Print Report

CEGL005277 Chamaedaphne calyculata / Carex oligosperma / Sphagnum spp. Poor Fen

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Leatherleaf / Few-seed Sedge / Peatmoss species Poor Fen

Colloquial Name: Laurentian Leatherleaf Poor Fen

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This dwarf-shrub poor fen community is found in the northern Great Lakes region and across much of central Canada. Sites are found on peatlands with low exposure to mineral-rich groundwater, including basin fens, shores above the level of seasonal flooding, and margins of larger peatlands. Stands have a saturated hydrology with a fibric Sphagnum spp. peat soil and a pH usually <4.5. Vegetation is dominated by an open dwarf-shrub/scrub conifer layer with very scattered trees (<10% cover). Microtopography is high to intermediate hummocks with hollows or a flat lawn of Sphagnum spp. Ericaceous dwarf-shrubs are dominant, including Chamaedaphne calyculata, Kalmia polifolia, and Ledum groenlandicum, and the creeping dwarf-shrubs Andromeda polifolia and Vaccinium oxycoccos. Betula pumila has low cover but is fairly constant. Scrub conifers include Larix laricina and Picea mariana. They also occur as scattered trees (>3 m). The herb layer is species-poor, containing Carex oligosperma, Carex limosa, Equisetum fluviatile, Menyanthes trifoliata, Sarracenia purpurea, and Scheuchzeria palustris. The moss layer forms a continuous hummocky mat dominated by Sphagnum angustifolium, Sphagnum fuscum, and Sphagnum magellanicum. Diagnostic features include the dominance of a dwarf-shrub ericaceous layer, absence of a tree layer (<10%), species-poor herbaceous layer, and a low abundance of minerotrophic indicators, such as Betula pumila, Carex aquatilis and Carex stricta.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: It is difficult to distinguish this leatherleaf poor fen from leatherleaf bogs in the field, but conceptually this type has somewhat more minerotrophic influence and a corresponding set of minerotrophic indicators. When minerotrophic indicators are absent or "very low", the type is placed in ~Chamaedaphne calyculata - Ledum groenlandicum - Kalmia polifolia Bog (CEGL005278)$$ (Harris et al. 1996). Stands with sparse black spruce-tamarack layer (<10% tree cover) are part of this type. Stands with 10-25% black spruce and tamarack cover are placed in black spruce/leatherleaf semi-treed bog, ~Picea mariana / Chamaedaphne calyculata / Sphagnum spp. Open Bog Woodland (CEGL005218)$$. This type also overlaps closely with a "scrubby poor fen type" ~Larix laricina / Chamaedaphne calyculata / Carex lasiocarpa Acidic Peatland (CEGL005226)$$. There are intermediates between this poor fen and sedge meadows, such as when Sphagnum spp. and Chamaedaphne calyculata have invaded a Carex rostrata meadow and the Carex rostrata is hanging on because it still has deep rooting in the underlying minerotrophic peat or mineral soil (N. Aaseng pers. comm. 2000).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The vegetation is dominated by an open dwarf-shrub/scrub conifer layer with very scattered trees (<10% cover). Microtopography is high to intermediate hummocks with hollows or a flat lawn of Sphagnum spp. Ericaceous dwarf-shrubs are dominant, including Chamaedaphne calyculata, Kalmia polifolia, and Ledum groenlandicum, and the creeping dwarf-shrubs Andromeda polifolia and Vaccinium oxycoccos. Betula pumila has low cover but is fairly constant. Scrub conifers include Larix laricina and Picea mariana. They also occur as scattered trees (>3 m). The herb layer is species-poor, containing Carex oligosperma, Carex limosa, Equisetum fluviatile, Menyanthes trifoliata, Sarracenia purpurea, and Scheuchzeria palustris. Minerotrophic indicators include Carex aquatilis, Carex rostrata, and Carex stricta. The moss layer forms a continuous hummocky mat dominated by Sphagnum angustifolium, Sphagnum fuscum, and Sphagnum magellanicum (Harris et al. 1996).

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Sites are found on peatlands with low exposure to mineral-rich groundwater, including basin fens, shores above the level of seasonal flooding, and margins of larger peatlands. Stands have a saturated hydrology with a fibric Sphagnum spp. peat soil and a pH usually <4.5. (Harris et al. 1996).

Geographic Range: This dwarf-shrub poor fen community is found in the northern Great Lakes region and across much of central Canada, ranging from the eastern lake states west to Minnesota, and northward from Quebec to Manitoba and other parts of Canada.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MI, MN, ON, QC?, WI




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: This type (CEGL002498) is separated into leatherleaf bog (CEGL005278) and leatherleaf poor fen (CEGL005277) types.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Chamaedaphne calyculata / Carex oligosperma / Sphagnum spp. Poor Fen Dwarf-shrubland (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Open Bog Leatherleaf Subtype]
= Open Sphagnum Bog Intermediate Subtype (MNNHP 1993)

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-29-00

  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Harris, A. G., S. C. McMurray, P. W. C. Uhlig, J. K. Jeglum, R. F. Foster, and G. D. Racey. 1996. Field guide to the wetland ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Science and Technology, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Field guide FG-01. 74 pp. plus appendix.
  • Hop, K., D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Lew-Smith, N. Aaseng, and S. Lubinski. [1999]. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI. 210 pp.
  • Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010a. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, Wisconsin. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/199. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 310 pp.
  • Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010c. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Michigan. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/201. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. 358 pp.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1999b. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Classification of the vegetation of Isle Royale National Park. The Nature Conservancy, Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN, and International Headquarters, Arlington, VA. 143 pp.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]