Print Report

CEGL006352 Eriocaulon parkeri - Polygonum punctatum Tidal Marsh

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Estuary Pipewort - Dotted Smartweed Tidal Marsh

Colloquial Name: Estuary Pipewort Freshwater Intertidal Flat

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This freshwater tidal community occurs in estuaries of the northern Atlantic Coast generally confined to low marsh where it is subjected to high levels of flood disturbance. As a result, the substrate is generally sandy or gravelly with low organic matter content. The vegetation is low, generally less than 35 cm in height, with variable cover of scattered to fairly dense Eriocaulon parkeri. Associates include Polygonum punctatum, Isoetes riparia, Lindernia dubia, Bidens eatonii, and Ludwigia palustris.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: The floristics and environmental setting of this association show overlap with ~Isoetes riparia Tidal Marsh (CEGL006058)$$.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This community is an herbaceous (95% cover) wetland dominated by annuals or herbaceous perennials. Eriocaulon parkeri is characteristic of this association. In the northern portion of the range, associated species include Zizania aquatica, Ludwigia palustris, Bidens eatonii, Bidens hyperborea, Crassula aquatica, and Schoenoplectus pungens. Farther south, associates additionally include Sagittaria latifolia, Pontederia cordata, Peltandra virginica, and Orontium aquaticum. Vegetation cover can be highly variable with significant fluctuations in floristic composition and species density from year to year. Seasonal variability also occurs; early in the season, Isoetes spp. can predominate. Several regionally rare species occur in this type including Eriocaulon parkeri, Limosella australis, Bidens eatonii, and Crassula aquatica.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This community occurs within freshwater tidal wetland complexes in upper reaches of tides where there is seasonal flushing which removes accumulated fine-grained materials. The typical substrate consists of loamy sand with about 5% gravel. The moisture regime is very wet with the community being exposed during low tide and often remaining inundated during spring tides.

Geographic Range: This vegetation is restricted to shores of tidal rivers from southern Maine to North Carolina, with possible peripheral occurrences in South Carolina and New Brunswick, Canada, and excluding New York.

Nations: CA?,US

States/Provinces:  CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NB?, NC, NJ, NY, QC?, SC?, VA




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: Merged into this association

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: > Eriocaulon parkeri - Hypericum mutilum - Gratiola aurea community (Metzler and Barrett 2006)
> Eriocaulon parkeri - Polygonum punctatum community (Metzler and Barrett 2006)
? FW Tidal Marsh (Rawinski 1984a) [formerly Southern New England FW Tidal.]
= Vegetation type VII - Polygonum (Barrett 1994)

Concept Author(s): Eastern Ecology Group

Author of Description: S.L. Neid

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-13-02

  • Barrett, N. E. 1994. Vegetation patch dynamics in freshwater tidal wetlands. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut. 277 pp.
  • Breden, T. F. 1989. A preliminary natural community classification for New Jersey. Pages 157-191 in: E. F. Karlin, editor. New Jersey''s rare and endangered plants and animals. Institute for Environmental Studies, Ramapo College, Mahwah, NJ. 280 pp.
  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • CDPNQ [Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec]. No date. Unpublished data. Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec, Québec.
  • Coxe, R. 2009. Guide to Delaware vegetation communities. Spring 2009 edition. State of Delaware, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Smyrna.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Fleming, G. P., K. D. Patterson, and K. Taverna. 2017. The natural communities of Virginia: A classification of ecological community groups and community types. Third approximation. Version 3.0. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. [http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural-heritage/natural-communities/]
  • Gawler, S. C. 2002. Natural landscapes of Maine: A guide to vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta, ME.
  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.
  • Haines, A. 2001. Eriocaulon parkeri (Parker''s Pipewort) conservation and research plan. New England Plant Conservation Program, Framingham, MA. [http://www.newfs.org]
  • Harrison, J. W. 2011. The natural communities of Maryland: 2011 working list of ecological community groups and community types. Unpublished report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis. 33 pp.
  • Harrison, J. W., compiler. 2004. Classification of vegetation communities of Maryland: First iteration. A subset of the International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, NatureServe. Maryland Natural Heritage Program, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis. 243 pp.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]