Print Report
A0266 Betula alleghaniensis - Aesculus flava Forest Alliance
Type Concept Sentence: This alliance includes montane forests, mainly of the higher elevations of the Southern and Central Appalachians, dominated by Fagus grandifolia, Betula alleghaniensis, and Aesculus flava.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Yellow Birch - Yellow Buckeye Forest Alliance
Colloquial Name: Southern Appalachian High Montane Buckeye - Northern Hardwood Forest
Hierarchy Level: Alliance
Type Concept: This alliance includes montane forests, mainly of the Southern and Central Appalachians, dominated by Fagus grandifolia, Betula alleghaniensis, and Aesculus flava, occurring in combination or with strong dominance by one of these species. Other species that may form a typically minor canopy component include Acer saccharum, Betula lenta, Halesia tetraptera var. monticola, Picea rubens, Prunus serotina var. serotina, Quercus rubra, and Tilia americana var. heterophylla. Subcanopy species can include small stems of canopy species as well as Acer spicatum, Acer pensylvanicum, Amelanchier laevis, and Sorbus americana. Shrub density varies among associations, ranging from very high to entirely lacking. Common species in the shrub and sapling strata include Acer pensylvanicum, Acer spicatum, Amelanchier arborea var. austromontana, Aristolochia macrophylla, Cornus alternifolia, Crataegus punctata, Hydrangea arborescens, Ilex montana, Rhododendron maximum, Ribes cynosbati, Ribes rotundifolium, Ribes glandulosum, Rubus allegheniensis, Rubus canadensis, Vaccinium erythrocarpum, and Viburnum lantanoides. The composition of herbaceous strata varies among associations. Variability in the herbaceous stratum may be related to aspect, elevation, and soil-nutrient status. These forests occur in a cool, humid climate, typically at high elevations (1066-1828 m [3500-6000 feet]) on a variety of sites, from upper concave slopes and steep, periglacial boulderfields and talus slopes, to flat ridgetops and saddles between ridges. Associations will vary with elevation, latitude, and geology and occur as small to large patches surrounded by other forest types, montane grasslands, or shrublands.
Diagnostic Characteristics: This alliance includes montane forests, mainly of the Southern and Central Appalachians, dominated by Fagus grandifolia, Betula alleghaniensis, and Aesculus flava, occurring in combination or with strong dominance by one of these species, typically at high elevations (1066-1828 m [3500-6000 feet]).
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: ~Acer rubrum - Betula lenta - Magnolia fraseri / (Rhododendron maximum, Kalmia latifolia) Ruderal Forest (CEGL008558)$$ is transitional to acidic coves described in ~Appalachian-Central Interior Mesic Forest Group (G020)$$.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: This alliance includes montane forests. The subcanopy can include small stems of canopy species as well as others. Shrub density varies among associations, ranging from very high to entirely lacking. The composition of herbaceous strata varies among associations. Variability in the herbaceous stratum may be related to aspect, elevation, and soil-nutrient status. Forests on drier, south-facing sites (often open convex slopes) typically have dense herbaceous cover, often approaching 100% coverage, while more mesic sites have herbaceous strata dominated by large forbs and patches of ferns, with lesser amounts of sedges. In some forests, seepage areas are common, producing wet microhabitats with unique species assemblages. Woody vines, and vining shrubs, may be common, especially in boulderfield associations.
Floristics: This alliance includes montane forests dominated by Fagus grandifolia, Betula alleghaniensis, and Aesculus flava, occurring in combination or with strong dominance by one of these species. Other species that may form a typically minor canopy component include Acer saccharum, Betula lenta, Halesia tetraptera var. monticola, Picea rubens, Prunus serotina var. serotina, Quercus rubra, and Tilia americana var. heterophylla. Subcanopy species can include small stems of canopy species as well as Acer spicatum, Acer pensylvanicum, Amelanchier laevis, and Sorbus americana. Shrub density varies among associations, ranging from very high to entirely lacking. Common species in the shrub and sapling strata include Acer pensylvanicum, Acer spicatum, Amelanchier arborea var. austromontana, Aristolochia macrophylla, Cornus alternifolia, Crataegus punctata, Hydrangea arborescens, Ilex montana, Rhododendron maximum, Ribes cynosbati, Ribes rotundifolium, Ribes glandulosum, Rubus allegheniensis, Rubus canadensis, Vaccinium erythrocarpum, and Viburnum lantanoides. The composition of herbaceous strata varies among associations. Variability in the herbaceous stratum may be related to aspect, elevation, and soil-nutrient status. Forests on drier, south-facing sites (often open convex slopes) typically have dense herbaceous cover, often approaching 100% coverage, and dominated by species of Carex (Carex aestivalis, Carex brunnescens ssp. sphaerostachya, Carex debilis var. rudgei, Carex intumescens, Carex pensylvanica), while more mesic sites have herbaceous strata dominated by large forbs and patches of ferns, with lesser amounts of sedges. In some forests, seepage areas are common, producing wet microhabitats with unique species assemblages (Chelone lyonii, Circaea alpina, Rudbeckia laciniata, Impatiens pallida, and Monarda didyma). Woody vines, and vining shrubs, may be common, especially in boulderfield associations. Other typical herbaceous species for this alliance include Ageratina altissima var. roanensis, Anemone quinquefolia, Angelica triquinata, Arisaema triphyllum, Eurybia chlorolepis (= Aster chlorolepis), Athyrium filix-femina ssp. asplenioides, Cardamine clematitis, Actaea podocarpa (= Cimicifuga americana), Actaea racemosa (= Cimicifuga racemosa), Circaea alpina, Claytonia caroliniana, Clintonia borealis, Prosartes lanuginosa (= Disporum lanuginosum), Dryopteris campyloptera, Dryopteris intermedia, Dryopteris marginalis, Erythronium umbilicatum ssp. monostolum, Hylocomium splendens, Luzula acuminata, Maianthemum canadense, Medeola virginiana, Oxalis montana, Phacelia bipinnatifida, Phacelia fimbriata, Poa alsodes, Prenanthes altissima, Prenanthes roanensis, Rugelia nudicaulis, Saxifraga micranthidifolia, Solidago curtisii (= Solidago caesia var. curtisii), Solidago glomerata, Stellaria corei, Stellaria pubera, Streptopus lanceolatus var. roseus (= Streptopus roseus), Tiarella cordifolia, Thelypteris noveboracensis, and Trillium erectum.
Dynamics: No Data Available
Environmental Description: These forests occur in a cool, humid climate, typically at high elevations (1066-1828 m [3500-6000 feet]) on a variety of sites, from upper concave slopes and steep, periglacial boulderfields and talus slopes, to flat ridgetops and saddles between ridges. Associations will vary with elevation, latitude, and geology and occur as small to large patches surrounded by other forest types, montane grasslands, or shrublands.
Geographic Range: Forests in this alliance are found in the high-elevation regions of the Blue Ridge, Cumberland, and Allegheny Mountains from West Virginia south to northern Georgia and may extend into the adjacent Ridge and Valley and Appalachian Plateau provinces. This alliance is found in Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: GA, KY, NC, SC?, TN, VA, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.842026
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: equivalent to A.266
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: ? IA4c. Yellow Birch Boulderfield Forest (Allard 1990)
? IA4d. Southern Appalachian Beech Gap (Allard 1990)
? IA4e. Southern Appalachian Northern Hardwoods Forest (Allard 1990)
? IA4d. Southern Appalachian Beech Gap (Allard 1990)
? IA4e. Southern Appalachian Northern Hardwoods Forest (Allard 1990)
- Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
- Bratton, S. P. 1975. The effect of the European wild boar, Sus scrofa, on Gray beech forest in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 56:1356-1366.
- Brown, D. M. 1941. Vegetation of Roan Mountain: A phytosociological and successional study. Ecological Monographs 11:61-97.
- Chafin, L. G., and S. B. Jones, Jr. 1989. Community structure of two Southern Appalachian boulderfields. Castanea 54:230-237.
- Davis, J. H., Jr. 1930. Vegetation of the Black Mountains of North Carolina: An ecological study. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 45:291-318.
- Evans, M., B. Yahn, and M. Hines. 2009. Natural communities of Kentucky 2009. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. 22 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, M. Hall, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, L. Sneddon, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2013-2019b. Screening alliances for induction into the U.S. National Vegetation Classification: Part 1 - Alliance concept review. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
- Fuller, R. D. 1977. Why does spruce not invade the high elevation beech forests of the Great Smoky Mountains? M.S. thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 64 pp.
- Golden, M. S. 1981. An integrated multivariate analysis of forest communities of the central Great Smoky Mountains. The American Midland Naturalist 106:37-53.
- Pittillo, J. D., and G. A. Smathers. 1979. Phytogeography of the Balsam Mountains and Pisgah Ridge, southern Appalachian Mountains. Pages 206-245 in: H. Lieth and E. Landolt, editors. Proceedings of the 16th International phytogeographic excursion. Veroff. Geobot. Inst., Stiftung Rubel, Zurich.
- Ramseur, G. S. 1960. The vascular flora of high mountain communities of the Southern Appalachians. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 76:82-112.
- Russell, N. H. 1953. The beech gaps of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 34:366-374.
- Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
- Singer, F. J., W. T. Swank, and E. E. C. Clebsch. 1984. Effects of wild pig rooting in a deciduous forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:464-473.
- Sneddon, L., M. Anderson, and K. Metzler. 1994. A classification and description of terrestrial community alliances in The Nature Conservancy''s Eastern Region: First approximation. Unpublished report to USDI Fish & Wildlife Service, Gap Analysis Program. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Heritage Task Force, Boston, MA. 116 pp.
- Wharton, C. H. 1978. The natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta. 227 pp.
- White, P. S., E. R. Buckner, J. D. Pittillo, and C. V. Cogbill. 1993. High-elevation forests: Spruce-fir forests, northern hardwoods forests, and associated communities. Pages 305-337 in: W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht, editors. Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: Upland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
- Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1-80.