Print Report
A3417 Picea rubens Central Appalachian Swamp Forest Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: This alliance encompasses swamp forests at high elevations of the Central Appalachians and High Alleghany Plateau dominated by Picea rubens, or codominated by Abies balsamea, Betula alleghaniensis, or Tsuga canadensis, with a shrub layer characterized by Hypericum densiflorum, Ilex montana, Rhododendron maximum, Sorbus americana, Vaccinium myrtilloides, and Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides. The vegetation occurs on sloping valleys, headwaters, or poorly drained flats.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Red Spruce Central Appalachian Swamp Forest Alliance
Colloquial Name: Central Appalachian-Northeast Acidic Swamp
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: This alliance encompasses swamp forests dominated by Picea rubens, or codominated by Abies balsamea, Betula alleghaniensis, or Tsuga canadensis, with a shrub layer characterized by Hypericum densiflorum, Ilex montana, Rhododendron maximum, Sorbus americana, Vaccinium myrtilloides, and Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides. The vegetation occurs at high elevations of the Central Appalachians and High Alleghany Plateau, on sloping valleys, headwaters, or poorly drained flats.
Diagnostic Characteristics: Swamp forest dominated by Picea rubens in the Central Appalachians and High Alleghany Plateau.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This alliance includes swamp forests ranging from completely coniferous to mixed deciduous-coniferous. The tree canopy ranges from open woodland to closed forest.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: This swamp forest ranges from coniferous to mixed deciduous-coniferous. The tree canopy may be closed but ranges to partially open with multiple canopy gaps, to very open woodland structure. The shrub and herbaceous layers are usually well-developed, and the bryophyte layer is also well-developed over a hummock-and-hollow microtopography.
Floristics: This alliance encompasses swamp forests dominated by Picea rubens, or codominated by Abies balsamea, Acer rubrum, Betula alleghaniensis, Nyssa sylvatica, or Tsuga canadensis, with a shrub layer characterized by Hypericum densiflorum, Ilex montana, Rhododendron maximum, Sorbus americana, Vaccinium angustifolium, Vaccinium corymbosum, Vaccinium myrtilloides, and Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides. Characteristic herbs include Dryopteris campyloptera, Huperzia lucidula, and Oclemena acuminata (= Aster acuminatus). Other associates may include Caltha palustris, Carex leptalea, Carex trisperma, Chelone glabra, Coptis trifolia, Dalibarda repens, Glyceria melicaria, Glyceria striata, Impatiens capensis, and Osmunda cinnamomea. Well-drained hummocks may support Dryopteris intermedia, Gaultheria hispidula, Maianthemum canadense, Oxalis montana, and Vaccinium oxycoccos. Sphagnum spp. (Sphagnum girgensohnii, Sphagnum fallax, Sphagnum palustre, Sphagnum rubellum) and other mosses are abundant in the mucky hollows and blanket the irregular hummocks between seepage hollows. Other bryophytes include Bazzania trilobata, Polytrichum spp. and Hypnum imponens (Byers et al. 2007).
Dynamics: These wetlands arose as headwater streams underlain by resistant bedrock and rock outcrops that form natural dams. The saturated hydrology and cold-air drainage from surrounding hills supports a flora more typical of northern regions (Byers et al. 2007).
Environmental Description: Forests in this alliance occur on saturated and temporarily flooded soils in headwater basins at elevations between 600 and 1400m.These forests are known from poorly drained bottomlands in the northern Ridge and Valley and Central Appalachians. Soils are somewhat poorly to poorly drained peat, muck, or organic-rich mottled silt loam
Geographic Range: This alliance occurs in the Central Appalachians and High Alleghany Plateau of Maryland, central New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia, ranging to the northern section of the Southern Blue Ridge in North Carolina.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: MD, NC, NY, PA, TN?, VA, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.899541
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: no protoalliance
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: No Data Available
- Byers, E. A., J. P. Vanderhorst, and B. P. Streets. 2007. Classification and conservation assessment of high elevation wetland communities in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins.
- Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
- Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
- Hutton, E. E. 1974. A large vegetational formation of Cretaceous and Tertiary origin in West Virginia. Castanea 39:70-76.
- Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
- Smith, T. L. 1991. Natural ecological communities of Pennsylvania. First revision. Unpublished report. Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy, Middletown, PA. 111 pp.
- Sneddon, L., M. Anderson, and K. Metzler. 1996. Community alliances and elements of the Eastern Region. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Heritage Task Force, Boston, MA. 235 pp.
- Walbridge, M. R., and G. E. Lang. 1982. Major plant communities and patterns of community distribution in four wetlands of the unglaciated Appalachian region. In: R. B. MacDonald, editor. Proceedings of the Symposium on Wetlands of the Unglaciated Appalachian Region. West Virginia University, Morgantown.
- Weakley, A. S., and M. P. Schafale. 1994. Non-alluvial wetlands of the Southern Blue Ridge: Diversity in a threatened ecosystem. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 77:359-383.