Print Report
A3131 Pinus cembroides - Pinus discolor - Pinus edulis / Shrub Understory Woodland Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: This Madrean pinyon-juniper woodland alliance is composed of an open to moderately dense canopy of Pinus cembroides or Pinus discolor often with Juniperus coahuilensis or Juniperus deppeana and an open to moderately dense shrub layer with >10% cover in understory. It occurs in foothills and lower montane zones of southeastern Arizona and southern New Mexico, extending into western Texas and northern Mexico.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Mexican Pinyon - Border Pinyon - Two-needle Pinyon / Shrub Understory Woodland Alliance
Colloquial Name: Madrean Pinyon - Juniper / Shrub Woodland
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: This Madrean pinyon-juniper woodland alliance occurs in foothills and lower montane zones of southeastern Arizona and southern New Mexico, extending into western Texas and northern Mexico. These open to moderately dense woodlands have 10-60% cover of pinyon and juniper trees with shrubs in the understory forming an open to dense short-shrub layer. The presence of Madrean pinyons Pinus cembroides, Pinus discolor, or Pinus remota is diagnostic of this alliance. Junipers may be absent to dominant in the tree canopy with Juniperus coahuilensis, Juniperus deppeana, Juniperus flaccida, or Juniperus pinchotii trees being characteristic. Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma may be present to dominant when diagnostic Madrean species are present. Evergreen oaks such as Quercus arizonica, Quercus emoryi, Quercus gravesii, or Quercus grisea are often present in the tree canopy but have lower total cover than conifers. The shrub layer is composed of a variety of shrubs and rosettes such as Agave lechuguilla, Agave lechuguilla, Arctostaphylos pungens, Cercocarpus montanus var. paucidentatus, Mimosa dysocarpa, Quercus emoryi, Quercus gambelii, Quercus graciliformis, Quercus hypoleucoides, Quercus mohriana, Quercus pungens, Quercus rugosa, Quercus toumeyi, Quercus turbinella, Quercus x pauciloba, Rhus trilobata, and Salvia regla. Perennial graminoid cover is typically low and patchy because of high shrub cover on rocky sites. Herbaceous species are numerous and typical of the Chihuahuan Desert or Madrean foothills and include Muhlenbergia emersleyi, Muhlenbergia pauciflora, Muhlenbergia setifolia, Piptochaetium fimbriatum, and Piptochaetium pringlei. Stands are typically found on cool aspects in canyons and on steep scarp slopes at elevations of 1400 to 2200 m. Substrates are generally shallow, rocky soils but include deeper loamy soils, especially on sites where trees have recently colonized.
Diagnostic Characteristics: These open to moderately dense woodlands (10-60% cover) of pinyon and juniper trees have an understory of shrubs that typically form an open to moderately dense layer greater than 10% cover. The presence of Madrean pinyons Pinus cembroides, Pinus discolor, or Pinus remota with a shrub layer is diagnostic of this alliance. Junipers may be absent to dominant in tree canopy with Juniperus coahuilensis, Juniperus deppeana, Juniperus flaccida, or Juniperus pinchotii trees being characteristic. Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma may be present to dominant when diagnostic Madrean species are present. Evergreen oaks such as Quercus arizonica, Quercus emoryi, Quercus gravesii, or Quercus grisea are often present in the tree canopy but have lower total cover than conifers. The shrub layer is composed of a variety of shrubs and rosettes such as Agave lechuguilla, Arctostaphylos pungens, Cercocarpus montanus var. paucidentatus, Garrya wrightii, Mimosa dysocarpa, Ptelea trifoliata, Quercus emoryi, Quercus graciliformis, Quercus gambelii, Quercus hypoleucoides, Quercus mohriana, Quercus X pauciloba, Quercus pungens, Quercus rugosa, Quercus toumeyi, Quercus turbinella, Rhus trilobata, and Salvia regla. All of these species are diagnostic except Cercocarpus montanus var. paucidentatus, Quercus gambelii, Quercus X pauciloba, Quercus turbinella, and Rhus trilobata. Herbaceous species are numerous and typical of the Chihuahuan Desert or Madrean foothills and include Bouteloua eriopoda, Eragrostis intermedia, Muhlenbergia dubia, Muhlenbergia emersleyi, Muhlenbergia pauciflora, Muhlenbergia setifolia, Piptochaetium fimbriatum, Piptochaetium pringlei, and Schizachyrium cirratum.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Juniperus deppeana trees have a broader range than this Madrean alliance, extending north into the southern Rocky Mountains.
Confusion over the taxonomic treatments of Pinus discolor D.K. Bailey & Hawksworth and related taxa Pinus cembroides Zucc. and Pinus remota (Little) D.K. Bailey & Hawksworth has caused confusion in the classification of this alliance. USDA PLANTS Database (USDA NRCS 2013) and Kartesz (1999) both use Bailey and Hawksworth''s (1979) treatment and list the above three names as accepted species. However, Kral''s treatment in Flora of North America (Kral 1993) is based on Little (1971) and includes Pinus remota and Pinus discolor within Pinus cembroides Zucc. (var. remota Little and var. bicolor Little, respectively). Currently, Pinus remota woodlands have been described from the Glass and Del Norte mountains of the Trans-Pecos and the Edwards Plateau in central Texas. Pinus cembroides stands have been reported from the Chisos and Davis mountains of the Trans-Pecos, extending into Coahuila, Mexico. Pinus discolor woodlands have been reported from several mountain ranges in southwestern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona below the Mogollon Rim and include the Animas, Peloncillos, Santa Catalina, Chiricahua, Mule, Dragoon, and Huachuca mountains. The woodlands are predicted to occur throughout the Borderlands of New Mexico, Arizona and Mexico (Muldavin et al. 1998a). It has been suggested that the Pinus discolor associations be renamed Pinus cembroides, but it is not known whether the trees in these associations were misidentified or if there is a problem with the current taxonomy.
Confusion over the taxonomic treatments of Pinus discolor D.K. Bailey & Hawksworth and related taxa Pinus cembroides Zucc. and Pinus remota (Little) D.K. Bailey & Hawksworth has caused confusion in the classification of this alliance. USDA PLANTS Database (USDA NRCS 2013) and Kartesz (1999) both use Bailey and Hawksworth''s (1979) treatment and list the above three names as accepted species. However, Kral''s treatment in Flora of North America (Kral 1993) is based on Little (1971) and includes Pinus remota and Pinus discolor within Pinus cembroides Zucc. (var. remota Little and var. bicolor Little, respectively). Currently, Pinus remota woodlands have been described from the Glass and Del Norte mountains of the Trans-Pecos and the Edwards Plateau in central Texas. Pinus cembroides stands have been reported from the Chisos and Davis mountains of the Trans-Pecos, extending into Coahuila, Mexico. Pinus discolor woodlands have been reported from several mountain ranges in southwestern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona below the Mogollon Rim and include the Animas, Peloncillos, Santa Catalina, Chiricahua, Mule, Dragoon, and Huachuca mountains. The woodlands are predicted to occur throughout the Borderlands of New Mexico, Arizona and Mexico (Muldavin et al. 1998a). It has been suggested that the Pinus discolor associations be renamed Pinus cembroides, but it is not known whether the trees in these associations were misidentified or if there is a problem with the current taxonomy.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: Vegetation included in this alliance has an open tree canopy that is typically 5-10 m tall, but may reach 15 m. A sparse to moderately dense tree subcanopy (3-10 m tall) is typically present. The canopy is dominated by evergreen needle-leaved trees with the subcanopy dominated by broad-leaved or scale-leaved evergreen trees. An open to dense (>10% cover) shrub layer may be present and is typically dominated by broad-leaved evergreen shrubs that are usually less than 5 m tall. A sparse to moderately dense layer dominated by perennial graminoids is usually present. Perennial forbs have sparse cover. Annual forbs and grasses may be seasonally present.
Floristics: This Madrean alliance is characterized by open to moderately dense woodlands with 10-60% cover of pinyon and juniper trees with shrubs in the understory forming an open to dense short-shrub layer with greater than 10% cover. Perennial graminoid cover is typically low and patchy because of high shrub cover on rocky sites. The presence of Madrean pinyons Pinus cembroides, Pinus discolor, or Pinus remota is diagnostic of this alliance. Junipers may be absent to dominant in the tree canopy with Juniperus coahuilensis, Juniperus deppeana, or Juniperus flaccida. Wide-ranging species Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma may be present to dominant when diagnostic Madrean species are present. Evergreen oaks such as Quercus arizonica, Quercus emoryi, Quercus gravesii, or Quercus grisea are often present in the tree canopy but have lower total cover than conifers. The shrub layer is composed of a variety of shrubs and rosettes such as Agave lechuguilla, Arctostaphylos pungens, Cercocarpus montanus var. paucidentatus, Garrya wrightii, Mimosa dysocarpa, Ptelea trifoliata, Quercus emoryi, Quercus graciliformis, Quercus gambelii, Quercus hypoleucoides, Quercus mohriana, Quercus x pauciloba, Quercus pungens, Quercus rugosa, Quercus toumeyi, Quercus turbinella, Rhus trilobata, and Salvia regla. All of these species are diagnostic except Cercocarpus montanus var. paucidentatus, Quercus gambelii, Quercus x pauciloba, Quercus turbinella, and Rhus trilobata. A sparse to moderately dense layer dominated by perennial graminoids is usually present. Characteristic species are typical of the desert grasslands or Madrean foothills and include Bouteloua eriopoda, Eragrostis intermedia, Muhlenbergia dubia, Muhlenbergia emersleyi, Muhlenbergia pauciflora, Muhlenbergia setifolia, Piptochaetium fimbriatum, Piptochaetium pringlei, and Schizachyrium cirratum. Other common graminoids include Bouteloua curtipendula and Bouteloua gracilis. Forbs are typically sparse. Some of the more common forbs include Ageratina herbacea (= Eupatorium herbaceum), Artemisia carruthii, Artemisia ludoviciana, Cheilanthes fendleri, Dysphania graveolens (= Chenopodium incisum), Geranium caespitosum, Hedeoma hyssopifolia, Packera neomexicana (= Senecio neomexicanus), Thalictrum fendleri, and Viguiera spp. Annual forbs and grasses may be seasonally present.
Dynamics: Stands are typically small and naturally patchy, and reflect the late-successional stage of Sierra Madrean woodlands and savannas. This is a highly diverse alliance with a preponderance of Sierra Madrean elements that have a restricted distribution in the U.S. Grazing and, to a lesser degree, fuelwood harvest continue to impact stands. Altered fire regimes (failed fire suppression followed by increased intensity and extent of fire) may be reducing the number of stands.
Pinyon trees are drought-tolerant and slow-growing (Little 1987, Powell 1988b, Muldavin et al. 1998a). They are also non-sprouting and may be killed by fire (Wright et al. 1979). The effect of fire on a stand is largely dependent on the tree height and density, fine-fuel load on the ground, weather conditions, and season (Dwyer and Pieper 1967, Wright et al. 1979). Trees are more vulnerable in open stands where fires frequently occur in the spring, the relative humidity is low, wind speeds are over 10-20 mph, and there are adequate fine fuels to carry fire (Wright et al. 1979). Under other conditions, burns tend to be spotty with low tree mortality. Large trees are generally not killed unless fine fuels, such as tumbleweeds, have accumulated beneath the tree to provide ladder fuels for the fire to reach the crown (Jameson et al. 1962). Closed-canopy stands rarely burn because they typically do not have enough fine fuels in the understory or wind to carry a fire (Wright et al. 1979).
Although pinyon trees are drought-tolerant, prolonged droughts will weaken trees and promote mortality by secondary agents. Periodic die-offs of pinyon pine caused by insects, such as the pinyon ips beetle (Ips confusus), or fungal agents, such as blackstain root-rot (Leptographium wageneri), tend to be correlated with droughts (Anhold 2005). These mortality events may be localized or widespread but can result in 50 to 90% mortality of Pinus edulis (Harrington and Cobb 1988).
In addition, altered fire regimes, cutting trees for fencing or firewood, and improper grazing by livestock have significant impacts on the quality of sites. Grazing by livestock can modify the fire regime by removing the fine fuels that carry fire. Fire, livestock grazing, and trampling by recreationalists and vehicles disturb cryptogamic soil crusts that help maintain soil structure, reduce soil erosion, provide habitat for plants and preserve biological diversity (Ladyman and Muldavin 1996). More study is needed to understand and manage these woodlands ecologically. Climatic and other factors have resulted in denser and expanded pinyon-juniper stands that have likely become denser in much of the Madrean region. Denser stands are more susceptible to attack by insects and disease (Anhold 2005).
Pinyon trees are drought-tolerant and slow-growing (Little 1987, Powell 1988b, Muldavin et al. 1998a). They are also non-sprouting and may be killed by fire (Wright et al. 1979). The effect of fire on a stand is largely dependent on the tree height and density, fine-fuel load on the ground, weather conditions, and season (Dwyer and Pieper 1967, Wright et al. 1979). Trees are more vulnerable in open stands where fires frequently occur in the spring, the relative humidity is low, wind speeds are over 10-20 mph, and there are adequate fine fuels to carry fire (Wright et al. 1979). Under other conditions, burns tend to be spotty with low tree mortality. Large trees are generally not killed unless fine fuels, such as tumbleweeds, have accumulated beneath the tree to provide ladder fuels for the fire to reach the crown (Jameson et al. 1962). Closed-canopy stands rarely burn because they typically do not have enough fine fuels in the understory or wind to carry a fire (Wright et al. 1979).
Although pinyon trees are drought-tolerant, prolonged droughts will weaken trees and promote mortality by secondary agents. Periodic die-offs of pinyon pine caused by insects, such as the pinyon ips beetle (Ips confusus), or fungal agents, such as blackstain root-rot (Leptographium wageneri), tend to be correlated with droughts (Anhold 2005). These mortality events may be localized or widespread but can result in 50 to 90% mortality of Pinus edulis (Harrington and Cobb 1988).
In addition, altered fire regimes, cutting trees for fencing or firewood, and improper grazing by livestock have significant impacts on the quality of sites. Grazing by livestock can modify the fire regime by removing the fine fuels that carry fire. Fire, livestock grazing, and trampling by recreationalists and vehicles disturb cryptogamic soil crusts that help maintain soil structure, reduce soil erosion, provide habitat for plants and preserve biological diversity (Ladyman and Muldavin 1996). More study is needed to understand and manage these woodlands ecologically. Climatic and other factors have resulted in denser and expanded pinyon-juniper stands that have likely become denser in much of the Madrean region. Denser stands are more susceptible to attack by insects and disease (Anhold 2005).
Environmental Description: This Madrean pinyon-juniper woodland alliance is found in foothills and lower montane zones of southeastern Arizona and southern New Mexico, extending into western Texas and Mexico. Elevation ranges from 1400-2200 m. Stands occur on gently to moderately sloping alluvial plains, bajadas and canyon bottoms to steep rocky slopes in canyons, piedmont hills, mesas and mountains. Lower elevation stands occur in cool microsites of canyons, washes and along drainages. Climate is semi-arid. Summers are generally hot and winters mild with cold periods and occasional snows. The mean annual precipitation ranges from 45-50 cm, mostly occurring during the monsoon season from July to September. Soils are shallow, gravelly or stony sandy loams or sandy clay loams, derived from a mixture of alluvium and colluvium. Aspect is variable, but stands are typically on the less xeric north slopes. Soils are shallow, lithic, gravelly loams derived from colluvium and residuum. Parent materials include alluvium, andesite, limestone, rhyolite and tuff.
Geographic Range: This Madrean pinyon-juniper savanna and woodland group occurs in lower foothills and plains of southeastern Arizona and southern New Mexico, extending into western Texas and northern Mexico.
Nations: MX,US
States/Provinces: AZ, MXCHH, MXCOA?, MXSON, NM, TX
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.899256
Confidence Level: Low
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: In part A.392, A.510, A.516, A.523, and A.538. This alliance was created from associations with shrub dominated understory selected from the following Old AlliancesI.C.3.N.a. Pinus cembroides - Quercus gravesii Forest Alliance (A.392), II.A.4.N.a. Pinus cembroides Woodland Alliance (A.510), II.A.4.N.a. Pinus discolor Woodland Alliance (A.538), II.A.4.N.a. Pinus edulis - (Juniperus spp.) Woodland Alliance (A.516), II.A.4.N.a. Pinus remota Woodland Alliance (A.523).
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: > Pinus discolor / Quercus hypoleucoides Woodland (Bassett et al. 1987)
> Pinus discolor / Quercus toumeyi Woodland (Bassett et al. 1987)
> Pinus edulis - Quercus arizonica / Rhus trilobata (Moir and Carleton 1987)
> Pinus edulis - Quercus arizonica / Rhus trilobata Habitat Type (Larson and Moir 1986)
< Pinyon Pine-Oak Series (Diamond 1993) [relationship uncertain]
> Pinus discolor / Quercus toumeyi Woodland (Bassett et al. 1987)
> Pinus edulis - Quercus arizonica / Rhus trilobata (Moir and Carleton 1987)
> Pinus edulis - Quercus arizonica / Rhus trilobata Habitat Type (Larson and Moir 1986)
< Pinyon Pine-Oak Series (Diamond 1993) [relationship uncertain]
- Anhold, J. 2005. PiƱon pine mortality event in the Southwest: An update for 2005. Poster abstract. Ecological Restoration of Southwest Ponderosa Pine and Pinyon-Juniper Ecosystems, May 11 and 12, 2005, St. George, UT.
- Bailey, D. K., and F. G. Hawksworth. 1979. Pinyons of the Chihuahuan Desert region. Phytologia 44:129-133.
- Bassett, D., M. Larson, and W. Moir. 1987. Forest and woodland habitat types of Arizona south of the Mogollon Rim and southwestern New Mexico. Edition 2. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.
- Bourgeron, P. S., L. D. Engelking, H. C. Humphries, E. Muldavin, and W. H. Moir. 1993b. Assessing the conservation value of the Gray Ranch: Rarity, diversity and representativeness. Unpublished report prepared for The Nature Conservancy by the Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. (Volume I and II).
- Bourgeron, P. S., L. D. Engelking, H. C. Humphries, E. Muldavin, and W. H. Moir. 1995a. Assessing the conservation value of the Gray Ranch: Rarity, diversity and representativeness. Desert Plants 11(2-3):3-68.
- Diamond, D. D. 1993. Classification of the plant communities of Texas (series level). Unpublished document. Texas Natural Heritage Program, Austin. 25 pp.
- Dwyer, D. D., and R. D. Pieper. 1967. Fire effects on blue gramma-pinyon-juniper rangeland in New Mexico. Journal of Range Management 20:359-362.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
- Harrington, T. C., and F. W. Cobb, Jr., editors. 1988. Leptographium root diseases on conifers. The American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN. 149 pp.
- Jameson, D. A., J. A. Williams, and E. W. Wilton. 1962. Vegetation and soils of Fishtail Mesa, Arizona. Ecology 43:403-410.
- Kartesz, J. T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: J. T. Kartesz and C. A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, NC.
- Kral, R. 1993. Pinus. Pages 373-398 in: Flora of North America. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Ladyman, J. A. R., and E. Muldavin. 1996. Terrestrial cryptograms of pinyon-juniper woodlands in the southwestern United States: A review. General Technical Report RM-GTR-280. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 33 pp.
- Larson, M., and W. H. Moir. 1986. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of southern New Mexico and central Arizona (north of the Mogollon Rim). USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. 76 pp.
- Little, E. L. 1987. Pinyon trees (Pinus edulis) remeasured after 47 years. Pages 65-68 in: Proceedings - pinyon-juniper conference. General Technical Report INT-215. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
- Little, E. L., Jr. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Volume I. Conifer and important hardwoods. USDA Miscellaneous Publication Number 1146.
- Moir, W. H., and J. O. Carleton. 1987. Classification of pinyon-juniper (P-J) sites on national forests in the Southwest. Pages 216-226 in: R. L. Everett, editor. Proceedings of the Pinyon-Juniper Conference, Reno, NV, 13-16 January 1986. General Technical Report. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 581 pp.
- Muldavin, E., V. Archer, and P. Neville. 1998a. A vegetation map of the Borderlands Ecosystem Management Area. Final report submitted to USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Experiment Station, Flagstaff, AZ, by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. 58 pp.
- Plumb, G. A. 1992. Vegetation classifications of Big Bend National Park, Texas. Texas Journal of Science 44:375-387.
- Powell, A. M. 1988b. Trees and shrubs of Trans-Pecos Texas including Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains national parks. Big Bend Natural History Assoc., Inc. 536 pp.
- Taylor, W. P., W. B. McDougall, and W. B. Davis. 1944. Preliminary report of an ecological survey of Big Bend National Park. Unpublished report. USDI National Park Service, Big Bend National Park. 55 pp.
- USDA NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service]. No date. The PLANTS Database. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA. [http://plants.usda.gov/]
- Wright, H. A., L. F. Neuenschwander, and C. M. Britton. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state of the art review. General Technical Report INT-58. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.