Print Report

CEGL005913 Pinus contorta / Vaccinium membranaceum / Xerophyllum tenax Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Lodgepole Pine / Thinleaf Huckleberry / Common Beargrass Forest

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This large-patch to matrix type is manifested as a seral type from central Idaho northward to northern Idaho, eastern Washington, western Montana and southwestern Alberta. This association is most prominent in west-central and central Montana forests. This association''s elevation range is rather broad, from 1030 to 2015 m (3100-6600 feet). It occupies primarily south- through west-facing, moderate to steep slopes and is usually found on midslope to slope shoulder positions. It also occurs on benches associated with broad ridges. Soils are well-drained and derived from a broad spectrum of parent materials including glacial till and drift, both calcareous and noncalcareous sedimentary types, intrusive and extrusive igneous rock and metamorphic types, particularly quartzite. In one study soil texture ranged from gravelly sandy loams to silts. Ground surfaces have little or no bare soil or rock exposed. The canopy structure ranges from moderately open to closed (>60% cover) with Pinus contorta being strongly dominant in this layer, with lesser amounts of Larix occidentalis and Pseudotsuga menziesii. At mid to upper elevation limits of the type, Abies grandis, Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii may be minor components of the overstory and major components of the subcanopy. A tall-shrub layer is absent and even scattered individuals are rare. A short-shrub layer dominates the undergrowth with Vaccinium membranaceum being dominant, often exceeding 50% canopy cover; Spiraea betulifolia, Lonicera utahensis, Paxistima myrsinites, Amelanchier alnifolia, and Rosa gymnocarpa are the other high-constancy species of this layer. Dwarf-shrub layer species that occur with consistency include only Vaccinium scoparium and Mahonia repens. The herbaceous layer is generally relatively depauperate with the diagnostic species Xerophyllum tenax being strongly dominant (average cover reported by various studies ranging from 25 to 61%). Only two graminoids occur consistently and are well-represented in cover, Calamagrostis rubescens and Carex geyeri. Other forbs with moderate to high constancy include Arnica cordifolia, Arnica latifolia, Chimaphila umbellata, Orthilia secunda, Thalictrum occidentale, and Viola orbiculata; not all of these forbs have high constancy throughout the range of the type.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: With the comparatively recent emphasis on developing descriptions of (and keys to) existing vegetation (Grossman et al. 1998), it has yet to be determined at what cover values forest vegetation types will be distinguished one from another when the canopy tree species are mostly seral in nature and have a broad environmental range (broad niche). Pfister et al. (1977) recognized Pinus contorta community types only when no other, more shade-tolerant tree species could be found on site. With Pinus contorta, which is exclusively seral except with respect to some subspecies on unusual substrates or atypical environments, researchers in Glacier National Park took the position that this very shade-intolerant, stand-replacing fire-adapted species should have several times the cover of the next most abundant canopy species for a Pinus contorta type to be recognized. What is really being indicated by this approach are areas having experienced stand-replacing fires (or similar catastrophic disturbance, e.g., clearcutting). Another approach could simply recognize the plurality of tree cover in assigning stands to particular associations treating existing vegetation. The stands representing this type are climax in a number of different tree series including Abies lasiocarpa, Abies grandis, Tsuga mertensiana, and Pseudotsuga menziesii. That this association in fact occurs in the states and USFS Sections listed derives from this writer''s interpretation of constancy/cover tables of various authors/publications; where Pinus contorta is listed as a major seral species the inference has been made that stands quite likely occur on the landscape where this species strongly dominates the upper canopy (often observed throughout northern Idaho and western Montana) (S. Cooper pers. comm.).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The canopy structure ranges from moderately open to closed (>60% cover) with Pinus contorta being strongly dominant in this layer though often joined by lesser amounts of Larix occidentalis and Pseudotsuga menziesii (sites beyond the cold limits of Pinus ponderosa for the most part). At mid to upper elevation limits of the type, Abies grandis, Abies lasiocarpa, and Picea engelmannii may be minor components of the overstory and major components of the subcanopy. A tall-shrub layer is absent and even scattered individuals are rare. The short-shrub layer dominates the undergrowth with Vaccinium membranaceum being dominant, often exceeding 50% canopy cover; Spiraea betulifolia, Lonicera utahensis, Paxistima myrsinites, Amelanchier alnifolia, and Rosa gymnocarpa are the other high-constancy species of this layer. Dwarf-shrub layer species that occur with consistency include only Vaccinium scoparium, Vaccinium myrtillus and Mahonia repens (= Berberis repens); if the cover of either of these Vaccinium species exceeds approximately 5%, then a different association is indicated. The herbaceous layer is generally relatively depauperate with the diagnostic species Xerophyllum tenax being strongly dominant (average cover reported by various studies ranging from 25 to 61%). Only two graminoids occur consistently and are well-represented in cover, Calamagrostis rubescens and Carex geyeri. Other forbs with moderate to high constancy include Arnica cordifolia, Arnica latifolia, Chimaphila umbellata, Orthilia secunda (= Pyrola secunda), Thalictrum occidentale, and Viola orbiculata; not all of these forbs have high constancy throughout the range of the type.

Dynamics:  Data from the subalpine zone of northern Idaho indicate that because of natural mortality patterns Pinus contorta canopy domination is not expected to last more than 160-180 years following stand initiation (Cooper et al. 1987). Stands of this association are predominantly early, mid and late seral stages succeeding to ~Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Vaccinium membranaceum / Xerophyllum tenax Forest (CEGL005917)$$ and ~Pseudotsuga menziesii / Vaccinium membranaceum / Xerophyllum tenax Forest (CEGL005852)$$.

Environmental Description:  This large-patch to matrix type is manifested as a seral type from central Idaho northward to northern Idaho, eastern Washington, western Montana and southwestern Alberta, and it very probably will be identified for British Columbia. This association is most prominent in west-central and central Montana forests. This association''s elevation range is rather broad, from 1030 to 2015 m (3100-6600 feet). Virtually the whole of this appreciable elevation range can be realized in a given geographic area. It occupies primarily south- through west-facing, moderate to steep slopes and is usually found on midslope to slope shoulder positions. It also occurs on benches associated with broad ridges. Soils are well-drained and derived from a broad spectrum of parent materials including glacial till and drift, both calcareous and noncalcareous sedimentary types, intrusive and extrusive igneous rock and metamorphic types, particularly quartzite. In one study soil texture ranged from gravelly sandy loams to silts, and a yet greater range in texture can be expected across the type''s distribution. Ground surfaces have little or no bare soil or rock exposed.

Geographic Range: This large-patch to matrix type is found from central Idaho north to northern Idaho, to eastern Washington, western Montana and southwestern Alberta, and it very probably will be identified for British Columbia with additional crosswalking.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, ID, MT, OR?, WA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: >< Abies grandis / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981)
>< Abies grandis / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977)
>< Abies grandis / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type, Vaccinium membranaceum Phase (Cooper et al. 1987)
>< Abies lasiocarpa - (Pinus contorta) / Xerophyllum tenax Vegetation Type (Achuff et al. 2002)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type, Vaccinium globulare (= Vaccinium membranaceum) Phase (Cooper et al. 1987)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type, Vaccinium globulare (= Vaccinium membranaceum) Phase (Pfister et al. 1977)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type, Vaccinium globulare (= Vaccinium membranaceum) Phase (Steele et al. 1981)
>< Abies lasiocarpa / Xerophyllum tenax Plant Association (Williams et al. 1995)
= Pinus contorta / Vaccinium membranaceum / Xerophyllum tenax Forest (Hop et al. 2007)
>< Pseudotsuga menziesii / Vaccinium membranaceum Habitat Type, Xerophyllum tenax Phase (Pfister et al. 1977)
>< Tsuga mertensiana / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977)
>< Tsuga mertensiana / Xerophyllum tenax Habitat Type, Vaccinium membranaceum Phase (Cooper et al. 1987)

Concept Author(s): Hop et al. (2007)

Author of Description: S.V. Cooper

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-02-04

  • ANHIC [Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Community database files. Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development, Edmonton.
  • Achuff, P. L., R. L. McNeil, M. L. Coleman, C. Wallis and C. Wershler. 2002. Ecological land classification of Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta. Volume I: Integrated resource description. Parks Canada, Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta. 226 pp.
  • Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
  • Cooper, Steve. Personal communication. Ecologist, Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT.
  • Daubenmire, R. F., and J. B. Daubenmire. 1968. Forest vegetation of eastern Washington and northern Idaho. Washington State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No. 60. 104 pp.
  • Grossman, D. H., D. Faber-Langendoen, A. S. Weakley, M. Anderson, P. Bourgeron, R. Crawford, K. Goodin, S. Landaal, K. Metzler, K. D. Patterson, M. Pyne, M. Reid, and L. Sneddon. 1998. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the United States. Volume I. The national vegetation classification system: Development, status, and applications. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  • Hop, K., M. Reid, J. Dieck, S. Lubinski, and S. Cooper. 2007. U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program: Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI. 131 pp. plus Appendices A-L.
  • Johnson, C. G., Jr., and S. A. Simon. 1987. Plant associations of the Wallowa-Snake Province Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. Technical Paper R6-ECOL-TP-255A-86. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 399 pp. plus appendices.
  • Lillybridge, T. R., B. L. Kovalchik, C. K. Williams, and B. G. Smith. 1995. Field guide for forested plant associations of the Wenatchee National Forest. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-359. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 335 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Reid, M. S., S. V. Cooper, and G. Kittel. 2004. Vegetation classification of Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park. Final report for USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program, International Peace Park Mapping Project. NatureServe, Arlington VA.
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Williams, C. K., B. F. Kelly, B. G. Smith, and T. R. Lillybridge. 1995. Forest plant associations of the Colville National Forest. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-360. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 140 pp.