Print Report

CEGL005193 Thuja occidentalis - (Myrica gale) / Trichophorum alpinum / Drepanocladus spp. Fen

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Northern White-cedar - (Sweetgale) / Alpine Bulrush / Brown Moss species Fen

Colloquial Name: Northern White-cedar - Sweetgale Scrub Fen

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This white-cedar scrub fen type is found in southern Ontario, Canada, and possibly in adjacent northern areas of the Great Lakes states in the United States. Stands contain at least 40 cm or more of brown moss or sedge peat. Stands are rarely flooded, primarily saturated, and the pH is slightly alkaline to mildly acidic. The vegetation contains a scrub layer between 1 and 2 m tall dominated by Thuja occidentalis, with occasional Myrica gale. The ground layer contains a rich diversity of herbs and mosses, including Trichophorum alpinum and Drepanocladus spp.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Type concept is taken from the southern Ontario list of vegetation types by Lee et al. (1998) and needs rangewide review. Type may closely resemble a Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda shrub fen type, ~Dasiphora fruticosa / Carex interior - Carex flava - Sarracenia purpurea Fen (CEGL005140)$$. Trichophorum alpinum is the Kartesz (1999) name for Scirpus hudsonianus. See also ~Betula pumila - Dasiphora fruticosa / Carex lasiocarpa - Trichophorum alpinum Fen (CEGL002495)$$ for a similar, but more boreal, rich fen.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The vegetation contains a scrub layer between 1 and 2 m tall dominated by Thuja occidentalis, with occasional Myrica gale. The ground layer contains a rich diversity of herbs and mosses, including Trichophorum alpinum (= Scirpus hudsonianus) and Drepanocladus spp.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Stands contain at least 40 cm or more of brown moss or sedge peat. Stands are rarely flooded, primarily saturated, and the pH is slightly alkaline to mildly acidic.

Geographic Range: This white-cedar scrub fen type is found in southern Ontario, Canada, and possibly in adjacent northern areas of the Great Lakes states in the United States.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  MI, ON




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Thuja occidentalis - (Myrica gale) / Trichophorum alpinum / Drepanocladus spp. Shrubland (Faber-Langendoen 2001)
>< Low White Cedar Shrub Fen Type (Lee et al. 1998)
>< Tamarack - White Cedar Coniferous Treed Fen Type (Lee et al. 1998)

Concept Author(s): Lee et al. (1998)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-01-99

  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Harris, A. G., S. C. McMurray, P. W. C. Uhlig, J. K. Jeglum, R. F. Foster, and G. D. Racey. 1996. Field guide to the wetland ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Science and Technology, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Field guide FG-01. 74 pp. plus appendix.
  • Kartesz, J. T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: J. T. Kartesz and C. A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. 1999b. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Classification of the vegetation of Isle Royale National Park. The Nature Conservancy, Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN, and International Headquarters, Arlington, VA. 143 pp.