Print Report

G061 Schizachyrium scoparium - Sporobolus heterolepis - Juniperus communis Alvar Grassland & Shrubland Group

Type Concept Sentence: This alvar grassland and shrubland group is found in the temperate-boreal transition of the Great Lakes basin.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Little Bluestem - Prairie Dropseed - Common Juniper Alvar Grassland & Shrubland Group

Colloquial Name: Great Lakes Alvar

Hierarchy Level:  Group

Type Concept: This alvar grassland and shrubland group is found in the temperate-boreal transition of the Great Lakes basin. The group is characterized by distinctive scrub and herb flora, of eastern tallgrass prairie elements and eastern subboreal elements, with less than 10% tree cover. It is found primarily in an arc along the Niagara Escarpment from northern Lake Michigan across northern Lake Huron and eastern Ontario and northwestern New York State. The climate is humid and subhumid, and sites are centered on areas of glaciated horizontal limestone/dolomite (dolostone) bedrock pavement with a discontinuous thin soil mantle. This group can be divided into two main variants: (1) open grasslands and pavements, with shrubs <25% cover and (2) shrublands, where shrubs are >25%. These two variants are distinguished by the amount of exposed bedrock, the cover of herbaceous plants (mostly grasses and sedges), the cover of shrubs, and the cover of trees (<10% cover).

Alvar grasslands are typically dominated by Schizachyrium scoparium, Deschampsia cespitosa, Sporobolus heterolepis, Eleocharis compressa, Carex crawei, Juniperus horizontalis, Carex scirpoidea, and Packera paupercula. Other characteristic grasses and herbs include Sporobolus neglectus, Sporobolus vaginiflorus, Trichostema brachiatum, and Allium schoenoprasum. In parts, there is a mosaic of pavement and grassland areas dominated by characteristic native species, such as Sporobolus neglectus, Sporobolus vaginiflorus, Panicum philadelphicum, Poa compressa, Oligoneuron album, Danthonia spicata, Trichostema brachiatum, Packera paupercula, Carex crawei, and Panicum flexile. In more exposed areas, there is a mosaic of mossy patches and exposed bedrock that is covered with crustose and foliose lichens.

In shrubby areas, the dominant shrub is the short to tall shrub Juniperus communis, mixed with Juniperus horizontalis and/or Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda, or a mix of scrub forms of tree species such as Picea glauca, Thuja occidentalis, Larix laricina, Abies balsamea. Mixed among the shrubs are Danthonia spicata, Oligoneuron album, Packera paupercula, Clinopodium arkansanum, and Tetraneuris herbacea. Characteristic tall shrubs (2 to 5 m tall) include scrub forms of trees such as Juniperus virginiana, Thuja occidentalis, and Quercus macrocarpa. Alvars are maintained by associated geologic, hydrologic, and other landscape processes. In particular, most types of alvar tend to flood each spring, then experience moderate to severe drought in summer months. They include open pavement, grassland, and shrubland/woodland types. Alvar communities occur in an ecological matrix with similar bedrock and hydrologically influenced communities. Four key ecological processes influence Great Lakes alvar communities: (1) hydrology and soil moisture regime, (2) fire regime and land-use history, (3) herbivory: browsing by deer and grazing by cattle, and (4) the invasion of exotic plant species.

Diagnostic Characteristics: This type is characterized by a variable physiognomy, from open perennial (rarely annual) grassland or shrubland and nonvascular pavement (5-25% herb and/or shrub cover) to dense grassland or shrubland (>25%) with scattered evergreen needleleaf (more rarely broadleaf deciduous) trees <10% (variable) Species composition contains a mix of prairie grasses and sub-boreal to boreal shrubs and trees. Sites are on thin-soil, limestone pavement, with a xero-hydric moisture regime. Key dominants and differentials include the perennials Schizachyrium scoparium, Sporobolus heterolepis, and Deschampsia cespitosa; less commonly with Sporobolus neglectus, Sporobolus vaginiflorus, and Panicum philadelphicum. Key shrubs, when present, are Juniperus communis and Juniperus horizontalis. Trees, when present, include Picea glauca, Thuja occidentalis, Larix laricina, and Abies balsamea (in more northern sites) and Quercus macrocarpa or Quercus muehlenbergii (more southern sites).

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Excluded from the concept are limestone bedrock lakeshore and rivershore pavement grasslands, and various limestone woodlands. These lack the typical diagnostic species of alvar (Reschke et al. 1999). Limestone savannas and woodlands, with >10% tree cover, are treated with ~Laurentian-Acadian Limestone Woodland Group (G655)$$. Also excluded is the Midwest wet-mesic dolomite prairie in the upper Midwest. That grassland community occurs on shallow, temporarily flooded or frequently saturated soils overlying dolomite bedrock in northeastern Illinois. It has a dense cover of herbaceous vegetation, while woody species are virtually absent. The most abundant species include Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex sartwellii, Carex scoparia, Carex sterilis, Arnoglossum plantagineum, Deschampsia cespitosa, Clinopodium arkansanum, Schizachyrium scoparium, Oligoneuron ohioense, and Spartina pectinata. Although that grassland has a soil moisture regime very similar to alvar grasslands, the soils are generally deeper, and that community seems to be dependent upon frequent fires. The combination of the fire regime, the relative abundance of many characteristic prairie species not found in alvar, and the lack of subboreal elements, are the main reasons that community is considered a prairie instead of an alvar (Reschke et al. 1999).

Juniper shrublands lack many of the diagnostic species common in grassland alvars, and further review is needed to resolve their placement.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Open alvar grassland and pavement communities have very few trees (less than 10% cover of trees over 5 m tall), a low cover of shrubs (less than 25% cover), and a high abundance of either herbaceous plants or exposed bedrock, which may be covered with crustose lichens and mosses. Alvar shrubland communities have very few trees (less than 10% covers of trees over 5 m tall), moderate to high cover of especially needleleaf evergreen shrubs (at least 25% cover of shrubs), and variable amounts of cover of herbaceous and nonvascular plants.

Floristics: The following is a summary of information from Reschke et al. (1999). Alvar grasslands are typically dominated by Schizachyrium scoparium, Deschampsia cespitosa, Sporobolus heterolepis, Eleocharis compressa, Carex crawei, Juniperus horizontalis, Carex scirpoidea, and Packera paupercula (= Senecio pauperculus). Other characteristic grasses and herbs include Sporobolus neglectus, Sporobolus vaginiflorus, Trichostema brachiatum, and Allium schoenoprasum. Less common is a dry grassland phase dominated by Danthonia spicata, Poa compressa, and sometimes Schizachyrium scoparium. It may represent a disturbed phase. Typically there are several turf and weft mosses forming a patchy mat at the base of grasses and forbs; typical mosses are Bryum pseudotriquetrum, Abietinella abietina, Tortella tortuosa, and Drepanocladus spp.

In parts, there is a mosaic of pavement and grassland areas dominated by characteristic native species, such as Sporobolus neglectus, Sporobolus vaginiflorus, Panicum philadelphicum, Poa compressa, Oligoneuron album (= Solidago ptarmicoides), Danthonia spicata, Trichostema brachiatum (= Isanthus brachiatus), Packera paupercula (= Senecio pauperculus), Carex crawei, and Panicum flexile. In more exposed areas, there is a mosaic of mossy patches and exposed bedrock that is covered with crustose and foliose lichens. In the mossy patches, characteristic mosses are Tortella tortuosa, other Tortella spp., and Tortula ruralis, and a characteristic lichen is Cladonia pocillum. On exposed pavement patches, characteristic lichens are Placynthium nigrum and Dermatocarpon cf. miniatum.

In shrubby areas, a dominant shrub is often Juniperus communis, mixed with either Juniperus horizontalis and/or Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda (= Pentaphylloides floribunda), or a mix of scrub forms of tree species such as Picea glauca, Thuja occidentalis, Larix laricina, and Abies balsamea. Other typical short shrubs (0.5 to 2 m tall) are Prunus virginiana, Diervilla lonicera, Shepherdia canadensis, Cornus sericea, Rhamnus alnifolia, Cornus racemosa (= Cornus foemina ssp. racemosa), Rhus aromatica, and Viburnum rafinesqueanum. Mixed among the shrubs are Danthonia spicata, Oligoneuron album, Packera paupercula, Clinopodium arkansanum (= Calamintha arkansana), and Tetraneuris herbacea (= Hymenoxys herbacea). There can be a "lawn" dominated by Iris lacustris and Carex eburnea. Characteristic tall shrubs (2 to 5 m tall) include scrub forms of trees such as Juniperus virginiana, Thuja occidentalis, and Quercus macrocarpa. Other less common trees (over 5 m tall) that may be present include Carya ovata, Ulmus thomasii, and Fraxinus americana. It is possible that shrub cover may increase with disturbances such as grazing or lack of fire. Once established, the shrub cover may be thick enough to prevent trees from establishing.

Exotics: Reschke et al. (1999) listed 14 species that occurred in at least 9% of observation points across the range of alvars. These are, in decreasing order of frequency, Poa compressa, Hypericum perforatum, Potentilla recta, Verbascum thapsus, Phleum pratense, Leucanthemum vulgare, Hieracium piloselloides, Rumex crispus, Hieracium spp., Daucus carota, Echium vulgare, Melilotus officinalis, Poa pratensis, and Rhamnus cathartica. Aggressive species which are problematic include Rhamnus cathartica, Hypericum perforatum, Potentilla recta, Cynanchum rossicum. Poa compressa, which is considered by most experts to be an introduced species, is also well-established on many alvar sites.

Dynamics:  Fire: Natural fires appear always to have been at least an incidental part of their history, and probably instrumental in maintaining some alvar types, such as juniper alvar shrubland. This suggests that aggressive fire suppression is not needed on alvar habitats. Based on evidence from alvars that are open with old trees and have no burn evidence, it is clear that not all alvars require fire to remain in an open state. If fire is at all required in some of these alvars, it could only be on the basis of a return cycle of many hundreds of years. Therefore, the use of fire as a management tool is not advised for all alvar community types. (Reschke et al. 1999).

Grazing: White-tail deer are a native species in the Great Lakes basin, but artificially high population levels across much of the basin, created and sustained by habitat modifications and management policies, are seriously impacting plant populations in many natural habitats (Rooney et al. 2004). Alvars in the Great Lakes basin and elsewhere have long been influenced by grazing livestock. Grazing has been little studied in North America, but has been documented on alvars of the Swedish island of Oland, where grazing by domestic animals has occurred since the first centuries A.D. (Titlyanova et al. 1988). There, grazing has been considered essential to prevent encroachment in closed grasslands occurring on siliceous soils, where soil depth would potentially support woody vegetation (Bengtsson et al. 1988, Rosen 1992). Closed turf of ungrazed sites hindered germination of perennial herbs, and the short turf and gaps in grazed communities increased the abundance and persistence of some monocarpic plant species (Rusch 1988). However, the intensity of grazing appears to be critical. A comparison of ungrazed, moderately grazed, and heavily grazed sites showed decreased biomass and floristic changes in the heavily grazed sites, with perennial and annual ruderal species replacing the dominant alvar species. Alvar lichens had the highest biomass values in the moderately grazed sites (Titlyanova et al. 1988).

Brownell (1998) has noted that where grazing is intense on Great Lakes alvar grasslands, the grasses may be reduced and that species avoided by cattle such as Eleocharis compressa may increase in abundance. Rosette-forming species such as Symphyotrichum ciliolatum and Solidago species also may increase. Ranunculus fascicularis is much more frequent on some alvars subject to grazing than on adjacent non-grazed sites. Nevertheless, even light grazing tends to result in elimination of certain species, such as the disjunct Orobanche fasciculata (Catling and Brownell 1995). These factors led the Alvar Working Group to hypothesize that cattle grazing is generally detrimental to alvar communities, but some light grazing may help to keep alvar areas open (Reschke et al. 1999).

Exotics: Several exotic species are invasive and problematic in alvar communities, including Hypericum perforatum in Michigan, Poa compressa in Ontario and New York, and Cynanchum rossicum, Rhamnus cathartica, Lonicera tatarica, and Lonicera morrowii in New York. Poa compressa, which is considered by most experts to be an introduced species, is also well-established on many alvar sites. These exotic species compete with native species for space and nutrients and, in some cases, become dominant, significantly reducing the ecological value of alvar communities (Reschke et al. 1999).

Environmental Description:  Climate: Alvars are found in humid and subhumid climates. Soil/substrate/hydrology: Alvars are natural systems of humid and subhumid climates, centered on areas of glaciated horizontal limestone/dolomite (dolostone) bedrock pavement with a discontinuous thin soil mantle. Most hydrologic studies of alvars in the Great Lakes region have concentrated on Chaumont Barrens in New York State (Feeney 1996, 1997, Reschke et al. 1999). Reschke (1995) found strong correlations between soil moisture conditions and vegetation types, with "alvar grasslands" (equivalent to tufted hairgrass wet alvar grassland) located in the wettest, seasonally flooded areas, and "calcareous pavement barrens" (equivalent to juniper alvar shrubland) in the drier, never-flooded areas. At the Limerick Cedars alvar, also in New York State, Gilman (1995) observed that alvar community structure was influenced by rapidly changing environmental conditions and differential tolerances of plants, especially to periodic drought.

Each alvar community type undoubtedly has its own special rhythm of seasonal wetness and dryness, and studies to date have only begun to document these patterns. Based on the Chaumont Barrens work, the hydrology of alvar grasslands has a considerable seasonal variation ranging from near-flooded conditions to near desiccation. Flooded conditions occur during March, April, May, and into June, and again in late September through November until snows accumulate. These alvar grasslands achieve a near-wetland condition based upon the characteristics of the principal grassland soils, vegetation, and the spring and fall hydrologic conditions. Wet spring and fall conditions are usually interrupted by a very dry period in July and August in which all ponding ends and vegetation can be stressed to near, or beyond, the wilting point. Soils are very shallow (average is about 6 cm), and hold limited supplies of water; this limited soil moisture reservoir appears to be quickly depleted in dry periods. Surface temperatures on exposed rock within alvars can reach very high levels, from 43° to 53° C during summer periods (Gilman 1995, Schaefer and Larson 1997). Because of these factors, soils approach total desiccation in August and September, even during cool wet years (Reschke et al. 1999). The rate of drying varies among different alvar community types. Shrubland alvars (in this case juniper alvar shrubland) consistently appear to dry more rapidly than grasslands (including tufted hairgrass wet alvar grassland and little bluestem alvar grassland) or adjacent woods.

The extreme range in hydrologic conditions appears to be a principal factor in limiting the invasion of woody species and maintaining grassland and other open alvar communities (Stephenson and Herendeen 1986, Reschke 1995). A hard summer drought on the Maxton Plains alvars on Drummond Island resulted in a die-back of woody plants that did not have their roots in moist bedrock cracks, along with an increased diversity of annual alvar plants the following year (Stephenson and Herendeen 1986).

Geographic Range: Almost all of North America''s alvars occur within the Great Lakes basin, primarily in an arc along the Niagaran Escarpment from northern Lake Michigan across northern Lake Huron and eastern Ontario and northwestern New York State.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MI, NY, OH, ON, WI




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: > Alvar grassland (Edinger et al. 2002)
> Alvar pavement grassland (Edinger et al. 2002)
> Alvar shrubland (Edinger et al. 2002)
> Calcareous pavement woodland (Edinger et al. 2002)

Concept Author(s): P.M. Catling and V.R. Brownell (1995)

Author of Description: C. Reschke and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-07-13

  • Albert, D. 1990. Drummond Island Alvar. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI.
  • Bengtsson, K., H. C. Prentice, E. Rosen, R. Moberg, and E. Sjogren 1988. The dry alvar grasslands of Oland: Ecological amplitudes of plant species in relation to vegetation composition. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 76:21-46.
  • Brownell, V. R. 1998. Significant alvar natural heritage areas in the Ontario Great Lakes region: A preliminary discussion paper. Prepared for Federation of Ontario Naturalists, Toronto. 54 pp.
  • Catling, P. M., and V. R. Brownell. 1995. A review of the alvars of the Great Lakes Region: Distribution, floristic composition, biogeography, and protection. The Canadian Field Naturalist 109:143-171.
  • Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, K. Snow, J. Teague, and R. White. 2003-present. Ecological systems of the United States: A working classification of U.S. terrestrial systems. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2002. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. (Draft for review). New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Feeney, T. P. 1996. The source of seasonal flood waters in alvar grasslands: Chaumont Barrens, New York State. Unpublished report to The Nature Conservancy.
  • Feeney, T. P. 1997. The geomorphic evolution of limestone pavements and alvar grasslands in northwestern New York State, USA. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens. 311 pp.
  • Gilman, B. A. 1995. Vegetation of Limerick Cedars: Pattern and process in alvar communities. Unpublished dissertation, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY. 322 pp.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Reschke, C. 1995. Biological and hydrological monitoring at the Chaumont Barrens Preserve. A report prepared for the Nature Conservancy''s Rodney Johnson Grants Program. Grant #R93NY01. New York Natural Heritage Program, Latham, NY.
  • Reschke, C., R. Reid, J. Jones, T. Feeney, and H. Potter, on behalf of the Alvar Working Group. 1998. Conserving Great Lakes Alvars. Final Technical Report of the International Alvar Conservation Initiative. The Nature Conservancy, Great Lakes Program, Chicago, IL. 119 pp. plus 4 appendices.
  • Rooney, T. P., S. M. Weigmann, D. A. Rogers, and E. M. Waller. 2004. Biotic impoverishment and homogenization in unfragmented forest understory communities. Conservation Biology 18:787-798.
  • Rosen, E. 1992. Vegetation development and sheep grazing in limestone grasslands of south Oland, Sweden. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 72:1-104.
  • Rusch, G. 1988. Reproductive regeneration in grazed and ungrazed limestone grassland communities on Oland: Preliminary results. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 76:113-124.
  • Schaefer, C. A., and D. W. Larson. 1997. Vegetation, environmental characteristics and ideas on the maintenance of alvars on the Bruce Peninsula, Canada. Journal of Vegetation Science 8:797-810.
  • Stephenson, S. N., and P. S. Herendeen. 1986. Short-term drought effects on the alvar communities of Drummond Island, Michigan. Michigan Botanist 25:16-27.
  • Titlyanova, A., G. Rusch, and E. van der Maarel. 1988. Biomass structure of limestone grasslands on Oland in relation to grazing intensity. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 76:125-134.