix humilis are also typically present. This alliance is found on flat to rolling landscapes. Soils are usually fine-textured but one variant occurs on sandy soils near the southern Great Lakes.

Diagnostic Characteristics: This alliance is composed of mesic tallgrass prairies usually dominated by Andropogon gerardii and Sorghastrum nutans with Panicum virgatum, Sporobolus heterolepis, and Schizachyrium scoparium present to codominant.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: This is a mesic, tallgrass prairie alliance, dominated by a moderately dense to very dense layer of C4 grasses up to 2 m tall. Forbs are typically abundant in this alliance. Woody species are uncommon in most stands but can become abundant in the prolonged absence of fire.

Floristics: This alliance is a very widespread mesic tallgrass prairie, which occurs in central North America. Andropogon gerardii is dominant across this alliance''s range. Other abundant species include Schizachyrium scoparium, Sorghastrum nutans, Sporobolus heterolepis, and Hesperostipa spartea (= Stipa spartea) (northward). Pascopyrum smithii may occur in the western portions of the range. Forbs are abundant in stands of this alliance, especially in the more humid east. Among these are Aletris farinosa (in the east), Coreopsis palmata, Echinacea pallida, Helianthus grosseserratus, Liatris spicata, Liatris pycnostachya, Oligoneuron rigidum, Phlox pilosa, Ratibida pinnata, Silphium laciniatum (central), and Solidago spp. Diamond and Smeins (1988) found Galium boreale and Oxalis sp. to be more common in northern tallgrass prairies than in southern. Trees and tall shrubs are infrequent in high quality stands, especially in the Great Plains. Among those that may be found are scattered Symphoricarpos occidentalis (in the northern Great Plains), Rhus spp., and Quercus macrocarpa (in the central and eastern portions of this alliance''s range).

Dynamics:  This alliance is found in a climate that can support trees and shrubs but woody vegetation is inhibited by frequent fires, periodic drought, and, historically, by grazing from large ungulates (Anderson 1990b). Historically, fire-return intervals were short, estimated at between 2 and 5 years (Stambaugh et al. 2006, Landfire 2007a). The frequent but unpredictable fires created a patchwork of habitats across the landscape, with recently burned sites having less litter and forb cover and sites with infrequent fires possibly having more woody species and dense stands of grasses (Kucera and Koelling 1964). Lack of fire, grazing, or mowing results in a decrease in productivity due to the soil surface staying cooler and shaded longer in the spring (Rice and Parenti 1978, Hulbert 1988). Lack of fire allows tree cover to increase rapidly, especially on lower, more mesic slopes (Heineman and Bragg 1982). This alliance is well-adapted to moderate grazing over time or heavy grazing for short periods, but when used as long-term pasture and with high stocking rates, the dominant native grasses are reduced or eliminated. Heavy haying or grazing or, if those are done consistently during the mid-summer months, negatively affects the dominant warm-season grasses by removing their biomass before they have flowered. Cool-season grasses and forbs which set seed earlier are favored by these activities. Native and non-native forbs, woody species, and C3 grasses increase in the absence of fire, especially when combined with grazing by livestock. Drier sites on hilltops or rocky soils persist longer but mesic sites on lower slopes can be invaded by trees and shrubs after just several years without fire. Non-native grasses have been planted for forage on some sites, as well.

Environmental Description:  Stands of this alliance occur on flat to rolling topography. Soils are generally fertile, deep, slightly acidic, and moderately to well-drained (Curtis 1959, Tatina 1987). In glacial lakeplains near the Great Lakes, soils tend to be more poorly drained (Comer et al. 1995b). Soil moisture is generally mesic, although it can vary from dry-mesic to wet-mesic. Soil texture can range from clay loams to sands. Litter can build up quickly in these productive grasslands unless removed by fire, grazing, or haying.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found from southern Minnesota south to north-central Kansas and northern Missouri and east to southern Michigan, southern Ontario, and western Ohio.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, OH, ON, SD, WI




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: This alliance is made up of four associations from old A.1192.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Mesic Prairie (Curtis 1959)

Concept Author(s): J. Drake and D. Faber-Langendoen, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: J. Drake and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 06-09-15

  • Anderson, R. C. 1990b. The historic role of fire in the North American grassland. In: S. L. Collins and L. L. Wallace. Fire in the North American tallgrass prairies. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
  • Branson, F. A., R. F. Miller, and I. S. McQueen. 1964. Effects of two kinds of geologic materials on plant communities and soil moisture. American Society of Agronomy Special Publication 5:165-175.
  • Clements, F. E. 1904. Formation and succession herbaria. University of Nebraska, University Studies IV(4):329-355.
  • Comer, P. J., W. A. MacKinnon, M. L. Rabe, D. L. Cuthrell, M. R. Penskar, and D. A. Albert. 1995b. A survey of Lakeplain Prairie in Michigan. CZM Project 94D-0.04. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI.
  • Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of plant communities. Reprinted in 1987. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 657 pp.
  • Diamond, D. D., and F. E. Smeins. 1988. Gradient analysis of remnant true and upper coastal prairie grasslands of North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 66:2152-2161.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Heineman, P. L., and T. B. Bragg. 1982. Woody plant invasion of Iowa loess bluff prairies. MA thesis, Department of Biology, University of Nebraska, Omaha. 16 pp. with figures.
  • Hulbert, L. C. 1988. Causes of fire effects in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 69(1):46-58.
  • Kucera, C. L., and M. Koelling. 1964. The influence of fire on composition of central Missouri prairie. The American Midland Naturalist 72(1):142-147.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • LANDFIRE [Landfire National Vegetation Dynamics Database]. 2007a. Landfire National Vegetation Dynamics Models. Landfire Project, USDA Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior. (January - last update) [http://www.LANDFIRE.gov/index.php] (accessed 8 February 2007).
  • Rice, E. L., and R. L. Parenti. 1978. Causes of decreases in productivity in undisturbed tallgrass prairie. American Journal of Botany 65(10):1091-1097.
  • Stambaugh, M. C., R. P. Guyette, E. R. McMurray, and D. C. Dey. 2006. Fire history at the eastern Great Plains margin, Missouri River Loess Hills. Great Plains Research 16:149-159.
  • Tatina, R. 1987. Gradient analysis and description of a transition zone prairie in eastern South Dakota. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 66:51-64.
  • Tolstead, W. L. 1942. Vegetation of the northern part of Cherry County, Nebraska. Ecological Monographs 12(3):257-292.