Print Report

CEGL006394 Sphagnum (cuspidatum, torreyanum) - Vaccinium macrocarpon Fen

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: (Toothed Peatmoss, Giant Peatmoss) - Cranberry Fen

Colloquial Name: Peatland Moss Lawn / Mud Bottom

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association is bryophyte-dominated vegetation with a sparse vascular component found in wet bog hollows in northern New England and adjacent Canada. Variously called "moss lawn" or "moss carpet," it occurs in acidic fens and bogs. It may form a floating mat over open water, as in kettleholes, or it may develop around secondary pools on raised bog surfaces. The substrate pH is acidic, usually about 4.0. Bryophyte carpets dominate the vegetation, with vascular plants scattered across their surface and generally totaling under 25% cover. The only woody plants are sparse and extremely stunted (usually <10 cm tall) heath shrubs. The dominant bryophytes vary among sites, but are typically some combination of Sphagnum cuspidatum and Sphagnum torreyanum. Characteristic vascular species include stunted Andromeda polifolia var. glaucophylla and Chamaedaphne calyculata, plus Drosera rotundifolia, Drosera intermedia, Eriophorum virginicum, Rhynchospora alba, and Vaccinium macrocarpon. This association is floristically similar to certain other fen associations (e.g., ~Chamaedaphne calyculata / Eriophorum virginicum / Sphagnum rubellum Acidic Peatland (CEGL006513)$$ but is differentiated from other Sphagnum-based peatland vegetation types by the very low abundance of vascular plants.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: As described, this association encompasses a variety of bryophyte carpet assemblages. Rangewide analyses of plots with bryophytes as well as vascular plants identified to species might determine more homogeneous associations.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Sphagnum carpets dominate the vegetation, with vascular plants scattered across their surface and generally totaling under 25% cover. The only woody plants are sparse and extremely stunted (usually <10 cm tall) heath shrubs. The dominant bryophytes vary among sites, but are typically some combination of Sphagnum cuspidatum and Sphagnum torreyanum. Characteristic vascular species include Andromeda polifolia var. glaucophylla (= Andromeda glaucophylla) and Chamaedaphne calyculata, plus Drosera rotundifolia, Drosera intermedia, Eriophorum virginicum, Rhynchospora alba, and Vaccinium macrocarpon.

Dynamics:  No Data Available

Environmental Description:  This association is bryophyte-dominated vegetation of very wet bog hollows in northern New England and adjacent Canada. Variously called "moss lawn" or "moss carpet," it occurs in acidic fens and bogs. It may form a floating mat over open water, as in kettleholes, or it may develop around secondary pools on raised bog surfaces. The substrate pH is acidic, usually about 4.0.

Geographic Range: This type is found in northern New England and adjacent Canada, from New Brunswick southwest to upstate New York.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NY, RI, VT




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Rhynchospora alba / Sphagnum cuspidatum community (Metzler and Barrett 2006)
= Rhynchospora alba mud-bottom community (Damman and French 1987)
? Moss lawn and Moss lawn - mud bottom / sedge (Types 2 and 10) (Anderson and Davis 1997)
= Type 2: Moss lawn-mudbottom / sedge (Sphagnum cuspidatum - Cladopodiella fluitans / Rhynchospora alba) (Engstrom 1998)
= Type 2: Moss lawn-mudbottom/sedge (Sphagnum cuspidatum-Cladopodiella fluitans/Rhynchospora alba) (Anderson and Davis 1998)

Concept Author(s): S.C. Gawler

Author of Description: S.C. Gawler and S.L. Neid

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-01-04

  • Anderson, D. S., and R. B. Davis. 1997. The vegetation and its environment in Maine peatlands. Canadian Journal of Botany 75:1785-1805.
  • Anderson, D. S., and R. B. Davis. 1998. The flora and vegetation of Maine peatlands. Maine Agriculture and Forest Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 170. Orono, ME. 98 pp.
  • Damman, A. W. H., and T. W. French. 1987. The ecology of peat bogs of the glaciated northeastern United States: A community profile. USDI Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Report 85(7.16). 100 pp.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke''s ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
  • Engstrom, B. 1998. Inventory and classification of natural communities along the Upper Saco River, New Hampshire. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Inventory, Concord, NH. 26 pp. plus appendices.
  • Enser, R. W., and J. A. Lundgren. 2006. Natural communities of Rhode Island. A joint project of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Natural Heritage Program and The Nature Conservancy of Rhode Island. Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Kingston. 40 pp. [www.rinhs.org]
  • Gawler, S. C. 2002. Natural landscapes of Maine: A guide to vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta, ME.
  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • Sperduto, D. D., W. F. Nichols, and N. Cleavitt. 2000a. Bogs and fens of New Hampshire. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Inventory, Concord, NH.
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]
  • Thompson, E. H., and E. R. Sorenson. 2005. Wetland, woodland, wildland: A guide to the natural communities of Vermont. The Nature Conservancy and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. 456 pp.