Print Report
G904 Laurentian-Acadian Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp Group
Type Concept Sentence: This Laurentian-Northeastern group is found in basins or along rivers and streams in areas of low current where soils are saturated or flooded with shallow water for part to most of the growing season and the vegetation is dominated by short to medium-tall forbs and graminoids or, rarely, the shrub Spiraea alba. Sites are flooded or saturated for most of the growing season, and soils tend to be fine-textured with muck or sedge peat.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Laurentian-Acadian Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp
Colloquial Name: Laurentian-Acadian Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp
Hierarchy Level: Group
Type Concept: This group is found in the Laurentian region of the Great Lakes and the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada north from West Virginia. It is characterized by wet-mesic to wet sites and can be dominated by a variety of graminoids and forbs. Common abundant species include the graminoids Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex lacustris, Carex stricta, Carex vesicaria, Carex utriculata, Glyceria striata, Leersia oryzoides, and Scirpus cyperinus. Forbs that may be common or dominant include Boltonia asteroides var. asteroides, Eutrochium fistulosum, Eupatorium perfoliatum, Impatiens capensis, Impatiens pallida, Mentha arvensis, Sagittaria latifolia, Solidago canadensis, Solidago rugosa, Symphyotrichum racemosum, and Verbesina alternifolia. Sites are found in basins or along slow-moving rivers and streams and are flooded or saturated for at least some of the growing season but rarely more than 0.3 m deep.
Diagnostic Characteristics: This group is characterized by wet-mesic to wet sites dominated by graminoids and forbs. Sites are found in basins or along slow-moving rivers and streams and are flooded or saturated for at least some of the growing season but rarely more than 0.3 m deep. Sites are relatively rich and lack significant bog or fen indicator species.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This group can be very similar to ~Midwest Wet Prairie, Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp Group (G770)$$ in the central and western Great Lakes area. Each group can have stands dominated by Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex lacustris, and Carex stricta. Differential species are not well known but could include Carex atherodes and Carex sartwellii for G770 and Carex utriculata and Carex vesicaria for G904. Stands in the central and western Great Lakes area lacking good differential species and dominated by Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex lacustris, and Carex stricta may need to be placed in a group based on their geographic location. Stands in Province 212 go to G904 and stands in Province 222 go to G770 (Cleland et al. 2007).
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: This group usually has a moderate to dense cover of graminoids and forbs 0.5-1.5 m tall. Shrubs and trees are usually absent to uncommon (<25%) but stands in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia can have a dense layer of shrubs approximately 2 m tall.
Floristics: A variety of forbs and graminoids can dominate stands of this group. Graminoids may be more common across the group and some can be very abundant, forming low-diversity stands strongly dominated by a few species but stands with a wide variety of forbs and graminoids can also be found. Graminoids that can be common to dominant are Calamagrostis canadensis and Carex spp., usually Carex lacustris, Carex stricta, Carex vesicaria, and Carex utriculata, Glyceria striata, Leersia oryzoides, Scirpus atrovirens, and Scirpus cyperinus. Forbs that may be common or dominant include Boltonia asteroides var. asteroides, Eutrochium fistulosum (= Eupatorium fistulosum), Eupatorium perfoliatum, Impatiens capensis, Impatiens pallida, Mentha arvensis, Sagittaria latifolia, Solidago canadensis, Solidago rugosa, Symphyotrichum racemosum, and Verbesina alternifolia. A variety of other graminoids and forbs may be present, including Agrostis gigantea, Carex aquatilis, Dulichium arundinaceum, Glyceria grandis, Juncus effusus, Poa palustris, and Typha spp., and common forbs include Acorus calamus, Boehmeria cylindrica, Comarum palustre, Iris versicolor, Polygonum amphibium, Symphyotrichum lanceolatum, and Thelypteris palustris. Shrubs typically have <25% cover and include Alnus incana, Alnus serrulata, Cephalanthus occidentalis (in the east), and Vaccinium corymbosum. Some stands noted in West Virginia have a high cover of Spiraea alba. Trees are absent to uncommon and may include Acer rubrum, Fraxinus nigra, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Salix nigra, Thuja occidentalis, and others. The grass Phalaris arundinacea and the exotic shrubs Rhamnus cathartica and Rosa multiflora are sometimes invasive in this community and can become very abundant.
Dynamics: Stands are flooded or saturated for at least a few weeks each year and can remain saturated for most of the growing season in some stands. Prolonged changes in hydrologic regime, either wetter or drier, often result in a change to a different group. This group is common behind beaver dams.
Environmental Description: This group occurs in basins or along the edges of slow-moving rivers or streams. Sites are saturated or flooded by shallow water for at least a few weeks during the growing season. Water is usually less than 0.3 m deep. Soils are alluvial, muck, or sometimes peaty. This group occurs from low elevations near the coast in New England and New Jersey to the high Allegheny Mountains in West Virginia.
Geographic Range: This group is common in the Laurentian region of the Great Lakes and in the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada but does not extend into the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: CT, DC?, DE, IA, IL, IN, MA, MB, MD, ME, MI, MN, NB, ND, NH, NJ, NY, OH, ON, PA, QC, RI, SD, VA, VT, WI, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1093904
Confidence Level: Proposed (Submitted)
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.C Shrub & Herb Wetland Subclass | S44 | 2.C |
Formation | 2.C.4 Temperate to Polar Freshwater Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Formation | F013 | 2.C.4 |
Division | 2.C.4.Nd Eastern North American Temperate Freshwater Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Division | D323 | 2.C.4.Nd |
Macrogroup | 2.C.4.Nd.2 Broadleaf Cattail - White Snakeroot - Rush species Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Macrogroup | M069 | 2.C.4.Nd.2 |
Group | 2.C.4.Nd.2.g Laurentian-Acadian Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp | G904 | 2.C.4.Nd.2.g |
Alliance | A4107 <i>Carex spp. - Calamagrostis canadensis</i> Northern Wet Meadow Alliance | A4107 | 2.C.4.Nd.2.g |
Alliance | A4377 Gray Alder Shrub Swamp Alliance | A4377 | 2.C.4.Nd.2.g |
Alliance | A4403 Shrubby-cinquefoil / Smooth Sawgrass - Baltic Rush Wet Meadow Alliance | A4403 | 2.C.4.Nd.2.g |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: No Data Available
- Cleland, D. T., J. A. Freeouf, J. E. Keys, Jr., G. J. Nowacki, C. Carpenter, and W. H. McNab. 2007. Ecological subregions: Sections and subsections for the conterminous United States. A. M. Sloan, cartographer. General Technical Report WO-76. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. [1:3,500,000] [CD-ROM].
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
- Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]