Print Report

CEGL005105 Dasiphora fruticosa / Cladium mariscoides - Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis - (Rhynchospora capillacea) Wet Meadow

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Shrubby-cinquefoil / Smooth Sawgrass - Baltic Rush - (Rhynchospora capillacea) Wet Meadow

Colloquial Name: Interdunal Wetland

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This interdunal wetland herbaceous community is found in dune systems of the southern (and perhaps northern) Great Lakes in the United States and Canada. Stands occur on the sandy soils of wet depressions in wind-deposited dune systems. The substrate is 75-100% sand. Organics and silts occur in small amounts in depressions of exposed dunelands, and in larger amounts in sheltered, inland wet depressions. Herbaceous vascular plants have <30% cover, trees and shrubs together have <30% cover, and trees alone have <5% cover. Several variants occur, correlating with depth to the mean annual water table (centers of swales versus highest portions of swales) and distance inland from the lakeshore (exposed duneland versus sheltered inland/duneland). The physiognomy and floristics of the herb-dominated intermediate zone of the swale are emphasized in this description, and include Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex spp., Cladium mariscoides, Eleocharis quinqueflora, Equisetum variegatum, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis, Dichanthelium acuminatum var. fasciculatum, Rhynchospora capillacea, Schoenoplectus acutus, and Typha spp. Apart from the dominants, characteristic species include Carex viridula, Oligoneuron ohioense, Hypericum kalmianum, Panicum flexile, Scleria verticillata, Lysimachia quadriflora, Packera paupercula, and Eleocharis spp. (including Eleocharis quinqueflora). Compositional changes take place if surrounding open dunes are stabilized and succeed to a forested condition.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This type may fit better under a Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda saturated alliance (P. Comer pers. comm. 1997), where the shrub component may vary from low to as high as 50%. This range of this type is currently limited to the southern Great Lakes, but in Michigan this type could occur in northern Michigan, where it may be found as part of the ~Great Lakes Wooded Dune and Swale Complex (CECX005701)$$. A number of the dominant and indicator species (Cladium mariscoides, Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda, Oligoneuron ohioense) are common in both the southern and northern wetlands, but stands in the south are often found with oak savanna and tallgrass prairie species on adjacent ridges, and thus have some compositional differences reflected in the wetlands (P. Comer pers. comm. 2000). It is also possible that ~Calamagrostis canadensis - Carex viridula - Cladium mariscoides - Lobelia kalmii Fen (CEGL005115)$$ is the northern interdunal wetland equivalent.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Herbaceous vascular plants have <30% cover, trees and shrubs together have <30% cover, and trees alone have <5% cover. Several variants of this community occur, correlating with depth to the mean annual water table (centers of swales versus highest portions of swales) and distance inland from the lakeshore (exposed duneland versus sheltered inland/duneland). The species composition of the community resembles alkaline shrub/herb fens, especially in the zone of groundwater emergence. The physiognomy and floristics of the herb-dominated intermediate zone of the swale are emphasized in this description and include Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex spp., Cladium mariscoides, Eleocharis quinqueflora, Equisetum variegatum, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus), Dichanthelium acuminatum var. fasciculatum (= Panicum implicatum), Rhynchospora capillacea, Schoenoplectus acutus (= Scirpus acutus), and Typha spp. Apart from the dominants, characteristic species include Carex viridula, Oligoneuron ohioense (= Solidago ohioensis), Hypericum kalmianum, Panicum flexile, Scleria verticillata, Lysimachia quadriflora, Packera paupercula (= Senecio pauperculus), Eleocharis spp. (including Eleocharis quinqueflora (= Eleocharis pauciflora)). Rhynchospora capillacea is not in Ohio sites (White and Madany 1978, Homoya et al. 1985, Hiebert et al. 1986, Chapman et al. 1989).

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Interdunal wetlands are found on the sandy soils of wet depressions in wind-deposited dune systems of the Great Lakes. The depressions often form a sequence, with the youngest near the lake and older ones inland. Ontario occurrences of this same vegetative community have been recorded from moist, sandy substrates well inland. The substrate is 75-100% sand. Organics and silts occur in small amounts in depressions of exposed dunelands, and in larger amounts in sheltered, inland wet depressions. High concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and carbonate increase alkalinity and fertility. Phosphorus and important trace minerals, such as iron, manganese, zinc, copper, and cobalt, decrease when pH is above 7. Cation-exchange capacity is low. Occasionally, when located within active dune fields, these communities are buried by dune sand. Springs have been recorded to occur within interdunal wetland complexes, probably resulting from hydrological heads developed within adjacent dune ridges. These springs, when occurring on an occasional basis, set back succession within the wetland (Hiebert et al. 1986).

Geographic Range: This interdunal wetland herbaceous community is found in dune systems of the southern (and perhaps northern) Great Lakes in the United States and Canada, ranging from northern Illinois and Indiana, northward to Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ontario. Great Lakes shores include Lake Michigan, Lake Huron (not south of Saginaw Bay), Georgian Bay, and possibly Lake Erie.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  IL, IN, MI, ON, WI




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3?

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Cladium mariscoides - Juncus balticus - (Rhynchospora capillacea) Herbaceous Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Interdunal Wetland]

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: J. Drake and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-03-94

  • Bakowsky, W. D. 1990. Vegetation of Pinery Provincial Park. Prepared for Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Pinery Provincial Park.
  • Chapman, K. A., D. A. Albert, and G. A. Reese. 1989. Draft descriptions of Michigan''s natural community types. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI. 35 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Hiebert, R. D., D. A. Wilcox, and N. B. Pavlovic. 1986. Vegetation patterns in and among pannes (calcareous intradunal ponds) at the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana. The American Midland Naturalist 116(2):276-281.
  • Homoya, M. A., D. B. Abrell, J. R. Aldrich, and T. W. Post. 1985. The natural regions of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94:245-268.
  • Hop, K., S. Lubinski, J. Dieck, J. Drake, and S. Menard. 2009. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI, and NatureServe, St. Paul, MN. 312 pp.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • Reznicek, A. A., and P. M. Catling. 1989. The flora of Long Point, Regional Municipality of Haldimand-Norfold, Ontario. The Michigan Botanist 28(3):99-175.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.