Print Report

A3642 Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii Treeline Dry-Mesic Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: Forests occurring at or near treeline in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains in Wyoming and Colorado and dominated by Abies lasiocarpa and/or Picea engelmannii.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Treeline Dry-Mesic Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Treeline Dry-Mesic Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: These forests occur at or near treeline in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains. Canopies are dominated by Abies lasiocarpa and/or Picea engelmannii and stand structure may take on a ribbon or tree island form. Abies lasiocarpa, Pinus flexilis, and Pinus aristata are minor components in the canopy and very infrequent in the understory. The shrub layer is sparse and species-poor although Ribes montigenum and Vaccinium scoparium may be present. Herbaceous species may be absent or sparse and typically include the forbs Geum rossii and Trifolium dasyphyllum. These forests occur at 3300-3450 m (10,810-11,320 feet) elevation, just below krummholz timberline. Sites are gentle to moderately steep slopes that are relatively xeric, cold and exposed.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Open- to closed-canopy needle-leaved evergreen forests occurring at or near treeline dominated by Abies lasiocarpa and/or Picea engelmannii. Diagnostic of this alliance in part are forests with ribbon or tree island structures.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This alliance is based upon four associations, for which only one has detailed floristic and environmental information. Furthermore, the composition of tree islands and ribbon forests has not been adequately sampled. Therefore, further information will be required to complete a more comprehensive description of this alliance.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: These are forests dominated by needle-leaved evergreen with open to high cover (20-100%). Understory layers are typically depauperate.

Floristics: Canopies are dominated by Abies lasiocarpa and/or Picea engelmannii and stand structure may take on a ribbon or tree island form. Abies lasiocarpa, Pinus flexilis, and Pinus aristata are minor components in the canopy and very infrequent in the understory. The shrub layer is sparse and species-poor although Ribes montigenum and Vaccinium scoparium may be present. Herbaceous species may be absent or sparse and typically include the forbs Geum rossii and Trifolium dasyphyllum.

Dynamics:  Abies lasiocarpa forests develop on sites with limited, short growing seasons and relatively deep winter snowpacks. Tree growth is very slow in these habitats, and forests are rapidly colonized by much more rapidly growing shade-intolerant species, such as Pseudotsuga menziesii, Pinus contorta, or Populus tremuloides, following fire, clearcut logging, or windthrow disturbance. Abies lasiocarpa is among the most shade-tolerant trees in the Rocky Mountains, but seedlings compete poorly in greater than 50% full sunlight (Burns and Honkala 1990a). Snow avalanches occur frequently at upper elevations, and can result in a mosaic of varying stand ages on sites affected by this disturbance type.

Environmental Description:  These forests occur at 3300-3450 m (10,810-11,320 feet) elevation, just below krummholz timberline. Sites are gentle to moderately steep slopes that are relatively xeric, cold and exposed.

Geographic Range: This alliance is known from the central and southern Rocky Mountains of Wyoming and Colorado. Stands may also occur in Arizona and Utah.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CO, UT?, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: A.164, A.168, in part.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii Series (Johnston 1987)
>< Picea series (Pfister et al. 1977)
>< Engelmann Spruce - Subalpine Fir: 206 (Eyre 1980)
>< Western Needleleaf Forests: 15: Western Spruce-Fir Forest (Picea-Abies) (Küchler 1964)
>< Western Needleleaf Forests: 21: Southwestern Spruce-Fir Forest (Picea-Abies) (Küchler 1964)

Concept Author(s): B.C. Johnston (1984)

Author of Description: M.E. Hall

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-14-14

  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1984. Plant associations of Region Two. Edition 3.5. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.