Print Report

CEGL000587 Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Quaking Aspen / Common Juniper Forest

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This Populus tremuloides forest association is known from the mountains of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and Montana. It occurs on gentle to steep slopes (10-100%), on nearly all exposures from 2285 to 3000 m (7500-9800 feet) in elevation. It is also documented from swales, broad benches or dry flats acting as frost pockets, or where subject to cold-air drainage. Soils are derived primarily from sandstone or granite. The tree canopy is dominated by Populus tremuloides. Scattered conifer trees occur, such as Pseudotsuga menziesii, Abies lasiocarpa, Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa, Pinus flexilis, Picea engelmannii, and Picea pungens. The shrub layer is dominated by Juniperus communis, although it also contains Acer glabrum, Paxistima myrsinites, Rosa woodsii, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, and sometimes Artemisia tridentata, and dwarf-shrubs Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Mahonia repens, and Vaccinium myrtillus. The herbaceous layer is variable in expression, with graminoids dominant in some stands and forbs dominant in others. Graminoids commonly occurring include Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, Elymus trachycaulus, Calamagrostis rubescens, Bromus ciliatus, Achnatherum occidentale, Oryzopsis asperifolia, Danthonia parryi, Poa nemoralis, or Poa secunda. Forbs include Achillea millefolium, Astragalus miser, Geranium viscosissimum, Lupinus argenteus, and Thalictrum fendleri. Diagnostic characteristics of this association are canopy dominance by Populus tremuloides and a short-shrub layer with abundant Juniperus communis.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: No Data Available

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Stands a have a somewhat closed to closed canopy of trees 5-20 m tall that is dominated or codominated by the cold-deciduous broad-leaved tree Populus tremuloides. Scattered conifer trees sometimes occur, such as Pseudotsuga menziesii, Abies lasiocarpa, Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa, Pinus flexilis, Picea engelmannii, and Picea pungens, but at least some stands appear to be persistent aspen clones. The shrub layer is dominated by Juniperus communis, although it also contains Acer glabrum, Amelanchier alnifolia, Paxistima myrsinites, Rosa woodsii, Symphoricarpos oreophilus, and sometimes Artemisia tridentata, and dwarf-shrubs Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, Mahonia repens, and Vaccinium myrtillus. The herbaceous layer is variable in expression, with graminoids dominant in some stands and forbs dominant in others. Graminoids commonly occurring include Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, Elymus glaucus, Elymus trachycaulus, Calamagrostis rubescens, Bromus carinatus, Bromus ciliatus, Bromus porteri, Achnatherum occidentale (= Stipa occidentalis), Carex siccata (= Carex foenea), Carex geyeri, Carex rossii, Hesperostipa comata, Oryzopsis asperifolia, Danthonia parryi, Festuca thurberi, Poa fendleriana, Poa nemoralis, or Poa secunda (= Poa nevadensis). The most common forbs present include Thalictrum fendleri, Vicia americana, Achillea millefolium, Astragalus flexuosus, Astragalus miser, Fragaria virginiana, Pseudocymopterus montanus, Thermopsis divaricarpa, Lupinus argenteus, Campanula rotundifolia, and Arnica cordifolia. Exotic species, such as Taraxacum officinale, Poa pratensis, Bromus inermis, and Bromus tectorum, are often common in stands disturbed by grazing.

Dynamics:  This association is considered a stable, climax Populus tremuloides forest on most sites. However, it can also be seral to Abies lasiocarpa or Pseudotsuga menziesii forests. Heavy grazing can impact and alter the herbaceous composition; Astragalus miser and Lupinus argenteus are grazing increasers.

Environmental Description:  This Populus tremuloides forest association is known from the mountains of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and Montana. It occurs on gentle to steep slopes (10-100%), on nearly all exposures from 2285 to 3000 m (7500-9800 feet) in elevation. Distribution of these forests is primarily limited by adequate soil moisture required to meet its high evapotranspiration demand (Mueggler 1988). Secondarily, its range is limited by the length of the growing season or low temperatures (Mueggler 1988). This forest type occurs in two differing environments: (1) warm, dry sites near the margin of bunchgrass meadows and (2) swales, broad benches or dry flats acting as frost pockets, or where subject to cold-air drainage. Soils are derived primarily from sandstone, limestone or granite parent material, and the ground surface may have a high percentage of boulders and gravel.

Geographic Range: This association is known from the mountains and high plateaus of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and Montana.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AZ, CO, ID, MT, NV, UT, WY




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: > Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis / Astragalus miser Community Type (Mueggler and Campbell 1986)
> Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis / Carex geyeri Community Type (Mueggler and Campbell 1986)
> Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis / Sitanion hystrix Community Type (Mueggler and Campbell 1986)
= Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis Plant Association (Baker 1984a)
= Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis Community Type (Powell 1988a)
< Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis Community Type (Youngblood and Mueggler 1981)
= Populus tremuloides / Juniperus communis Plant Association (Johnston 1987)

Concept Author(s): Western Ecology Group

Author of Description: G. Kittel, S.L. Neid, K.A. Schulz, and J. Coles

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 09-07-05

  • Baker, W. L. 1984a. A preliminary classification of the natural vegetation of Colorado. Great Basin Naturalist 44(4):647-676.
  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
  • Cogan, D., J. E. Taylor, and K. Schulz. 2012. Vegetation inventory project: Great Basin National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/MOJN/NRR--2012/568. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 373 pp.
  • Coles, J., D. Cogan, D. Salas, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, J. Von Loh, and A. Evenden. 2008a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Dinosaur National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR-2008/112. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 814 pp.
  • Curry, R. R. 1962. Geobotanical correlations in the alpine and subalpine regions of the Tenmile Range, Summit County, Colorado. Unpublished thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder. 133 pp.
  • Johnston, B. C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. R2-ECOL-87-2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Lakewood, CO. 429 pp.
  • Jones, G., and S. Ogle. 2000. Characterization abstracts for vegetation types on the Bighorn, Medicine Bow, and Shoshone national forests. Prepared for USDA Forest Service, Region 2 by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming.
  • Kearsley, M. J. C., K. Green, M. Tukman, M. Reid, M. Hall, T. J. Ayers, and K. Christie. 2015. Grand Canyon National Park-Grand Canyon / Parashant National Monument vegetation classification and mapping project. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRCA/NRR--2015/913. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 75 pp. plus appendices.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • Marr, J. W., D. A. Boyce, and J. W. Todd. 1973b. Preliminary report on the Redcliff project, Eagle County, Colorado. Unpublished report to the D. E. Fleming Company, Denver, and the Colorado River Water Conservation District, Glenwood Springs, by University of Colorado, Boulder. 9 pp.
  • Mueggler, W. F. 1988. Aspen community types of the Intermountain Region. General Technical Report INT-250. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 135 pp.
  • Mueggler, W. F., and R. B. Campbell, Jr. 1986. Aspen community types of Utah. Research Paper INT-362. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  • Murphy, P. H. 1982. The forest vegetation of the Lost Creek area in the southern Front Range, Colorado. Unpublished thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder. 145 pp.
  • Owns, T., project coordinator, et al. 2004. U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program: Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument. U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service. 390 pp.
  • Peet, R. K. 1975. Forest vegetation of the east slope of the northern Colorado Front Range. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Peet, R. K. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range. Vegetatio 45:3-75.
  • Powell, D. C. 1988a. Aspen community types of the Pike and San Isabel national forests in south-central Colorado. Report R2-ECOL-88-01. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Denver, CO. 254 pp.
  • Reid, M. S., and M. E. Hall. 2010. Vegetation classification of Grand Canyon National Park. Draft report submitted to National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Salas, D. E., J. Stevens, K. Schulz, M. Artmann, B. Friesen, S. Blauer, E. W. Schweiger, and A. Valdez. 2010b. Vegetation classification and mapping project report: Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMN/NRR--2010/179. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Salas, D., J. Stevens, and K. Schulz. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Technical Memorandum No. 8260-05-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 161 pp. plus Appendices A-L (733 pp.).
  • Schulz, K. A., and M. E. Hall. 2011. Vegetation inventory project: Great Basin National Park. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. NatureServe, Western Regional Office, Boulder, CO. 30 pp. plus Appendices A-H.
  • Shepherd, H. R. 1975. Vegetation of two dissimilar bighorn sheep ranges in Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife Report 4. 223 pp.
  • Tendick, A., B. Friesen, G. Kittel, P. Williams, J. Coles, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2011a. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Cedar Breaks National Monument. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2011/470. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Tendick, A., G. Kittel, J. Von Loh, P. Williams, D. Cogan, J. Coles, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2011b. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Bryce Canyon National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2011/442. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
  • Youngblood, A. P., and W. F. Mueggler. 1981. Aspen community types on the Bridger-Teton National Forest in western Wyoming. Research Paper INT-272. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 34 pp.