Print Report

A3896 Typha domingensis - Typha latifolia - Phragmites australis ssp. americanus Western Marsh Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This native alliance contains freshwater cattail marshes dominated by Typha domingensis, Typha latifolia, and/or Phragmites australis ssp. americanus, which can be monotypic stands or codominated by bulrush species such as Schoenoplectus acutus, Schoenoplectus americanus, or Schoenoplectus pungens. It is found most commonly along lake margins and in shallow basins, and occasionally in river backwaters in the semi-arid western U.S., including the semi-arid western Great Plains, and adjacent Canada, and possibly Mexico.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Southern Cattail - Broadleaf Cattail - American Common Reed Western Marsh Alliance

Colloquial Name: Western Emergent Cattail - Common Reed Marsh

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance contains stands dominated by native species Typha angustifolia, Typha domingensis, and/or Phragmites australis ssp. americanus either alone as monotypic stands or in combination with other tall emergent freshwater marsh species. Associated species vary widely; they include many sedges such as Carex aquatilis, Carex pellita, Carex rostrata, bulrushes such as Schoenoplectus acutus, Schoenoplectus americanus, and Schoenoplectus heterochaetus, and broad-leaved herbs such as Asclepias incarnata, Impatiens capensis, Sagittaria latifolia, Scutellaria lateriflora, Sparganium eurycarpum, and Verbena hastata. It is found most commonly along lake margins and in shallow basins, and occasionally in river backwaters and other deepwater habitats of the semi-arid western U.S., including the semi-arid western Great Plains, and adjacent Canada and possibly Mexico.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Stands of emergent vegetation in shallow water (<2 m) dominated by native Phragmites australis ssp. americanus and/or native Typha domingensis or Typha latifolia.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association is limited to the western U.S. and adjacent Mexico and Canada and is intended to cover the native stands of Typha and/or Phragmites australis ssp. americanus. Compare with similar monotypic stands in central Great Plains and eastern U.S. alliances. Typha angustifolia is considered a non-native in the western U.S. and was removed as a nominal species from this alliance and placed into a ruderal marsh alliance. Disturbed stands may have Typha angustifolia present to codominant; monotypic stands of Typha angustifolia would indicate conversion to a ruderal vegetation type.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Tall, emergent graminoid species, with cover usually dense, and averaging over 2 m, but <3 m in height. Shorter graminoids and forbs may be present, but typically are not abundant due to the dense cover of the taller species. When there is standing water during the growing season, floating and submerged aquatic species may be present.

Floristics: This alliance is characterized by the dominance of Phragmites australis ssp. americanus, Typha domingensis, and/or Typha latifolia, either alone or in combination with other tall emergent marsh species. Other graminoids commonly present can include Carex aquatilis, Carex pellita (= Carex lanuginosa), Carex rostrata, Cyperus spp., Distichlis spicata, Eleocharis spp., Glyceria spp., Juncus spp., Schoenoplectus acutus (= Scirpus acutus), Schoenoplectus americanus (= Scirpus americanus), Schoenoplectus heterochaetus (= Scirpus heterochaetus), Schoenoplectus pungens (= Scirpus pungens), Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (= Scirpus tabernaemontani), and Setaria magna. Forbs may include Ambrosia psilostachya, Anemopsis californica, Asclepias incarnata, Epilobium ciliatum, Glycyrrhiza lepidota, Hibiscus moscheutos, Impatiens capensis, Iva axillaris, Mentha arvensis, Polygonum amphibium, Sagittaria latifolia, Scutellaria lateriflora, Sparganium eurycarpum, Thelypteris palustris, Verbena hastata, and many others. Aquatic species such as Bacopa eisenii, Lemna minor, Potamogeton spp., and Sagittaria spp. may be present and dominate the water surface (Anderson 1982, MNNHP 1993, Hansen et al. 1995).

Vegetative diversity and density are highly variable in response to water depth, water chemistry, and natural forces. Vegetation in this alliance may be natural or semi-natural and includes mixed stands of the nominal species, as well as essentially monospecific stands. Typha often occurs in pure stands, and can colonize areas recently exposed by either natural or human causes. These monospecific stands occur especially in artificial wetlands, such as borrow pits or ponds.

Dynamics:  Typha species are prolific seed producers, spreading rapidly to become the early colonizers of wet mineral soil and will persist under wet conditions (Hansen et al. 1995). Roots and lower stems are well-adapted to prolonged submergence, but periods of draw-down are required for seed germination to occur (Hansen et al. 1995). Haase (1972) reported that Typha domingensis communities have expanded their distribution in the lower Gila River basin, due to increased irrigation runoff. Typha angustifolia occupies inundated and disturbed ground and can tolerate deeper water and higher alkalinity levels than Typha latifolia (Great Plains Flora Association 1986). These are important wetland communities for many species of birds and waterfowl. Hansen et al. (1995) report that in Montana heavy livestock use may convert stands to Carex nebrascensis-dominated communities.

Environmental Description:  These are palustrine and lacustrine non- tidal cattail marshes. Elevations range from near sea level to around 2000 m. Many have a muck-bottom zone bordering the shoreline, where cattails are rooted in the bottom substrate, and a floating mat zone, where the roots grow suspended in a buoyant peaty mat. This alliance occurs on hydric soils in wetlands, ditches, ponds, lakes, and rivers, as well as on shorelines and streambanks. Inundation is commonly 3-6 dm (1-2 feet) in depth but can be as deep as 1.5 m for a significant part of the growing season. Occurrences may display areas of open water, but emergent vegetation dominates (80% cover). Seasonal flooding during winter and spring or flooding during heavy rains help maintain these marshes by causing water exchange which replenishes freshwater and circulates nutrients and organic debris. Soils which support this community can be mineral or organic but are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. Sites can be inter-dune ponds, mainland ponds, impoundments and tanks with brackish water from storm flooding, storm tides, or island overwash, adjacent to shallow lakes or ponds (Bundy et al. 1996), in areas of standing water or subirrigation along major stream bottoms (Baker 1982b), or in old oxbows (Haase 1972). Running water is uncommon, except during periods of extensive irrigation runoff or because of high precipitation. Usually if the water table is below the surface, capillary action will keep the soil saturated to the surface. In Nevada, soils were described by Bundy et al. (1996) to be very deep, somewhat poorly drained and composed of fine-grained alluvium. They may be slightly saline, but not strongly so. Typha domingensis is more tolerant of alkaline conditions than Typha latifolia. Soils are characterized by accumulations of organic matter over deposits of fine silt and clay (Hansen et al. 1995), or loams, sandy loams, or coarse sand (Jones and Walford 1995, Bundy et al. 1996). Typha often occurs in pure stands, and can colonize areas recently exposed by either natural or human causes.

Geographic Range: This alliance occurs throughout interior non-tidal marshes of the western U.S., including the semi-arid western Great Plains, and adjacent Canada, and possibly Mexico.

Nations: CA,MX?,US

States/Provinces:  AB, AZ, BC, CA, CO, ID, MT, NE, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: A.1392 and A.1436 western portions

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Phragmites australis Herbaceous Alliance and Semi-Natural Stands (Sawyer et al. 2009)
= Phragmites australis Semipermanently Flooded Herbaceous Alliance (Thomas et al. 2004)
= Typha (angustifolia, domingensis, latifolia) (Cattail marshes) Alliance (Sawyer et al. 2009) [52.050.00]
= Typha (angustifolia, domingensis, latifolia) Alliance (Cattail marshes) (Buck-Diaz et al. 2012)
= Typha (angustifolia, domingensis, latifolia) Herbaceous Alliance (Evens et al. 2014)
= Typha (angustifolia, latifolia) - (Scirpus spp.) Semipermanently Flooded Herbaceous Alliance [Provisional] (Keeler-Wolf et al. 2012)
= Typha domingensis - Typha latifolia - Typha angustifolia Western Herbaceous Emergent Alliance (Rodriguez et al. 2017)
? Typha latifolia Habitat Type (Hansen et al. 1995)
= Typha (angustifolia, domingensis, latifolia) Herbaceous Alliance (CNPS 2017) [52.050.00]
>< Bulrush-Cattail Series (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995)
>< Cattail Series (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995)
>< Cismontane Alkali Marsh (#52310) (Holland 1986b)
>< Coastal Brackish Marsh (#52200) (Holland 1986b)
>< Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh (#52410) (Holland 1986b)
>< Montane Freshwater Marsh (#52430) (Holland 1986b)
>< Transmontane Alkali Marsh (#52320) (Holland 1986b)
>< Transmontane Freshwater Marsh (#52420) (Holland 1986b)

Concept Author(s): G. Kittel, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: G. Kittel, M.S. Reid and K.A. Schulz

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 08-14-17

  • Apfelbaum, S. I. 1985. Cattail (Typha spp.) management. Natural Areas Journal 5(3):9-17.
  • Baker, W. L. 1982b. Natural vegetation of the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Appendix D, pages 1-113 in: J. S. Peterson and W. L. Baker, editors. Inventory of the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Unpublished report for the Bureau Land Management, Craig, CO.
  • Baker, W. L., and S. C. Kennedy. 1985. Presettlement vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado, described from remnants. Great Basin Naturalist 45(4):747-777.
  • Buck-Diaz, J., S. Batiuk, and J. M. Evens. 2012. Vegetation alliances and associations of the Great Valley ecoregion, California. California Native Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/pdf/great_valley_eco-vegclass2012.pdf]
  • Bundy, R. M., J. V. Baumgartner, M. S. Reid, P. S. Bourgeron, H. C. Humphries, and B. L. Donohue. 1996. Ecological classification of wetland plant associations in the Lahontan Valley, Nevada. Prepared for Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge and USDI Fish & Wildlife Service. 53 pp. not including inventories, tables and graphs.
  • Bunin, J. E. 1985. Vegetation of the City of Boulder, Colorado open space lands. Report prepared for the City of Boulder, Real Estate/Open Space, Boulder, CO. 114 pp.
  • CNPS [California Native Plant Society]. 2015-2017. A manual of California vegetation [online]. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://vegetation.cnps.org/].
  • Christy, S. 1973. An analysis of the woody vegetation on the South Platte River flood plain in northeastern Colorado. Unpublished thesis, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley. 82 pp.
  • Cronquist, A., A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren, J. L. Reveal, and P. K. Holmgren. 1977. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Volume 6: The Monocotyledons. Columbia University Press, New York. 584 pp.
  • DiTomaso, J. M., and E. A. Healy. 2007. Weeds of California and other western States. Two volumes. Publication 3488. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA. 1808 pp.
  • Dilts, T., and P. Weisberg. 2010. Death Valley springs monitoring dataset. Great Basin Landscape Ecology Lab, University of Nevada Reno, NV.
  • Evens, J. M., K. Sikes, D. Hastings, and J. Ratchford. 2014. Vegetation alliance descriptions for Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Death Valley National Park and Mojave National Preserve. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Network Inventory and Monitoring Program. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
  • Evens, J. M., and E. Kentner. 2006. Classification of vegetation associations from the Mount Tamalpais Watershed, Nicasio Reservoir, and Soulajule Reservior in Marin County, California. Report for the Marin Municipal Water District. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.
  • Evens, J., and S. San. 2006. Vegetation alliances of the San Dieguito River Park region, San Diego County, California. Final report (August 2005) Version 2 (revised May 2006). Prepared by California Native Plant Society in cooperation with the California Natural Heritage Program of the California Department of Fish and Game and San Diego Chapter of the California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. 271 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Ferren, W. R., P. L. Fiedler, and R. A. Leidy. 1996b. Wetlands of California. MadroƱo 43:105-125.
  • Grace, J. B., and R. G. Wetzel. 1981. Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattail (Typha): Experimental field studies. The American Midland Naturalist 118:463-474.
  • Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence. 1402 pp.
  • Haase, E. F. 1972. Survey of floodplain vegetation along the lower Gila River in southwestern Arizona. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 7:75-81.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublished draft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.
  • Hickson, D., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 2007. Vegetation and land use classification and map of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Prepared for the Bay Delta Region, California Department of Fish and Game by the Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. 152 pp. plus appendices.
  • Holland, R. F. 1986b. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. Unpublished report prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame-Heritage Program and Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento. 156 pp.
  • Jones, G. P., and G. M. Walford. 1995. Major riparian vegetation types of eastern Wyoming. Submitted to Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. 245 pp.
  • Junak, S., D. A. Knapp, J. R. Haller, R. Philbrick, A. Schoenherr and T. Keeler-Wolf. 2007. The Channel Islands. Chapter 9 in: M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial vegetation of California, third edition. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • Keeler-Wolf, T., P. E. Moore, E. T. Reyes, J. M. Menke, D. N. Johnson, and D. L. Karavidas. 2012. Yosemite National Park vegetation classification and mapping project report. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/YOSE/NRTR--2012/598. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Keeler-Wolf, T., and J. Evens. 2006. Vegetation classification of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area and environs in Ventura and Los Angeles counties, California. A report submitted to National Park Service, Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area by California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch and The California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program, Sacramento, CA.
  • Keeler-Wolf, T., and M. Vaghti. 2000. Vegetation mapping of Suisun Marsh, Solano County, California. A report to the California Department of Water Resources. California Department of Fish and Game, California Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento, CA.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G., R. Rondeau, and A. McMullen. 1996. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the Lower South Platte and parts of the Upper Arkansas River basins, Colorado. Submitted to Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII. Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins. 243 pp.
  • Klein, A., J. Crawford, J. Evens, T. Keeler-Wolf, and D. Hickson. 2007. Classification of the vegetation alliances and associations of the northern Sierra Nevada foothills, California. Volumes 1 and 2. Report prepared for California Department of Fish and Game, Habitat Conservation Division. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. [https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18232&inline=1]
  • Komarkova, V. 1976. Alpine vegetation of the Indian Peaks Area, Front Range, Colorado Rocky Mountains. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 655 pp.
  • Komarkova, V. 1986. Habitat types on selected parts of the Gunnison and Uncompahgre national forests. Unpublished final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO. 270 pp. plus appendices.
  • Kovalchik, B. L. 1993. Riparian plant associations on the national forests of eastern Washington - Draft version 1. USDA Forest Service, Colville National Forest, Colville, WA. 203 pp.
  • Lambert, A., K. Saltonstall, R. Long, and T. L. Dudley. 2016. Biogeography of Phragmites australis lineages in the southwestern United States. Biological Invasions 18:2597-2617.
  • Lambertini, C. 2016. Heteroplasmy due to chloroplast paternal leakage: Another insight into Phragmites haplotypic diversity in North America. Biological Invasions 18(9):2443-2455. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1193-3]
  • Lindauer, I. E. 1978. A comparison of the vegetative communities of the South Platte and Arkansas River drainages in eastern Colorado. Pages 56-72 in: W. D. Graul and S. J. Bissel, editors. Lowland River and Stream Habitat in Colorado: A Symposium, 4-5 October 1978. Colorado Chapter of Wildlife Society and Audubon Council.
  • Lindauer, I. E., and S. J. Christy. 1972. An analysis of the woody vegetation on the South Platte River floodplain in northeastern Colorado. Unpublished report to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO, by the University of Northern Colorado, Biology Department, Greeley.
  • MacDonald, K. B. 1988. Coastal salt marsh. Pages 263-294 in: M. G. Barbour and J. Major, editors. Terrestrial vegetation of California. California Native Plant Society, Special Publication No. 9.
  • Masek, J. 1979. Vegetation community descriptions for the South Platte River in Colorado and Nebraska. Unpublished report prepared for the Water and Power Resources Service, Denver, CO. 23 pp.
  • McEachern, K. 1979. Population biology of Populus sargentii in northeastern Colorado. Unpublished thesis, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley. 41 pp.
  • Mitsch, W. J., and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. Second edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York. 722 pp.
  • Muldavin, E., B. Sims, and L. Johnson. 1993b. Pecos Wild and Scenic River in stream flow report. Final report prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Santa Fe National Forest, Santa Fe, NM.
  • Muldavin, E., P. Durkin, M. Bradley, M. Stuever, and P. Mehlhop. 2000a. Handbook of wetland vegetation communities of New Mexico. Volume I: Classification and community descriptions. Final report to the New Mexico Environment Department and the Environmental Protection Agency prepared by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
  • Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1989. Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho. Research Paper R4-ECOL-89-0. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Pickart, A. J. 2006. Vegetation of diked herbaceous wetlands of Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge: Classification, description, and ecology. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Arcata, CA.
  • Rocchio, Joe. Personal communication. Ecologist. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
  • Rodriguez, D., K. G. Sikes, T. Keeler-Wolf, G. Kittel, J. Curtis, C. Curley, and J. Evens. 2017. Vegetation classification of Channel Islands National Park. Report to the National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Sada, D. W., and D. J. Cooper. 2012. Furnace Creek springs restoration and adaptive management plan, Death Valley National Park, California. Report for Death Valley National Park. Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, and Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99:2445-2449.
  • Saltonstall, K., P. M. Peterson, and R. J. Soreng. 2004. Recognition of Phragmites australis subsp. americanus (Poaceae: Arundinoideae) in North America: Evidence from morphological and genetic anlyses. Sida 21:683-692.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 471 pp.
  • Simkins, E. C. 1931. The alpine flora of Mt. Niwot, Colorado. Unpublished thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder. 68 pp.
  • Smith, J. P., Jr., and K. W. Allred. 2016. Phragmites australis. In Jepson Flora Project, editors. Jepson eFlora. [http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/get_IJM.pl?tid=37931] (accessed on November 18, 2016).
  • Sproul, F., T. Keeler-Wolf, P. Gordon-Reedy, J. Dunn, A. Klein, and K. Harper. 2011. Vegetation classification manual for western San Diego County. AECOM, California Department of Fish and Game, San Diego Area Governments.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1995b. Element Stewardship Abstract for North American cattails. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 16 pp.
  • Thomas, K. A., T. Keeler-Wolf, J. Franklin, and P. Stine. 2004. Mojave Desert Ecosystem Program: Central Mojave vegetation mapping database. U.S. Geological Survey, Western Regional Science Center. 251 pp.
  • Thorne, R. F. 1982. The desert and other transmontane plant communities of southern California. Aliso 10(2):219-257.
  • VegCAMP and AIS [Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program and Aerial Information Systems, Inc.]. 2013. 2012 California desert vegetation map and accuracy assessment in support of the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. Unpublished report to California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program and Aerial Information Systems, Inc.
  • Youngblood, A. P., W. G. Padgett, and A. H. Winward. 1985a. Riparian community type classification of eastern Idaho-western Wyoming. R4-Ecol-85-01. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, UT. 78 pp.
  • Zedler, J. B. 1982. The ecology of southern California coastal salt marshes: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, Washington, D.C. FWS/OBS-81/54. 110 pp.