Print Report
G125 Schoenoplectus spp. - Typha spp. Freshwater Marsh Group
Type Concept Sentence: This group is composed of freshwater emergent herbaceous marshes in the cool-temperate region of eastern North America from western Minnesota and northern Missouri east. Stands of this group are usually dominated by medium to tall graminoids, though short forbs dominate some stands in the east. Sites are flooded for a few weeks to the entire growing season but water depth is shallow.
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Bulrush species - Cattail species Freshwater Marsh Group
Colloquial Name: Eastern North American Freshwater Marsh
Hierarchy Level: Group
Type Concept: These freshwater emergent marshes are dominated by herbaceous vegetation, primarily graminoids. Schoenoplectus spp., Typha spp., and Zizania spp. are common dominants though other species can be abundant or even form nearly monotypic stands. They are common throughout the northern half of the eastern United States and adjacent Canadian provinces. Freshwater marshes occur in closed or open basins that are generally flat and shallow and are always or nearly always flooded. Water depths range from a few centimeters to approximately 1 m. They are associated with lakes, ponds, slow-moving streams, and/or impoundments or ditches. These marshes include those along the shores and estuaries of the Great Lakes. Dominant vegetation tends to be 1-2 m tall and cover varies from moderate to dense. Scattered shrubs may be present but total less than 25% cover. Trees are generally absent and, if present, are scattered. The substrate is typically muck over mineral soil, though where waves or currents are stronger or in some low-nutrient sites, the mineral soil may be exposed.
Diagnostic Characteristics: Permanently or semipermanently flooded freshwater emergent marshes dominated by herbaceous species, often including Typha spp. and/or Schoenoplectus spp. but many species are possible, including Equisetum fluviatile, Eriocaulon aquaticum, Peltandra virginica, Pontederia cordata, and Zizania spp. Tall shrubs have <25% cover.
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Freshwater marshes have some overlap floristically and spatially with these other groups: ~Midwest Wet Prairie, Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp (G770)$$, ~Appalachian-Northeast Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp Group (G903)$$, ~Laurentian-Acadian Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp Group (G904)$$, ~Great Plains Freshwater Marsh Group (G325)$$, ~Central Interior Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp Group (G599)$$, ~Appalachian-Northeast Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp Group (G903)$$, and ~Laurentian-Acadian Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp Group (G904)$$. G770, G903 and G904 have flooding that is less deep and less permanent (sites often dry up by mid- to late-summer), and sites tend to be dominated by Carex spp., Calamagrostis canadensis, or Spartina pectinata. G325 is in similar habitats but found further west. Species and ranges of G325 and this group (G125) overlap and need to be clarified.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: Freshwater emergent marshes are dominated by medium to tall herbaceous plants, typically graminoids. Typical heights are 1-2 m, though a variety of low-forbs can predominate in some stands with heights rarely exceeding 0.5 m above the water surface. Vegetation cover is extremely variable from sparse to very dense. Shrubs are not common; when present, they tend to be on the drier portions of these communities.
Floristics: These freshwater marshes can be dominated by a variety of species. Typha spp. and Schoenoplectus spp. are common and widespread, but a wide variety of species may be dominant in any single stand. Dominants include Equisetum fluviatile, Eriocaulon aquaticum (in the eastern portion of the range and tends to be on more oligotrophic sites), Pontederia cordata (in the eastern portion of the range), Schoenoplectus acutus, Schoenoplectus americanus, Bolboschoenus fluviatilis (= Schoenoplectus fluviatilis), Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani, Sparganium spp., Typha angustifolia, Typha latifolia, Zizania aquatica, and Zizania palustris. Many other graminoids or broad-leaved forbs can be found in these marshes. Some of the common ones are Carex aquatilis, Carex lacustris, Carex pellita, Carex stricta, Eleocharis palustris, Leersia oryzoides, Peltandra virginica, and Sagittaria latifolia. Along the drier margins of some sites where soils are more saturated than flooded, Calla palustris, Symplocarpus foetidus, and Thelypteris palustris can sometimes be found, and in areas with more variable or shallow flooding, some wet meadow species may be present. Calamagrostis canadensis, Dulichium arundinaceum, and Spartina pectinata are typical of these areas. Floating-leaved or submergent species can be present where the water is deeper. Non-rooted floating-leaved species, typically Lemna spp., Spirodela polyrrhiza, and Wolffia spp., are often present to abundant in the spaces between the emergent plants. The invasives Lythrum salicaria and Phragmites australis are abundant in some sites and may even form nearly monotypic stands. Shrubs are absent to rare; when present, Alnus incana, Ilex verticillata, Myrica gale, and Spiraea alba are typical.
Dynamics: Wave and current action is typically minor in these marshes. Especially strong storms may create especially strong waves and/or currents that break up marsh vegetation. Prolonged drought or a lowering of the water table may lead to exposure of the soil and invasion by plants more typical of wet meadows. Prolonged increases in the water level will favor submergent or floating-leaved vegetation. These dynamics of flood and drought are more common on the western edge of this group''s range, though not as common as in the Great Plains.
Environmental Description: Climate: The climate of these marshes ranges from cool-temperate to sub-boreal in southern Canada and the northern United States to nearly warm-temperate in the Atlantic Coastal Plain in Virginia and Maryland. Soil/substrate/hydrology: Most examples of these marshes are eutrophic with muck over mineral soil as the substrate. Where wave or currents are more active, the mineral soil may be exposed. Some examples of these marshes occur on oligotrophic sites where sand is the substrate. Parts of these marshes can occur on floating root mats which may move with prevailing currents or winds. Marshes are permanently to semipermanently flooded with water depths from a few centimeters to over 1 m deep except in very dry years.
Geographic Range: This freshwater marsh group is found across most of the northern half of the eastern United States and adjacent Canada. This area stretches from New England and New Brunswick south to Virginia and west through the Great Lakes area to eastern North Dakota and northwestern Ontario, south to northern Missouri.
Nations: CA,US
States/Provinces: CT, DC?, DE, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NB, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NS, NY, OH, ON, PA, PE, QC, RI, SD, TN, VA, VT, WI, WV
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.837180
Confidence Level: Low
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: GNR
Greasons: No Data Available
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: > Emergent Aquatics (Curtis 1959) [Does not include the Great Lakes shore marshes in Wisconsin.]
> Emergent Marsh (Kost et al. 2007)
>< Great Lakes Marsh (Kost et al. 2007)
> Emergent Marsh (Kost et al. 2007)
>< Great Lakes Marsh (Kost et al. 2007)
- Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of plant communities. Reprinted in 1987. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 657 pp.
- Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
- Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]