Print Report

CEGL005449 Calamagrostis canadensis North-Central Wet Meadow

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Bluejoint North-Central Wet Meadow

Colloquial Name: North-Central Bluejoint Wet Meadow

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This wet meadow vegetation is widespread in the midwestern United States. Stands occur on the floodplains of small streams, in poorly drained depressions, beaver meadows, levees and lakeshores. Soils are typically mineral soil or well-decomposed peat, with a thick root mat. Water regime varies between temporarily and seasonally flooded. Graminoid cover is typically dense and can form hummocky microtopography. Calamagrostis canadensis is dominant, often occurring in almost pure stands or with tall sedges, such as Carex aquatilis, Carex lacustris, and Carex stricta. Agrostis gigantea, Glyceria grandis, Poa palustris, Poa compressa, Scirpus cyperinus, and Typha latifolia are sometimes abundant. Forbs include Campanula aparinoides, Epilobium leptophyllum, Eutrochium maculatum, Eupatorium perfoliatum, Impatiens capensis, Iris versicolor, Polygonum amphibium, and Comarum palustre. Scattered shrubs, such as Viburnum nudum, Viburnum dentatum, Spiraea alba, Cornus amomum, or Alnus serrulata, may be present. Phalaris arundinacea and/or Lythrum salicaria may be present, especially in disturbed examples.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This type can grade into sedge meadows. A guideline of <50% sedges may be suggested as a criterion for the definition of this type compared to sedge meadow types. Harris et al. (1996) suggest that the bluejoint meadow type is drier than sedge meadows and less peaty than shore fens.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Graminoid cover is typically dense and can form hummocky microtopography. Calamagrostis canadensis is dominant, often occurring in almost pure stands or with tall sedges, such as Carex aquatilis, Carex lacustris, and Carex stricta. Agrostis gigantea (= Agrostis alba), Glyceria grandis, Poa palustris, Poa compressa, Scirpus cyperinus, and Typha latifolia are sometimes abundant. Forbs include Campanula aparinoides, Epilobium leptophyllum, Eutrochium maculatum (= Eupatorium maculatum), Eupatorium perfoliatum, Iris versicolor, Polygonum amphibium, and Comarum palustre (= Potentilla palustris). Scattered shrubs, such as Viburnum nudum, Viburnum dentatum, Spiraea alba, or Cornus amomum may be present. Lythrum salicaria may be present, especially in disturbed examples.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Stands occur on the floodplains of small streams, in poorly drained depressions, beaver meadows, levees and lakeshores. Soils are typically mineral soil or well-decomposed peat or peat silt loam with a thick root mat. Water regime varies between temporarily and seasonally flooded.

Geographic Range: This wet meadow vegetation is common in the north-central parts of the midwestern United States.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MB?, MN, ON, WI




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: CEGL005174 split into 2 new types (CEGL005448, CEGL005449) (DFL 7-13).

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Calamagrostis canadensis - Phalaris arundinacea Herbaceous Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Bluejoint Meadow]

Concept Author(s): Northern Appalachian Planning Team

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 07-05-13

  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Harris, A. G., S. C. McMurray, P. W. C. Uhlig, J. K. Jeglum, R. F. Foster, and G. D. Racey. 1996. Field guide to the wetland ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Science and Technology, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Field guide FG-01. 74 pp. plus appendix.
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]