Print Report

CEGL001558 Agrostis (gigantea, stolonifera) Ruderal Marsh

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: (Redtop, Creeping Bentgrass) Ruderal Marsh

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This semi-natural herbaceous association is typically found in more mesic areas such as riparian floodplains and seasonally flooded wetlands in the semi-arid western U.S. where Agrostis spp. have escaped from cultivation. Sites are typically flat to gently sloping or undulating. Elevations range from 854-2671 m (2800-8760 feet). Stands occur along low- to medium-gradient streams, often in broad, relatively flat, wet or irrigated meadows. Soil moisture ranges from dry to seasonally wet with stream and groundwater present. Substrates are variable. This type grows best on moist to temporarily wet soils, but it will tolerate poorly drained soils with high water tables and some flooding. Soil textures range from coarse alluvial sand and colluvium to fine clay, but it does best on clay loam and loam soils. The vegetation is characterized by a moderate to dense perennial graminoid layer dominated by introduced forage species Agrostis gigantea or Agrostis stolonifera. Other herbaceous species may occur as well, but they are generally less than 10% cover. Occasional shrubs or saplings may be present such as Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia, Populus angustifolia, Rosa woodsii, or species of Salix. Common native species include graminoids Carex spp., Deschampsia elongata, Eleocharis quinqueflora, Hordeum jubatum, Juncus spp., Muhlenbergia asperifolia, and forbs Achillea millefolium, Argentina anserina, Artemisia ludoviciana, Equisetum spp., Iris missouriensis, and Thermopsis montana. Other introduced species are common, such as Bromus inermis, Cirsium arvense, Dactylis glomerata, Schedonorus pratensis, Melilotus officinalis, Phalaris arundinacea, Phleum pratense, Plantago lanceolata, Poa pratensis, Rumex crispus, Taraxacum officinale, Trifolium spp., and others.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: The concept of this association was broadened to include dominance by Agrostis gigantea, a species closely related to Agrostis stolonifera and also a commonly planted forage species.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This association is characterized by a moderate to dense perennial graminoid layer dominated by introduced forage species Agrostis gigantea or Agrostis stolonifera. Other herbaceous species may occur as well, but they are generally less than 10% cover. Occasional shrubs or saplings may be present such as Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia, Populus angustifolia, Rosa woodsii, or species of Salix. Common native species include graminoids Carex microptera, Carex nebrascensis, Carex pellita, Carex simulata, Carex utriculata, Deschampsia elongata, Eleocharis quinqueflora (= Eleocharis pauciflora), Hordeum jubatum, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus), Juncus longistylis, Muhlenbergia asperifolia, and forbs Achillea millefolium, Argentina anserina, Artemisia ludoviciana, Equisetum hyemale, Equisetum laevigatum, Iris missouriensis, and Thermopsis montana (Hansen et al. 1995, Manning and Padgett 1995, Hall and Hansen 1997, Carsey et al. 2003a). Other introduced species are common, such as Bromus inermis, Cirsium arvense, Dactylis glomerata, Schedonorus pratensis (= Festuca pratensis), Melilotus officinalis, Phalaris arundinacea, Phleum pratense, Plantago lanceolata, Poa pratensis, Rumex crispus, Taraxacum officinale, Trifolium pratense, Trifolium repens, and others.

Dynamics:  Agrostis gigantea and Agrostis stolonifera are pasture grasses of Eurasian origin that are widely cultivated as hay. This type produces moderate to high amounts of forage, which is moderately palatable to livestock and possibly elk. The dense network of roots and rhizomes makes this type highly effective for stabilizing streams (Kittel et al. 1999b). Where grazing is intense or persistent along streambanks, soils may be compacted or streambanks eroded (Hansen et al. 1995). It has moderate tolerance of drought and flooding, but low tolerance for salinity and shade (Kittel et al. 1999b).

Environmental Description:  This semi-natural herbaceous association is typically found in more mesic areas such as riparian floodplains and seasonally flooded wetlands in the semi-arid western U.S. where Agrostis spp. have escaped from cultivation. Sites are typically flat to gently sloping or undulating. Elevations range from 854-2671 m (2800-8760 feet). Stands occur along low- to medium-gradient streams, often in broad, relatively flat, wet or irrigated meadows (Carsey et al. 2003a). Soil moisture ranges from dry to seasonally wet with stream and groundwater present. Substrates are variable. It grows best on moist to temporarily wet soils, but it will tolerate poorly drained soils with high water tables and some flooding. Soil textures range from coarse alluvial sand and colluvium to fine clay, but it does best on clay loam and loam soils (Hansen et al. 1995, Manning and Padgett 1995).

Geographic Range: This semi-natural hay meadow type occurs widely across the western U.S. and is typically restricted to mesic areas such as riparian floodplains and seasonally flooded wetlands in semi-arid climates.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CO, ID, MT, NV




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Agrostis gigantea Herbaceous Vegetation (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Agrostis gigantea Herbaceous Vegetation (Kittel et al. 1999b)
? Agrostis stolonifera (Sawyer et al. 2009) [45.106.02]
= Agrostis stolonifera Community Type (Manning and Padgett 1995)
= Agrostis stolonifera Community Type (Hall and Hansen 1997)
= Agrostis stolonifera Community Type (Hansen et al. 1995)

Concept Author(s): Western Ecology Group

Author of Description: K.A. Schulz

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-21-06

  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Coles, J., A. Tendick, J. Von Loh, G. Bradshaw, G. Manis, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2010. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2010/361. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Hall, J. B., and P. L. Hansen. 1997. A preliminary riparian habitat type classification system for the Bureau of Land Management districts in southern and eastern Idaho. Riparian and Wetland Research Program, School of Forestry, University of Montana. Idaho Bureau of Land Management, Technical Bulletin No. 97-11. 381 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublished draft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, A. McMullen, and J. Sanderson. 1999b. A classification of riparian and wetland plant associations of Colorado: A user''s guide to the classification project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO. 70 pp. plus appendices.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Manning, M. E., and W. G. Padgett. 1995. Riparian community type classification for Humboldt and Toiyabe national forests, Nevada and eastern California. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region. 306 pp.
  • Rice, P. M., E. W. Schweiger, W. Gustafson, C. Lea, D. Manier, D. Shorrock, B. Frakes, and L. O’Gan. 2012c. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site. Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMN/NRR--2012/589. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 176 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Tendick, A., J. Coles, P. Williams, G. Bradshaw, G. Manis, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2010. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Curecanti National Recreation Area. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2010/408. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 797 pp.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Wohl, E. E., and A. Hammack. 1995. Recent channel change along the Gunnison River at Curecanti National Recreation Area. Unpublished report. USDI National Park Service. NPBIB ID: CURE0236.