Print Report
G177 Quercus myrtifolia - Quercus geminata Xeric Scrub Group
Type Concept Sentence: This scrub without trees is dominated by sclerophyllous shrubs, such as Quercus myrtifolia and Quercus geminata, Chrysoma pauciflosculosa, or Ceratiola ericoides, which occurs on deep dry sands in southern Georgia and central Florida, especially on the Lake Wales Ridge.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Myrtle Oak - Sand Live Oak Xeric Scrub Group
Colloquial Name: Florida Xeric Scrub
Hierarchy Level: Group
Type Concept: This group consists of xeromorphic shrub-scrub vegetation without an emergent overstory of Pinus clausa. It is dominated by sclerophyllous shrubs, such as Quercus myrtifolia and Quercus geminata, Chrysoma pauciflosculosa, or Ceratiola ericoides. Herbaceous ground cover is always sparse, and bare soil patches are typically evident. It is found on a sequence of sand ridges and ancient dunefields which are oriented essentially north-south in the Florida Peninsula (especially the Lake Wales Ridge) and to a lesser extent in southern Georgia. This group has long been noted for its unique and interesting vegetation.
Diagnostic Characteristics: Scrub shrubland lacking canopy of Pinus clausa but typically dominated by sclerophyllous shrubs, such as Quercus myrtifolia and Quercus geminata or Ceratiola ericoides. This vegetation occurs on deep dry sands most commonly in central Florida. Some of the best occurrences are on the Lake Wales Ridge.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This group is floristically, biogeographically and ecologically similar to ~Sand Pine Scrub Forest & Open Woodland Group (G008)$$; however, that group is dominated by Pinus clausa, which is lacking in this group. They are correctly split into these two groups based on the physiognomy (G008 is forest and open woodland and G177 is shrubland). The shrub vegetation of the Ohoopee Dunes and similar sand ridges in southern Georgia is included here.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: This group has long been noted for its unique and interesting vegetation by authors such as Vignoles (1823), Harper (1914), Mulvania (1931), Kurz (1942), and Laessle (1958, 1968). More recent treatments by Myers (1990) and Menges (1999) have provided the most comprehensive summaries of scrub available. According to Harper (1927), "the vegetation is mostly dwarfed, gnarled and crooked, and presents a tangled, scraggly aspect." The appearance, floristics, and boundary of Florida scrub contrast dramatically with the "high pine" or sandhill vegetation which is often adjacent (Laessle 1968).
Floristics: The vegetation of this group is dominated by xeromorphic, evergreen shrub species. The shrub layer composition is relatively constant, as is the abundance of individual species. Quercus myrtifolia, Quercus inopina, Serenoa repens, Quercus geminata, Quercus chapmanii, Lyonia ferruginea, and Ceratiola ericoides are the most important species. Myers (1990) indicates that much of the variability in Florida scrub is due to variation in fire-return interval, ranging from once every 10 to 100 years. Ground cover is always sparse but typically includes Licania michauxii, Rhynchospora megalocarpa, Andropogon floridanus, and a variety of lichens (Cladonia species). There are a number of endemic plant species which may occur in inland Florida scrubs, including at least 13 Federally listed species; many of the rarest scrub species are found only in the Lake Wales region.
Dynamics: Florida scrub is naturally prone to fire and supports plants and animals that benefit from fire. In fact, scrub is maintained by high-intensity, infrequent fires. Litter-fall rates are high, while turnover rates are low, contributing to fuel buildup (Lugo and Zucca 1983, Schmalzer and Hinkle 1996). However, scrub typically lacks dense fine-textured grassy fuels necessary for fires to start; most scrub fires ignite in other adjacent habitats. If fire spreads into scrub, it is generally only under severe conditions of high wind, low humidity, and low fuel moisture. When fires occur in scrub, the shrub layer is typically killed back to ground layer but rapidly resprouts and eventually returns to prefire levels of cover (Abrahamson 1984, Schmalzer and Hinkle 1992b). Other species such as Ceratiola ericoides may regenerate from seeds stored in soil (Johnson 1982). Several narrowly endemic herb species exhibit peaks in survival, recruitment, and density after fire (Menges 1999). Many scrub fires burn heterogeneously with resulting patches of unburned fuels, especially in the most xeric types such as Ceratiola ericoides scrub (Menges 1994). Patches of Ceratiola ericoides may not survive if burned more than once in 20 years (Johnson 1982). In the sustained absence of fire, smaller shrubs and herbs may be lost as a consequence of increasing dominance of oak stems (Menges et al. 1993).
Environmental Description: This group is restricted to a sequence of north/south-trending sand ridges, ancient dunefields, and former shorelines in the Florida Peninsula and to a lesser extent, southern Georgia. The largest inland scrub is found in two primary areas, essentially isolated from one another. The so called "Big Scrub" of the Ocala National Forest is the largest expanse of this group, with a somewhat smaller, more southerly area associated with the Lake Wales Ridge. Climate: The climate is humid warm temperate. The area of central Florida has a very high number of lightning strikes. Soil/substrate/hydrology: According to Myers (1990), inland scrub occurs on Quartzipsamments which are excessively well-drained, nearly pure siliceous sands low in nutrients. Although all scrub soils are Entisols, there is considerable variation in soil color. This color variation appears to be related to the amount of leaching which has taken place, and appears to be related to the amount of time a site has been occupied by scrub vegetation. Excessive leaching, due to inferred long occupation by scrub vegetation, is believed to bleach upper soil horizons and develop pure white soils (such as the St. Lucie series), while moderate leaching, due to shorter occupation by scrub, contributes to less bleaching and consequently more yellow-colored soils (Paola and Orsino series).
Geographic Range: This group is nearly endemic to the Florida Peninsula. It is most common in two discrete islands or patches, the Big Scrub of Ocala and the Lake Wales Ridge. It also occurs in southern Georgia on sand ridges associated with coastal plain rivers.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: AL, FL, GA, MS, SC?
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.836018
Confidence Level: High
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.B Temperate & Boreal Grassland & Shrubland Subclass | S18 | 2.B |
Formation | 2.B.2 Temperate Grassland & Shrubland Formation | F012 | 2.B.2 |
Division | 2.B.2.Nh Southeastern North American Grassland & Shrubland Division | D102 | 2.B.2.Nh |
Macrogroup | 2.B.2.Nh.1 Saw Palmetto - Myrtle Oak / Beyrich''s Three-awn Scrub & Dry Prairie Macrogroup | M162 | 2.B.2.Nh.1 |
Group | 2.B.2.Nh.1.a Myrtle Oak - Sand Live Oak Xeric Scrub Group | G177 | 2.B.2.Nh.1.a |
Alliance | A0779 Sand Live Oak - Myrtle Oak - Chapman Oak Scrub Alliance | A0779 | 2.B.2.Nh.1.a |
Alliance | A0817 Sand-heath - Woody-goldenrod Scrub Alliance | A0817 | 2.B.2.Nh.1.a |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: No Data Available
- Abrahamson, W. G. 1984. Post-fire recovery of the Florida Lake Wales Ridge vegetation. American Journal of Botany 71:9-21.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
- Harper, R. M. 1914. Geography and vegetation of northern Florida. Florida Geological Survey 6:163-391.
- Harper, R. M. 1927. Natural resources of southern Florida. Pages 27-206 in: 18th Annual Report. Florida Geologic Survey, Tallahassee.
- Johnson, A. F. 1982. Some demographic characteristics of the Florida rosemary, Ceratiola ericoides Michx. The American Midland Naturalist 108:170-174.
- Kurz, H. 1942. Florida dunes and scrub, vegetation and geology. Florida Department of Conservation, Geologic Survey. Geologic Survey Bulletin No. 23. Tallahassee. 154 pp.
- Laessle, A. M. 1958. The origin and successional relationship of sandhill vegetation and sand pine scrub. Ecological Monographs 28:361-387.
- Laessle, A. M. 1968. Relationship of sand pine scrub to former shore lines. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Science 30:269-286.
- Lugo, A. E., and C. P. Zucca. 1983. Comparison of litter fall and turnover in two Florida ecosystems. Florida Scientist 46:101-110.
- Menges, E. S. 1994. Fog temporarily increases water potential in Florida scrub oaks. Florida Scientist 57:65-74.
- Menges, E. S. 1999. Ecology and conservation of Florida scrub. Pages 7-23 in: R. C. Anderson, J. S. Fralish, and J. M. Baskin, editors. 1999. Savanna, barren, and rock outcrops plant communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Menges, E. S., W. G. Abrahamson, K. T. Givens, N. P. Gallo, and J. N. Layne. 1993. Twenty years of vegetation change in five long-unburned Florida plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:375-386
- Monk, C. D. 1966. An ecological significance of evergreenness. Ecology 47:504-505.
- Mulvania, M. 1931. Ecological survey of a Florida scrub. Ecology 12:528-540.
- Myers, R. L. 1990a. Scrub and high pine. Pages 150-193 in: R. L. Myers and J. L. Ewel, editors. Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando.
- Schmalzer, P. A., and C. R. Hinkle. 1992b. Recovery of oak-saw palmetto scrub after fire. Castanea 57:158-173.
- Schmalzer, P. A., and C. R. Hinkle. 1996. Biomass and nutrients in aboveground vegetation and soils of Florida oak-saw palmetto scrub. Castanea 61:168-193.
- Vignoles, C. B. 1823. Observations upon the Floridas. E. Bliss & E. White, New York.