Print Report

A3757 Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii Swamp Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This alliance includes subalpine riparian or seep slope conifer forests characterized by the codominance of the conifers Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii. Other conifer species that may be present to codominant include Picea engelmannii x glauca, Picea glauca, Pinus contorta, and Tsuga mertensiana in the upper montane and subalpine areas of the Rocky Mountains. These forests occur in landscape positions where snowmelt moisture creates shallow water tables, seeps, or streamside flooding during much of the growing season.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Swamp Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This alliance includes subalpine riparian or seep slope conifer forests characterized by the codominance of the conifers Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii. Other conifer species that may be present to codominant include Picea engelmannii x glauca, Picea glauca, Pinus contorta, and Tsuga mertensiana. Additional conifers may also be present in small amounts. The shrub layer is often well-developed, occurring as a dense ribbon along streams or where there is a break in the forest canopy. Important shrubs include Alnus incana, Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata, Ledum glandulosum, Lonicera spp., Oplopanax horridus, Ribes lacustre, Salix spp., Vaccinium spp., and Xerophyllum tenax. The herbaceous layer is typically lush and dominated by a mixture of mesophytic mostly forbs and some graminoids, including Arnica cordifolia, Calamagrostis spp., Caltha leptosepala, Cardamine cordifolia, Carex spp., Deschampsia cespitosa, Dodecatheon jeffreyi, Equisetum spp., Ligusticum porteri, Ligusticum spp., Linnaea borealis, Mertensia ciliata, Mitella pentandra, Orthilia secunda, Oxypolis fendleri, Senecio triangularis, Senecio triangularis, and Streptopus amplexifolius. These forests occur in the upper montane and subalpine areas of the Rocky Mountains in landscape positions where snowmelt moisture creates shallow water tables, seeps, or streamside flooding during much of the growing season. Sites include moist toeslopes, subirrigated stream terraces, alluvial benches, pond margins, wet meadows, or slopes and hillsides that are wet in spring and early summer. Soils often show evidence of podzolization processes and gleying due to seasonally saturated conditions, and tend to be acidic. They often have high organic matter content throughout the profile, but can vary from shallow to deep, and coarse to fine-textured.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Diagnostic characteristics of these forests are that the tree canopy is dominated by Abies lasiocarpa and/or Picea engelmannii as the predominant conifer in the tree regeneration layer, and they occur on sites saturated until late summer by snowmelt, occurring below seeps on lower hillslopes or in riparian habitats.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This alliance covers both closed-canopy and open-canopy woodlands and forests along riparian areas. One Pinus flexilis community type documented from Idaho and Wyoming is included in this alliance but there is no floristic or environmental information about it. We assume that it occurs at similar elevations as the other associations listed here.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: These are forests dominated by needle-leaved evergreen trees up to 30 m in height and of high cover (60-100%). A moderately dense shrub layer is usually present, dominated by ericaceous or, less commonly, cold-deciduous species. The herbaceous layer is dominated by perennial forbs, and herbaceous cover increases with increasing light availability and/or soil moisture.

Floristics: These forests are characterized by the codominance of Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii in the tree canopy, but Pinus contorta can be dominant on some sites. Other conifers can occur, typically as individuals of Picea pungens, Larix occidentalis, or Pseudotsuga menziesii. In the Northern Rockies, there is a well-developed shrub layer in these forests, although sometimes it can be patchy. Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata is the dominant shrub, averaging 35% cover, with lesser amounts of Vaccinium membranaceum, Vaccinium scoparium, or Xerophyllum tenax. The herbaceous layer in these Northern Rockies stands is not lush, and the most constant species are Orthilia secunda and Arnica cordifolia. In the Southern Rockies of Colorado and New Mexico, these forests do not have a significant layer of shrubs, but at high elevations Vaccinium myrtillus occasionally is present with 0-50% cover. Salix drummondiana, Lonicera involucrata, and Ribes species can be present, but with less than 10% cover. The herbaceous layer is a diverse mixture of mesophytic forbs and is often well over 80% in cover. Important species include Cardamine cordifolia, Caltha leptosepala, Ligusticum porteri, Mertensia ciliata, Mitella pentandra, Oxypolis fendleri, Senecio triangularis, and Saxifraga odontoloma (= Micranthes odontoloma).

Dynamics:  Abies lasiocarpa temporarily flooded forests develop at sites with cool summer temperatures and wet soils. Tree growth is very slow in these habitats, and forests are rapidly colonized by much more rapidly growing shade-intolerant species, such as Pinus contorta, Populus tremuloides, or Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata, following fire, clearcut logging, or windthrow disturbance. Extensive windthrow is not common due to the relatively sheltered topographic positions. Removal of the tree layer at these sites can lead to rising water tables and expansion of anaerobic wetland soils, precluding recolonization by trees.

Environmental Description:  These are semi-riparian or seep slope forests in upper montane and subalpine areas of the northern and central Rocky Mountains. Annual precipitation generally exceeds 75 cm in these forests in the Northern Rockies, snowpacks are typically deep and late-lying, and summers are cool. Summer frosts are characteristic in these habitats, due to cold-air drainage. Elevations range from 1525-2290 m in the northern Rocky Mountains, and from 2500-3480 m in Colorado and New Mexico. These forests occur in landscape positions where snowmelt moisture creates shallow water tables or seeps for a portion of the growing season. Sites include lower and middle slopes, stream terraces, benches, narrow valleys, or seep slopes. Slope aspects vary, but are often northerly, and can be flat to moderately steep (up to 55%). When these forests occur along streams, they are usually within 5 m of the stream channel and within 2 m of channel bankfull height (Kittel et al. 1999a). Soils often show evidence of podzolization processes and gleying due to seasonally saturated conditions. They often have high organic matter content throughout the profile. These forests are a specialized type within the Abies - Picea matrix type in subalpine areas of the Rocky Mountains, but may extend into montane habitats due to cold-air drainage and cool, moist microhabitats. Adjacent upland forests include Picea engelmannii or Abies lasiocarpa forests at the upper elevation boundary and Pseudotsuga menziesii, Abies grandis, or Tsuga heterophylla - Thuja plicata forests at lower elevations. Wetter sites often support herbaceous, cold-deciduous, or ericaceous riparian plant communities, or Abies lasiocarpa seasonally flooded forest communities.

Geographic Range: This alliance is found throughout the Rocky Mountains from eastern Oregon and Washington, southern British Columbia and Alberta, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, the Sky Islands of Arizona, as well as mountain ranges in Nevada.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, AZ, BC, CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available

Type Name Database Code Classification Code
Class 1 Forest & Woodland Class C01 1
Subclass 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass S15 1.B
Formation 1.B.3 Temperate Flooded & Swamp Forest Formation F026 1.B.3
Division 1.B.3.Nc Rocky Mountain-Great Basin Montane Flooded & Swamp Forest Division D195 1.B.3.Nc
Macrogroup 1.B.3.Nc.1 Engelmann Spruce - Narrowleaf Cottonwood / Red-osier Dogwood Riparian & Swamp Forest Macrogroup M034 1.B.3.Nc.1
Group 1.B.3.Nc.1.a Engelmann Spruce - Blue Spruce - Narrowleaf Cottonwood Riparian & Swamp Forest Group G506 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Alliance A3757 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Swamp Forest Alliance A3757 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000296 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Gray Alder Swamp Forest CEGL000296 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000297 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Sitka Alder Swamp Forest CEGL000297 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000300 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Bluejoint Swamp Forest CEGL000300 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000302 Subalpine Fir / Howell''s Marsh-marigold Swamp Forest CEGL000302 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000314 Subalpine Fir / Western Labrador-tea Swamp Forest CEGL000314 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000322 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Devil''s-club Swamp Forest CEGL000322 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000327 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Drummond''s Willow Swamp Forest CEGL000327 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000336 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Clasping Twisted-stalk Swamp Forest CEGL000336 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000339 Subalpine Fir / Carolina Tassel-rue Swamp Forest CEGL000339 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000357 Engelmann Spruce / White Marsh-marigold Swamp Forest CEGL000357 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000359 Engelmann Spruce / Widefruit Sedge Swamp Forest CEGL000359 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000361 Engelmann Spruce / Few-flower Spikerush Swamp Woodland CEGL000361 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000367 Engelmann Spruce - Narrowleaf Cottonwood / Common Cow-parsnip Swamp Forest CEGL000367 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000376 Engelmann Spruce / Arrowleaf Ragwort Swamp Forest CEGL000376 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000414 (Western White Spruce, Engelmann Spruce) / Rocky Mountain Groundsel Swamp Forest CEGL000414 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000511 Mountain Hemlock / Clasping Twisted-stalk Swamp Forest CEGL000511 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL000812 Limber Pine / Shrubby-cinquefoil / Saltgrass Swamp Woodland CEGL000812 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL002630 Engelmann Spruce / Fire-thread Sedge Swamp Woodland CEGL002630 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL002636 Subalpine Fir / Water Sedge Swamp Forest CEGL002636 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL002663 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Tall Fringed Bluebells Swamp Forest CEGL002663 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL002677 Engelmann Spruce / Red-osier Dogwood Swamp Woodland CEGL002677 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL002678 Engelmann Spruce / Bluejoint Swamp Forest CEGL002678 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL005446 Engelmann Spruce / Mountain Sedge Swamp Woodland CEGL005446 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL005843 Engelmann Spruce / Drummond''s Willow Swamp Woodland CEGL005843 1.B.3.Nc.1.a
Association CEGL005927 Engelmann Spruce / Field Horsetail Swamp Forest CEGL005927 1.B.3.Nc.1.a

Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii Series (Johnston 1987)
>< Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii Series (Johnston 1987)
>< Engelmann Spruce - Subalpine Fir: 206 (Eyre 1980)
>< Western Needleleaf Forests: 15: Western Spruce-Fir Forest (Picea-Abies) (Küchler 1964)
>< Western Needleleaf Forests: 21: Southwestern Spruce-Fir Forest (Picea-Abies) (Küchler 1964)

Concept Author(s): G. Kittel, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2013)

Author of Description: G. Kittel

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-26-14

  • Alexander, B. G., Jr. 1981. A preliminary forest habitat classification for the Lincoln National Forest, New Mexico. Unpublished thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff. 94 pp.
  • Baker, W. L. 1986a. Riparian vegetation of the montane and subalpine zones in west-central and southwestern Colorado: Final report prepared for The Nature Conservancy and Colorado Natural Areas Program, Boulder.
  • Baker, W. L. 1989b. Classification of the riparian vegetation of the montane and subalpine zones in western Colorado. Great Basin Naturalist 49(2):214-228.
  • Clausnitzer, R. R., and B. A. Zamora. 1987. Forest habitat types of the Colville Indian Reservation. Unpublished report prepared for the Department of Forest and Range Management, Washington State University, Pullman. 110 pp.
  • Cooper, D. J., and T. R. Cottrell. 1990. Classification of riparian vegetation in the northern Colorado Front Range. Unpublished report prepared for The Nature Conservancy, Colorado Field Office, Boulder. 115 pp.
  • Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
  • DeVelice, R. L., J. A. Ludwig, W. H. Moir, and F. Ronco, Jr. 1986. A classification of forest habitat types of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. General Technical Report RM-131. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 59 pp.
  • DeVelice, R. L., and J. A. Ludwig. 1983a. Climax forest series of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado. Pages 45-53 in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Southwestern Habitat Types, 6-8 April 1983, Albuquerque, NM. USDA Forest Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
  • Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublished draft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.
  • Hess, K. 1981. Phyto-edaphic study of habitat types of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 558 pp.
  • Hess, K., and R. R. Alexander. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests in northcentral Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-266. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
  • Johnson, C. G., Jr., and S. A. Simon. 1987. Plant associations of the Wallowa-Snake Province Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. Technical Paper R6-ECOL-TP-255A-86. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 399 pp. plus appendices.
  • Johnson, C. G., and R. R. Clausnitzer. 1992. Plant associations of the Blue and Ochoco mountains. R6-ERW-TP-036-92. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 163 pp. plus appendices.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Kettler, S., and A. McMullen. 1996. Routt National Forest riparian vegetation classification. Report prepared for Routt National Forest by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G. M., and N. D. Lederer. 1993. A preliminary classification of the riparian vegetation of the Yampa and San Miguel/Dolores river basins. Unpublished report prepared for Colorado Department of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency by The Nature Conservancy, Colorado Field Office, Boulder.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G., R. Rondeau, and A. McMullen. 1996. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the Lower South Platte and parts of the Upper Arkansas River basins, Colorado. Submitted to Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII. Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins. 243 pp.
  • Komarkova, V. K., R. R. Alexander, and B. C. Johnston. 1988b. Forest vegetation of the Gunnison and parts of the Uncompahgre national forests: A preliminary habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-163. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 65 pp.
  • Komarkova, V., A. Peters, G. Kamani, W. Jones, V. Howard, H. Gordon, and K. Southwick. 1988a. Natural recovery of plant communities on disturbance plots and history of land use in the Niwot Ridge/Green Lakes Valley, Front Range, Colorado. University of Colorado Longterm Ecological Research Working Paper 88/1. Boulder, CO. 46 pp.
  • Kovalchik, B. L. 1993. Riparian plant associations on the national forests of eastern Washington - Draft version 1. USDA Forest Service, Colville National Forest, Colville, WA. 203 pp.
  • Küchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographic Society Special Publication 36. New York, NY. 116 pp.
  • Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
  • Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1988b. Riparian community type classification of Utah. Publication R4-ECOL-88-01. USDA Forest Service, Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Peet, R. K. 1975. Forest vegetation of the east slope of the northern Colorado Front Range. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Peet, R. K. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range. Vegetatio 45:3-75.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Richard, C., G. Kittel, and S. Kettler. 1996. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the San Juan National Forest. Draft 1 report. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
  • Steen, O. A., and R. L. Dix. 1974. A preliminary classification of Colorado subalpine forests: A working guide. Unpublished report prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 9 pp.
  • Terwilliger, C., K. Hess, and C. Wasser. 1979a. Key to the preliminary habitat types of Region 2. Addendum to initial progress report for habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO.
  • Wasser, C. H., and K. Hess. 1982. The habitat types of Region II. USDA Forest Service: A synthesis. Final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 140 pp.
  • Whipple, S. A. 1975. The influence of environmental gradients on vegetational structure in the subalpine forest of the southern Rocky Mountains. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Williams, C. K., T. R. Lillybridge, and B. G. Smith. 1990b. Forested plant associations of the Colville National Forest. Report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Colville National Forest, Colville, WA. 133 pp.
  • Williams, C. K., and B. G. Smith. 1990. Forested plant associations of the Wenatchee National Forest. Unpublished draft prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 217 pp.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. General Technical Report INT-187. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.