Print Report
CEGL000300 Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Calamagrostis canadensis Swamp Forest
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Bluejoint Swamp Forest
Colloquial Name: No Data Available
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This spruce-fir riparian forest type is a minor and sporadic plant association in the middle Rocky Mountains of Colorado and Utah, but is consistently present in most mountain ranges in the northern Rocky Mountains well into Canada. It occupies the lower to middle reaches of the subalpine zone, occurring from 1400 to 2776 m (4595-9075 feet), and occasionally to 3300 m (10,800 feet) in elevation. It has the coldest and wettest environment in the Abies lasiocarpa alliance because of high groundwater levels and cold-air drainage from surrounding uplands. Snowpack often persists late into the season. Sites include toeslopes and footslopes and stream terraces of all gradients. However, the most common landscape position is poorly drained depressions or basins, from pond margins, to fairly sizable kettleholes to minor swales. These depositional positions are typified by fine-textured soils. These sites are typically subirrigated and in the early portion of the growing season are saturated to the surface, but they become dry by mid summer or earlier. The canopy of this type is highly variable with some stands having a dense canopy of Abies lasiocarpa, with Picea engelmannii a lesser component and Pinus contorta or Populus tremuloides seral components. Abies and Picea are sometimes only poorly represented as stunted or very slow-growing individuals in old-growth stands of persistent Pinus contorta. These prolonged seral conditions typically occur with sites that are not too wet. Sites are sufficiently wet that Pseudotsuga menziesii and Larix occidentalis do poorly here as seral species. Pinus albicaulis may occur when this type extends into the upper subalpine zone in protected basins, where it is most commonly found on hummocks or drier sites within the stand. Shrub associates include Ledum glandulosum, Lonicera involucrata, Ribes lacustre, Vaccinium cespitosum, Vaccinium myrtillus, and Vaccinium scoparium. Rubus parviflorus, Symphoricarpos albus, and Spiraea betulifolia, can comprise a distinct layer in some stands. The modal undergrowth condition is characterized as a relatively lush sward of Calamagrostis canadensis (or Calamagrostis stricta) with scattered shrubs and herbs. Other graminoids can include Carex aquatilis, Carex disperma, Carex microptera, Carex norvegica ssp. inferalpina, Carex utriculata, Luzula parviflora, and Poa reflexa. Associated forbs are geographically variable, and occasionally they can be conspicuous. Those forbs with high constancy include Thalictrum occidentale, Senecio triangularis, Veratrum viride, Heracleum maximum, Dodecatheon jeffreyi, Maianthemum stellatum, Streptopus amplexifolius, and Equisetum arvense. Moss cover is typically high.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This association is defined as a PNV vegetation type. If it were renamed as a dominance type, the species would include Pinus contorta, Abies lasiocarpa, or Picea engelmannii. The association name proposed here is new and better reflects the fact that a mix of the two climax dominant tree species exists in these stands in all combinations of cover and structure. Prior classifications (Pfister et al. 1977, Steele et al. 1983) have recognized and termed this same type Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis, accepting that Picea engelmannii might constitute anything from a dominant to a trace or even be absent. They viewed the absence of Abies lasiocarpa, where Picea engelmannii was dominant with the same undergrowth composition, as somehow different. We have recognized that Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii are close ecological analogues and that this community is the wettest in which these two species are capable of sharing dominance. There is presently no indication that ~Picea engelmannii / Calamagrostis canadensis Swamp Forest (CEGL002678)$$, defined by a total lack of Abies lasiocarpa, is other than a stochastic phenomena, though in some portions of Montana the lower elevation limits of Picea are noted to exceed those of Abies lasiocarpa. In situations as wet as denoted by say ~Picea engelmannii / Equisetum arvense Swamp Forest (CEGL005927)$$, Abies lasiocarpa is either not present, or found only in microsites, or as unthrifty specimens that will never reach the upper canopy.
A number of phases of the Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis association have been recognized (Pfister et al. 1977, Steele et al. 1981, 1983, Cooper et al. 1987), but at this juncture we have considered those with an appreciable cover of forbs (for example the Ligusticum canbyi phase in northern Idaho) as just variation to be accepted within the association. There is no information to suggest they measurably differ in site parameters, rather they seem more to represent geographic floristic distinctions. The shrub-dominated phases (Vaccinium cespitosum, Ledum glandulosum) do exhibit differences in site parameters and probably should be elevated to the association level (for example Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium cespitosum / Calamagrostis canadensis), but this has not yet been thoroughly reviewed. Some (including Hansen et al. (1995)) have apparently included stands with appreciable (>10%) cover of Carex utriculata, Carex disperma, or Carex scopulorum in this association, when in fact a yet wetter soil moisture regime is indicated by these species when exhibiting such relatively high cover.
A number of phases of the Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis association have been recognized (Pfister et al. 1977, Steele et al. 1981, 1983, Cooper et al. 1987), but at this juncture we have considered those with an appreciable cover of forbs (for example the Ligusticum canbyi phase in northern Idaho) as just variation to be accepted within the association. There is no information to suggest they measurably differ in site parameters, rather they seem more to represent geographic floristic distinctions. The shrub-dominated phases (Vaccinium cespitosum, Ledum glandulosum) do exhibit differences in site parameters and probably should be elevated to the association level (for example Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium cespitosum / Calamagrostis canadensis), but this has not yet been thoroughly reviewed. Some (including Hansen et al. (1995)) have apparently included stands with appreciable (>10%) cover of Carex utriculata, Carex disperma, or Carex scopulorum in this association, when in fact a yet wetter soil moisture regime is indicated by these species when exhibiting such relatively high cover.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: The canopy of this type is highly variable, with stands of the southern distribution having a dense canopy of Abies lasiocarpa, with Picea engelmannii a lesser component and Pinus contorta a highly constant seral component. Populus tremuloides is also present sometimes as a seral component. Often these Abies lasiocarpa-dominated stands represent a later successional stage, from which the formerly dominant Pinus contorta has been removed by natural mortality. According to Mauk and Henderson (1984), Abies and Picea are sometimes only poorly represented as stunted or very slow-growing individuals in old-growth stands of persistent Pinus contorta. These prolonged seral conditions typically occur with sites that are not too wet. In the north all degrees of canopy closer have been documented, with the cover usually not greater than 50% and dominated by highly variable combinations of Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii. Sites are sufficiently wet that Pseudotsuga menziesii and Larix occidentalis do poorly here as seral species, though Pinus contorta may constitute a significant component, its cover often exceeding that of climax dominants. Pfister et al. (1977) report that Pinus albicaulis may occur when this type extends into the upper subalpine zone in protected basins, where it is most commonly found on hummocks or drier sites within the stand. Shrub associates include Ledum glandulosum, Lonicera involucrata, Ribes lacustre, Vaccinium cespitosum, Vaccinium myrtillus, and Vaccinium scoparium. Shrubs characteristic of drier sites may grow on hummocks or at the base of trees (Steele et al. 1983). Rubus parviflorus, Symphoricarpos albus, and Spiraea betulifolia, can comprise a distinct layer in some stands.
The modal undergrowth condition is characterized as a relatively lush sward of Calamagrostis canadensis (or Calamagrostis stricta) with scattered shrubs and herbs. Other graminoids include Carex aquatilis, Carex disperma, Carex microptera (= Carex festivella), Carex norvegica ssp. inferalpina (= Carex media), Luzula parviflora, and Poa reflexa. Associated forbs are geographically variable, and occasionally they can be conspicuous. Those forbs with high constancy at least in the northern portion of this type''s range include Thalictrum occidentale, Senecio triangularis, Veratrum viride, Heracleum maximum, Dodecatheon jeffreyi, Maianthemum stellatum (= Smilacina stellata), Streptopus amplexifolius, and Equisetum arvense. In particular geographic areas Ligusticum spp., Trautvetteria caroliniensis, and Aconitum columbianum can comprise significant cover; other important species include Actaea rubra, Arnica cordifolia, Linnaea borealis, Mertensia ciliata, Mitella pentandra, Osmorhiza depauperata, Pyrola chlorantha, Saxifraga odontoloma (= Saxifraga arguta),and Trollius laxus. Due to the high coverage values for both shrubs and graminoids, the forb component of some sites is negligible (Cooper 1975). Moss cover is typically high.
Steele et al. (1981) and Cooper et al. (1987) recognize four phases for this type in Idaho. The first phase is a Ledum glandulosum phase. It represents the colder or higher extremes of the type, with reduced species richness, Ledum glandulosum forming a dominant undergrowth, and Gaultheria humifusa occurring with a greater frequency than in the other phases. Calamagrostis canadensis becomes increasingly scarce at the upper elevations of this phase. The second phase is a Vaccinium cespitosum phase, representing a frost pocket condition with Pinus contorta a persistent seral dominant. This phase often merges with Abies lasiocarpa/Vaccinium cespitosum on drier sites. The third phase is a Ligusticum canbyi phase which occupies stream terraces and wet benchlands at lower to mid elevations. It has a rich assortment of forbs. Picea is the major seral dominant while Pinus contorta is less abundant than in the other phases. The final phase is a Calamagrostis canadensis phase occurring at low to mid elevations and exhibiting the typic conditions for this association.
Steele et al. (1983) recognize three phases for this type in western Wyoming. The first, a Ledum glandulosum phase, represents the cool extreme of the type. The second, a Vaccinium cespitosum phase, indicates a frost pocket condition. The last phase is a Calamagrostis canadensis phase, representing the typic conditions of the association.
Pfister et al. (1977) recognize three phases for this type in Montana. This first phase, a Calamagrostis canadensis phase, represents the typic conditions of the type. The second, a Galium triflorum phase, represents the type at its lower elevational limits where it is transitional to warmer habitat types such as Abies lasiocarpa/Galium triflorum or Picea/Equisetum arvense. The third phase, a Vaccinium cespitosum phase, is also associated with the lower elevations of the type, but on drier sites and is transitional to the Abies lasiocarpa/Vaccinium cespitosum type.
Abies lasiocarpa/Calamagrostis canadensis occupies the lowest, most poorly drained sites, and is found near Abies lasiocarpa/Vaccinium scoparium and Abies lasiocarpa/Menziesia ferruginea on adjacent better drained sites (Pfister et al. 1977). Abies lasiocarpa/Calamagrostis canadensis can be found merging on the wet end of its moisture spectrum with marshes, sedge-dominated meadows, and pond margins, and on the dry side with various Pseudotsuga associations (Cooper 1975).
The modal undergrowth condition is characterized as a relatively lush sward of Calamagrostis canadensis (or Calamagrostis stricta) with scattered shrubs and herbs. Other graminoids include Carex aquatilis, Carex disperma, Carex microptera (= Carex festivella), Carex norvegica ssp. inferalpina (= Carex media), Luzula parviflora, and Poa reflexa. Associated forbs are geographically variable, and occasionally they can be conspicuous. Those forbs with high constancy at least in the northern portion of this type''s range include Thalictrum occidentale, Senecio triangularis, Veratrum viride, Heracleum maximum, Dodecatheon jeffreyi, Maianthemum stellatum (= Smilacina stellata), Streptopus amplexifolius, and Equisetum arvense. In particular geographic areas Ligusticum spp., Trautvetteria caroliniensis, and Aconitum columbianum can comprise significant cover; other important species include Actaea rubra, Arnica cordifolia, Linnaea borealis, Mertensia ciliata, Mitella pentandra, Osmorhiza depauperata, Pyrola chlorantha, Saxifraga odontoloma (= Saxifraga arguta),and Trollius laxus. Due to the high coverage values for both shrubs and graminoids, the forb component of some sites is negligible (Cooper 1975). Moss cover is typically high.
Steele et al. (1981) and Cooper et al. (1987) recognize four phases for this type in Idaho. The first phase is a Ledum glandulosum phase. It represents the colder or higher extremes of the type, with reduced species richness, Ledum glandulosum forming a dominant undergrowth, and Gaultheria humifusa occurring with a greater frequency than in the other phases. Calamagrostis canadensis becomes increasingly scarce at the upper elevations of this phase. The second phase is a Vaccinium cespitosum phase, representing a frost pocket condition with Pinus contorta a persistent seral dominant. This phase often merges with Abies lasiocarpa/Vaccinium cespitosum on drier sites. The third phase is a Ligusticum canbyi phase which occupies stream terraces and wet benchlands at lower to mid elevations. It has a rich assortment of forbs. Picea is the major seral dominant while Pinus contorta is less abundant than in the other phases. The final phase is a Calamagrostis canadensis phase occurring at low to mid elevations and exhibiting the typic conditions for this association.
Steele et al. (1983) recognize three phases for this type in western Wyoming. The first, a Ledum glandulosum phase, represents the cool extreme of the type. The second, a Vaccinium cespitosum phase, indicates a frost pocket condition. The last phase is a Calamagrostis canadensis phase, representing the typic conditions of the association.
Pfister et al. (1977) recognize three phases for this type in Montana. This first phase, a Calamagrostis canadensis phase, represents the typic conditions of the type. The second, a Galium triflorum phase, represents the type at its lower elevational limits where it is transitional to warmer habitat types such as Abies lasiocarpa/Galium triflorum or Picea/Equisetum arvense. The third phase, a Vaccinium cespitosum phase, is also associated with the lower elevations of the type, but on drier sites and is transitional to the Abies lasiocarpa/Vaccinium cespitosum type.
Abies lasiocarpa/Calamagrostis canadensis occupies the lowest, most poorly drained sites, and is found near Abies lasiocarpa/Vaccinium scoparium and Abies lasiocarpa/Menziesia ferruginea on adjacent better drained sites (Pfister et al. 1977). Abies lasiocarpa/Calamagrostis canadensis can be found merging on the wet end of its moisture spectrum with marshes, sedge-dominated meadows, and pond margins, and on the dry side with various Pseudotsuga associations (Cooper 1975).
Dynamics: This type is not so constantly moist as to prevent burning as indicated by the predominance of Pinus contorta (Cooper 1975). Fischer and Bradley (1987) place this association in their fire group nine, except for the drier Abies lasiocarpa/Calamagrostis canadensis, Vaccinium cespitosum phase which is in fire group seven. Fire group nine represents the moist, lower subalpine habitat types with infrequent but severe fires of long-lasting effect. The combination of deep duff and large amounts of dead rotten fuel can result in severe surface fire during unusually dry moisture conditions such as late-summer droughts. Where dense understories exist, such fires can easily spread to the tree crowns and destroy the stand. Even if a severe surface fire does not crown, there is a good chance the overstory trees will be killed by cambium heating. Under normal moisture conditions for these sites, a lush undergrowth of shrubs and herbs usually serves as an effective barrier to rapid fire spread.
Environmental Description: This riparian forest type is a minor and sporadic plant association in the middle Rocky Mountains but is consistently present in most mountain ranges in the northern Rocky Mountains well into Canada. It occupies the lower to middle reaches of the subalpine zone, occurring at elevations as low as 1400 m (4600 feet) in frost pockets to 2776 m (9100 feet), and occasionally as high as 3300 m (10,800 feet) (Rocky Mountain National Park). It has the coldest and wettest environment in the Abies lasiocarpa alliance because of high groundwater levels and cold-air drainage from surrounding uplands (Hess and Alexander 1986). In Colorado, at the southern extreme of its distribution, this association is characterized as having a narrow niche, occurring on toeslopes adjacent to moderate-gradient streams. Snowpack often persists late into the season. Conversely, in the Northern Rockies sites include toeslopes and footslopes and stream terraces of all gradients. However, the most common landscape position is poorly drained depressions or basins, from pond margins, to fairly sizable kettleholes to minor swales. Being predominantly depositional positions in the landscape, these sites are typified by fine-textured soils, clay loams being quite prevalent (Pfister et al. 1977). These sites are subirrigated and in the early portion of the growing season are saturated to the surface, some even having standing water; they become dry by midsummer or earlier. Permanently wet sites (seeps) have mucky surface soils below a typically thick organic layer. Better drained sites have a loamy surface soil texture, and often gravel. Areas of bare soil or rock are negligible on most sites. Average litter depths are extremely variable, ranging from almost none in stream bottom sites to depths of 15 cm in seepage or depression areas. Parent material for soils varies widely and includes granitics, quartzite, alluvium and colluvium, glacial till and drift of sedimentary origin (both calcareous and noncalcareous), and volcanics, both extrusive and intrusive.
Geographic Range: This association occurs in Colorado, northern Utah, western Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, and north into Alberta, Canada.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: AB, CO, ID, MT, OR, UT, WA, WY
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.684581
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G5
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 1 Forest & Woodland Class | C01 | 1 |
Subclass | 1.B Temperate & Boreal Forest & Woodland Subclass | S15 | 1.B |
Formation | 1.B.3 Temperate Flooded & Swamp Forest Formation | F026 | 1.B.3 |
Division | 1.B.3.Nc Rocky Mountain-Great Basin Montane Flooded & Swamp Forest Division | D195 | 1.B.3.Nc |
Macrogroup | 1.B.3.Nc.1 Engelmann Spruce - Narrowleaf Cottonwood / Red-osier Dogwood Riparian & Swamp Forest Macrogroup | M034 | 1.B.3.Nc.1 |
Group | 1.B.3.Nc.1.a Engelmann Spruce - Blue Spruce - Narrowleaf Cottonwood Riparian & Swamp Forest Group | G506 | 1.B.3.Nc.1.a |
Alliance | A3757 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce Swamp Forest Alliance | A3757 | 1.B.3.Nc.1.a |
Association | CEGL000300 Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / Bluejoint Swamp Forest | CEGL000300 | 1.B.3.Nc.1.a |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Calamagrostis canadensis Forest (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Calamagrostis canadensis Plant Association (Baker 1984a)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977) [found in west-central Montana from 1830-2286 m (6000-7500 feet) and east of the Continental Divide in Montana from 2135-2590 m (7000-8500 feet).]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Association (Crowe et al. 2004)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Mauk and Henderson 1984) [found in the Uinta Mountains of northern Utah from 2347 to near 3050 m (7700-10,000 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Hess and Alexander 1986) [found in the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests of Colorado.]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981) [found in central Idaho from 1950-2745 m (6400-9000 feet) and in frost pockets and along cold-air drainages as low as 1400 m (4600 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Cooper et al. 1987) [found in northern Idaho, mostly south of the Middle Fork of the Clearwater River drainage from 1555-2286 m (5100-7500 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1983) [found in western Wyoming in Yellowstone National Park from 2075-2775 m (6800-9100 feet).]
? Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Cooper 1975) [found in Yellowstone National Park and the Targhee National Forest of Wyoming from 2075-2620 m (6800-8600 feet).]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Komarkova et al. 1988b) [found in the Gunnison National Forest of Colorado.]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type, Calamagrostis canadensis Phase (Cooper et al. 1987) [(p.46)]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type, Ligusticum canbyi Phase (Cooper et al. 1987) [(p.46)]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type, Vaccinium caespitosum Phase (Cooper et al. 1987) [(p.46)]
< Conifer / Calamagrostis canadensis Community Type (Padgett et al. 1989)
= Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Calamagrostis canadensis Plant Association (Baker 1984a)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977) [found in west-central Montana from 1830-2286 m (6000-7500 feet) and east of the Continental Divide in Montana from 2135-2590 m (7000-8500 feet).]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997)
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Association (Crowe et al. 2004)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Mauk and Henderson 1984) [found in the Uinta Mountains of northern Utah from 2347 to near 3050 m (7700-10,000 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Hess and Alexander 1986) [found in the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests of Colorado.]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981) [found in central Idaho from 1950-2745 m (6400-9000 feet) and in frost pockets and along cold-air drainages as low as 1400 m (4600 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Cooper et al. 1987) [found in northern Idaho, mostly south of the Middle Fork of the Clearwater River drainage from 1555-2286 m (5100-7500 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1983) [found in western Wyoming in Yellowstone National Park from 2075-2775 m (6800-9100 feet).]
? Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Cooper 1975) [found in Yellowstone National Park and the Targhee National Forest of Wyoming from 2075-2620 m (6800-8600 feet).]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type (Komarkova et al. 1988b) [found in the Gunnison National Forest of Colorado.]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type, Calamagrostis canadensis Phase (Cooper et al. 1987) [(p.46)]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type, Ligusticum canbyi Phase (Cooper et al. 1987) [(p.46)]
= Abies lasiocarpa / Calamagrostis canadensis Habitat Type, Vaccinium caespitosum Phase (Cooper et al. 1987) [(p.46)]
< Conifer / Calamagrostis canadensis Community Type (Padgett et al. 1989)
- ANHIC [Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Community database files. Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development, Edmonton.
- Baker, W. L. 1984a. A preliminary classification of the natural vegetation of Colorado. Great Basin Naturalist 44(4):647-676.
- Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
- CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
- Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
- Cogan, D., K. Varga, and G. Kittel. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Grand Teton National Park and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway. Final Project Report 2002-2005 Vegetation Mapping Project. Technical Memorandum 8260-06-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 87 pp. plus Appendixes A-F.
- Cooper, D. J., and T. R. Cottrell. 1990. Classification of riparian vegetation in the northern Colorado Front Range. Unpublished report prepared for The Nature Conservancy, Colorado Field Office, Boulder. 115 pp.
- Cooper, S. V. 1975. Forest habitat types of northwestern Wyoming and contiguous portion of Montana and Idaho. Unpublished dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman. 190 pp.
- Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
- Crowe, E. A., B. L. Kovalchik, and M. J. Kerr. 2004. Riparian and wetland vegetation of central and eastern Oregon. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Oregon State University, Portland. 473 pp. [http://oregonstate.edu/ornhic/ publications.html]
- Crowe, E. A., and R. R. Clausnitzer. 1997. Mid-montane wetland plant associations of the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman national forests. Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-22-97. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR.
- Fischer, W. C., and A. F. Bradley. 1987. Fire ecology of western Montana forest habitat types. General Technical Report INT-223. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 95 pp.
- Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
- Hess, K., and R. R. Alexander. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests in northcentral Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-266. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
- Hop, K., M. Reid, J. Dieck, S. Lubinski, and S. Cooper. 2007. U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program: Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI. 131 pp. plus Appendices A-L.
- IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2005. Wetland and riparian plant associations in Idaho. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise. [http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/tech/CDC/ecology/wetland_riparian_assoc.cfm] (accessed 14 June 2005).
- Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
- Kettler, S., and A. McMullen. 1996. Routt National Forest riparian vegetation classification. Report prepared for Routt National Forest by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Komarkova, V. K., R. R. Alexander, and B. C. Johnston. 1988b. Forest vegetation of the Gunnison and parts of the Uncompahgre national forests: A preliminary habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-163. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 65 pp.
- MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
- Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
- Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1989. Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho. Research Paper R4-ECOL-89-0. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
- Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
- Reid, M. S., S. V. Cooper, and G. Kittel. 2004. Vegetation classification of Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. Final report for USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, International Peace Park Mapping Project. NatureServe, Arlington VA.
- Richard, C., G. Kittel, and S. Kettler. 1996. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the San Juan National Forest. Draft 1 report. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Salas, D., J. Stevens, and K. Schulz. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Technical Memorandum No. 8260-05-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 161 pp. plus Appendices A-L (733 pp.).
- Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
- Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
- Terwilliger, C., K. Hess, and C. Wasser. 1979a. Key to the preliminary habitat types of Region 2. Addendum to initial progress report for habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO.
- WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
- WNHP [Washington Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data files. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.