Print Report
CEGL006556 Picea rubens - Acer rubrum / Ilex verticillata Swamp Forest
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Red Spruce - Red Maple / Common Winterberry Swamp Forest
Colloquial Name: Red Spruce - Red Maple / Winterberry Swamp Forest
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This mixed woodland or forested swamp occurs in higher elevation (260-1220 m) valleys, basins, floodplains, and seepage areas along streams and wetland margins in the Central Appalachians. It is a small-patch community maintained by seepage, rainfall, and occasional low-energy overflow from streams. Slopes are gentle (0-5°). The canopy is closed or occasionally open and dominated by Picea rubens, Acer rubrum, Tsuga canadensis, and Betula alleghaniensis var. alleghaniensis, with associates Pinus strobus, Nyssa sylvatica, and Fraxinus nigra. The shrub layer is variable and may include Ilex verticillata, Alnus incana ssp. rugosa, Rhododendron maximum, Vaccinium angustifolium, Vaccinium corymbosum, and Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides. The herbaceous layer is diverse and variable, typically including Glyceria melicaria, Carex trisperma, Glyceria striata, Osmunda cinnamomea, Carex leptalea, Impatiens capensis, Chelone glabra, and Caltha palustris. Well-drained hummocks may support mesophytes such as Maianthemum canadense, Dryopteris intermedia, and Oxalis montana. Sphagnum spp. and other mosses are abundant in the mucky hollows and blanket the irregular hummocks between braided seepage rills or streamlets.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: No Data Available
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: In Pennsylvania, stands of this community type have a closed canopy of Acer rubrum and Picea rubens, with associates of Pinus strobus, Tsuga canadensis, Nyssa sylvatica, Betula alleghaniensis, Betula populifolia, Fraxinus nigra, and Larix laricina. The shrub layer is often dense and may include Ilex verticillata, Vaccinium corymbosum, Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides, Ilex mucronata (= Nemopanthus mucronatus), and Rhododendron viscosum. The herb layer is typically dominated by ferns and graminoids, particularly Carex trisperma, Carex folliculata, Glyceria striata, Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis, and Osmunda cinnamomea; Gaultheria hispidula, Coptis trifolia, and Viola spp. are frequent forbs. Well-drained hummocks may support mesophytes such as Maianthemum canadense and Trientalis borealis. Some pools may be dominated by bryophytes of the genera Sphagnum, Mnium, Fissidens, and Thuidium. Virginia examples are very small (<2 ha or 5 acres) and lack several species of pronounced northern distribution. Canopies are generally codominated by Picea rubens, Acer rubrum, and Tsuga canadensis, with Picea rubens usually the most abundant of the three. Betula alleghaniensis is the only other canopy tree recorded in plots. Shrub layers are very sparse, although Vaccinium angustifolium locally forms dense, low patches on better-drained hummocks and flats. Except in the more deeply flooded pools, herbaceous cover is moderately dense to dense. Variably dominant herbs include Glyceria melicaria, Osmunda cinnamomea, Viola cucullata, Carex leptalea, Impatiens capensis, Glyceria striata, and Packera aurea (= Senecio aureus). Other frequent or locally important herbs are Caltha palustris, Cardamine pensylvanica, Carex baileyi, Carex prasina, Carex stipata, Carex trisperma, Chelone glabra, Cinna latifolia, Platanthera clavellata, Veratrum viride, and Viola macloskeyi ssp. pallens. Well-drained hummocks and mounds may support extensive colonies of Dryopteris intermedia, Lycopodium dendroideum, Maianthemum canadense, Oxalis montana, Thelypteris noveboracensis, and Schizachne purpurascens. Species richness in five plot-sampled Virginia stands ranged from 39 to 55 taxa per 400 m2 (mean = 48).
In West Virginia, canopies are open to closed and dominated by Picea rubens, Tsuga canadensis, and Betula alleghaniensis var. alleghaniensis, with occasional additions of Acer rubrum, Fraxinus nigra, Abies balsamea, Pinus strobus, or Nyssa sylvatica. The shrub layers are characterized by Alnus incana ssp. rugosa, Rhododendron maximum, the regenerating canopy species, and occasionally Ilex verticillata. The herbaceous layer is diverse and variable. Herbaceous species with high constancy include Glyceria melicaria, Impatiens capensis, Osmunda cinnamomea var. cinnamomea, Chrysosplenium americanum, Polygonum sagittatum, Leersia oryzoides, Chelone glabra, Symplocarpus foetidus, Maianthemum canadense, Caltha palustris var. palustris, Onoclea sensibilis, Carex leptalea ssp. leptalea, Oxalis montana, and Dryopteris intermedia. Nonvascular plants are dominated by Sphagnum spp. carpeting the mucky hollows, Rhizomnium appalachianum in the seepy areas, and Hypnum imponens and Dicranum scoparium blanketing the woody hummocks. Mean species richness of all vascular plants and any nonvascular plants with cover >1% ranges from 29-61 (mean = 43) taxa per 400 m2, with nearly 20% of the diversity in the bryophyte layer.
In West Virginia, canopies are open to closed and dominated by Picea rubens, Tsuga canadensis, and Betula alleghaniensis var. alleghaniensis, with occasional additions of Acer rubrum, Fraxinus nigra, Abies balsamea, Pinus strobus, or Nyssa sylvatica. The shrub layers are characterized by Alnus incana ssp. rugosa, Rhododendron maximum, the regenerating canopy species, and occasionally Ilex verticillata. The herbaceous layer is diverse and variable. Herbaceous species with high constancy include Glyceria melicaria, Impatiens capensis, Osmunda cinnamomea var. cinnamomea, Chrysosplenium americanum, Polygonum sagittatum, Leersia oryzoides, Chelone glabra, Symplocarpus foetidus, Maianthemum canadense, Caltha palustris var. palustris, Onoclea sensibilis, Carex leptalea ssp. leptalea, Oxalis montana, and Dryopteris intermedia. Nonvascular plants are dominated by Sphagnum spp. carpeting the mucky hollows, Rhizomnium appalachianum in the seepy areas, and Hypnum imponens and Dicranum scoparium blanketing the woody hummocks. Mean species richness of all vascular plants and any nonvascular plants with cover >1% ranges from 29-61 (mean = 43) taxa per 400 m2, with nearly 20% of the diversity in the bryophyte layer.
Dynamics: This is a small-patch woodland/forest community. It is maintained by seepage flow from surrounding upland forest, rainfall, and occasional low-energy stream overflow. Nutrient cycling occurs from the decay of fallen trees, litter, herbaceous vegetation, and overflow deposition/outwash.
Environmental Description: Sites are located in valleys, basins, floodplains, and seepage areas along the headwaters of streams. Slopes are gentle (0-5°), and habitats are characterized by strong hummock-and-hollow microtopography, with Sphagnum-covered mounds, mucky pools, and braided seepage rills or streamlets. Soils may have shallow to deep organic horizons and are acidic, with variable base status.
Geographic Range: This community is scattered throughout the Allegheny Plateau and high Allegheny Mountains from Pennsylvania to West Virginia and extreme west-central Virginia (Highland County). Outliers are reported from the Pocono Plateau and Ridge and Valley provinces of Pennsylvania (Fike 1999). Elevation ranges are 280-670 m on glacial deposits of the Allegheny Plateau in Pennsylvania, 770-1220 m in the unglaciated Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia, and above 1060 m in the unglaciated Allegheny Mountains of Virginia.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: PA, VA, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.688193
Confidence Level: High
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G3
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.3 Temperate Flooded & Swamp Forest Formation | F026 | 1.B.3 |
Division | 1.B.3.Na Eastern North American-Great Plains Flooded & Swamp Forest Division | D011 | 1.B.3.Na |
Macrogroup | 1.B.3.Na.2 Pin Oak - Green Ash - Blackgum Swamp Forest Macrogroup | M503 | 1.B.3.Na.2 |
Group | 1.B.3.Na.2.f Red Maple - Blackgum - Green Ash Swamp Forest Group | G902 | 1.B.3.Na.2.f |
Alliance | A3417 Red Spruce Central Appalachian Swamp Forest Alliance | A3417 | 1.B.3.Na.2.f |
Association | CEGL006556 Red Spruce - Red Maple / Common Winterberry Swamp Forest | CEGL006556 | 1.B.3.Na.2.f |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Picea rubens - Betula alleghaniensis var. alleghaniensis - Tsuga canadensis / Glyceria melicaria / Sphagnum spp. Swamp (Byers et al. 2007)
= Picea rubens - Tsuga canadensis - Acer rubrum / Glyceria melicaria Forest (Fleming and Coulling 2001)
= Picea rubens / Vaccinium angustifolium - Epilobium leptophyllum Association (Fleming and Moorhead 1996)
< Bog forest association (Darlington 1943)
= Mixed northern swamp forest community (Robinette 1966)
= Picea rubens - Tsuga canadensis - Acer rubrum / Glyceria melicaria Forest (Fleming and Coulling 2001)
= Picea rubens / Vaccinium angustifolium - Epilobium leptophyllum Association (Fleming and Moorhead 1996)
< Bog forest association (Darlington 1943)
= Mixed northern swamp forest community (Robinette 1966)
- Byers, E. A., J. P. Vanderhorst, and B. P. Streets. 2007. Classification and conservation assessment of high elevation wetland communities in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins.
- Darlington, H. C. 1943. Vegetation and substrate of Cranberry Glades, West Virginia. Botanical Gazette 104:371-393.
- DeMeo, T., D. McCay, D. Walton, and J. Concannon. 1998. Terrestrial ecological classification of the Monongahela National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Elkins, WV.
- Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
- Eichelberger, B. 2011n. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program. Red Spruce - Mixed Hardwood Palustrine Forest Factsheet. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Community.aspx?=16030] (accessed February 15, 2012)
- Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
- Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
- Fleming, G. P., and P. P. Coulling. 2001. Ecological communities of the George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Preliminary classification and description of vegetation types. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 317 pp.
- Fleming, G. P., and W. H. Moorhead, III. 1996. Ecological land units of the Laurel Fork Area, Highland County, Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 96-08. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. 114 pp. plus appendices.
- Francl, K. E. 2003. Community characterization of high elevation Central Appalachian wetlands. Ph.D. disseration, University of Georgia, Athens.
- Robinette, S. L. 1964. Plant ecology of an Allegheny mountain swamp. M.S. thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
- Robinette, S. L. 1966. Major plant communities of Cranesville Swamp, West Virginia. Arboretum Newsletter 16(1): 1-7.
- WVNHP [West Virginia Natural Heritage Program]. No date. Unpublished data. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, Elkins.
- Zimmerman, E. A., T. Davis, M. A. Furedi, B. Eichelberger, J. McPherson, S. Seymour, G. Podniesinski, N. Dewar, and J. Wagner, editors. 2012. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg. [http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/Communities.aspx]