Print Report
CEGL003428 Eleocharis rostellata Marsh
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Beaked Spikerush Marsh
Colloquial Name: No Data Available
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This association is known from low to mid elevations in widely scattered intermontane basins and plains of the West. It is documented to occur in Idaho, Montana, Washington, Oregon, California, Wyoming, and Colorado. It is suspected to occur in similar habitats in Nevada and British Columbia. This association forms sharply delineated, near-monocultural stands in areas with perennially saturated or inundated hydrologic conditions. It often occurs in association with warm springs or fens with alkaline or calcareous soils at the northern limits of its range, but it is also known from cold springs in desert canyons. This association forms on soils ranging from relatively deep organic soils, to alkaline and calcareous soils (e.g., travertine), to coarse mineral soils that are directly in contact with springs or thermal waters. There are two distinct phases of this association: a dense one with 90% cover of Eleocharis rostellata, occurring on relatively deep organic soils that sometimes form a quaking mat, and an open one with less than 70% Eleocharis rostellata cover. The open phase has considerable areas of exposed soil, gravel, rock, and water and appears restricted to mineral substrates on gentle to steep slopes. Low species diversity is characteristic of the Eleocharis rostellata association, and woody vegetation is lacking or if present only as a very minor component. Common associated species with low cover include Berula erecta, Castilleja minor ssp. minor, Carex simulata, Carex nebrascensis, Carex scirpoidea, Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda, Deschampsia cespitosa, Helianthus nuttallii, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis, Juncus torreyi, Mimulus guttatus, Muhlenbergia asperifolia, Schoenoplectus americanus, Symphyotrichum ascendens, and Triglochin maritima.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Although described from a limited number of plots (e.g., 3 plots in Montana, 6 plots in Idaho), the Eleocharis rostellata association is sharply delineated in the field by its clear dominance of the diagnostic species (Jankovsky-Jones et al. 2001). In Montana, Hansen et al. (1995) lumped all combinations of Eleocharis rostellata and Eleocharis quinqueflora into an Eleocharis quinqueflora habitat type due to similarities in environmental conditions and management concerns. Observations in Montana by Lesica (1990) indicate that the Eleocharis rostellata association is distinct, and at least partially thermophilic, unlike the Eleocharis quinqueflora type. In some cases, Eleocharis rostellata may be confused with Eleocharis palustris, especially if the stolons of Eleocharis rostellata are not present or not obvious, but the sites on which these associations occur are very different ecologically. Eleocharis rostellata is sometimes codominant with Carex lasiocarpa and Calamagrostis spp. in rich fens of the prairie states (from South Dakota to Indiana), but it never forms dense, nearly monoculture stands such as in this type. A Schoenoplectus americanus - Eleocharis rostellata community has been identified in the Owens Valley of California (Odion et al. 1992). The Eleocharis rostellata community considered here has no similarity to these types, other than their occurrence on saline or alkaline/calcareous sites. Eleocharis rostellata is a dominant plant in 4 different tidal marsh or salt meadow vegetation communities ranging from Louisiana to Florida, north to Delaware. A fen type, with codominant Eleocharis rostellata, occurs at sea level from Virginia to Maine. These eastern associations have no similarity in composition or ecology to the western, non-coastal association considered here.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: There are two distinct phases of this association: a dense one with 90% cover of Eleocharis rostellata, occurring on relatively deep organic soils that sometimes form a quaking mat, and an open one with less than 70% Eleocharis rostellata cover. The open phase has considerable areas of exposed soil, gravel, rock, and water and appears restricted to mineral substrates on gentle to steep slopes. Low species diversity is characteristic of the Eleocharis rostellata association, and woody vegetation is lacking or if present only as a very minor component. Common associated species with low cover include Berula erecta, Castilleja minor ssp. minor, Carex simulata, Carex nebrascensis, Carex scirpoidea, Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda, Deschampsia cespitosa, Helianthus nuttallii, Juncus arcticus ssp. littoralis (= Juncus balticus), Juncus torreyi, Mimulus guttatus, Muhlenbergia asperifolia, Schoenoplectus americanus (= Scirpus americanus), Symphyotrichum ascendens, and Triglochin maritima.
Dynamics: Springs, rich fens, and thermal areas supporting Eleocharis rostellata are heavily impacted by human recreation, livestock grazing, water diversions, and wild ungulate use (IDCDC 2002). Some areas that once had the potential to support this association have been completely de-watered or otherwise eliminated from the landscape. However, Eleocharis rostellata is reported to be an early colonizer of bare substrates with proper chemical and hydrological conditions. At Ohanacaposh Hot Spring (Mount Rainier National Park) this association has apparently expanded and colonized the lower springs after removal of water developments over 50 years ago. It is presumed to be a stable association once established, unless water tables are altered (FEIS 2000). Eleocharis species have low palatability for livestock and wild animals (Hansen et al. 1995) and are generally vigorous colonizers that are resilient to, and increasers with, minor disturbances.
Environmental Description: The association is restricted to areas with perennially saturated or inundated hydrologic conditions. It has high affinity with warm springs or fens with alkaline or calcareous soils at the northern limits of its range, but it is also known from cold springs in desert canyons (Jankovsky-Jones et al. 2001). This association forms on soils ranging from relatively deep organic soils, to alkaline and calcareous soils (e.g., travertine), to coarse mineral soils that are directly in contact with springs or thermal waters.
Geographic Range: This association is documented in Idaho, Montana, Washington, Oregon, California, Wyoming and Colorado. It is suspected to occur in similar habitats in Nevada and British Columbia as the species is widespread in western North America.
Nations: CA?,US
States/Provinces: BC?, CA, CO, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, WY
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.687797
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G3
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.C Shrub & Herb Wetland Subclass | S44 | 2.C |
Formation | 2.C.5 Salt Marsh Formation | F035 | 2.C.5 |
Division | 2.C.5.Nd North American Western Interior Brackish Marsh, Playa & Shrubland Division | D036 | 2.C.5.Nd |
Macrogroup | 2.C.5.Nd.1 Warm & Cool Desert Alkali-Saline Marsh, Playa & Shrubland Macrogroup | M082 | 2.C.5.Nd.1 |
Group | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a Saltgrass - Lemmon''s Alkali Grass - Saltwort species Alkaline-Saline Marsh & Playa Group | G538 | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a |
Alliance | A3930 Common Spikerush - Beaked Spikerush Alkaline-Saline Marsh Alliance | A3930 | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a |
Association | CEGL003428 Beaked Spikerush Marsh | CEGL003428 | 2.C.5.Nd.1.a |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Eleocharis rostellata Association (Evens et al. 2014)
= Eleocharis rostellata Herbaceous Vegetation (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Eleocharis rostellata Herbaceous Vegetation (Carsey et al. 2003a)
- CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
- Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
- Evens, J. M., K. Sikes, D. Hastings, and J. Ratchford. 2014. Vegetation alliance descriptions for Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Death Valley National Park and Mojave National Preserve. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Network Inventory and Monitoring Program. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
- FEIS [Fire Effects Information System]. 2002. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. [http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/]
- Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana''s riparian and wetland sites. Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, School of Forestry, University of Montana. 646 pp. plus posters.
- Hansen, P., S. Chadde, R. Pfister, J. Joy, D. Svoboda, J. Pierce, and L. Myers. 1988a. Riparian site types, habitat types, and community types of southwestern Montana. Draft Version 1. University of Montana, Montana Riparian Association, School of Forestry, Missoula. 140 pp.
- IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2002. Unpublished riparian and wetland association occurrence and plot data on file at the Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID.
- IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2005. Wetland and riparian plant associations in Idaho. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise. [http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/tech/CDC/ecology/wetland_riparian_assoc.cfm] (accessed 14 June 2005).
- Jankovsky-Jones, M., C. J. Murphy, and C. L. Coulter. 2001. Riparian and wetland plant associations of southwestern Idaho in the Lower Snake River District, Bureau of Land Management. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise.
- Kagan, J. S., J. A. Christy, M. P. Murray, and J. A. Titus. 2004. Classification of native vegetation of Oregon. January 2004. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland. 52 pp.
- Lesica, P. 1990. Vegetation and sensitive plant species of wetlands associated with geothermal areas in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem in Montana. Unpublished report on file at the Montana Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, Helena. 9 pp.
- MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
- Odion, D. C., R. M. Callaway, W. R. Ferren, and F. W. Davis. 1992. Vegetation of Fish Slough, an Owens Valley wetland ecosystem. Pages 171-196 in: C.A. Hall and B. Widawski, editors. The history of water: Eastern Sierra Nevada, Owens Valley, White-Inyo Mountains. White Mountains Research Station Symposium 4. University of California, White Mountain Research Station, Los Angeles, CA.
- WNHP [Washington Natural Heritage Program]. 2018. Unpublished data files. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.