Print Report

CEGL002254 Carex pellita - Calamagrostis stricta Wet Meadow

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Woolly Sedge - Slimstem Reedgrass Wet Meadow

Colloquial Name: Woolly Sedge - Reedgrass Wet Meadow

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This sedge - reedgrass wet meadow is found in the northern Great Plains. Stands occur on level ground in shallow depressions and other lowlands on poorly drained sandy, loamy, or silty clay soils. Standing water may be present for a few to several weeks during most years. Soil pH is circumneutral to somewhat alkaline and organic content can be moderately high. The vegetation of this community provides approximately 100% cover and the dominant vegetation is graminoids, typically 0.5-1.0 m tall. Forbs can be common, but shrubs are rarely found in this type. The most abundant species are Calamagrostis stricta, Carex pellita, Carex sartwellii, Anemone canadensis, Apocynum cannabinum, Symphyotrichum lanceolatum, Eleocharis compressa, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis, Phalaris arundinacea, Polygonum amphibium, and Schoenoplectus americanus. Carex buxbaumii may be common, except in North Dakota.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Type concept is a little unclear. Simple dominance by Carex lanuginosa (now Carex pellita in Kartesz 1994) may not be adequate. Hydrologic placement is difficult, ranging from seasonally flooded to temporarily flooded. In the northern tallgrass prairie region, this type is difficult to distinguish from ~Spartina pectinata - Calamagrostis stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow (CEGL002027)$$ (wet prairie), or vice-versa. For example, in Minnesota, see Prairie Meadow/Carr Type [WMp73a] (Minnesota DNR 2005b) which almost always contains the typical wet prairie grass dominants along with woolly sedge. See also ~Carex pellita Wet Meadow (CEGL001809)$$.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The vegetation of this community provides approximately 100% cover, and the dominant vegetation is graminoid, typically 0.3-1.0 m tall. Forbs can be common; they had 25% relative cover in the stands studied by Nelson et al. (1981). Shrubs are rarely found in this type. The most abundant species are Calamagrostis stricta, Carex pellita (= Carex lanuginosa), Carex sartwellii, Anemone canadensis, Apocynum cannabinum, Symphyotrichum lanceolatum (= Aster lanceolatus), Eleocharis compressa, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus), Phalaris arundinacea, Polygonum amphibium, and Schoenoplectus americanus (= Scirpus americanus). Carex buxbaumii can be common, except in North Dakota.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This community occurs on level ground in shallow depressions and other lowlands on poorly drained sandy, loamy, or silty clay soils. Standing water can be present for a few to several weeks a year (Dix and Smeins 1967, Smeins and Olsen 1970). Soil pH is circumneutral to somewhat alkaline, and organic content can be moderately high.

Geographic Range: This sedge-reedgrass wet meadow is found in the in the northern Great Plains, ranging from the Dakotas to parts of the Canadian prairie provinces.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  CO, MB, MN?, MT, ND, SD, SK, WY




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G5

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Carex lanuginosa / Calamagrostis inexpansa Habitat Type (Nelson et al. 1981)
= Carex lanuginosa Community (Smeins and Olsen 1970)
= Carex pellita - Calamagrostis stricta Herbaceous Vegetation (Cooper et al. 2001)
= Carex pellita - Calamagrostis stricta Herbaceous Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001)

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: J. Drake and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 07-03-13

  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • Cooper, S. V., C. Jean, and P. Hendricks. 2001. Biological survey of a prairie landscape in Montana''s glaciated plains. Report to State Office, Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena. 24 pp. plus appendices.
  • Dix, R. L., and F. E. Smeins. 1967. The prairies, meadows, and marsh vegetation of Nelson County, North Dakota. Canadian Journal of Botany 45:21-58.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Greenall, J. A. 1996. Manitoba''s terrestrial plant communities. MS Report 96-02. Manitoba Conservation Data Centre, Winnipeg.
  • INAI [Iowa Natural Areas Inventory]. 2017. Vegetation classification of Iowa. Iowa Natural Areas Inventory, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Des Moines.
  • Kartesz, J. T. 1994a. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Second edition. Volume 1--Checklist. Timber Press, Portland, OR. 622 pp.
  • MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2005b. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • NDNHI [North Dakota Natural Heritage Inventory]. 2018. Unpublished data. Vegetation classification of North Dakota. North Dakota Natural Heritage Inventory, North Dakota Parks & Recreation Department, Bismarck.
  • Nelson, W. T., W. T. Barker, and H. Goetz. 1981. Habitat type classification of grasslands of Sheyenne National Grassland of southeastern North Dakota. Completion Report for Cooperative Agreement No. RM-80-139-CA. Unpublished report. 138 pp.
  • SDNHP [South Dakota Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data. South Dakota Natural Heritage Program, Pierre, SD.
  • Smeins, F. E., and D. E. Olsen. 1970. Species composition and production of a native northwestern Minnesota tall grass prairie. The American Midland Naturalist 84(2):398-410.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. [1997] c. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Classification of the vegetation of Mount Rushmore National Memorial. The Nature Conservancy, Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN, and International Headquarters, Arlington, VA. 28 pp.
  • WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.