Print Report

A4389 Hesperostipa comata Northern Dry Grassland Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This widespread alliance is found in the northwestern Great Plains. Hesperostipa comata is a common dominant, with codominants of Bouteloua gracilis, Carex filifolia, and Carex inops ssp. Heliophile. Sites are on flat to rolling uplands or hillsides with medium-textures.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Needle-and-Thread Northern Dry Grassland Alliance

Colloquial Name: Needle-and-Thread Northern Dry Grassland

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This widespread alliance is found in the northwestern Great Plains. Mid and short grasses and sedges dominate this dry-mesic prairie. Hesperostipa comata is common throughout this alliance. Bouteloua gracilis, Carex filifolia, and Carex inops ssp. heliophila are also common. Festuca idahoensis is generally absent, but may be locally dominant in small parts of the range. Koeleria macrantha increases on degraded sites. Calamovilfa longifolia is more abundant on sandier soils while Pascopyrum smithii is usually present but not abundant. Forb cover is typically low. Sites are on flat to rolling uplands or hillsides. If soils are sufficiently coarse-textured, it can occur in valley bottoms. Soils are medium-textured or coarser and derived from sandstone or limestone

Diagnostic Characteristics: This is an abundant alliance in the northwestern Great Plains and it shares some species with several others. The predominance of Hesperostipa comata and short grasses and sedges on medium- or coarse-textured soils is characteristic.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Two of the associations in this alliance (CEGL001700 and CEG001701) are not described. Based on their range and nominals, they may be considered for merging with CEGL002037.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: This alliance is dominated by mid- and shortgrass species; woody species do not regularly achieve prominence. Total vegetation cover is typically moderate and leaf litter is present but not thick. Few of the species exceed 1 m, while many do not exceed 50 cm in height. Perennial and annual forbs are common but are not abundant in most stands.

Floristics: The most abundant species are Hesperostipa comata (= Stipa comata) and Bouteloua gracilis. On more mesic sites Hesperostipa comata is predominant, while on areas that are drier or subject to light grazing Bouteloua gracilis takes precedence. Other graminoid species that are commonly found in communities of this alliance are Aristida purpurea var. longiseta (= Aristida longiseta), Carex duriuscula (= Carex eleocharis), Carex filifolia, Carex inops ssp. heliophila, Koeleria macrantha, Pascopyrum smithii, and Poa secunda. Festuca idahoensis is generally absent, but may be locally dominant in small parts of the range. Sites in the southern half of the range of this alliance may have significant amounts of Bouteloua curtipendula. Forbs are common but not usually abundant (<10% cover). Forb species that are regularly found are Antennaria parvifolia, Artemisia frigida, Allium textile, Eriogonum umbellatum, Gaura coccinea, Heterotheca villosa, Liatris punctata, Sphaeralcea coccinea (= Malvastrum coccineum), Phlox hoodii, Packera fendleri (= Senecio fendleri), and Sphaeralcea coccinea. The clubmoss Selaginella densa is present in many stands in this alliance (Coupland 1950, Hansen et al. 1984, DeVelice et al. 1995). Scattered shrubs and dwarf-shrubs are sometimes present. These may include Artemisia frigida, Gutierrezia spp., Krascheninnikovia lanata, Prunus virginiana, Rhus trilobata, Rosa spp., and Symphoricarpos occidentalis. In the western and southwestern portions of its range, Cercocarpus montanus may be found where this alliance occurs on slopes (Hanson 1955).

Dynamics:  These mixed grasslands occur in the subhumid/semi-arid steppes in the western Great Plains where high variability of precipitation, both seasonally and yearly allows both short and mid grasses to co-exist (Coupland 1992a). Hesperostipa comata will decline with overgrazing, leaving the more grazing-tolerant Bouteloua gracilis to dominate (Smoliak 1965, Smoliak et al. 1972, Laurenroth et al. 1994a). Fire also can change the species composition of these grasslands. Burning generally kills or severely damages Hesperostipa comata plants. After fire, regeneration of this non-rhizomatous bunchgrass is through seed and may take many years to reach prefire densities (FEIS 1998). Burning Bouteloua gracilis during the growing season will top-kill the plant, but the rhizomes are usually unharmed and quickly regrow (FEIS 1998). Bouteloua gracilis is usually unharmed by fires in years with above normal winter and spring precipitation (soil moisture prevents lethal soil temperatures), but it can be severely damaged by fires that occur during drought years (FEIS 1998). Exotic species such as Taraxacum officinale, Medicago sativa, Melilotus officinalis, or Salsola kali are present in some stands

Environmental Description:  Grasslands included in this alliance are common in the west-central and northwestern Great Plains. Elevations range from 600-2350 m. Climate is temperate, continental and semi-arid to subhumid. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 25-50 cm. The year-to-year variation is great, in both total annual precipitation and the proportion of precipitation occurring in the winter and spring versus summer.Stands typically occur on upland sites in rolling plains, breaks, foothills, and plateaus. Sites are flat to moderately steep slopes on any aspect. Soils are shallow to moderately deep, non-saline, often calcareous and alkaline, with sandy loam, loam, or sometimes clay loam texture. Parent materials often include limestone, sandstone, or shale with glacial deposits in the northern Great Plains.Adjacent stands in the plains are often grasslands dominated by Pascopyrum smithii in mesic bottomlands and Bouteloua gracilis in the xeric plains and Festuca idahoensis in the mountains, shrublands dominated by Artemisia tridentata, Ribes spp., or Rhus trilobata, and woodlands dominated by Pinus edulis, Pinus flexilis, Pinus ponderosa, or Juniperus spp.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found in the northwestern Great Plains from western Kansas and eastern Colorado to southern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, CO, KS, MT, ND, NE, SD, WY




Confidence Level: Proposed (Submitted)

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Bouteloua-Stipa Faciation (Coupland 1950)
> Stipa comata/Carex filifolia (Hansen and Hoffman 1988) [Stipa comata/Carex filifolia and Stipa comata/Carex heliophila together equal this alliance.]
> Stipa comata/Carex heliophila (Hansen and Hoffman 1988) [Stipa comata/Carex filifolia and Stipa comata/Carex heliophila together equal this alliance.]
>< Stipa-Bouteloua Faciation (Coupland 1950)
>< Central and Eastern Grasslands: 64: Grama-Needlegrass-Wheatgrass (Bouteloua-Stipa-Agropyron) (Küchler 1964)
>< Central and Eastern Grasslands: 66: Wheatgrass-Needlegrass (Agropyron-Stipa) (Küchler 1964)
>< Mixed Prairie climax (Tolstead 1942)
? Western Needlegrass, Sedge, Blue Grama community (Tolstead 1941)

Concept Author(s): J. Drake, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: No Data Available

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: No Data Available

  • Coupland, R. T. 1950. Ecology of mixed prairie in Canada. Ecological Monographs 20(4):271-315.
  • Hansen, P. L., and G. R. Hoffman. 1988. The vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland districts of the Custer National Forest: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-157. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 68 pp.
  • Hoagland, B. and D. Faber-Langendoen. 2020. Revisions to Great Plains grassland, shrubland, and woodland vegetation types. Proceedings of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. USNVC-Proc-XX. February 2020. Ecological Society of America, Washington, DC., USA. xx pp.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • Tolstead, W. L. 1941. Plant communities and secondary succession in south-central South Dakota. Ecology 22(3):322-328.
  • Tolstead, W. L. 1942. Vegetation of the northern part of Cherry County, Nebraska. Ecological Monographs 12(3):257-292.