Print Report

A3891 Eleocharis palustris - Eleocharis macrostachya Marsh Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This herbaceous wetland alliance is dominated or codominated by Eleocharis palustris and/or Eleocharis macrostachya, and occurs in shallow, mostly still water throughout much of the western United States and into northern Mexico, from sea level to upper montane altitudes. Stands occur on a variety of landforms, including lake margins, stream terraces, floodplains, gravel bars, and around springs or wet basins (cienegas).


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Common Spikerush - Pale Spikerush Marsh Alliance

Colloquial Name: Common Spikerush - Pale Spikerush Marsh

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This herbaceous wetland alliance is characterized by an herbaceous layer that is dominated or codominated by Eleocharis palustris and/or Eleocharis macrostachya. Associates include Carex praegracilis, Deschampsia cespitosa, Distichlis spicata, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis, Muhlenbergia asperifolia, Panicum virgatum, Phalaris arundinacea, and Spartina pectinata. Forb cover is also variable and may include Berula erecta, Caltha leptosepala, Iris missouriensis, Lemna spp., Mentha arvensis, Pedicularis groenlandica, Potamogeton spp., Ranunculus cymbalaria, Rhodiola integrifolia, Nasturtium officinale, Rumex crispus, and Sparganium angustifolium. Stands occur in shallow, mostly still water throughout much of the western United States and into northern Mexico, from sea level to upper montane altitudes. Stands occur on a variety of landforms, including lake margins, stream terraces, floodplains, gravel bars, and around springs or wet basins (cienegas).

Diagnostic Characteristics: Diagnostic of this herbaceous wetland alliance is the dominance or codominance of Eleocharis palustris and/or Eleocharis macrostachya and the presence of surface water for extended periods during the growing season.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This alliance is primarily a freshwater alliance, although some stands may become brackish as ponds dry.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: This alliance is characterized by a rhizomatous perennial that dominates the graminoid stratum (up to 70% cover). The forb layer is sparse (0-20%) and contains both aquatic and terrestrial species.

Floristics: Associations within this alliance are dominated by Eleocharis palustris and/or Eleocharis macrostachya. Cover ranges from sparse to quite dense (10-80%). Distichlis spicata and Muhlenbergia asperifolia codominate the graminoid layer in cienegas (Arizona and New Mexico). Forb cover is composed of Berula erecta and Nasturtium officinale (= Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum), especially in stands with deep water (Cross 1991). At higher montane elevations, other graminoids present include Carex aquatilis, Carex buxbaumii, Carex utriculata, Deschampsia cespitosa, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus), and Eleocharis rostellata. Forb cover is typically low, but can be up to 25% in some stands. Common forb species include Caltha leptosepala, Pedicularis groenlandica, and Rhodiola integrifolia (Hansen et al. 1995, Kittel et al. 1999a). Crowe and Clausnitzer (1997) state that Eleocharis palustris is an aggressive species, typically excluding other species from establishing. In Oregon stands, associated forbs include Iris missouriensis, Mentha arvensis, Ranunculus cymbalaria, and Rumex crispus.

In California, forb cover can be quite high, and a mixture of forbs will infrequently dominate the community. However, it is the cover of Eleocharis, which typically exceeds 50%, that distinguishes this community from others with high forb cover. Forbs present include Berula erecta, Centaurea solstitialis, Euthamia occidentalis, Hydrocotyle umbellata, Melilotus indicus, Mentha arvensis, Mimulus guttatus, Perideridia parishii, Polygonum bistortoides, Pseudognaphalium canescens ssp. beneolens (= Gnaphalium canescens ssp. beneolens), Ranunculus californicus, Nasturtium officinale, Sonchus asper (= ssp. asper), Stachys pycnantha, Symphyotrichum spathulatum (= Aster occidentalis), Trifolium wormskioldii, and Urtica dioica ssp. holosericea. In vernal pools and other seasonally flooded wetlands, other forbs include Eryngium castrense and/or Eryngium vaseyi, Juncus sp., Plagiobothrys stipitatus var. micranthus, and Psilocarphus brevissimus var. brevissimus. Graminoids present include the characteristic Eleocharis macrostachya, with Aira caryophyllea, Bromus arenarius, Bromus hordeaceus, Carex barbarae, Carex nebrascensis, Carex spp., Eleocharis acicularis, Eleocharis rostellata, Juncus bufonius, Juncus effusus var. pacificus, Juncus nevadensis, Lemna minor, Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum (= Lolium multiflorum), Polypogon monspeliensis, Schoenoplectus americanus (= Scirpus americanus), and Vulpia myuros.

Dynamics:  At lower elevation, Eleocharis palustris plant associations occur well within the active channel and are inundated annually. These early-seral communities colonize backwater eddies and shallow edges of slow-moving reaches of small and larger rivers. The stands are probably ephemeral, as the eddies and river edges are scoured out each year during high spring flows (Kittel et al. 1999a). These communities have also been described as early-seral stages by Padgett et al. (1989), who describe light-colored soils for the sites, indicating an early phase of soil development. Kovalchik (1987) reports that the lower elevation plant associations within this alliance frequently form seral communities in ponded sites between stream rehabilitation structures such as loose rock check dams. In the montane zone, associations within this alliance occur in ponded sites on faster moving streams. If siltation occurs, sites may become dominated by Carex utriculata. At higher elevations, the associations appear to be stable. Stands occur near seeps on soils with deep organic layers, often sapric, and are saturated throughout the growing season.

Crowe and Clausnitzer (1997) state that Eleocharis palustris is of little to no forage value to livestock and wild ungulates. On seasonally drier sites, ungulate trampling may cause this species to increase (Snyder 1992 as cited in Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997). However, this species does provide seed forage and cover to ducks and geese (Kovalchik 1987).

Environmental Description:  Elevation ranges from sea level in California to 3050 m in Colorado. Stands occur on a variety of landforms, including lake margins, stream terraces, floodplains, gravel bars, and wet basins (cienegas) or meadows. Stands occur on sites that are flat, 1% slope with all aspects (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997). Most sites are permanently flooded or permanently saturated, but occasionally they can be seasonally saturated or seasonally flooded. Water is characteristically supplied from surface sheeting or subsurface flows originating upstream or upslope from the site. Soils vary from Histosols to Entisols. High-elevation stands consistently occur on organic (highly sapric) soils, or on a thick organic horizon that overlays fine to coarse alluvial material. Lower elevation stands occur on fresh alluvial deposits of fine-textured loamy sands, clays, and sandy clays (Kittel et al. 1999a). Soil reaction is often alkaline (Hansen et al. 1988). All sites are saturated throughout much of the growing season. Oregon stands are located on soils derived from volcanic (andesite, basalt) or sedimentary parent materials (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997).

At higher elevation, Carex aquatilis or Carex utriculata meadows and Salix wolfii or Salix planifolia shrublands occur within the riparian mosaic. At lower elevation, Schoenoplectus pungens often occurs within the stream channel while wet meadow prairies of Panicum virgatum and Sorghastrum nutans occupy the immediate streambanks and low floodplains.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found in eastern Oregon and Washington, northeastern California, in the Sierra Nevada, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico, and into northern Mexico.

Nations: MX,US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CA, CO, ID, MT, MXSON, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: A.1422, in part [with edits]

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? Carex spp. Series (Johnston 1987)
? Eleocharis macrostachya (Pale spike rush marshes) Alliance (Sawyer et al. 2009) [45.230.00]
? Eleocharis macrostachya Herbaceous Alliance (CNPS 2017) [45.230.00]
? Montane, Plains, and Great Basin Marshlands (Brown 1982a)

Concept Author(s): G. Kittel, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: G. Kittel, D. Culver, and M.J. Russo

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-26-14

  • Baker, W. L. 1983c. Natural vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared for the State of Colorado Natural Areas Program, Department of Natural Resources, Denver by Colorado Natural Heritage Inventory, Denver.
  • Baker, W. L., and S. C. Kennedy. 1985. Presettlement vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado, described from remnants. Great Basin Naturalist 45(4):747-777.
  • Brotherson, J. D. 1987. Plant community zonation in response to soil gradients in a saline meadow near Utah Lake, Utah County, Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 47(2):322-333.
  • Brotherson, J. D., and S. J. Barnes. 1984. Habitat relationships of Glaux maritima in central Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 44(2):299-309.
  • Brown, D. E., editor. 1982a. Biotic communities of the American Southwest-United States and Mexico. Desert Plants Special Issue 4(1-4):1-342.
  • Bunin, J. E. 1985. Vegetation of the City of Boulder, Colorado open space lands. Report prepared for the City of Boulder, Real Estate/Open Space, Boulder, CO. 114 pp.
  • CNPS [California Native Plant Society]. 2015-2017. A manual of California vegetation [online]. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. [http://vegetation.cnps.org/].
  • Cronquist, A., A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren, J. L. Reveal, and P. K. Holmgren. 1977. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Volume 6: The Monocotyledons. Columbia University Press, New York. 584 pp.
  • Cross, A. F. 1991. Vegetation of two southeastern Arizona desert marshes. Madrono 38(3):185-194.
  • Crowe, E. A., and R. R. Clausnitzer. 1997. Mid-montane wetland plant associations of the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman national forests. Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-22-97. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR.
  • Durkin, P., M. Bradley, E. Muldavin, and P. Mehlhop. 1995a. Riparian/wetland vegetation community classification of Rio Grande: A classification and site evaluation. Unpublished report for New Mexico Environment Department Surface Water Quality Bureau. New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, Albuquerque.
  • Ellis, S. L., T. Shoemaker, and R. Sanz. 1979. Inventories of plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians of the Unaweep Canyon Springs, Mesa County, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared for Colorado Natural Areas Program, Department of Natural Resources, Denver.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Flowers, S. 1962. Vegetation of Morrow Point and Blue Mesa Reservoir basins of the upper Gunnison River, Colorado. Pages 47-102 in: A. M. Woodbury, editor. Ecological studies of the flora and fauna of the Curecanti Reservoir Basins, western Colorado. University of Utah, Anthropological Papers No. 59 (Upper Colo. Series No. 8).
  • Hall, J. B., and P. L. Hansen. 1997. A preliminary riparian habitat type classification system for the Bureau of Land Management districts in southern and eastern Idaho. Riparian and Wetland Research Program, School of Forestry, University of Montana. Idaho Bureau of Land Management, Technical Bulletin No. 97-11. 381 pp.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P. L., S. W. Chadde, and R. D. Pfister. 1988b. Riparian dominance types of Montana. University of Montana Miscellaneous Publication 49. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, Missoula. 411 pp.
  • Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublished draft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.
  • Hendrickson, D. A., and W. L. Minckley. 1984. Cienegas - Vanishing climax communities of the American Southwest. Desert Plants 6(3):131-175.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Kettler, S., and A. McMullen. 1996. Routt National Forest riparian vegetation classification. Report prepared for Routt National Forest by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G. M., and N. D. Lederer. 1993. A preliminary classification of the riparian vegetation of the Yampa and San Miguel/Dolores river basins. Unpublished report prepared for Colorado Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency by The Nature Conservancy, Colorado Field Office, Boulder.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G., R. Rondeau, N. Lederer, and D. Randolph. 1994. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the White and Colorado River basins, Colorado. Final report submitted to Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Boulder. 166 pp.
  • Kovalchik, B. L. 1987. Riparian zone associations - Deschutes, Ochoco, Fremont, and Winema national forests. Technical Paper 279-87. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 171 pp.
  • Kovalchik, B. L. 1993. Riparian plant associations on the national forests of eastern Washington - Draft version 1. USDA Forest Service, Colville National Forest, Colville, WA. 203 pp.
  • Manning, M. E., and W. G. Padgett. 1995. Riparian community type classification for Humboldt and Toiyabe national forests, Nevada and eastern California. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region. 306 pp.
  • Muldavin, E., P. Durkin, M. Bradley, M. Stuever, and P. Mehlhop. 2000a. Handbook of wetland vegetation communities of New Mexico. Volume I: Classification and community descriptions. Final report to the New Mexico Environment Department and the Environmental Protection Agency prepared by the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
  • Mutel, C. F. 1973. An ecological study of the plant communities of certain montane meadows in the Front Range of Colorado. Unpublished thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder. 77 pp.
  • Mutel, C., and J. W. Marr. 1973. A vegetative study of three montane herbaceous basins. Journal of the Colorado-Wyoming Academy of Science 7(4):28 (Abstract).
  • Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1988b. Riparian community type classification of Utah. Publication R4-ECOL-88-01. USDA Forest Service, Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1989. Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho. Research Paper R4-ECOL-89-0. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Ramaley, F. 1919a. The role of sedges in some Colorado plant communities. American Journal of Botany 6:120-130.
  • Ramaley, F. 1942. Vegetation of the San Luis Valley in southern Colorado. University of Colorado Studies, Series D, 1:231-277.
  • Reid, M. S., L. S. Engelking, and P. S. Bourgeron. 1994. Rare plant communities of the conterminous United States, Western Region. Pages 305-620 in: D. H. Grossman, K. L. Goodin, and C. L. Reuss, editors. Rare plant communities of the conterminous United States, an initial survey. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. Second edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. 1300 pp.
  • Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 471 pp.
  • Shupe, J. B., J. D. Brotherson, and S. R. Rushforth. 1986. Patterns of vegetation surrounding springs in Goshen Bay, Utah County, Utah, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 139:97-107.
  • Stearns-Roger, Inc. 1978. Rawhide Energy Project. Transmission system, ecological investigations. Volume II. Technical baseline report to Platte River Power Authority. 51 pp.
  • Stewart, B. K. 1940. Plant ecology and paleoecology of the Creede Valley, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 154 pp.
  • Sturges, D. L. 1968. Hydrologic properties of peat from a Wyoming mountain bog. Soil Science 106:262-264.
  • Youngblood, A. P., W. G. Padgett, and A. H. Winward. 1985a. Riparian community type classification of eastern Idaho-western Wyoming. R4-Ecol-85-01. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, UT. 78 pp.