Print Report

A0197 Picea mariana - Larix laricina / Sphagnum spp. Poor Swamp Forest Alliance

Type Concept Sentence: This poor (acidic) conifer swamp alliance dominated by Picea mariana is found in the boreal and subboreal region of eastern Canada, (excluding the Atlantic boreal region), southward into the northern Great Lakes region and northeastern United States, on poorly drained mineral soils or deep peats and minerotrophic peatland margins.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Black Spruce - Tamarack / Peatmoss species Poor Swamp Forest Alliance

Colloquial Name: Eastern Boreal Black Spruce Poor Swamp Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Alliance

Type Concept: This poor (acidic) conifer swamp is found in the boreal region of eastern Canada, excluding the Atlantic boreal region, southward into the subboreal regions of northern Great Lakes region and northeastern United States. The vegetation is dominated by Picea mariana with other canopy associates including Abies balsamea, Larix laricina, and Betula papyrifera. Most stands have a well-developed shrub layer. Shrubs are typically ericaceous species such as Chamaedaphne calyculata, Gaylussacia baccata (in the east), Kalmia angustifolia (in Quebec), Ledum groenlandicum, Linnaea borealis, Rhododendron canadense (in the east), Vaccinium angustifolium, and Vaccinium myrtilloides. Herbs include Carex trisperma, Drosera spp., Eriophorum spp., and Sarracenia purpurea. There is a continuous and often deep sphagnum layer, including especially Sphagnum capillifolium, but also Sphagnum fuscum, Sphagnum girgensohnii, and Sphagnum magellanicum. The habitat is characterized by poorly drained mineral soils or deep peats and minerotrophic peatland margins. The peats and groundwater are acidic and are most typically nutrient-poor. Most stands are on level ground, but some are on gentle lower slopes adjacent to wetlands.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Tree canopy cover is variable but generally exceeds 10%. The vegetation is dominated by Picea mariana, typically <10 m, but occasionally taller, with other canopy associates, including Abies balsamea, Larix laricina, and Betula papyrifera. Most stands have a well-developed shrub layer. Shrubs are typically ericaceous species such as Chamaedaphne calyculata, Gaylussacia baccata (in the east), Kalmia angustifolia (in Quebec), Ledum groenlandicum, Linnaea borealis, Rhododendron canadense (in the east), Vaccinium angustifolium, and Vaccinium myrtilloides. Herbs include Carex trisperma, Drosera spp., Eriophorum spp., and Sarracenia purpurea. There is a strong sphagnum layer, including especially Sphagnum capillifolium, but also Sphagnum fuscum, Sphagnum girgensohnii, and Sphagnum magellanicum. This alliance is difficult to distinguish from ~Picea mariana / Sphagnum spp. Eastern Boreal Bog Woodland Alliance (A3836)$$, but often contains some minerotrophic indicators (Abies balsamea, Betula papyrifera, Linnaea borealis, Rhododendron canadense) and does not occur on raised peat mats that are truly ombrotrophic.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: A separate Atlantic boreal poor swamp alliance has been developed.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Tree canopy cover is variable but generally exceeds 10%. The vegetation is dominated by conifers, typically <10 m, but occasionally taller. Most stands have a well-developed, ericaceous shrub layer, and a continuous, often deep (>0.5 m) sphagnum layer.

Floristics: The vegetation is dominated by Picea mariana with other canopy associates including Abies balsamea, Larix laricina, and Betula papyrifera. Most stands have a well-developed shrub layer. Shrubs are typically ericaceous species such as Chamaedaphne calyculata, Gaylussacia baccata (in the east), Kalmia angustifolia (in Quebec), Ledum groenlandicum, Linnaea borealis, Rhododendron canadense (in the east), Vaccinium angustifolium, and Vaccinium myrtilloides. Herbs include Drosera spp., Sarracenia purpurea, Eriophorum spp., and Carex trisperma. There is a strong sphagnum layer, including especially Sphagnum capillifolium, but also Sphagnum fuscum, Sphagnum girgensohnii, and Sphagnum magellanicum. The habitat is characterized by poorly drained mineral soils or deep peats and minerotrophic peatland margins. The peats and groundwater are acidic and are most typically nutrient-poor. Most stands are on level ground, but some are on gentle lower slopes adjacent to wetlands.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  The habitat is characterized by poorly drained mineral soils or deep peats and minerotrophic peatland margins. The peats and groundwater are acidic and are most typically nutrient-poor, but with at least a weak minerotrophic influence. Most stands are on level ground, but some are on gentle lower slopes adjacent to wetlands.

Geographic Range: This type is found in eastern Canada, excluding the Atlantic boreal region, and adjacent northern regions of the northeastern United States from the western Great Lakes to northern New England.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MB, ME, MI, MN, NB, NH, NS?, NY, ON, QC, VT, WI




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: ? "inverted flats" (Cogbill 1987)
>< Black Spruce: 12 (Eyre 1980)
? Tamarack: 38 (Eyre 1980)

Concept Author(s): A.G. Harris et al. (1996)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: We have incorporated significant descriptive information previously compiled by K. Baldwin.

Version Date: 09-26-14

  • Brewer, R. 1966. Vegetation of two bogs in southwestern Michigan. The Michigan Botanist 5(1):36-46.
  • Cogbill, C. V. 1987. The boreal forests of New England. Wildflower Notes 2:27-36.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., and Midwest State Natural Heritage Program Ecologists. 1996. Terrestrial vegetation of the midwest United States. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the United States. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Harris, A. G., S. C. McMurray, P. W. C. Uhlig, J. K. Jeglum, R. F. Foster, and G. D. Racey. 1996. Field guide to the wetland ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Science and Technology, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Field guide FG-01. 74 pp. plus appendix.
  • MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
  • Sims, R. A., W. D. Towill, K. A. Baldwin, and G. M. Wickware. 1989. Field guide to the forest ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto. 191 pp.
  • Sytsma, K. J., and R. W. Pippen. 1981b. The Hampton Creek wetland complex in southwestern Michigan. I. History and physical features. The Michigan Botanist 20:137-142.
  • Zoladeski, C. A., G. M. Wickware, R. J. Delorme, R. A. Sims, and I. G. W. Corns. 1995. Forest ecosystem classification for Manitoba: Field guide. Special Report 2. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Center, Edmonton, Alberta.