Print Report

CEGL003993 Pinus (virginiana, taeda) / Juniperus virginiana - Chionanthus virginicus - Ulmus alata Granitic Flatrock Border Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Pinus (virginiana, taeda) / Eastern Red-cedar - White Fringetree - Winged Elm Granitic Flatrock Border Woodland

Colloquial Name: Granitic Flatrock Pine Border Woodland

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This granitic flatrock border woodland occurs on shallow soils over exfoliated granitic bedrock, on the margins of Piedmont Fall-line granite outcrops (some of which are actually found east of the fall-line in the Coastal Plain). Stands are generally associated with open granitic flatrock communities. Stands of this association are somewhat open forests or woodlands. The closure of stands may be variable, and many would fall below the 60% forest/woodland threshold, but this association is placed in a "forest" alliance. The canopy is typically dominated by Pinus virginiana or Pinus taeda. Other canopy species, which also may form an open understory, include Juniperus virginiana, Ulmus alata, Carya glabra, Chionanthus virginicus, and Quercus stellata. Frequent shrubs include Vaccinium arboreum and Rhus copallinum. Other shrubs include Vaccinium stamineum and Rhus aromatica. Woody vines, especially Vitis rotundifolia, Toxicodendron radicans, Smilax bona-nox, and Smilax rotundifolia, are often abundant. Herb cover is generally low to moderate and usually includes only small amounts of the species of the open rock. Grasses, including Schizachyrium scoparium, Piptochaetium avenaceum, or Danthonia spicata, may be common. Xerophytic species such as Opuntia humifusa or Yucca filamentosa are often present, as are typical forest species such as Chimaphila maculata and Asplenium platyneuron. The understories of stands of this type may become invaded by the exotic species Ligustrum sinense, Lonicera japonica, Microstegium vimineum, or Stellaria media.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: A forest that borders granite outcroppings in Virginia includes a deciduous association also known as Piedmont Hardpan Forest (CEGL003714), which is somewhat floristically similar to the forest described here, but much more diverse.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Stands of this association are somewhat open forests or woodlands. The canopy is typically dominated by Pinus virginiana or Pinus taeda. Other canopy species, which also may form an open understory, include Juniperus virginiana, Quercus stellata, Ulmus alata, Carya glabra, Carya tomentosa, Quercus marilandica, Quercus alba, and Chionanthus virginicus. Frequent shrubs include Vaccinium arboreum and Rhus copallinum. Other shrubs include Vaccinium stamineum and Rhus aromatica. Woody vines, especially Vitis rotundifolia, Toxicodendron radicans, Smilax bona-nox, and Smilax rotundifolia, are often abundant. Herb cover is generally low to moderate and usually includes only small amounts of the species of the open rock. Grasses, including Schizachyrium scoparium, Piptochaetium avenaceum, or Danthonia spicata, may be common. Xerophytic species such as Opuntia humifusa (= var. humifusa) or Yucca filamentosa are often present, as are typical forest species such as Chimaphila maculata and Asplenium platyneuron. The understories of stands of this type may become invaded by the exotic species Ligustrum sinense, Lonicera japonica, Microstegium vimineum, or Stellaria media.

Dynamics:  The dynamics of these communities are not well known, but appear to be distinctive. Examples tend to have younger-looking trees and more ruderal species composition, compared to typical Piedmont dry forests. They are also more prone to invasion by exotic species. It is likely they are chronically disturbed naturally. The thin soil and underlying bedrock without crevices presumably make the canopy trees more susceptible to both windthrow and drought-caused mortality. On the edges of the open rock outcrops and in isolated patches within the rock, they probably expand and contract with variation in natural disturbances. In the surrounding areas, fire spreading from adjacent forests likely also once played a role. It is possible that these communities have expanded at the expense of open rock outcrop vegetation with the suppression of fire.

Environmental Description:  Examples of this association are found on the margins of granitic flatrock communities, along the fall-line of the Piedmont of the southeastern United States, from Alabama north to North Carolina.

Geographic Range: This association is restricted to the Piedmont of the southeastern United States, from Alabama north to North Carolina.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL?, GA, NC, SC




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3?

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: No Data Available

Concept Author(s): M.P. Schafale and M. Pyne

Author of Description: M.P. Schafale and M. Pyne

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-19-12

  • McManamay, R. H. 2015. Vegetation mapping at Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR--2015/1088. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 278 pp.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.