Print Report

CEGL004982 Betula alleghaniensis - Tilia americana var. heterophylla / Acer spicatum / Ribes cynosbati / Dryopteris marginalis Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Yellow Birch - Appalachian Basswood / Mountain Maple / Eastern Prickly Gooseberry / Marginal Woodfern Forest

Colloquial Name: Southern Appalachian Hardwood Rich Boulderfield Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association includes boulderfield forests of the Southern Appalachians, with abundant Betula alleghaniensis, but in habitats that allow for more diverse canopies, including other species such as Aesculus flava, Betula lenta, and Tilia americana var. heterophylla. This community occurs in a cool, humid climate, on steep, rocky, northwest- to northeast-facing, middle to upper concave slopes, or in saddles between ridges, at moderate to high elevations (610-1220 m [2000-4000 feet]) of the Blue Ridge and possibly ranging into the Cumberland Mountains and adjacent Ridge and Valley and Appalachian Plateau provinces. It grows on bouldery talus and is often associated with small streams and seepage. Betula alleghaniensis in the canopy are often stunted and gnarled, with roots that may have grown to encircle the boulders. The canopy is much more open than the surrounding forest and tree windthrow is common, leaving patches of exposed mineral soil and gaps in the canopy. A woody layer of shrubs and vines is usually well-developed. Rooting opportunities for most herbaceous plants is limited because of the development of this community on periglacial boulderfields of blocky talus, thus herbaceous cover is only sparse to moderate. Typical shrubs and vines which are more abundant in this type than in other associations in this alliance include Acer spicatum, Aristolochia macrophylla, Hydrangea arborescens, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Toxicodendron radicans, Vitis spp., Ribes cynosbati, and Ribes rotundifolium. Dryopteris marginalis is often an abundant herb. This type is conceptually similar to ~Betula alleghaniensis / Ribes glandulosum / Polypodium appalachianum Forest (CEGL006124)$$, which is more restricted to more extreme boulderfield situations at high elevations (1370-1615 m [4500-5300 feet]). The association described here generally occurs at lower elevations in less extreme environmental situations and lacks species characteristic of high elevations. However, it ranges to higher elevations than the typical rich cove forests with which it shares canopy species. Similar Betula alleghaniensis-dominated forests occur on glaciated rocky slopes in the upper mid-Atlantic and in the northeastern United States. The Betula alleghaniensis-dominated periglacial boulderfields of the southern Appalachian Mountains are distinguished from the northern forests by the occurrence of Southern Appalachian endemic species, better developed shrub layers and slightly less species diversity.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association includes boulderfield forests of the Southern Appalachians, with abundant Betula alleghaniensis, but in habitats that allow for more diverse canopies, including other species such as Aesculus flava, Betula lenta, and Tilia americana var. heterophylla. This community occurs in a cool, humid climate, on steep, rocky, northwest- to northeast-facing, middle to upper concave slopes, or in saddles between ridges, at moderate to high elevations (610-1220 m [2000-4000 feet]) of the Blue Ridge and possibly ranging into the Cumberland Mountains and adjacent Ridge and Valley and Appalachian Plateau provinces. It grows on bouldery talus and is often associated with small streams and seepage. Betula alleghaniensis in the canopy are often stunted and gnarled, with roots that may have grown to encircle the boulders. The canopy is much more open than the surrounding forest and tree windthrow is common, leaving patches of exposed mineral soil and gaps in the canopy. A woody layer of shrubs and vines is usually well-developed. Rooting opportunities for most herbaceous plants is limited because of the development of this community on periglacial boulderfields of blocky talus, thus herbaceous cover is only sparse to moderate. Typical shrubs and vines which are more abundant in this type than in other associations in this alliance include Acer spicatum, Aristolochia macrophylla, Hydrangea arborescens, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Toxicodendron radicans, Vitis spp., Ribes cynosbati, and Ribes rotundifolium. Dryopteris marginalis is often an abundant herb. This type is conceptually similar to ~Betula alleghaniensis / Ribes glandulosum / Polypodium appalachianum Forest (CEGL006124)$$, which is more restricted to more extreme boulderfield situations at high elevations (1370-1615 m [4500-5300 feet]). The association described here generally occurs at lower elevations in less extreme environmental situations and lacks species characteristic of high elevations. However, it ranges to higher elevations than the typical rich cove forests with which it shares canopy species. Similar Betula alleghaniensis-dominated forests occur on glaciated rocky slopes in the upper mid-Atlantic and in the northeastern United States. The Betula alleghaniensis-dominated periglacial boulderfields of the southern Appalachian Mountains are distinguished from the northern forests by the occurrence of Southern Appalachian endemic species, better developed shrub layers and slightly less species diversity.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This association includes boulderfield forests of the Southern Appalachians, with abundant Betula alleghaniensis, but in habitats that allow for more diverse canopies, including other species such as Aesculus flava, Betula lenta, and Tilia americana var. heterophylla. Betula alleghaniensis in the canopy are often stunted and gnarled, with roots that may have grown to encircle the boulders. The canopy is much more open than the surrounding forest and tree windthrow is common, leaving patches of exposed mineral soil and gaps in the canopy. A woody layer of shrubs and vines is usually well-developed. Rooting opportunities for most herbaceous plants is limited because of the development of this community on periglacial boulderfields of blocky talus, thus herbaceous cover is only sparse to moderate. Typical shrubs and vines which are more abundant in this type than in other associations in this alliance include Acer spicatum, Aristolochia macrophylla, Toxicodendron radicans, Hydrangea arborescens, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Ribes cynosbati, and Ribes rotundifolium. Dryopteris marginalis is often an abundant herb.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This community occurs in a cool, humid climate, usually found on steep, rocky, northwest- to northeast-facing, middle to upper concave slopes, or in saddles between ridges, at moderate to high elevation (610-1220 m [2000-4000 feet]). These forests grow over bouldery talus and are often associated with small streams and seepage.

Geographic Range: This community occurs in the southern Appalachian Mountains of the eastern United States.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  GA, NC, TN, VA?




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Betula alleghaniensis - Tilia americana var. heterophylla / Acer spicatum / Ribes cynosbati / Dryopteris marginalis Forest (Major et al. 1999)
< IA4c. Yellow Birch Boulderfield Forest (Allard 1990)
< Oligotrophic Forest (Rawinski 1992)

Concept Author(s): Southern Blue Ridge Planning Team

Author of Description: M.P. Schafale and M. Pyne

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-22-08

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Chafin, L. G., and S. B. Jones, Jr. 1989. Community structure of two Southern Appalachian boulderfields. Castanea 54:230-237.
  • Evans, M., B. Yahn, and M. Hines. 2009. Natural communities of Kentucky 2009. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. 22 pp.
  • Fleming, G. P., and K. D. Patterson. 2009a. A vegetation classification for the Appalachian Trail: Virginia south to Georgia. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. In-house analysis, March 2009.
  • GNHP [Georgia Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data. Georgia Natural Heritage Program, Wildlife Resources Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Social Circle.
  • Major, C. S., C. Bailey, J. Donaldson, R. McCoy, C. Nordman, M. Williams, and D. Withers. 1999. An ecological inventory of selected sites in the Cherokee National Forest. Cost Share Agreement #99-CCS-0804-001. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage, Nashville, TN.
  • Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. No date. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Rawinski, T. J. 1992. A classification of Virginia''s indigenous biotic communities: Vegetated terrestrial, palustrine, and estuarine community classes. Unpublished document. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical Report No. 92-21. Richmond, VA. 25 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Schafale, Mike P. Personal communication. Ecologist, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • TDNH [Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage]. 2018. Unpublished data. Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage, Nashville, TN.