Print Report

G220 Pinus contorta Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Group

Type Concept Sentence: This group occupies upper montane and subalpine elevations of the Rocky Mountains, and is dominated by Pinus contorta with shrub, grass, or barren understories, typically on well-drained, gravelly, coarse-textured, and acidic parent materials.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Lodgepole Pine Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Group

Colloquial Name: Rocky Mountain Lodgepole Pine Forest & Woodland

Hierarchy Level:  Group

Type Concept: This group occupies upper montane to subalpine elevations of the Rocky Mountains, north into the Canadian Rockies and east into mountain "islands" of north-central Montana. Parent materials are typically well-drained, gravelly, coarse-textured, acidic, and are rarely formed from calcareous parent materials. Other stands occur over excessively well-drained pumice deposits, glacial till and alluvium on valley floors where there is cold-air accumulation, warm and droughty shallow soils over fractured quartzite bedrock, and shallow moisture-deficient soils with a significant component of volcanic ash. In these conditions where other conifers cannot become established, stands of Pinus contorta may persist for longer periods. These forests are dominated by Pinus contorta with shrub, grass, or barren understories. Sometimes there are intermingled mixed conifer/Populus tremuloides stands, with the latter occurring with inclusions of deeper, typically fine-textured soils. The shrub stratum may be conspicuous to absent; common species include Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Artemisia tridentata, Juniperus communis, Ceanothus velutinus, Linnaea borealis, Mahonia repens, Purshia tridentata, Spiraea betulifolia, Spiraea douglasii, Shepherdia canadensis, Vaccinium scoparium, Vaccinium cespitosum, Vaccinium membranaceum, Symphoricarpos albus, and Ribes spp. Common herbaceous species include Festuca idahoensis, Elymus elymoides, Calamagrostis rubescens, Carex geyeri, Carex pensylvanica, and Carex rossii.

Diagnostic Characteristics: This group is characterized by needle-leaved evergreen trees, strongly dominated by Pinus contorta and may include smaller inclusions of Populus tremuloides. Understory growth forms may be conspicuous to absent, shrub- or graminoid-dominated.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: The higher elevation Pinus contorta forests of the southern Cascades in Oregon are included in ~Sierra-Cascade Cold-Dry Subalpine Woodland Group (G243)$$, corresponding to the distribution of Pinus contorta var. murrayana. In the mountains of British Columbia and western Alberta, this group transitions to a yet-to-be described boreal lodgepole group, as well as to a boreal mesic mixed conifer-hardwood group, where lodgepole mixes with boreal species such as Picea glauca and Picea mariana.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: These forests and woodlands occur most frequently as dense, even-aged, early- to mid-successional stands, or less often as uneven-aged, later-successional stands where other conifers cannot become established. The understory varies from a conspicuous or sparse layer of shrubs or grasses to nearly barren substrate.

Floristics: Pinus contorta is the overwhelming canopy dominant often forming dense stands. Other conifers such as spruce and fir may become established. Populus tremuloides can occur as a seral component or in mixed stands with the lodgepole. The understory varies and may be conspicuous to absent and dominated by shrubs or graminoids. Common shrubs include Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Arctostaphylos nevadensis, Artemisia tridentata, Juniperus communis, Ceanothus velutinus, Linnaea borealis, Mahonia repens, Purshia tridentata, Spiraea betulifolia, Spiraea douglasii, Shepherdia canadensis, Vaccinium scoparium, Vaccinium cespitosum, Vaccinium membranaceum, Menziesia ferruginea, Symphoricarpos albus, and Ribes spp. Common herbaceous species include Osmorhiza berteroi, Thalictrum occidentale, Thalictrum fendleri, Xerophyllum tenax, Clintonia uniflora, Carex inops ssp. inops, Arnica cordifolia, Festuca idahoensis, Elymus elymoides, Calamagrostis rubescens, Carex geyeri, Carex pensylvanica, and Carex rossii.

Dynamics:  Pinus contorta is an aggressively colonizing, shade-intolerant conifer which usually occurs in lower subalpine forests in the major ranges of the western United States. Establishment is episodic and linked to stand-replacing disturbances, primarily fire. The incidence of serotinous cones varies within and between varieties of Pinus contorta, being most prevalent in Rocky Mountain populations. Closed, serotinous cones appear to be strongly favored by fire, and allow rapid colonization of fire-cleared substrates (Burns and Honkala 1990a). Hoffman and Alexander (1980, 1983) report that in stands where Pinus contorta exhibits a multi-aged population structure, with regeneration occurring, there is typically a higher proportion of trees bearing nonserotinous cones. The dominance of Pinus contorta in associations in this group is related to fire history and topo-edaphic conditions (Pfister et al. 1977, Hoffman and Alexander 1980, Steele et al. 1981, Mauk and Henderson 1984). Following stand-replacing fires, Pinus contorta will rapidly colonize and develop into dense stands of even-aged trees. These stands, while frequently persistent for more than 100 years, may succeed to spruce-fir forests or woodlands. Most (but not all) forests in this group are early- to mid-successional forests which developed following fires.

Some Pinus contorta forest associations occur, and will persist, on sites that are too extreme for other conifers to establish. These include excessively well-drained pumice deposits (Volland 1976), glacial till and alluvium on valley floors where there is cold-air accumulation (Steele et al. 1981), warm and droughty shallow soils over fractured quartzite bedrock (Mauk and Henderson 1984), well-drained to xeric stabilized sand dunes (Jenny et al. 1969, Kumler 1969), and shallow moisture-deficient soils with a significant component of volcanic ash (Cooper et al. 1987). Some Pinus contorta forests can be persistent for hundreds of years, a result of a lack of seed source or the competitive exclusion of other conifer species (Moir 1969a, Pfister et al. 1977, Despain 1973b, Hoffman and Alexander 1983, Cooper et al. 1987), or the frost tolerance of Pinus contorta seedlings and mature trees, which allows the development of monotypic stands in frost-prone areas (Steele et al. 1981, Burns and Honkala 1990a).

Environmental Description:  This group occupies upper montane to subalpine elevations of the Rocky Mountains, north into the Canadian Rockies and east into mountain "islands" of north-central Montana. Elevations range from just over 900 m in the northeastern Cascades to well over 3100 m in the Uinta Mountains in Utah and the southern Colorado Rockies.

Climate: Temperature regimes are extreme throughout this region and frequent growing season frosts occur. Annual precipitation in these montane and subalpine habitats ranges from less than 40 cm to over 150 cm, usually with the majority falling as snow. Late-melting snowpacks provide the majority of growing season moisture.

Soil/substrate/hydrology: Stands typically occur over well-drained, gravelly, coarse-textured, acidic, and rarely formed from calcareous parent materials occasionally with inclusions of deeper, typically fine-textured soils. Other stands occur over excessively well-drained pumice deposits, glacial till and alluvium on valley floors where there is cold-air accumulation, warm and droughty shallow soils over fractured quartzite bedrock, and shallow moisture-deficient soils with a significant component of volcanic ash.

Geographic Range: This group occurs at upper montane to subalpine elevations of the Rocky Mountains, from Colorado north into the Canadian Rockies, west across Idaho into the eastern Cascades in Washington, the Blue Mountains in Oregon, and east onto mountain "islands" of north-central Montana.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  AB, BC, CA?, CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < LP Lodgepole pine, Interior Cedar Hemlock and Interior Douglas-fir zones (Ecosystems Working Group 1998)
< Lodgepole Pine: 218 (Eyre 1980)
< Montane Seral Forests (Peet 2000)
>< Pl - Huckleberry - Cladonia (ESSFwc2/02) (Lloyd et al. 1990)
>< Pl - Huckleberry - Knight''s plume (SBSmw/11) (Steen and Coupé 1997)
>< Pl - Huckleberry - Velvet-leaved blueberry (SBSmw/03) (Steen and Coupé 1997)
>< Pl - Juniper - Dwarf blueberry (SBSmc3/02) (DeLong et al. 1993)
>< Pl - Juniper - Dwarf blueberry (SBSmc3/02) (Steen and Coupé 1997)
>< Pl - Juniper - Ricegrass (SBSdk/02) (DeLong et al. 1993)
>< Pl - Juniper - Ricegrass (SBSdk/02) (Steen and Coupé 1997)
>< Pl - Juniper - Ricegrass (SBSdk/02) (Banner et al. 1993)
>< Pl - Velvet-leaved blueberry - Cladonia (SBSdh1/02) (DeLong 1996)
>< PlBl - Soopolallie - Kinnikinnick (MSdc2/04) (Steen and Coupé 1997)

Concept Author(s): D.G. Despain (1973b)

Author of Description: M.E. Hall

Acknowledgements: D. Tart

Version Date: 05-30-13

  • Alexander, R. M. 1986. Classification of the forest vegetation of Wyoming. Research Note RM-466. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 10 pp.
  • Arno, S. F., D. G. Simmerman, and R. E. Keane. 1985. Forest succession on four habitat types in western Montana. General Technical Report INT-177. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 74 pp.
  • Banner, A., W. MacKenzie, S. Haeussler, S. Thomson, J. Pojar, and R. Trowbridge. 1993. A field guide to site identification and interpretation for the Prince Rupert Forest Region. Ministry of Forests Research Program. Victoria, BC. Parts 1 and 2. Land Management Handbook Number 26.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  • Cooper, S. V., K. E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D. W. Roberts. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: A second approximation. General Technical Report INT-236.USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp. [reprinted in 1991]
  • DeLong, C. 1996. Draft field guide insert for site identification and interpretation for the Rocky Mountain Trench. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Prince George, BC. [update for LMH 15]
  • DeLong, C., D. Tanner, and M. J. Jull. 1993. A field guide for site identification and interpretation for the southwest portion of the Prince George Forest Region. Land Management Handbook No. 24. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Branch, Victoria, British Columbia.
  • Despain, D. G. 1973a. Vegetation of the Big Horn Mountains, Wyoming, in relation to substrate and climate. Ecological Monographs 43(3):329-354.
  • Despain, D. G. 1973b. Major vegetation zones of Yellowstone National Park. USDI National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park. Information Paper No. 19.
  • Ecosystems Working Group. 1998. Standards for broad terrestrial ecosystem classification and mapping for British Columbia. Prepared by the Ecosystems Working Group, Terrestrial Ecosystem Task Force, Resources Inventory Committee, for the Province of British Columbia. 174 pp. plus appendices. [http://srmwww.gov.bc.ca/risc/pubs/teecolo/tem/indextem.htm]
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Hess, K., and C. H. Wasser. 1982. Grassland, shrubland, and forest habitat types of the White River-Arapaho National Forest. Unpublished final report 53-82 FT-1-19. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 335 pp.
  • Hess, K., and R. R. Alexander. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt national forests in northcentral Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-266. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 48 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1976. Forest vegetation of the Bighorn Mountains, Wyoming: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-170. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 38 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1980. Forest vegetation of the Routt National Forest in northwestern Colorado: A habitat type classification. General Technical Report RM-221. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 41 pp.
  • Hoffman, G. R., and R. R. Alexander. 1983. Forest vegetation of the White River National Forest in western Colorado: A habitat type classification. Research Paper RM-249. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 36 pp.
  • Jenny, H., R. J. Arkley, and A. M. Schultz. 1969. The pygmy forest-podsol ecosystem and its dune associates of the Mendocino coast. Madrono 20:60-74.
  • Johnson, C. G., and R. R. Clausnitzer. 1992. Plant associations of the Blue and Ochoco mountains. R6-ERW-TP-036-92. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 163 pp. plus appendices.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1997. Ecological types of the Upper Gunnison Basin. USDA Forest Service, Grand Mesa-Uncompahgre-Gunnison national forests. Review Draft. 539 pp.
  • Kumler, M. L. 1969. Plant succession on the sand dunes of the Oregon coast. Ecology 50:695-704.
  • Lloyd, D. A., K. Angove, G. Hope, and C. Thompson. 1990. A guide for site identification and interpretation of the Kamloops Forest Region. 2 volumes. Land Management Handbook No. 23. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC. [http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/docs/lmh/lmh23.htm]
  • Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
  • Mehl, M. S. 1992. Old-growth descriptions for the major forest cover types in the Rocky Mountain Region. Pages 106-120 in: M. R. Kaufmann, W. H. Moir, and R. L. Bassett. Old-growth forests in the southwest and Rocky Mountain regions. Proceedings of the old-growth forests in the Rocky Mountains and Southwest conference, Portal, AZ. March 9-13, 1992. General Technical Report RM-213. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Meidinger, D., and J. Pojar, editors. 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Special Report Series No. 6. Victoria, BC. 330 pp.
  • Moir, W. H. 1969a. The lodgepole pine zone in Colorado. The American Midland Naturalist 81(1):87-99.
  • Peet, R. K. 2000. Forests and meadows of the Rocky Mountains. Chapter 3 in: M. G. Barbour and W. D. Billings, editors. North American terrestrial vegetation. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, New York. 434 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Steen, O. A., and R. A. Coupé. 1997. A field guide to forest site identification and interpretation for the Cariboo Forest Region. Land Management Handbook No. 39. Parts 1 and 2. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Program, Victoria, BC.
  • Volland, L. A. 1976. Plant communities of the central Oregon pumice zone. USDA Forest Service R-6 Area Guide 4-2. Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 113 pp.
  • Whipple, S. A. 1975. The influence of environmental gradients on vegetational structure in the subalpine forest of the southern Rocky Mountains. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Williams, C. K., and B. G. Smith. 1990. Forested plant associations of the Wenatchee National Forest. Unpublished draft prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 217 pp.