Print Report

CEGL000778 Pinus edulis - (Juniperus osteosperma) / Bouteloua gracilis Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Two-needle Pinyon - (Utah Juniper) / Blue Grama Woodland

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This woodland association is known from mountains and mesas in the southern Colorado Plateau, Mogollon Rim and extending north into southern Utah and probably western Colorado. Elevations normally range from 1700-2400 m (5575-7875 feet). Sites are variable but generally are relatively dry and rocky. Stands occur on flat to moderate slopes along drainages and on mesatops, on gentle to moderate (10-40%) rocky slopes of foothills, and at the base of cinder cones. The substrates are variable and range from deep, fine- or coarse-textured soils derived from cinder to finer-textured soils derived from sandstone, shale and limestone. The vegetation is characterized by an open to moderately dense tree canopy (10-65% cover) codominated by Pinus edulis and Juniperus osteosperma trees that are between 1 and 5 m tall. Pinus edulis may be present with relatively small cover in some stands. Juniperus deppeana may replace Juniperus osteosperma in southern stands. Other species of Juniperus, such as Juniperus scopulorum, may be present in higher elevation stands. Shrub cover is sparse (<10% cover). If Quercus gambelii is present, it has less than 5% cover. Other associated shrubs may be present in low cover, such as Cercocarpus montanus, Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus, Ephedra viridis, Ericameria nauseosa, Eriogonum microthecum, Rhus trilobata, or Yucca spp. The herbaceous layer is typically moderately dense and is dominated by the warm-season, perennial short grass Bouteloua gracilis. Associated graminoids include Aristida spp., Achnatherum hymenoides, Bouteloua curtipendula, Elymus elymoides, Koeleria macrantha, Hesperostipa comata, Hesperostipa neomexicana, and Pleuraphis jamesii. Muhlenbergia montana is absent or scarce (<1% cover). Forb cover is typically low but may be moderately diverse.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: The two Pinus edulis / Bouteloua gracilis plant associations are treated as phases in Stuever and Hayden (1997b). In the USNVC we are including stands with southern Great Plains, Chihuahua Desert floristic affinities in ~Pinus edulis - (Juniperus monosperma, Juniperus deppeana) / Bouteloua gracilis Open Woodland (CEGL002151)$$, and stands with the Colorado Plateau and Great Basin floristic affinities in ~Pinus edulis - (Juniperus osteosperma) / Bouteloua gracilis Woodland (CEGL000778)$$. Both of these associations may include stands codominated by Juniperus deppeana in their southern extent. Stuever and Hayden (1997b) also described a Juniperus deppeana phase (recognized by its dominance in the stand) and hillslope phase, which occurs on slopes >15% and may have low cover of grasses (<5% cover). More survey is needed to fully understand the distribution and ecological relationships between these 3 species of Juniperus and Pinus edulis.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This plant association is characterized by a sparse to moderately dense tree canopy (5-65% cover) codominated by Pinus edulis and Juniperus osteosperma trees that are between 1 and 5 m tall. Juniperus deppeana may replace Juniperus osteosperma in southern stands. Other species of Juniperus, such as Juniperus scopulorum, may be present in higher elevation stands. Shrub cover is sparse (<10% cover). If Quercus gambelii is present, it has less than 5% cover. Other associated shrubs may be present, such as scattered Artemisia tridentata, Brickellia californica, Cercocarpus montanus, Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus, Ephedra viridis, Ericameria nauseosa, Eriogonum corymbosum, Eriogonum microthecum, Fallugia paradoxa, Gutierrezia sarothrae, Opuntia spp., Purshia stansburiana, Rhus trilobata, Ribes cereum, or Yucca spp. The herbaceous layer is typically moderately dense and is dominated by the warm-season, perennial short grass Bouteloua gracilis. Associated graminoids include Aristida spp., Achnatherum hymenoides (= Oryzopsis hymenoides), Bouteloua curtipendula, Elymus elymoides, Koeleria macrantha, Hesperostipa comata (= Stipa comata), Hesperostipa neomexicana (= Stipa neomexicana), and Pleuraphis jamesii (= Hilaria jamesii). Muhlenbergia montana is absent or scarce (<1% cover). Forb cover is typically low but may be moderately diverse. Species such as Artemisia dracunculus, Eriogonum spp., Hymenoxys richardsonii, and Oxytropis lambertii are common.

Dynamics:  Pinus edulis is extremely drought-tolerant and slow-growing (Powell 1988, Little 1987, Muldavin et al. 1998a). It is also non-sprouting and may be killed by fire (Wright et al. 1979). The effect of a fire on a stand is largely dependent on the tree height and density, fine fuel load on the ground, weather conditions, and season (Wright et al. 1979, Dwyer and Pieper 1967). Trees are more vulnerable in open stands where fires frequently occur in the spring, when the relative humidity is low, wind speeds are over 10-20 mph, and there are adequate fine fuels to carry fire (Wright et al. 1979). Under other conditions, burns tend to be spotty with low tree mortality. Large trees are generally not killed unless fine fuels, such as tumbleweeds, have accumulated beneath the tree to provide ladder fuels for the fire to reach the crown (Jameson 1962). Closed-canopy stands rarely burn because they typically do not have enough understory or wind to carry a fire (Wright et al. 1979).

Altered fire regimes, cutting trees for fencing, and improper grazing by livestock have significant impacts on the quality of sites. Grazing by livestock can modify the fire regime by removing the fine fuels that carry fire. Fire, livestock grazing, and trampling by recreationalists and vehicles disturb cryptogamic soil crusts that help maintain soil structure, reduce soil erosion, provide habitat for plants and preserve biological diversity (Ladyman and Muldavin 1996). More study is needed to understand and manage these woodlands ecologically.

Environmental Description:  This woodland association is known from mountains and mesas in the southern Colorado Plateau, Mogollon Rim and extending north into southern Utah and probably western Colorado. Elevations normally range from 1700-2400 m (5575-7875 feet). Sites are variable but generally are relatively dry and rocky. Stands occur on flat to moderate slopes along drainages and on mesatops, on gentle to moderate (10-40%) rocky slopes of foothills, and at the base of cinder cones. The substrates are variable and range from to deep, coarse-textured soils derived from cinder, to sandy loams derived from sandstone or fine-textured soils derived from limestone or shale.

Geographic Range: This woodland association is known from mountains and mesas in the southern Colorado Plateau and Mogollon Rim of northern Arizona and extends into southern Utah and probably into western Colorado and possibly into western New Mexico.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CO, NM?, UT




Confidence Level: High

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Pinus edulis / Bouteloua gracilis (Stuever and Hayden 1997b)
? Pinus edulis/Bouteloua gracilis Plant Association (Larson and Moir 1987)

Concept Author(s): K.A. Schulz

Author of Description: K.A. Schulz and J. Coles

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 02-19-11

  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Clark, D., M. Dela Cruz, T. Clark, J. Coles, S. Topp, A. Evenden, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and J. Von Loh. 2009. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Capitol Reef National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2009/187. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 882 pp.
  • Dick-Peddie, W. A. 1993. New Mexico vegetation: Past, present, and future. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. 244 pp.
  • Dwyer, D. D., and R. D. Pieper. 1967. Fire effects on blue gramma-pinyon-juniper rangeland in New Mexico. Journal of Range Management 20:359-362.
  • Edwards, M. C., G. Miller, J. Redders, R. Stein, and K. Dunstan. 1987. Terrestrial ecosystem survey for the Carson National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. 552 pp.
  • Hansen, M., J. Coles, K. A. Thomas, D. Cogan, M. Reid, J. Von Loh, and K. Schulz. 2004a. USGS-NPS National Vegetation Mapping Program: Walnut Canyon National Monument, Arizona, vegetation classification and distribution. U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report. Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ. 219 pp.
  • Hansen, M., J. Coles, K. A. Thomas, D. Cogan, M. Reid, J. Von Loh, and K. Schulz. 2004c. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Sunset Crater National Monument, Arizona, vegetation classification and distribution. U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report. Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ. 188 pp.
  • Jameson, D. A. 1962. Effects of burning on a galleta-black grama range invaded by juniper. Ecology 43:760-763.
  • Kearsley, M. J. C., K. Green, M. Tukman, M. Reid, M. Hall, T. J. Ayers, and K. Christie. 2015. Grand Canyon National Park-Grand Canyon / Parashant National Monument vegetation classification and mapping project. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRCA/NRR--2015/913. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 75 pp. plus appendices.
  • Kennedy, K. L. 1983a. A habitat-type classification for the pinyon-juniper woodlands of the Lincoln National Forest. Unpublished thesis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces. 87 pp.
  • Ladyman, J. A. R., and E. Muldavin. 1996. Terrestrial cryptograms of pinyon-juniper woodlands in the southwestern United States: A review. General Technical Report RM-GTR-280. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 33 pp.
  • Larson, M., and W. H. Moir. 1987. Forest and woodland habitat types of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. Edition 2. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Little, E. L. 1987. Pinyon trees (Pinus edulis) remeasured after 47 years. Pages 65-68 in: Proceedings - pinyon-juniper conference. General Technical Report INT-215. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Moir, W. H., and J. O. Carleton. 1987. Classification of pinyon-juniper (P-J) sites on national forests in the Southwest. Pages 216-226 in: R. L. Everett, editor. Proceedings of the Pinyon-Juniper Conference, Reno, NV, 13-16 January 1986. General Technical Report. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 581 pp.
  • Muldavin, E., V. Archer, and P. Neville. 1998a. A vegetation map of the Borderlands Ecosystem Management Area. Final report submitted to USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Experiment Station, Flagstaff, AZ, by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. 58 pp.
  • Powell, D. C. 1988a. Aspen community types of the Pike and San Isabel national forests in south-central Colorado. Report R2-ECOL-88-01. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Denver, CO. 254 pp.
  • Reid, M. S., and M. E. Hall. 2010. Vegetation classification of Grand Canyon National Park. Draft report submitted to National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Romme, W. H., K. D. Heil, J. M. Porter, and R. Fleming. 1993. Plant communities of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. USDI National Park Service, Technical Report NPS/NAUCARE/NRTER-93/02. Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Northern Arizona University. 37 pp.
  • Stuever, M. C., and J. S. Hayden. 1997b. Plant associations of Arizona and New Mexico. Volume 2: Woodlands. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Habitat Typing Guides. 196 pp.
  • Tendick, A., J. Coles, K. Decker, M. Hall, J. Von Loh, T. Belote, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2012. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Canyonlands National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2012/577. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Thomas, K. A., M. L. McTeague, A. Cully, K. Schulz, and J. M. S. Hutchinson. 2009a. Vegetation classification and distribution mapping report: Petrified Forest National Park. National Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR--2009/273. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 294 pp.
  • Thomas, K. A., M. L. McTeague, L. Ogden, K. Schulz, T. Fancher, R. Waltermire, and A. Cully. 2010. Vegetation classification and distribution mapping report: Canyon de Chelly National Monument. National Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR-2010/306. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 338 pp.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1982. TES-9, Heber Ranger District. Unpublished report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Various pages, appendices and maps.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1986. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of southern New Mexico and central Arizona (north of the Mogollon Rim). USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 140 pp. plus insert.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1987a. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of northern New Mexico and northern Arizona. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, NM. Second edition, 170 pp. plus insert.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Wright, H. A., L. F. Neuenschwander, and C. M. Britton. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state of the art review. General Technical Report INT-58. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Wright, H. E., Jr., A. M. Bent, B. S. Hansen, and L. J. Mahar, Jr. 1973. Present and past vegetation of the Chuska Mountains, northwestern New Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin 84:1155-1179.