Print Report
M091 Quercus turbinella - Arctostaphylos pungens - Ceanothus greggii Warm Interior Chaparral Macrogroup
Type Concept Sentence: This macrogroup includes all the interior chaparral in the southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico and is composed of a very diverse list of diagnostic, mostly evergreen shrubs such as Arctostaphylos pungens, Ceanothus greggii, Garrya wrightii, and Quercus turbinella which dominate large areas on foothills, xeric mountain slopes and canyons.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sonoran Scrub Oak - Pointleaf Manzanita - Desert Ceanothus Warm Interior Chaparral Macrogroup
Colloquial Name: Warm Interior Chaparral
Hierarchy Level: Macrogroup
Type Concept: This interior chaparral macrogroup occurs across central Arizona (Mogollon Rim) and southern New Mexico, east in mountains across Trans-Pecos Texas, and south into the Madrean Occidentale and Madrean Oriental in northern Mexico. Occurrences are also found in desert mountains in the Sonoran and Mojave deserts. The vegetation is characterized by a moderate to dense evergreen shrub layer less than 3 m tall that is dominated by scrub oak and sclerophyllous shrubs. Widespread diagnostic species Quercus turbinella, Arctostaphylos pungens or Ceanothus greggii frequently dominant large areas. Other characteristic shrubs include Cercocarpus montanus var. paucidentatus, Garrya wrightii, Quercus toumeyi, and Rhus trilobata with Arctostaphylos pringlei and Arctostaphylos pungens at higher elevations. In desert chaparral stands in the western extent, Arctostaphylos glauca, Arctostaphylos patula, Cercocarpus montanus var. glaber, Eriodictyon angustifolium, Garrya flavescens, Juniperus californica, Nolina parryi, Quercus berberidifolia, Quercus cornelius-mulleri, Quercus john-tuckeri, Rhamnus ilicifolia, and Rhus ovata characterize this shrubland. In the eastern extent, stands in the Chihuahuan Desert mountains and the Sierra Madre Oriental are dominated by evergreen shrub oak species, such as Quercus mohriana, Quercus pungens, and Quercus vaseyana, and several widespread chaparral species, such as Arctostaphylos pungens, Ceanothus greggii, and Garrya wrightii. Additional characteristic Madrean species are may be present such as Arbutus xalapensis, Fendlera rigida, Garrya ovata, Purshia mexicana, Rhus virens var. choriophylla, and several species of Salvia. The herbaceous layer variable, but is generally composed of semi-arid perennial grasses. Stands are found on foothills, xeric mountain slopes and canyons in hotter and drier habitats and often dominate along the mid-elevation (1000-2500 m) transition zone between desert scrub and montane woodlands. Sites are often steep and rocky.
Diagnostic Characteristics: This wide-ranging upland shrubland is characterized by a very diverse list of diagnostic, mostly evergreen shrubs. Arctostaphylos pungens, Quercus turbinella, and Ceanothus greggii dominate large areas. Other diagnostic and often dominant shrubs include Arctostaphylos pringlei, Cercocarpus montanus, Eriodictyon angustifolium, Garrya flavescens, Garrya ovata, Garrya wrightii, Juniperus californica, Quercus cornelius-mulleri, Quercus mohriana, Quercus pungens, Quercus toumeyi, and Quercus vaseyana.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: No Data Available
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: This upland shrubland is typically dominated by a moderate to dense evergreen sclerophyllous shrub canopy usually less than 3 m tall. Herbaceous layers may be present and are typically dominated by perennial graminoids.
Floristics: The vegetation is characterized by a moderate to dense evergreen shrub layer less than 3 m tall that is dominated by the scrub oaks (Quercus turbinella, Quercus intricata, and Quercus toumeyi) along with wide diversity of other sclerophyllous shrubs that include Ceanothus greggii, Cercocarpus montanus var. paucidentatus, Garrya wrightii, and Rhus trilobata, with Arctostaphylos pringlei and Arctostaphylos pungens at higher elevations (Carmichael et al. 1978). In desert chaparral stands in the western extent, Arctostaphylos glauca, Arctostaphylos patula, Cercocarpus montanus var. glaber, Garrya flavescens, Juniperus californica, and Nolina parryi, Quercus cornelius-mulleri, Rhamnus ilicifolia, and Rhus ovata, characterize this shrubland (Keeler-Wolf 2007). Scattered remnant pinyon and juniper trees may be present; however, in the western Mojave, Juniperus californica sometimes forms an open, shrubby tree layer over the evergreen oaks and other shrubs (Keeler-Wolf 2007). In the eastern extent, stands in the Chihuahuan Desert mountains and the Sierra Madre Oriental are dominated by evergreen shrub oak species, such as Quercus mohriana, Quercus pungens, and Quercus vaseyana, and several widespread chaparral species, such as Arctostaphylos pungens, Ceanothus greggii, Cercocarpus montanus, Eriodictyon angustifolium, Fallugia paradoxa, and Garrya wrightii. Other Madrean Orientale species include Arbutus xalapensis (= Arbutus texana), Fraxinus greggii, Fendlera rigida (= Fendlera linearis), Garrya ovata, Juniperus pinchotii, Purshia mexicana, Rhus virens var. choriophylla (= Rhus choriophylla), Salvia lycioides (= Salvia ramosissima), Salvia roemeriana, and Salvia regla (Brown 1982a). The herbaceous layer is variable, but is generally composed of perennial grasses, such as Achnatherum speciosum, Bouteloua curtipendula, Bouteloua hirsuta, Bothriochloa barbinodis, Eragrostis intermedia, Lycurus phleoides, Muhlenbergia emersleyi, and several species of Aristida, which are largely restricted to rocky, protected areas because of past heavy livestock grazing (Brown 1982a).
Dynamics: Many of the communities in this macrogroup are dominated by fire-adapted shrubs. Quercus cornelius-mulleri sprouts vigorously from root crowns after fire. Since Quercus cornelius-mulleri chaparral occurs in areas of lower rainfall and sparser vegetation cover, it typically has less frequent fire and slower recovery rates than typical cismontane chaparral types elsewhere in California. Quercus turbinella in Arizona and New Mexico is a fire-type; it sprouts vigorously from the root crown and rhizomes. Typical fire intervals in Arizona exceed 74 years (Reid et al. 1999, Tirmenstein 1999d). Plants in the New York Mountains of California are treelike, suggesting that fires have been absent for perhaps greater than 100 years. Instead, flooding has initiated stem breakage and sprouting of some canyon bottom stands. Ceanothus greggii is an obligate seeder and germinates from seed after fire, and older stands will lose dominance of this shrub to other longer-lived sprouting shrubs.
Site conditions aside, the dynamics of fire within chaparral are still complex. In southern California, it has been suggested that the even-aged and large size of modern chaparral patches are a function of 20th century fire suppression feedbacks whereby intensive suppression has led to large fuel buildups over large areas of landscape leading to large stand-replacement fires of ever increasing size (Minnich 1983, 2001). Others contend that the large patch patterns are within that natural range of variability, and that they are driven more by climate trends, prevailing weather patterns, increased human ignition frequencies with increased population density, changes in land use, and landscape characteristics rather than suppression (Keeley and Fotheringham 2001a, 2001c, Moritz 2003). The pattern of chaparral distribution in southern New Mexico suggests that the latter scenario might be the case here. Because of the rugged country, effective suppression has been minimal. Hence, the large patches of chaparral may be representative of a more or less natural fire regime, but one possibly modified by increased human caused fires and fire suppression on neighboring forested lands. More frequent, intense fires leads to the decline of the grassy woodland savannas on the ridge top summits and a favoring of shrublands (possibly enhanced by increased fine fuels with the cessation of livestock grazing). In this type of fire regime, Keeley and Fotheringham (2001a) and Moritz (2003) contend that prescribed burning may be useless or even harmful and that fire suppression, at least in the short term, may be more appropriate for maintaining an ecosystem near its natural state. Minnich (2001) would likely argue the opposite saying it is fire suppression that generates the large patch pattern and that prescribed fire is needed to restore a small patch mosaic with imbedded natural fuel firebreaks. Detailed fire history studies that focus on chaparral patch age structure in a landscape context would be useful (and perhaps necessary) to help resolve these conflicting viewpoints and generate management options that are tailored to interior chaparral.
At the other end of the elevation spectrum, repeated burning of chaparral, particularly Pinchot juniper, has been suggested as a way to increase grass cover in shrubland communities (Ahlstrand 1982). Most of our understanding of how to manage of Pinchot juniper comes from the high Plains of Texas where it is seen as an invader of fine textured plains grasslands soils, and where management has focused on control and eradication to increase livestock forage. Research from the high plains indicates that the effectiveness of fire in controlling Pinchot juniper is a function of fire intensity, climatic conditions and position of the bud zone above or below the soil (Steuter and Britton 1983). Fire was particularly effective in inducing mortality in young plants with exposed buds on rocky sites, but this dropped off significantly with older plants. In addition, increased grass cover (grama grasses) can inhibit reproduction (Smith et al. 1975). As Ahlstrand (1982) has shown, fires can lead to at least short-term increases in grass cover, but because Pinchot juniper can recover 50% or more of its original cover within six or seven years of a burn, repeated prescribed fires at 10- to 15-year intervals would be needed to sustain a grassland type.
Site conditions aside, the dynamics of fire within chaparral are still complex. In southern California, it has been suggested that the even-aged and large size of modern chaparral patches are a function of 20th century fire suppression feedbacks whereby intensive suppression has led to large fuel buildups over large areas of landscape leading to large stand-replacement fires of ever increasing size (Minnich 1983, 2001). Others contend that the large patch patterns are within that natural range of variability, and that they are driven more by climate trends, prevailing weather patterns, increased human ignition frequencies with increased population density, changes in land use, and landscape characteristics rather than suppression (Keeley and Fotheringham 2001a, 2001c, Moritz 2003). The pattern of chaparral distribution in southern New Mexico suggests that the latter scenario might be the case here. Because of the rugged country, effective suppression has been minimal. Hence, the large patches of chaparral may be representative of a more or less natural fire regime, but one possibly modified by increased human caused fires and fire suppression on neighboring forested lands. More frequent, intense fires leads to the decline of the grassy woodland savannas on the ridge top summits and a favoring of shrublands (possibly enhanced by increased fine fuels with the cessation of livestock grazing). In this type of fire regime, Keeley and Fotheringham (2001a) and Moritz (2003) contend that prescribed burning may be useless or even harmful and that fire suppression, at least in the short term, may be more appropriate for maintaining an ecosystem near its natural state. Minnich (2001) would likely argue the opposite saying it is fire suppression that generates the large patch pattern and that prescribed fire is needed to restore a small patch mosaic with imbedded natural fuel firebreaks. Detailed fire history studies that focus on chaparral patch age structure in a landscape context would be useful (and perhaps necessary) to help resolve these conflicting viewpoints and generate management options that are tailored to interior chaparral.
At the other end of the elevation spectrum, repeated burning of chaparral, particularly Pinchot juniper, has been suggested as a way to increase grass cover in shrubland communities (Ahlstrand 1982). Most of our understanding of how to manage of Pinchot juniper comes from the high Plains of Texas where it is seen as an invader of fine textured plains grasslands soils, and where management has focused on control and eradication to increase livestock forage. Research from the high plains indicates that the effectiveness of fire in controlling Pinchot juniper is a function of fire intensity, climatic conditions and position of the bud zone above or below the soil (Steuter and Britton 1983). Fire was particularly effective in inducing mortality in young plants with exposed buds on rocky sites, but this dropped off significantly with older plants. In addition, increased grass cover (grama grasses) can inhibit reproduction (Smith et al. 1975). As Ahlstrand (1982) has shown, fires can lead to at least short-term increases in grass cover, but because Pinchot juniper can recover 50% or more of its original cover within six or seven years of a burn, repeated prescribed fires at 10- to 15-year intervals would be needed to sustain a grassland type.
Environmental Description: This macrogroup occurs across central Arizona (Mogollon Rim) and southern New Mexico, east in mountains across Trans-Pecos Texas, and south into the Madrean Occidentale and Madrean Oriental in northern Mexico. Occurrences are also found in desert mountains in the Sonoran and Mojave deserts. Stands are found on foothills, xeric mountain slopes and canyons in hotter and drier habitats. They often dominate along the mid-elevation (1000-2500 m) transition zone between desert scrub and montane woodlands (encinal, pine-oak, and ponderosa pine). Sites are variable but often steep and rocky. Sometimes this macrogroup occurs in thickets along upper canyon watercourses and northerly upland slopes within the pinyon-juniper woodland zone.
Climate: This macrogroup occurs in warm semi-desert regions in the southwestern U.S. The climate is hot and may have a somewhat bi-modal precipitation regime with spring rains and warm-season monsoonal rains as well. Frosts occur in winter, and even sometime snows, which will melt rapidly. Soil/substrate/hydrology: Parent materials are varied. This macrogroup is found on igneous intrusives and extrusives, sedimentary, and metamorphic including andesite, basalt, diabase, gneiss, schist, shale, slate, rhyolite, sandstone, tuff, and, more commonly, limestone and coarse-textured granitic substrates.
Climate: This macrogroup occurs in warm semi-desert regions in the southwestern U.S. The climate is hot and may have a somewhat bi-modal precipitation regime with spring rains and warm-season monsoonal rains as well. Frosts occur in winter, and even sometime snows, which will melt rapidly. Soil/substrate/hydrology: Parent materials are varied. This macrogroup is found on igneous intrusives and extrusives, sedimentary, and metamorphic including andesite, basalt, diabase, gneiss, schist, shale, slate, rhyolite, sandstone, tuff, and, more commonly, limestone and coarse-textured granitic substrates.
Geographic Range: This macrogroup is found across the southern portion of the southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico. The core distributions is in central Arizona (Mogollon Rim) and southwestern New Mexico south into Madrean Occidentale and Madrean Oriental in northern Mexico. Scattered locations occur in desert mountains extending west into the Sonoran Desert, Baja Norte to the western Mojave Desert, and east across Trans-Pecos Texas.
Nations: MX,US
States/Provinces: AZ, CA, MXBCN, MXCHH, MXCOA, MXSON, NM, NV, TX, UT
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.860411
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.B Temperate & Boreal Grassland & Shrubland Subclass | S18 | 2.B |
Formation | 2.B.2 Temperate Grassland & Shrubland Formation | F012 | 2.B.2 |
Division | 2.B.2.Ng Western North American Interior Chaparral Division | D061 | 2.B.2.Ng |
Macrogroup | 2.B.2.Ng.2 Sonoran Scrub Oak - Pointleaf Manzanita - Desert Ceanothus Warm Interior Chaparral Macrogroup | M091 | 2.B.2.Ng.2 |
Group | 2.B.2.Ng.2.a Dwarf Oak - Lacey Oak - Pungent Oak Chaparral Group | G280 | 2.B.2.Ng.2.a |
Group | 2.B.2.Ng.2.b Sonoran Scrub Oak - Desert Ceanothus - Mexican Manzanita Chaparral Group | G281 | 2.B.2.Ng.2.b |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: > "Arizona" Chaparral (Brown 1982a)
> "Coahuilan" Chaparral (Brown et al. 1979)
= Arizona Chaparral (503) (Shiflet 1994)
> Chihuahuan Interior (Coahuila) Chaparral - 133.4 (Brown et al. 1998)
> Desert Chaparral (Keeler-Wolf 2007)
< Interior Chaparral -133.3 (Brown 1982a)
= Interior Chaparral -133.3 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata-Cercocarpus spp. Association -133.316 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata-Quercus spp. Association -133.317 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata Association -133.315 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata-mixed sclerophyll Association -133.318 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella-Cercocarpus betuloides Association -133.313 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella-Cercocarpus breviflorus Association -133.312 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella Association -133.311 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella-mixed sclerophyll Association -133.314 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Silktassel Series, Garrya ovata Association -133.352 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Silktassel Series, Garrya wrightii Association -133.351 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Southwestern Interior (Arizona) Chaparral - 133.3 (Brown et al. 1998)
> "Coahuilan" Chaparral (Brown et al. 1979)
= Arizona Chaparral (503) (Shiflet 1994)
> Chihuahuan Interior (Coahuila) Chaparral - 133.4 (Brown et al. 1998)
> Desert Chaparral (Keeler-Wolf 2007)
< Interior Chaparral -133.3 (Brown 1982a)
= Interior Chaparral -133.3 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata-Cercocarpus spp. Association -133.316 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata-Quercus spp. Association -133.317 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata Association -133.315 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus intricata-mixed sclerophyll Association -133.318 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella-Cercocarpus betuloides Association -133.313 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella-Cercocarpus breviflorus Association -133.312 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella Association -133.311 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Scrub Oak Series, Quercus turbinella-mixed sclerophyll Association -133.314 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Silktassel Series, Garrya ovata Association -133.352 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Silktassel Series, Garrya wrightii Association -133.351 (Brown et al. 1979)
> Southwestern Interior (Arizona) Chaparral - 133.3 (Brown et al. 1998)
- Ahlstrand, G. M. 1982. Response of Chihuahuan Desert mountain shrub vegetation to burning. Journal of Range Management 35:62-65.
- Barbour, M. G., and J. Major, editors. 1988. Terrestrial vegetation of California: New expanded edition. California Native Plant Society, Special Publication 9, Sacramento. 1030 pp.
- Brown, D. E., C. H. Lowe, and C. P. Pase. 1979. A digitized classification system for the biotic communities of North America with community (series) and association examples for the Southwest. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 14:1-16.
- Brown, D. E., F. Reichenbacher, and S. E. Franson. 1998. A classification of North American biotic communities. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 141 pp.
- Brown, D. E., editor. 1982a. Biotic communities of the American Southwest-United States and Mexico. Desert Plants Special Issue 4(1-4):1-342.
- Cable, D. R. 1975a. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: The status of our knowledge. Research Paper RM-155. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 30 pp.
- Carmichael, R. S., O. D. Knipe, C. P. Pase, and W. W. Brady. 1978. Arizona chaparral: Plant associations and ecology. Research Paper RM-202. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 16 pp.
- DeBano, L. F. 1999. Chaparral shrublands in the southwestern United States. Chapter 7. Pages 83-94 in: P. F. Ffolliott and A. Ortega-Rubio, editors. Ecology and Management of Forests, Woodlands, and Shrublands in Dryland Regions of the United States and Mexico: Perspectives for the 21st Century. Co-edition number 1. University of Arizona-Centro de Investigacione.
- Dick-Peddie, W. A. 1993. New Mexico vegetation: Past, present, and future. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. 244 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
- Holland, V. L., and D. J. Keil. 1995. California vegetation. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 516 pp.
- Keeler-Wolf, T. 2007. Mojave Desert scrub vegetation. Pages 609-656 in: M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf, and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial vegetation of California. Third edition. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Keeley J. E., and C. J. Fotheringham. 2001c. Historic fire regime in southern California shrublands. Conservation Biology 15(6):1536-1548.
- Keeley, J. E., and C. J. Fotheringham. 2001a. History and management of crown-fire ecosystems: A summary and response. Conservation Biology 15:1561-1567.
- MacMahon, J. A. 1988. Warm deserts. Pages 232-264 in: M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, editors. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Minnich, R. A. 1983. Fire mosaics in southern California and northern Baja California. Science 219:1287-1294.
- Minnich, R. A. 2001. An integrated model of two fire regimes. Conservation Biology 15(6):1549-1553.
- Moritz, M. A. 2003. Spatiotemporal analysis of controls on shrubland fire regimes: Age dependency and fire hazard. Ecology 84(2):351-361.
- Muldavin, E., P. Mehlhop, and E. DeBruin. 1994a. A survey of sensitive species and vegetation communities in the Organ Mountains of Fort Bliss. Volume III: Vegetation communities. Report prepared for Fort Bliss, Texas, by New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, Albuquerque.
- Muldavin, E., P. Neville, P. Arbetan, Y. Chauvin, A. Browder, and T. Neville. 2003a. A vegetation map of Carlsbad Caverns National Park, New Mexico. Final report submitted in partial fulfillment of Cooperative Agreement No. Ca-7170-99-004. New Mexico Natural Heritage Program at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. 102 pp.
- Muldavin, E., Y. Chauvin, and G. Harper. 2000b. The vegetation of White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Volume I. Handbook of vegetation communities. Final report to Environmental Directorate, White Sands Missile Range. New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. 195 pp. plus appendices
- Reid, M. S., K. A. Schulz, P. J. Comer, M. H. Schindel, D. R. Culver, D. A. Sarr, and M. C. Damm. 1999. An alliance level classification of vegetation of the coterminous western United States. Unpublished final report to the University of Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and National Gap Analysis Program, in fulfillment of Cooperative Agreement 1434-HQ-97-AG-01779. The Nature Conservancy, Western Conservation Science Department, Boulder, CO.
- Shiflet, T. N., editor. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Society for Range Management. Denver, CO. 152 pp.
- Smith M. A., H. A. Wright, and J. L. Schuster. 1975. Reproductive characteristics of redberry juniper. Journal of Range Management 26(2):126-128.
- Steuter, A. A., and C. M. Britton. 1983. Fire-induced mortality of redberry juniper [Juniperus pinchotii Sudw.]. Journal of Range Management 36:343-345.
- Stout, D., J. Buck-Diaz, S. Taylor, and J. M. Evens. 2013. Vegetation mapping and accuracy assessment report for Carrizo Plain National Monument. California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program, Sacramento, CA. 71 pp.
- Thomas, K. A., T. Keeler-Wolf, J. Franklin, and P. Stine. 2004. Mojave Desert Ecosystem Program: Central Mojave vegetation mapping database. U.S. Geological Survey, Western Regional Science Center. 251 pp.
- Tirmenstein, D. 1999d. Quercus turbinella. In: Fire Effects Information System [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). [http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/] (accessed 11 March 2010).