Print Report

G660 North Atlantic Coastal Beach Group

Type Concept Sentence: This group covers non-forested, sparsely to moderately vegetated boulder, cobble, and gravel shores characterized by Cakile edentula, above the normal high-tide line along the immediate Atlantic coast, from northern North Carolina to the Canadian Maritimes.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: North Atlantic Coastal Beach Group

Colloquial Name: North Atlantic Coastal Beach

Hierarchy Level:  Group

Type Concept: This group covers mostly non-forested, sparsely to moderately vegetated boulder, cobble, and gravel shores, above the normal high-tide line along the immediate Atlantic coast, from northern North Carolina to the Canadian Maritimes. On the mainland, it is often a narrow zone between the high-tide line and the upland forest; this zone becomes wider with increasing maritime influence, e.g., on some islands. The substrate is sand flats and beaches, or sandy with broken rock, ranging from cobbles to gravels, sometimes with a shallow soil layer. Tree growth is prevented by extreme exposure to wind, salt spray, and fog. Cover is patchy herbs with an occasional shrub. On cobble beaches, where storm waves create an unstable substrate, vascular plant cover is low, with typical species including Cakile edentula ssp. edentula, Calystegia sepium, Chamaesyce polygonifolia, Chenopodium album, Elymus repens, Galeopsis bifida, Honckenya peploides ssp. diffusa, Lathyrus japonicus, Raphanus raphanistrum, Rumex crispus, Salsola kali, Sisymbrium altissimum, Solanum dulcamara, and Solidago sempervirens. Mertensia maritima is an infrequent but diagnostic species of cobble beaches. Open rocky shore habitats are characterized by sparse (<25%) cover of salt-tolerant herbs such as Argentina egedii ssp. groenlandica, Atriplex prostrata, Glaux maritima, Limonium carolinianum, Puccinellia maritima, Salicornia depressa, Spergularia salina, and Suaeda maritima. Detritus washed in by the tides may be prominent. In Atlantic Canada, an unusual treed cobble beach can occur.

Diagnostic Characteristics: Atlantic maritime ocean beach comprising sand, gravel, or cobbles; ranging north from central Virginia; Cakile edentula is characteristic.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Initial split between North Atlantic versus South Atlantic is based on the Acadian versus Virginian marine zones, which meets in central Virginia (L. Sneddon pers. comm. 2012). However, this leaves two groups and two alliances, with one association each, and little floristic difference.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: This group is characterized by sparse and patchy vegetation dominated primarily by succulent annual plants not generally exceeding 0.5 m in height. Trees are absent, and shrubs, if present, are very sparsely distributed and stressed.

Floristics: Cakile edentula is the most frequently occurring species across the range. Other associates may include Chamaesyce polygonifolia, Honckenya peploides ssp. diffusa (= Arenaria peploides), Salsola kali ssp. kali, Xanthium strumarium, as well as wave-deposited wrack comprising marine alga. On cobble beaches, where storm waves create an unstable substrate, vascular plant cover is low, with typical species including Cakile edentula ssp. edentula, Calystegia sepium, Chamaesyce polygonifolia, Chenopodium album, Elymus repens, Galeopsis bifida, Honckenya peploides ssp. diffusa (= Arenaria peploides), Lathyrus japonicus, Raphanus raphanistrum, Rumex crispus, Salsola kali, Sisymbrium altissimum, Solanum dulcamara, and Solidago sempervirens. Mertensia maritima is an infrequent but diagnostic species of cobble beaches. Open rocky shore habitats are characterized by sparse (<25%) cover of salt-tolerant herbs such as Argentina egedii ssp. groenlandica, Atriplex prostrata, Glaux maritima, Limonium carolinianum, Puccinellia maritima, Salicornia depressa, Spergularia salina (= Spergularia marina), and Suaeda maritima. Detritus washed in by the tides may be prominent. In Atlantic Canada, an unusual treed cobble beach can occur.

Dynamics:  This group is influenced by irregular tidal flooding, wave action, and storm tides. Its position between the regularly flooded, unvegetated beach, and the base of dunes or upland shores is not fixed. Intense storms often disturb or completely remove the habitat, but the easily dispersed annual plants comprising this group re-establish on newly formed habitat where the new wrack line develops.

Environmental Description:  This group occurs on Atlantic beaches above the limit of mean high tide, but is inundated by wave action during spring tides and storm tides. It occurs on ocean-fronting beaches of barrier islands, and the mainland coast, as well as on the more protected beaches of bay beaches. The substrate is sand, cobble, gravel, or a mixture of these.

Geographic Range: This group is found along the immediate Atlantic coast, from northern North Carolina to the Canadian Maritimes.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  CT, DE, LB, MA, MD, ME, NB?, NF, NH, NJ, NS, NY, ON, PE, QC?, RI, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: G124 split into G660 & G661 (DFL 7-24-12)

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Cakile edentula - Chenopodium album community (Metzler and Barrett 1996)
= Cakiletum edentula (Conard 1935)
= Beach community (Hill 1986)
= Beach community (Johnson 1985b)
= Marine intertidal gravel/sand beach community (Breden 1989)
= Maritime beach (Reschke 1990)
= beach (Fender 1937)
= beach (McDonnell 1979)
= beach (Higgins et al. 1971)
= beach community (Baumann 1978b)
= beach vegetation (Moul 1973)
? embryo dune (Klotz 1986)
? middle beach (Shreve et al. 1910)
? middle beach (Nichols 1920)
= pioneer beach community (Boule 1979)
= sea-strand vegetation, beach formation (Harshberger 1900)

Concept Author(s): L.A. Sneddon, in Faber-Langendoen et al. (2012)

Author of Description: L.A. Sneddon

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-05-15

  • Baumann, C. 1978b. The effects of overwash on the vegetation of a Virginia barrier island. M.A. thesis. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA. 104 pp.
  • Boule, M. E. 1979. The vegetation of Fisherman Island, Virginia. Castanea 44:98-108.
  • Breden, T. F. 1989. A preliminary natural community classification for New Jersey. Pages 157-191 in: E. F. Karlin, editor. New Jersey''s rare and endangered plants and animals. Institute for Environmental Studies, Ramapo College, Mahwah, NJ. 280 pp.
  • Conard, H. S. 1935. The plant associations of central Long Island. The American Midland Naturalist 16:433-516.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Fender, F. S. 1937. The flora of Seven Mile Beach, New Jersey. Bartonia 19:23-41.
  • Harshberger, J. W. 1900. An ecological study of the New Jersey strand flora. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science Philadelphia 52:623-671.
  • Higgins, E. A. T., R. D. Rappleye, and R. G. Brown. 1971. The flora and ecology of Assateague Island. University of Maryland Experiment Station Bulletin A-172. 70 pp.
  • Hill, S. R. 1986. An annotated checklist of the vascular flora of Assateague Island (Maryland and Virginia). Castanea 5:265-305.
  • Johnson, A. F. 1985b. A guide to the plant communities of the Napeague Dunes, Long Island, New York. Mad Printers, Mattituck, NY. 58 pp. plus plates.
  • Klotz, L. H. 1986. The vascular flora of Wallops Island and Wallops Mainland, Virginia. Castanea 51:306-326.
  • MNAP [Maine Natural Areas Program]. 1991. Natural landscapes of Maine: Classification of ecosystems and natural communities. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Natural Resources Information and Mapping Center, Augusta, ME. 77 pp.
  • McDonnell, M. J. 1979. The flora of Plum Island, Essex County, Massachusetts. University of New Hampshire, Agricultural Experiment Station. Station Bulletin No. 513. Durham, NH. 110 pp.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 1996. Vegetation classification for Connecticut organized into the modified UNESCO hierarchy. Unpublished review draft. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database. Hartford, CT. 48 pp.
  • Moul, E. T. 1973. Marine flora and fauna of the northeastern United States: Higher plants of the marine fringe. USDC National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Technical Report NMFS CIRC-384. Seattle, WA. 61 pp.
  • Nichols, G. E. 1920. The vegetation of Connecticut: III. The associations of depositing areas along the seacoast. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 47:511-548.
  • Reschke, C. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Latham, NY. 96 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Shreve, F., M. A. Chrysler, F. H. Blodgett, and F. W. Besley. 1910. The plant life of Maryland. Maryland Weather Service. Special Publication, Volume III. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD. 533 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2001. Classification of natural communities of Massachusetts. September 2001 draft. Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA.