Print Report
A3701 Platanus occidentalis - Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Liriodendron tulipifera Central Appalachian-Piedmont Floodplain Forest Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: These are high-energy floodplain forests of rocky streambeds and alluvial deposits, found in the Appalachian and Piedmont regions, typically dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Platanus occidentalis with Liquidambar styraciflua and/or Liriodendron tulipifera.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: American Sycamore - Green Ash - Tuliptree Central Appalachian-Piedmont Floodplain Forest Alliance
Colloquial Name: Central Appalachian-Piedmont Sycamore - Green Ash - Tuliptree Floodplain Forest
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: Stands are typically dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Platanus occidentalis with Liquidambar styraciflua and/or Liriodendron tulipifera. Other canopy and understory species that may be present include Acer rubrum, Aesculus sylvatica (within its range), Alnus serrulata, Asimina triloba, Carpinus caroliniana, Cornus florida, Fagus grandifolia, Fraxinus americana, and Ulmus americana, in the non-montane part of the distribution. Species present in the montane occurrences include Betula alleghaniensis, Betula lenta, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Platanus occidentalis, with Betula nigra, Carpinus caroliniana, Fraxinus americana, Hamamelis virginiana, Liquidambar styraciflua, Pinus strobus, Pinus virginiana, and Tsuga canadensis. Euonymus americanus is a typical shrub species in the lower elevation occurrences, while Leucothoe fontanesiana and Rhododendron maximum are common at higher elevations. These are high-energy floodplain forests of the Appalachian and Piedmont regions from Massachusetts, New York, and Connecticut south to Tennessee and Georgia. They typically occur on rocky streambeds and alluvial deposits of relatively high-gradient rivers.
Diagnostic Characteristics: These are high-energy floodplain forests of the Appalachian and Piedmont regions typically dominated by Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Platanus occidentalis with Liquidambar styraciflua and/or Liriodendron tulipifera. This combination of environment, floristics and biogeography should be diagnostic.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: No Data Available
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: These are broad-leaved deciduous forests, with canopy trees typically averaging 20 m in height. The shrub and herbaceous layers range from sparse to relatively lush. There is often an abundance of woody vines.
Floristics: These forests are typically dominated by some combination of Fraxinus pennsylvanica and Platanus occidentalis with Liquidambar styraciflua and/or Liriodendron tulipifera. Other woody species that may be present include Acer negundo, Acer saccharinum, Carya cordiformis, Celtis laevigata, Celtis occidentalis, Juglans nigra, Salix nigra, and Ulmus americana In addition, Asimina triloba, Crataegus spathulata, Crataegus viridis, and Lindera benzoin may be fairly dense in the understory. Herbaceous species that may be present include Boehmeria cylindrica, Carex abscondita, Carex grayi, Carex lupulina, Chasmanthium latifolium, Elymus virginicus, Leersia lenticularis, Pilea pumila, Polygonum virginianum, and others.
Dynamics: No Data Available
Environmental Description: These are high-energy floodplain forests of rocky streambeds and alluvial deposits.
Geographic Range: Stands of this alliance are found in the Appalachian and Piedmont regions from Massachusetts, New York, and Connecticut south to Tennessee and Georgia.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: CT, DC, DE, KY, MA, MD, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.899753
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: These associations come from a wide variety of old alliances: A.286 (1/13); A.288 (4/12); A.289 (4/8); A.297 (1/6); A.299 (1/8); A.316 (2/ ); A.633 (1/5).
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: No Data Available
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.