Print Report

CEGL000331 Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Ribes (montigenum, lacustre, inerme) Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Subalpine Fir - Engelmann Spruce / (Gooseberry Currant, Prickly Currant, White-stem Gooseberry) Forest

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This forested association occurs in southern Idaho, southern Montana, western Wyoming, central and southern Utah, and through the Colorado mountains. This association is found between 2225-3415 m (7300-11,200 feet) elevation. It occurs on plateaus, benchlands, and slopes ranging from gentle to very steep but is normally on cold northwest to northeast aspects. These forest can be large continuous stands or patch stands interspersed with open meadows. These forests are heavily shaded with a very open shrub layer of just a few individuals. Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii dominate the dense tree canopy, while any of the following four Ribes species may be present the shrub layer: Ribes inerme, Ribes lacustre, Ribes montigenum, or Ribes wolfii. Herbaceous layer is depauperate but rich in forbs. Common forbs include Aquilegia coerulea, Arnica cordifolia, Osmorhiza berteroi, and Thalictrum fendleri. A few graminoids are often present and often include Carex rossii, Carex geyeri, Achnatherum lettermanii, Bromus carinatus, and Festuca idahoensis.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: In Grand Teton National Park, stands were separated into Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Ribes lacustre and Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Ribes montigenum types. While both would fit into the broader USNVC concept, only one local description can be entered under one elcode.

Ribes montigenum is a major undergrowth component of the Abies lasiocarpa / Senecio sanguisorboides habitat type of central New Mexico (Moir and Ludwig 1979). Langenheim (1962) and Shepherd (1975) both describe a type similar to Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum for Colorado.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This type is consistently dominated by Picea engelmannii and Abies lasiocarpa. Late-successional stands may have a dominant overstory of Picea engelmannii possibly resulting, in part, from a reproductive advantage over Abies through exposure of mineral soil seedbeds by heavy grazing (Roe et al. 1970). Steele et al. (1981) note that Pinus albicaulis codominates with Abies lasiocarpa, with Picea becoming increasingly prevalent to the south and east. Both Abies and Picea are found layering in the understory (Cooper and Pfister 1985, Youngblood and Mauk 1985). Although an important early-seral associate, Populus tremuloides is usually present in mature stands only as remnant stems of poor vigor. Pinus contorta is a minor seral species. This association is generally above the cold limits of Pseudotsuga, but the species does occur at lower elevations of the type.

The shrub layer is sparse, with scattered clumps of Ribes montigenum usually confined to near the bases of large trees. Other shrubs, which may occur in openings or on recently disturbed areas, include Sambucus racemosa, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, and Shepherdia canadensis. The undergrowth is characteristically depauperate. Forbs with high constancies are Aquilegia coerulea, Arnica cordifolia, Arnica latifolia, Achillea millefolium, Astragalus miser, Chamerion angustifolium (= Epilobium angustifolium), Ligusticum porteri, Lupinus argenteus, Mertensia arizonica, Thalictrum fendleri, Thalictrum occidentale, Fragaria virginiana, Polemonium pulcherrimum, Pseudocymopterus montanus, Orthilia secunda (= Pyrola secunda), Frasera speciosa, Osmorhiza berteroi (= Osmorhiza chilensis), and Osmorhiza depauperata. Graminoids are weakly represented. Carex rossii is the only sedge encountered with any regularity. Under disturbed conditions, or in seral stands with incomplete conifer canopies, Lupinus argenteus, Lathyrus lanszwertii, Hymenoxys hoopesii (= Helenium hoopesii), Chamerion angustifolium, Aquilegia coerulea, and Achillea millefolium are expected to increase.

Youngblood and Mauk (1985) recognize two phases of Abies lasiocarpa/Ribes montigenum for Utah, the Ribes montigenum phase, representing the modal conditions of the type, at elevations between 2895-3200 m (9500-10,500 feet) on gentle to steep straight slopes, and the Mertensia arizonica phase, representing the most hydric extent of the type at the highest elevations, usually above 3050 m (10,000 feet) on gentle to moderate slopes or swales. It has a dense, relatively lush ground cover with numerous forbs as a result of abundant ground moisture from snowpack accumulations on lee slopes and numerous seeps and small springs.

Pfister (1972) recognizes three phases of this type for Utah, a Ribes montigenum phase (modal type), a Thalictrum fendleri phase representing the moist mesic extent of the type and characterized by the presence of Thalictrum fendleri and a much more diverse herb layer, and a Lonicera involucrata phase, a geographic isolate found in the LaSal and Abajo mountains of Utah. In addition to the three phases of Pfister, Mauk and Henderson (1984) recognize a Trisetum spicatum phase occupying the cool, dry, and windswept exposures in the timberline zone from 3200-3415 m (10,500-11,200 feet), and a Pinus contorta phase occurring only in the south-central Uinta Mountains near 3140 m (10,300 feet) on gentle to moderately steep slopes and ridges with well-drained soils.

Steele et al. (1983) recognize two phases of this type in Wyoming, the Ribes montigenum modal type phase and the Pinus albicaulis phase representing the upper extremes of Abies lasiocarpa/Ribes montigenum between 2950-3110 m (9680-10,200 feet) and characterized by the presence and frequent dominance of Pinus albicaulis.

Dynamics:  Evidence from stands burned by wildfire indicate that this type will be difficult to reforest and may persist as Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana- and bunchgrass-dominated communities (Cooper and Pfister 1985). However, according to Youngblood and Mauk (1985), following a major stand-destroying fire, remnant Populus tremuloides root systems resprout, creating clones. Invasion of Abies lasiocarpa follows, and saplings may develop quickly under this nurse crop of Populus tremuloides. Invasion of Picea is much slower and may be restricted to areas of bare soil. Pfister (1972) suggests this progression to a pure Abies - Picea climax, without further disturbance, may require at least 1000 years.

The uneven-aged climax stand usually has abundant Abies lasiocarpa seedlings and saplings in addition to vegetative layering. Picea engelmannii is found on raised root mounds and depressions in the understory, resulting from windthrow of the shorter lived Abies lasiocarpa following root rot (Youngblood and Mauk 1985). Abies lasiocarpa is almost uniformly susceptible to decay by Fomes annosus, which increases the chances of windthrow. Stands of Abies may also become infected with yellow witches'' broom rust (Melampsorella caryophyllacearum). Windthrow continually removes individuals or small groups of large-crowned old trees, allowing replacement of Populus, Abies, and Picea in the resultant openings. Devastation of old-growth Picea engelmannii overstories by the Engelmann spruce bark beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) creates sufficient disturbance to allow regeneration and release of all three tree species. The combination of these factors creates the characteristic all-aged structure of this type, in dynamic equilibrium with present environmental conditions and showing periodic fluctuations due to natural small-scale perturbations (Pfister 1972).

Environmental Description:  This association is found between 2409-3415 m (7300-11,200 feet) elevation. It occurs on plateaus, benchlands, and slopes ranging from gentle to very steep but is normally on cold northwest to northeast aspects. The forest is often broken by large meadows occupying the deeper soils of gentle basins along drainage systems. These meadows may be fairly dry and dominated by Artemisia, or fairly moist and dominated by grass, forbs, and sedges (Pfister 1972). Because of its wide distribution and broad range of altitudes, this association is found on a variety of substrate types, but soils are derived primarily from calcareous parent materials (Cooper and Pfister 1985). In Colorado, this common facultative riparian forest has a wide elevational range, 2500-3700 m. Stands occur along very steep streams where the riparian area is narrow and dominated by species of the surrounding forest. Soils are weakly developed, usually with only a structural B horizon, and generally have high rock and gravel content with pH ranging from 4.8-7.2. All of the soils have low temperatures. Textures range from loamy sands to silty clays; gravel content averages 18%, and the percentage of surface rock averages about 11% (Pfister 1972).

Geographic Range: This association is distributed from southern Idaho into Wyoming and south throughout Utah and Colorado.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CO, ID, MT, UT, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Ribes (montigenum, lacustre, inerme) Forest (Clark et al. 2009)
= Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Ribes montigenum Plant Association (Baker 1984a) [in Colorado.]
= Abies lasiocarpa - Picea engelmannii / Ribes spp. Forest (Carsey et al. 2003a)
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1983) [found in eastern Idaho and western Wyoming above 2440 m (8000 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Youngblood and Mauk 1985) [found on the high plateaus and mountains of central and southern Utah from 2895-3355 m (9500-11,000 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Mauk and Henderson 1984) [found in the Sawtooth, Uinta, and Caribou national forests of Idaho, and the Wasatch, Uinta, and Ashley national forests of Utah between 2410 and 3415 m (7900-11,200 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Pfister et al. 1977) [found in the Pryor Mountains from 2530-2590 m (8300-8500 feet), the Centennial Mountains from 2530-2745 m (8300-9000 feet), and the southern Gravelly Range at 2715 m (8900 feet) in southern Montana.]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Cooper and Pfister 1985) [found in the Bighorn Range in Montana from 2500-2790 m (8200-9150 feet).]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Henderson et al. 1976) [found in northwestern Utah and adjacent Idaho.]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Pfister 1972) [found on the southern Utah plateaus from 2835-3230 m (9300-10,600 feet), in the Uinta Range from 2835-3050 m (9300-10,000 feet), in the LaSal Mountains from 2895 m (9500 feet) to upper timberline, in the Wasatch Range from 2590 m (8500 feet) to upper timberline, and as low as 2225 m (7300 feet) in the Bear River Range of Utah.]
< Abies lasiocarpa / Ribes montigenum Habitat Type (Steele et al. 1981) [found in central Idaho from 2560-2990 m (8400-9800 feet).]
= Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Ribes spp. (Kittel et al. 1999b)
= Subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/one of several gooseberry species (Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Ribes spp. (montigenum, lacustre, inerme, wolfii)) Plant Association (Kittel et al. 1999a)

Concept Author(s): Western Ecology Group

Author of Description: L.D. Engelking and G. Kittel

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 01-06-05

  • Baker, W. L. 1984a. A preliminary classification of the natural vegetation of Colorado. Great Basin Naturalist 44(4):647-676.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Clark, D., M. Dela Cruz, T. Clark, J. Coles, S. Topp, A. Evenden, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and J. Von Loh. 2009. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Capitol Reef National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2009/187. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 882 pp.
  • Cogan, D., K. Varga, and G. Kittel. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Grand Teton National Park and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway. Final Project Report 2002-2005 Vegetation Mapping Project. Technical Memorandum 8260-06-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 87 pp. plus Appendixes A-F.
  • Cooper, S. V., and R. D. Pfister. 1985. Forest habitat types of the Crow and Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservations. Unpublished termination report prepared for Bureau of Indian Affairs, Billings Area Office by USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 118 pp.
  • Henderson, J. A., R. L. Mauk, D. L. Anderson, R. Ketchie, P. Lawton, S. Simon, R. H. Sperger, R. W. Young, and A. Youngblood. 1976. Preliminary forest habitat-types of northwestern Utah and adjacent Idaho. A report for the Department of Forestry and Outdoor Recreation, Utah State University, Logan. 99 pp.
  • Henderson, J. A., S. A. Simon, and S. B. Hartvigsen. 1977. Plant community types and habitat types of the Price District Manti-La Sal National Forest. Unpublished report prepared for Utah State University, Department of Forestry and Outdoor Recreation, Logan.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Jones, G., and S. Ogle. 2000. Characterization abstracts for vegetation types on the Bighorn, Medicine Bow, and Shoshone national forests. Prepared for USDA Forest Service, Region 2 by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming.
  • Kettler, S., and A. McMullen. 1996. Routt National Forest riparian vegetation classification. Report prepared for Routt National Forest by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, A. McMullen, and J. Sanderson. 1999b. A classification of riparian and wetland plant associations of Colorado: A user''s guide to the classification project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO. 70 pp. plus appendices.
  • Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  • Kittel, G., R. Rondeau, N. Lederer, and D. Randolph. 1994. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the White and Colorado River basins, Colorado. Final report submitted to Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Boulder. 166 pp.
  • Langenheim, J. H. 1962. Vegetation and environmental patterns in the Crested Butte area, Gunnison County, Colorado. Ecological Monographs 32:249-285.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Mauk, R. L., and J. A. Henderson. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. General Technical Report INT-170. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.
  • Peet, R. K. 1975. Forest vegetation of the east slope of the northern Colorado Front Range. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Pfister, R. D. 1972. Vegetation and soils in the subalpine forests of Utah. Unpublished dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman. 98 pp.
  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno, and R. C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 174 pp.
  • Shepherd, H. R. 1975. Vegetation of two dissimilar bighorn sheep ranges in Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife Report 4. 223 pp.
  • Steele, R., R. D. Pfister, R. A. Ryker, and J. A. Kittams. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. General Technical Report INT-114. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 138 pp.
  • Steele, R., S. V. Cooper, D. M. Ondov, D. W. Roberts, and R. D. Pfister. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho - western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 122 pp.
  • Tendick, A., B. Friesen, G. Kittel, P. Williams, J. Coles, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2011a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Cedar Breaks National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2011/470. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and R. L. Mauk. 1985. Coniferous forest habitat types of central and southern Utah. General Technical Report INT-187. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 89 pp.