Print Report
A3702 Platanus occidentalis - Liquidambar styraciflua - Liriodendron tulipifera Southern Appalachian Floodplain Forest Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: These are diverse floodplain forests with variable composition, typically dominated by some combination of Celtis laevigata, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Platanus occidentalis, and Ulmus americana. Examples are found in the Interior Low Plateau, southern Cumberlands/Ridge and Valley, the Piedmont, and the adjacent Southern Blue Ridge.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: American Sycamore - Sweetgum - Tuliptree Southern Appalachian Floodplain Forest Alliance
Colloquial Name: Southern Appalachian Sycamore - Sweetgum - Tuliptree Floodplain Forest
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: These are diverse floodplain forests with variable composition, typically dominated by some combination of Celtis laevigata, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Platanus occidentalis, and Ulmus americana. Stands also probably include Acer negundo, Carya cordiformis, Celtis occidentalis, Juglans nigra, Salix nigra, and Ulmus alata. The understory may be dense and typically contains Asimina triloba, Crataegus spathulata, and Lindera benzoin. Examples are found in the interior south of the United States, including the Interior Low Plateau, southern Cumberlands/Ridge and Valley, the Piedmont, and the adjacent Southern Blue Ridge from Alabama north to the Carolinas and west to Kentucky and Tennessee. One association known from the Piedmont and the lower elevations of the adjacent Southern Blue Ridge may contain Betula alleghaniensis and/or Betula lenta.
Diagnostic Characteristics: These are floodplain forests of the interior south of the United States typically dominated by some combination of Celtis laevigata, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Platanus occidentalis, and Ulmus americana. This combination of environment, floristics and biogeography should be diagnostic.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: No Data Available
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: These are broad-leaved deciduous forests, with canopy trees typically averaging 20 m in height. The shrub and herbaceous layers range from sparse to relatively lush. There is often an abundance of woody vines.
Floristics: Stands are diverse, and composition is somewhat variable across the range, but they are typically dominated by some combination of Celtis laevigata, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Platanus occidentalis, and Ulmus americana. One association known from the Piedmont and the lower elevations of the adjacent Southern Blue Ridge may contain Betula alleghaniensis and/or Betula lenta. Stands also probably include Acer negundo, Carya cordiformis, Celtis occidentalis, Juglans nigra, Salix nigra, and Ulmus alata. The understory may be dense and typically contains Asimina triloba, Crataegus spathulata, and Lindera benzoin.
Dynamics: No Data Available
Environmental Description: Forests in this alliance occur on the fronts, terraces, and levees of small, medium and large rivers in the Interior Low Plateau, southern Cumberlands/Ridge and Valley, the Piedmont, and the lower elevations of the adjacent Southern Blue Ridge.
Geographic Range: This is a potentially wide ranging alliance, found in the Interior Low Plateau, southern Cumberlands/Ridge and Valley, the Piedmont, and lower elevations of the adjacent Southern Blue Ridge from Alabama north to the Carolinas and west to Kentucky and Tennessee.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: AL, GA, KY, NC, SC, TN, VA?
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.899754
Confidence Level: Low
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: Descriptive information is taken primarily from old alliances A.288 and A.289.These associations come from a wide variety of old alliances: A.288 (2/12); A.289 (2/8); A.297 (1/6); A.316 (1/17); A.633 (1/5). Proto A0289, A2050 (split up among 3 new alliances).
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: No Data Available
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.