Print Report

M301 Western North American Ruderal Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Macrogroup

Type Concept Sentence: This macrogroup includes disturbed natural wetland habitats of temperate western North America that are now strongly dominated by non-native and sometimes weedy or generalist native species.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Western North American Ruderal Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Macrogroup

Colloquial Name: Western North American Ruderal Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland

Hierarchy Level:  Macrogroup

Type Concept: This macrogroup contains disturbed natural habitats such as wet meadows, emergent marshes, coastal backwater dunes, and sloughs as well as waste areas that were once wetlands and are now dominated by non-native species. Dominant non-native species include Agrostis gigantea, Agrostis stolonifera, Alopecurus pratensis, Arundo donax, Cirsium arvense, Conyza canadensis, Schedonorus arundinaceus, Lactuca serriola, Phalaris arundinacea, Phragmites australis, Poa palustris, Poa pratensis, and Sonchus spp. Native species may be present but are so low in abundance that they are insufficient to identify the native macrogroup or lower units. This macrogroup occurs from sea level up to the subalpine throughout the western U.S. Due to disturbance, soils may be compacted, missing upper horizons, or unnaturally enriched or depleted. Disturbance can be from activities such as severe continuous heavy grazing, abandoned building sites, industry, and road beds, areas that have been logged, or chained and cleared that occur where wetlands once stood.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Strongly dominated by non-native and weedy or generalist native species that are primarily facultative wetland taxa in wet graminoid, forb or shrub meadow or marsh settings. These include grasses and forbs such as Agrostis gigantea, Agrostis stolonifera, Alopecurus pratensis, Cirsium arvense, Conyza canadensis, Schedonorus arundinaceus, Iris pseudacorus, Lepidium latifolium, Lactuca serriola, Phalaris arundinacea, Phragmites australis (non-native strains), Poa palustris, Poa pratensis, Rubus armeniacus, Sonchus spp., and Typha angustifolia, among others.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This macrogroup does not include actively managed irrigated hay meadows that have been historically seeded, whether with native or exotics grasses. These belong under 7. ~Agricultural & Developed Vegetation Cultural Class (CCL01)$$. If management (frequent mowing, seeding, fertilizing) is stopped (was abandoned) and they take on a more spontaneous composition and structure, they may be placed here in M301. Some native plant communities in other macrogroups may be converted to this macrogroup (M301) through disturbances, such as altered soil moisture or soil profile disturbance, introduction of exotics sometimes as a feedback mechanism stemming from the introduced vegetation itself. As long as those communities contain sufficient diagnostic species of the macrogroup, they may be considered as altered phases of that macrogroup, but they are placed here (M301) when the non-native or weedy natives component is overwhelmingly dominant. The decision should be based on the combination of both biotic and abiotic (site) factors, not just site factors. For example, if a site has 99% cover of Phragmites and has such high site disturbance that it is hard to know whether it was once a native woody-dominated swamp or was always a native, herbaceous-dominated marsh, then it is clearly in this macrogroup. But if a site with 98% Phragmites and 2% cover of a native shrub that seems to indicate that the site is a native Salix swamp that was disturbed, and that disturbance has now ended (was abandoned), and can still be identified as a native plant association (albeit very poor condition), then that may belong to the native swamp macrogroup (adapted from D. Meidinger pers. comm. 2014).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Herbaceous stratum of perennial or annual graminoid and forbs, or shrubs.

Floristics: Vegetation of this macrogroup is dominated by non-native and weedy generalist species. Grasses and forbs include Agrostis gigantea, Agrostis stolonifera, Alopecurus pratensis, Arundo donax, Cirsium arvense, Conyza canadensis, Schedonorus arundinaceus, Lactuca serriola, Lythrum salicaria, Iris pseudacorus, Phalaris arundinacea, Phragmites australis, Poa palustris, Poa pratensis, Poa trivialis, Rubus armeniacus, Scirpus cyperinus, and Sonchus spp. Wet non-native shrub species need to be documented. Native diagnostic species may be present but are so low in abundance that the original native plant association is impossible to determine.

Dynamics:  This macrogroup includes areas that are a product of disturbance such as continuous severe heavy grazing by domestic livestock, soil disturbance/compactions from heavy equipment, or areas that have undergone a significant reduction in the amount or length of time water remains on site.

Environmental Description:  This macrogroup occupies wet (seasonal, temporary or permanently flooded) depressions, floodplains, or groundwater discharge sites. Soils may be mineral or organic. Sites can be seasonally wet, often drying by late summer, and many occur in a tension zone between perennial wetlands and uplands, where water tables fluctuate in response to long-term climatic cycles. They may have surface water for part of the year, but depths rarely exceed a few centimeters. Due to disturbance, soils may be compacted. Other sites are semipermanently to permanently flooded. Some sites once had active agricultural management regimes of seasonal sheet irrigation for grazing or haying purposes, but now lay abandoned and dominated by the original non-native hay grasses. Thus they are no longer agricultural pastures in a strict sense, nor do they bear any resemblance to the native historical meadow that occupied the site prior to the conversion to an irrigated hay meadow. These wetlands can also occur in areas that were historically uplands, but have become wetlands over time through the repeated application of irrigation water or from seepage off water conveyance and water storage infrastructures (ditches, stock ponds, reservoirs, etc.).

Geographic Range: This macrogroup is found throughout the entire western U.S., from Alaska to New Mexico and throughout western Canada.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, AZ, BC, CA, CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, SD, TX, UT, WA, WY




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNA

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: No Data Available

Concept Author(s): G. Kittel, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2014)

Author of Description: G. Kittel and J. Triepke

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-29-17

  • Buck-Diaz, J., S. Batiuk, and J. M. Evens. 2012. Vegetation alliances and associations of the Great Valley ecoregion, California. California Native Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/pdf/great_valley_eco-vegclass2012.pdf]
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Rocchio, P. Comer, G. Kudray, L. Vance, E. Byers, M. Schafale, C. Nordman, E. Muldavin, G. Kittel, L. Sneddon, M. Pyne, and S. Menard. 2008a. Overview of Natural Heritage methodology for ecological Element Occurrence ranking based on ecological integrity assessment methods. Draft for Network review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Meidinger, Del. Personal communication. Consultant, Meidinger Ecological Consultants, Ltd., Victoria, BC.
  • Rondeau, R. 2001. Ecological system viability specifications for Southern Rocky Mountain ecoregion. First edition. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 181 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Sueltenfuss, J. P., D. J. Cooper, R. L. Knight, and R. M. Waskom. 2013. The creation and maintenance of wetland ecosystems from irrigation canal and reservoir seepage in a semi-arid landscape. Wetlands 33:799-810.
  • Whitson, T. D., L. C. Burrill, S. A. Dewey, D. W. Cudney, B. E. Nelson, R. D. Lee, R. Parker. 2000. Weeds of the West. The Western Society of Weed Science in cooperation with the Western United States Land Grant Universities, Cooperative Extension Services. University of Wyoming, Laramie. 630 pp.