Print Report

CEGL005087 Cornus amomum - Salix spp. - Toxicodendron vernix - Rhamnus lanceolata Fen

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Silky Dogwood - Willow species - Poison-sumac - Lanceleaf Buckthorn Fen

Colloquial Name: Dogwood - Willow - Poison-sumac Shrub Fen

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This tall-shrub fen community type is found in the central midwestern United States. Stands are found on moraines, especially where gravels permit calcareous seepage, and occur both in lake basins and stream valleys. Soils are organic with calcareous seepage causing saturated conditions. The vegetation is dominated by tall shrubs 1-3 m in height, with a mixture of herbaceous species in the ground layer. Tall shrubs include Cornus amomum, Cornus sericea, Toxicodendron vernix, Rhamnus lanceolata, Salix discolor, Salix sericea, and Viburnum lentago. Vaccinium corymbosum may also be present. Herbaceous species include Cypripedium reginae, Filipendula rubra, Solidago patula, and Woodwardia virginica. The prairie species component in this tall-shrub fen is a diagnostic characteristic.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This type is found in western Ohio prairie shrub fens, as well as northern Indiana and Illinois tall-shrub circumneutral fens. It is the tall-shrub counterpart to the low-shrub/herb prairie fen, ~Dasiphora fruticosa / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardii - Arnoglossum plantagineum Fen (CEGL005139)$$. This type is very similar to the more circumneutral shrub fen/bog, ~Cornus spp. - Salix spp. - Vaccinium corymbosum - Rhamnus alnifolia - Toxicodendron vernix Fen (CEGL005083)$$ and the two types could probably be combined. It is also similar to ~Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub Swamp (CEGL002186)$$, but that type is a shrub swamp rather than fen. However, these tall shrub swamps are difficult to distinguish in terms of fen versus swamp. This type is found in southern Wisconsin and southern Michigan. However, although the type is fairly distinctive, it is often a relatively small zone on the edge of low shrub/graminoid fens, and is not always recognized or tracked.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: The vegetation is dominated by tall shrubs 1-3 m in height, with a mixture of herbaceous species in the ground layer. Tall shrubs include Cornus amomum, Cornus sericea, Toxicodendron vernix, Rhamnus lanceolata, Salix discolor, Salix sericea, and Viburnum lentago. Vaccinium corymbosum may also be present. Herbaceous species include Cypripedium reginae, Filipendula rubra, Solidago patula, and Woodwardia virginica. The prairie species component in this tall-shrub fen is a diagnostic characteristic (White and Madany 1978, Anderson 1982, Homoya et al. 1985, E. Epstein pers. comm. 1999).

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  Stands are found on moraines, especially where gravels permit calcareous seepage, and occur both in lake basins and stream valleys. Soils are organic with calcareous seepage causing saturated conditions (White and Madany 1978, Anderson 1982, Homoya et al. 1985).

Geographic Range: This tall-shrub fen community type is found in the central midwestern United States and probably adjacent Canada, ranging from western Ohio and probably southern Ontario to southern Wisconsin.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  IL, IN, MI, OH, ON, WI




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Cornus amomum - Salix spp. - Toxicodendron vernix - Rhamnus lanceolata Fen Shrubland (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Tall Shrub Fen]

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 12-08-98

  • Anderson, D. M. 1982. Plant communities of Ohio: A preliminary classification and description. Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, OH. 182 pp.
  • Epstein, Eric. Personal communication. Community Ecologist, Wisconsin Natural Heritage Program, Madison, WI.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Homoya, M. A., D. B. Abrell, J. R. Aldrich, and T. W. Post. 1985. The natural regions of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94:245-268.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • ONHD [Ohio Natural Heritage Database]. No date. Vegetation classification of Ohio and unpublished data. Ohio Natural Heritage Database, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.