Print Report
CEGL001176 Salix (boothii, geyeriana) / Carex aquatilis Wet Shrubland
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: (Booth''s Willow, Geyer''s Willow) / Water Sedge Wet Shrubland
Colloquial Name: No Data Available
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This association commonly occurs between 1220 to 2440 m (4000-8000 feet) elevation in the mountains of eastern Oregon and Washington, central and eastern Idaho, and northern Utah. The association occurs on floodplains, streambanks, and pond margins, sometimes upstream of beaver dams, but also adjacent to seeps or springs. Sites are usually located in moderate to broad low-gradient valleys and headwater basins of small to moderate-sized streams (orders 1 to 3). Such locations are subirrigated and have saturated surface conditions in the early summer, but are drier than perennially ponded areas (promoting Carex aquatilis understory dominance). Soils are derived from fine-textured alluvium and include silty, sandy, or clayey loams. Tall Salix boothii (usually with between 20 and 50% cover) dominates this association, and Salix geyeriana (with cover less than that of Salix boothii) is often subdominant. Various conifers, Alnus incana, Salix drummondiana, Salix lemmonii, or other tall shrubs are occasionally present with low cover. There is usually a low-shrub understory composed of Betula glandulosa and Lonicera involucrata, with Salix wolfii or Ribes spp. also sometimes present with low cover. Carex aquatilis clearly dominates the herbaceous understory, usually with between 30 and 60% cover. Other graminoid species are intermixed, each with low constancy and low cover, including Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex microptera, Carex utriculata, Deschampsia cespitosa, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis, and Scirpus microcarpus. Forbs are diverse, but generally low in cover, the most common including Aconitum columbianum, Geum macrophyllum, and Polemonium occidentale.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: This association is defined as a PNV vegetation type. Padgett et al. (1989) clearly delineate this association, and stands clearly dominated by Salix boothii and Carex aquatilis have been sampled by other researchers. However, researchers from eastern Oregon lumped stands of Salix boothii / Carex aquatilis within the broader Salix / Carex aquatilis association based on the lack of a single dominant Salix species (Kovalchik 1987, Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997). Tuhy (1981) and Mutz and Queiroz (1983) did not separate Salix boothii / Carex aquatilis from Salix drummondiana - Salix boothii / Carex rostrata - Carex aquatilis in central Idaho. Kovalchik (2001) identified a Salix / Carex rostrata association in eastern Washington that is usually dominated by Salix drummondiana, but which sometimes has moderate to high cover of Salix boothii, Salix geyeriana, and/or Carex aquatilis. Norton et al. (1981) and Youngblood et al. (1985a) did not have enough data to support separating Salix boothii / Carex aquatilis from Salix boothii / Carex rostrata (Carex rostrata consistently has higher constancy and cover). Some Salix boothii / Carex rostrata and Salix boothii / mesic graminoid stands have high cover of Carex aquatilis (Norton et al. 1981, Padgett et al. 1989, Walford et al. 2001). Salix geyeriana associations are always dominated by Salix geyeriana with less cover of Salix boothii. Salix boothii is sometimes present in short willow associations with understories dominated by Carex aquatilis (Hansen et al. 1995, Walford et al. 2001, Crowe et al. 2002). This may warrant a name change to Salix boothii / Carex aquatilis. However, at this time, many stands dominated by either Salix boothii or Salix geyeriana, or both, are described in the literature under one name by researchers (see above). Until further research distinguishes two distinct associations, we recommend tracking them under the current name.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: Tall Salix boothii (usually with between 20 and 50% cover) dominates this association, and Salix geyeriana (with cover less than that of Salix boothii) is often subdominant. Various conifers, Alnus incana, Salix drummondiana, Salix lemmonii, or other tall shrubs are occasionally present with low cover. There is usually a low-shrub understory composed of Betula glandulosa and Lonicera involucrata, with Salix wolfii or Ribes spp. also sometimes present with low cover. Carex aquatilis clearly dominates the herbaceous understory, usually with between 30 and 60% cover. Other graminoid species are intermixed, each with low constancy and low cover, including Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex microptera, Carex utriculata, Deschampsia cespitosa, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus), and Scirpus microcarpus. Forbs are diverse, but generally low in cover, the most common including Aconitum columbianum, Geum macrophyllum, and Polemonium occidentale.
Dynamics: Grazing must be light and prevented until late summer to avoid compacting and damaging wet organic soils (Kovalchik 1987, Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997). Overgrazing reduces cover and vigor of both Salix boothii and Carex aquatilis and promotes other graminoids (Juncus spp., Poa pratensis) and unpalatable mesic forbs. Overgrazing tramples and breaks the soil, reduces roots and rhizomes that anchor streambanks, and allows erosional downcutting or overwidening of streams (Kovalchik 1987, Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997). Salix boothii and Carex aquatilis growth can be rejuvenated with a rest from grazing and by burning with quick, moderate-intensity fires in late summer and fall (Hansen et al. 1995). Both Salix boothii and Carex aquatilis readily resprout from roots and rhizomes, however, it takes about 5 years for the community to grow large enough to withstand grazing. These species also produce large amounts of seeds that quickly colonize fine and moist, disturbed mineral soil (Kovalchik 1987, Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997). These species are adapted to cold and flooding, though too much inundation or drought will kill them. The association is stable unless overgrazing or other disturbance reduces willow and sedge cover allowing weeds, forbs, and less palatable graminoids to increase. As disturbance-induced species, including Poa pratensis, invade, streambanks lose stability and streams downcut. The water table eventually lowers causing further changes in community composition toward drier types (Kovalchik 1987, Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997).
Environmental Description: The association occurs on floodplains, streambanks, and pond margins, sometimes upstream of beaver dams, but also adjacent to seeps or springs. Sites are usually located in moderate to broad low-gradient valleys and headwater basins of small to moderate-sized streams (orders 1 to 3). Such locations are subirrigated and have saturated surface conditions in the early summer, but are drier than perennially ponded areas (promoting Carex aquatilis understory dominance). Soils are derived from fine-textured alluvium and include silty, sandy, or clayey loams.
Geographic Range: This association is frequently encountered in central and southeastern Idaho, and is confirmed to occur in eastern Oregon, northern Utah, and Washington. It is suspected to occur in northern Colorado, western Montana, California and British Columbia.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: CA?, CO, ID, OR, UT, WA
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.687862
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G3
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.C Shrub & Herb Wetland Subclass | S44 | 2.C |
Formation | 2.C.4 Temperate to Polar Freshwater Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Formation | F013 | 2.C.4 |
Division | 2.C.4.Nb Western North American Temperate Freshwater Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Division | D031 | 2.C.4.Nb |
Macrogroup | 2.C.4.Nb.5 Sitka Alder - Booth''s Willow / Northwest Territory Sedge Montane Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Macrogroup | M893 | 2.C.4.Nb.5 |
Group | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d Willow species - Alder species - Water Birch Riparian & Seep Shrubland Group | G527 | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d |
Alliance | A3769 Booth''s Willow - Geyer''s Willow - Yellow Willow Montane Wet Shrubland Alliance | A3769 | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d |
Association | CEGL001176 (Booth''s Willow, Geyer''s Willow) / Water Sedge Wet Shrubland | CEGL001176 | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Salix / Carex aquatilis (Kovalchik 1987) [(p.80)]
? Salix boothii - Salix geyeriana / Carex aquatilis Association (Crowe et al. 2002)
= Salix boothii / Carex aquatilis Community Type (Padgett et al. 1989)
= Salix spp. / Carex aquatilis (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997) [(p.108)]
? Salix boothii - Salix geyeriana / Carex aquatilis Association (Crowe et al. 2002)
= Salix boothii / Carex aquatilis Community Type (Padgett et al. 1989)
= Salix spp. / Carex aquatilis (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997) [(p.108)]
- Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
- Crowe, E. A., and R. R. Clausnitzer. 1997. Mid-montane wetland plant associations of the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman national forests. Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-22-97. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR.
- Crowe, E., B. Kovalchik, M. J. Kerr, J. Titus, and J. S. Kagan. 2002. Riparian and wetland plant communities of eastern Oregon. Draft report. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland, OR.
- Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
- Hansen, P. L., S. W. Chadde, and R. D. Pfister. 1988b. Riparian dominance types of Montana. University of Montana Miscellaneous Publication 49. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, Missoula. 411 pp.
- Hansen, P. L., and J. B. Hall. 2002. Classification and management of the USDI Bureau of Land Management''s riparian and wetland sites in eastern and southern Idaho. Unpublished draft prepared for the Upper Snake River District, Bureau of Land Management, by Bitterroot Restoration, Inc., Corvallis, MT.
- IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2002. Unpublished riparian and wetland association occurrence and plot data on file at the Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID.
- Kagan, J. S., J. A. Christy, M. P. Murray, and J. A. Titus. 2004. Classification of native vegetation of Oregon. January 2004. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland. 52 pp.
- Kovalchik, B. L. 1987. Riparian zone associations - Deschutes, Ochoco, Fremont, and Winema national forests. Technical Paper 279-87. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 171 pp.
- Kovalchik, B. L. 2001. Classification and management of aquatic, riparian and wetland sites on the national forests of eastern Washington. Part 1: The series descriptions. 429 pp. plus appendix. [http://www.reo.gov/col/wetland_classification/wetland_classification.pdf]
- Mutz, K. M., and J. Queiroz. 1983. Riparian community classification for the Centennial Mountains and South Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Unpublished report prepared for USDA Forest Service Intermountain Region under contract 53-84M8-2-0048 by Meiiji Resource Consultants, Layton, UT. 168 pp.
- Nez Perce National Forest. 1999b. Riparian ECODATA plots, 1987-1995. Unpublished data on file at the Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID.
- Norton, B. E., J. Tuhy, and S. Jensen. 1981. Riparian community classification for the Grey''s River, Wyoming. Unpublished final report prepared by Department of Range Science, Utah State University, Logan for USDA Forest Service, Region 4, Ogden, UT. 188 pp.
- Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1988b. Riparian community type classification of Utah. Publication R4-ECOL-88-01. USDA Forest Service, Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
- Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1989. Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho. Research Paper R4-ECOL-89-0. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
- Tuhy, J. S. 1981. Stream bottom community classification for the Sawtooth Valley, Idaho. Unpublished thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow. 230 pp.
- WNHP [Washington Natural Heritage Program]. 2002. Unpublished riparian and wetland association occurrence and plot data on file at Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
- WNHP [Washington Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data files. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
- Walford, G., G. Jones, W. Fertig, S. Mellman-Brown, and K. Houston. 2001. Riparian and wetland plant community types of the Shoshone National Forest. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-85. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 122 pp.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.
- Youngblood, A. P., W. G. Padgett, and A. H. Winward. 1985a. Riparian community type classification of eastern Idaho-western Wyoming. R4-Ecol-85-01. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, UT. 78 pp.
- Youngblood, A. P., W. G. Padgett, and A. H. Winward. 1985b. Riparian community type classification of northern Utah and adjacent Idaho. Unpublished report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, UT. 104 pp.