Print Report
G658 Rhododendron catawbiense - Pieris floribunda - Alnus viridis ssp. crispa Southern Appalachian Shrub Bald Group
Type Concept Sentence: These dense shrubland communities are frequently dominated by Rhododendron catawbiense, but substantial examples are also dominated by Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, Kalmia latifolia, Rhododendron carolinianum, or mixtures of these and other shrubs. They are found in the highest elevational zone of the Southern Appalachians, generally above 1524 m (5000 feet) but occasionally to 1220 m (4000 feet), and at slightly lower elevations at its northern limit in Virginia and West Virginia, and in the Cumberland Mountains along the Virginia-Kentucky border.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Catawba Rosebay - Mountain Fetterbush - Mountain Alder Southern Appalachian Shrub Bald Group
Colloquial Name: Southern Appalachian Shrub Bald
Hierarchy Level: Group
Type Concept: These dense shrubland communities are found in the highest elevational zone of the Southern Appalachians, generally above 1524 m (5000 feet) but occasionally to 1220 m (4000 feet), and at slightly lower elevations at its northern limit in Virginia and West Virginia, and in the Cumberland Mountains along the Virginia-Kentucky border. The vegetation consists of dense shrubby areas most often dominated by Rhododendron catawbiense, but substantial examples are also dominated by Rhododendron carolinianum, Kalmia latifolia, or a mixture of shrubs. One large (and unusual) example dominated by Alnus viridis ssp. crispa is also included. Heath balds may contain sparse stunted trees barely larger than the shrub canopy. This combination of high-elevation, non-wetland sites and dense shrub vegetation without appreciable rock outcrop conceptually distinguishes this group from all others in the Southern Appalachians. However, the widespread areas of degraded spruce-fir with grass and/or shrub cover and the invasion of balds by trees blur the distinction somewhat.
Diagnostic Characteristics: These are dense shrubland communities, dominated by Rhododendron catawbiense as well as by Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, Kalmia latifolia, Rhododendron carolinianum, or mixtures of these and other shrubs, and found at the highest elevations of the Southern Appalachians.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Grassy balds and heath balds differ in a number of ways and are often recognized as distinct entities. This vegetation occurs in settings similar to ~Southern Appalachian Rocky Outcrop Group (G670)$$ and the relationship among these is acknowledged by their placement together in ~Appalachian Rocky Felsic & Mafic Scrub & Grassland Macrogroup (M506)$$.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: These are dense shrubland communities found at the highest elevations of the Southern Appalachians.
Floristics: Examples of this vegetation consist of dense shrubs, particularly Rhododendron catawbiense, but substantial examples are also dominated by Kalmia latifolia, Rhododendron carolinianum, or a mixture of other shrubs, including Corylus cornuta, Gaylussacia baccata, Leiophyllum buxifolium, Pieris floribunda, Prunus pensylvanica, Sorbus americana, and Vaccinium corymbosum. One large example, dominated by Alnus viridis ssp. crispa, is also included here. Large areas have also become dominated by Rubus allegheniensis, possibly with other brambles (Rubus canadensis, Rubus idaeus ssp. strigosus) and by mixtures of native grasses with exotic pasture grasses (e.g., Phleum pratense). Heath balds may contain sparse stunted trees barely larger than the shrub canopy.
Dynamics: The dynamics that created and maintain this vegetation are the subject of a yet unresolved debate. In particular, the relationship between shrub balds and grassy balds is not fully understood. Some interpretations suggest that shrub balds are simply degraded grassy balds, but the situation may be more complicated. On the one hand, most grassy bald occurrences show a strong tendency to succeed to shrub or forest vegetation under present conditions, suggesting that some important maintenance process has been lost. Grazing by native herbivores (elk and bison) and periodic fire have both been suggested as natural mechanisms to keep out woody vegetation. Exposure to wind, snow, ice, and heavy rainfall also retard succession to forest. The presence of shade-intolerant disjunct herb species in some suggests even greater age. Some areas of the spruce-fir system degraded by a combination of logging, slash fires, and grazing resemble grassy or shrub balds, but most do not. The universal cattle grazing in grassy balds by early settlers has further obscured their original character and evidence of processes. Heath balds are more widely regarded as being created or maintained by fire. However, heavy organic accumulations in the soil suggest great age for some. Most show a very limited tendency to succeed to forest, suggesting that the dense shrub layer is highly competitive and that only infrequent fire would be needed to maintain them. As with the grassy balds, spruce-fir forests which burned in historical times do not usually develop vegetation identical to heath balds.
Environmental Description: This vegetation generally occurs at elevations above 1524 m (5000 feet) but may range as low as 1220 m (4000 feet) in the Southern Blue Ridge. It is also of limited extent above 1035 m (3400 feet) in the Cumberland Mountains along the Virginia-Kentucky border. It occurs on broad ridgetops and narrow spur ridges. Elevation and orographic effects (winds cooling as they rise to create increased condensation) make the climate cool and wet, with heavy moisture input from fog as well as high rainfall. Convex slopes and exposure to wind offset the moisture input to some extent. Concentration of air pollutants has been implicated as an important anthropogenic stress in this elevational range in recent years. Soils range from shallow and rocky to fairly deep residual soils. Any kind of bedrock may be present, but most sites have erosion-resistant felsic igneous or metamorphic rocks, with slate and quartzite particularly frequent. The sites that support balds are not obviously different from similar sites that support spruce-fir forests, so the origin of these communities continues to be a subject of some debate. Fire may be an important factor in some examples, whereas grazing and/or exposure to the elements promote the maintenance of others.
Geographic Range: This group ranges from the Balsam Mountains and Great Smoky Mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee northward to Virginia and West Virginia. It is also of limited extent in the Cumberland Mountains along the Virginia-Kentucky border. The current status in Georgia is open to question and it was apparently never extensive in any case.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: GA, KY, NC, SC?, TN, VA, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.877352
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.B Temperate & Boreal Grassland & Shrubland Subclass | S18 | 2.B |
Formation | 2.B.2 Temperate Grassland & Shrubland Formation | F012 | 2.B.2 |
Division | 2.B.2.Nc Eastern North American Grassland & Shrubland Division | D024 | 2.B.2.Nc |
Macrogroup | 2.B.2.Nc.1 Catawba Rosebay / Michaux''s Saxifrage - Flattened Oatgrass Felsic & Mafic Scrub & Grassland Macrogroup | M506 | 2.B.2.Nc.1 |
Group | 2.B.2.Nc.1.a Catawba Rosebay - Mountain Fetterbush - Mountain Alder Southern Appalachian Shrub Bald Group | G658 | 2.B.2.Nc.1.a |
Alliance | A0744 Catawba Rosebay - Carolina Azalea - Mountain Laurel Shrub Bald Alliance | A0744 | 2.B.2.Nc.1.a |
Concept Lineage: G057 split into G658 Southern Appalachian Shrub Bald and G657 Southern Appalachian Grass Bald (DFL 7-24-12)
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: No Data Available
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]