Print Report

CEGL003881 Morella pensylvanica / Diodia teres Shrubland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Northern Bayberry / Rough Buttonweed Shrubland

Colloquial Name: Chesapeake Bay Maritime Shrubland

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This community is a maritime shrubland dominated by Morella pensylvanica, occurring with Baccharis halimifolia, Rhus copallinum, and stunted individuals of Pinus taeda, Prunus serotina, Quercus virginiana, and Diospyros virginiana. Dense shade beneath shrubs and the frequent movement of sand in this community limit the herbaceous cover. Typical herbaceous species include Ammophila breviligulata, Panicum amarum var. amarulum, Cyperus grayi, Lechea maritima, Dichanthelium acuminatum, Spartina patens, Triplasis purpurea, Cenchrus tribuloides, Chamaesyce polygonifolia, Diodia teres, Hudsonia tomentosa, Oenothera humifusa, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Rumex acetosella, Solidago sempervirens, and Toxicodendron radicans. This maritime shrubland usually occupies the intermediate areas between the very unstable oceanward portions of the dunes and the more protected backdunes, where it forms partially open to dense shrub thickets. The substrate is sand with no soil profile development, and with variable amounts of accumulated leaf litter. Where this community occupies the lee side of foredunes, greater exposure to winds and storms contributes to a shorter stature and more open aspect of the vegetation. Here there are large patches of open unvegetated or sparsely vegetated sand. This community occurs from Delaware south to northern North Carolina.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This community is a maritime shrubland dominated by Morella pensylvanica. It supports species characteristic of ~Morella pensylvanica Dune Shrubland Alliance (A0902)$$, including Solidago sempervirens, Oenothera humifusa, Cyperus grayi, Ammophila breviligulata, Chamaesyce polygonifolia, Rhus copallinum, and from Maryland and north, Prunus maritima. This association is further characterized by species that differentiate it from other communities in the alliance, most notably Morella cerifera, Panicum amarum, Spartina patens, Baccharis halimifolia, and stunted individuals of Pinus taeda. ~Morella pensylvanica - Prunus maritima Shrubland (CEGL006295)$$ is the northern analog of this association.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This community is a maritime shrubland dominated by Morella pensylvanica (= Myrica pensylvanica), occurring with Baccharis halimifolia, Rhus copallinum, and stunted individuals of Pinus taeda. Prunus maritima is more characteristic of this community from Delaware northward. The constant movement of sand in this community limits the herbaceous cover. Typical herbaceous species include Ammophila breviligulata, Panicum amarum var. amarulum, Cyperus grayi, Dichanthelium acuminatum, Spartina patens, Triplasis purpurea, Cenchrus tribuloides, Chamaesyce polygonifolia, Diodia teres, Hudsonia tomentosa, Lechea maritima, Oenothera humifusa, Cakile edentula, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Rumex acetosella, Solidago sempervirens, and Toxicodendron radicans.

Dynamics:  This association can grade into Ammophila dunes or maritime forest.

Environmental Description:  This maritime shrubland community usually occupies the area intermediate between the very unstable oceanward portions of the dunes and the more protected backdunes, where it forms partially open to dense shrub thickets. The substrate is sand with no soil profile development, and with variable amounts of accumulated leaf litter. Where this community occupies the lee side of foredunes, greater exposure to winds and storms contributes to a shorter stature and more open aspect of the vegetation. Here, there are large patches of open unvegetated or sparsely vegetated sand.

Geographic Range: This association is restricted to backdunes of shorelines from Delaware to Nag''s Head, North Carolina.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  DE, MD, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Morella pensylvanica / Diodia teres Shrubland (TNC 1997a)
= Myrica pensylvanica - (Prunus maritima) Shrubland (Clancy 1996)
= Prunus maritima, Myrica pensylvanica coastal dune scrub association (Clancy 1993a) [Delaware.]
= Dunegrass-shrub transition zone (Higgins et al. 1971) [Assateague Island.]
< Shrub succession community (Hill 1986) [Assateague Island.]
< Upland (dune) thicket (Klotz 1986) [Virginia.]

Concept Author(s): L.A. Sneddon

Author of Description: L.A. Sneddon

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-01-05

  • Berdine, M. A. 1998. Maryland vegetation classification. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD.
  • Brock, J. C., C. W. Wright, M. Patterson, A. Naeghandi, and L. J. Travers. 2007. EAARL bare earth topography - Assateague Island National Seashore. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2007-1176. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1176/start.html]
  • Clancy, K. 1993a. Selected rare and historical vascular plants of Delaware. Bartonia 57:75-92.
  • Clancy, K. 1996. Natural communities of Delaware. Unpublished review draft. Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Division of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Smyrna, DE. 52 pp.
  • Coxe, R. 2009. Guide to Delaware vegetation communities. Spring 2009 edition. State of Delaware, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Smyrna.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Fleming, G. P. 2001a. Community types of Coastal Plain calcareous ravines in Virginia. Preliminary analysis and classification. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 4 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Higgins, E. A. T., R. D. Rappleye, and R. G. Brown. 1971. The flora and ecology of Assateague Island. University of Maryland Experiment Station Bulletin A-172. 70 pp.
  • Hill, S. R. 1986. An annotated checklist of the vascular flora of Assateague Island (Maryland and Virginia). Castanea 5:265-305.
  • Klotz, L. H. 1986. The vascular flora of Wallops Island and Wallops Mainland, Virginia. Castanea 51:306-326.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Sneddon, L., J. Menke, A. Berdine, E. Largay, and S. Gawler. 2017. Vegetation classification and mapping of Assateague Island National Seashore. Natural Resource Report NPS/ASIS/NRR--2017/1422. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 512 pp.
  • Sneddon, L., M. Anderson, and K. Metzler. 1996. Community alliances and elements of the Eastern Region. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Heritage Task Force, Boston, MA. 235 pp.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1995c. NBS/NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Vegetation classification of Assateague Island National Seashore. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Regional Office, Boston, MA.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1997a. Vegetation classification of Assateague Island National Seashore and Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge. Report to the NBS/NPS Vegetation Mapping Program. The Nature Conservancy. Eastern Regional Office, Boston, MA.