Print Report

A0948 Salix nigra Sand-Gravel Floodplain Scrub Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This alliance is composed of vegetation occurring on sand and gravel rivershores receiving high-energy flood-scour throughout the eastern United States and possibly adjacent Canada. The physiognomy is best characterized as scrub, formed by intermittent flood-scour. Salix nigra is characteristic, but floristic composition and structure is widely variable.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Black Willow Sand-Gravel Floodplain Scrub Alliance

Colloquial Name: Black Willow Sand-Gravel Riverine Scrub

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance is composed of vegetation occurring on sand and gravel rivershores receiving high-energy flood-scour. The physiognomy is best characterized as scrub, formed by intermittent flood-scour. Salix nigra is characteristic, but floristic composition and structure is widely variable. Other species of Salix may co-occur, as well as Alnus serrulata, Cornus sericea, and a variety of herbaceous species that tolerate flood disturbance. Alluvial tree saplings often occur as well, including Acer saccharinum, Populus deltoides, and others. This alliance occurs throughout the eastern United States and possibly adjacent Canada.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Flood-pruned trees and shrubs characterized by Salix nigra occurring on alluvial sand, gravel, and cobble.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This alliance is wide-ranging and broadly defined. There are likely to be multiple alliances housed within this alliance as a result of inclusion of the very broadly defined ~Salix nigra Wet Shrubland (CEGL003901)$$. Additional data collection and analysis will be necessary to differentiate them.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: The physiognomy is best characterized as scrub (low tree species 2-5 m tall), formed by intermittent flood-scour.

Floristics: Salix nigra is characteristic, but floristic composition and structure are widely variable. Other species of Salix may co-occur, as well as Alnus serrulata, Cornus sericea, and a variety of herbaceous species that tolerate flood disturbance. Alluvial tree saplings often occur as well, including Acer saccharinum, Populus deltoides, and others.

Dynamics:  These young, or frequently disturbed, thickets, often have few to no other species present. The presence of this vegetation is related to disturbance frequency, both natural and anthropogenic.

Environmental Description:  This alliance is composed of vegetation occurring on sand and gravel rivershores receiving high-energy flood-scour.

Geographic Range: This alliance occurs throughout the eastern United States and possibly adjacent Canada.

Nations: CA?,US

States/Provinces:  AL, AR, CT, DE, FL, GA, IL?, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MS, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OK, ON?, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA?, VT, WV




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Black Willow: 95 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): A.S. Weakley, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: L.A. Sneddon and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-18-14

  • Cogan, D. 2007c. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SOPN/NRTR--2007/073. National Park Service, Johnson City, TX. 118 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.
  • Lea, C. 2000. Plant communities of the Potomac Gorge and their relationship to fluvial factors. M.S. thesis, George Mason University. Fairfax, VA. 219 pp.
  • Lea, C. 2004. Draft vegetation types in National Capital Region Parks. Edited by S.C. Gawler and J. Teague. Working draft for review by NatureServe, Virginia Natural Heritage, West Virginia Natural Heritage, Maryland Natural Heritage, and National Park Service. July 2004. 157 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Smith, T. L. 1991. Natural ecological communities of Pennsylvania. First revision. Unpublished report. Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy, Middletown, PA. 111 pp.