Print Report

CEGL007563 Chamaecyparis thyoides - (Liriodendron tulipifera) / Lyonia lucida Swamp Forest

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Atlantic White-cedar - (Tuliptree) / Shining Fetterbush Swamp Forest

Colloquial Name: Sandhills Atlantic White-cedar Streamside Forest

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This forest, found along streams or at seepages in the Fall-line Sandhills, is usually dominated by Chamaecyparis thyoides, but possesses a mixed-species canopy with Liriodendron tulipifera usually present. It is found in the Sandhills area of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, but is possible on the outer coastal terraces of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The ground surface has little exposed soil. The community is not flood-prone, nor exposed to frequent fire. It occurs at seepage areas where water infiltration is impeded by an impervious clay layer and therefore flows out where the hardpan intersects the soil surface, usually on a slope and often creating a streamhead. The community also occurs at streamsides of small blackwater streams. Soils are generally acidic and saturated throughout the year and often are of the Torhunta (Typic Humaquept) and Johnston (Cumulic Humaquept) series. The canopy contains Chamaecyparis thyoides, with Liriodendron tulipifera, Pinus serotina, Pinus taeda, Nyssa biflora, and Acer rubrum. The subcanopy contains Persea palustris and Magnolia virginiana. The shrub stratum is tall and includes Cyrilla racemiflora, Ilex coriacea, Ilex glabra, Lyonia lucida, and Vaccinium formosum. Toxicodendron radicans, Smilax laurifolia and Smilax rotundifolia are extremely frequent in most occurrences. Arundinaria tecta is common. Herbaceous species that may be present include Drosera capillaris, Drosera rotundifolia, Sarracenia flava, Sarracenia rubra, Peltandra virginica, Mayaca fluviatilis, and Orontium aquaticum. Sphagnum spp. are also present.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This community type occurs along the northern and southern forks of the Edisto River in South Carolina.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This forest is usually dominated by Chamaecyparis thyoides, but possesses a mixed species canopy with Liriodendron tulipifera usually present. The canopy contains Chamaecyparis thyoides, with Liriodendron tulipifera, Pinus serotina, Pinus taeda, Nyssa biflora, and Acer rubrum. The subcanopy contains Persea palustris and Magnolia virginiana. The shrub stratum is tall and includes Cyrilla racemiflora, Ilex coriacea, Ilex glabra, Lyonia lucida, and Vaccinium formosum. Toxicodendron radicans, Smilax laurifolia and Smilax rotundifolia are extremely frequent in most occurrences. Arundinaria tecta (= Arundinaria gigantea ssp. tecta) is common. Herbaceous species that may be present include Drosera capillaris, Drosera rotundifolia, Sarracenia flava, Sarracenia rubra, Peltandra virginica, Mayaca fluviatilis and Orontium aquaticum. Sphagnum spp. are also present. Wetlands dominated by Chamaecyparis thyoides may be refugia for nationally or locally rare, endangered or threatened species. The swamps in the southern portion of the range may provide habitat areas for species that normally occur farther north (Laderman 1989).

Dynamics:  Occasional inundation may occur, but this is not a flood-prone community. Fires are very infrequent, but are possibly necessary for regeneration of the type. Natural fire and hydrologic regimes need to be maintained for successful regeneration and maintenance of this community. It is very susceptible to major disruptions in hydrology; rapid, prolonged change in water depth kills Chamaecyparis thyoides seedlings and stresses or kills mature specimens. Leaf litter and woody debris should not be too dense in order for the shade-intolerant Chamaecyparis thyoides seedlings to survive. In the absence of fire and adequate gap regeneration, succession often leads to development of a bay forest dominated by Magnolia virginiana, Persea palustris and Gordonia lasianthus.

Environmental Description:  This forest, found along streams or at seepages in the Fall-line Sandhills, is usually dominated by Chamaecyparis thyoides, but possesses a mixed species canopy with Liriodendron tulipifera usually present. It is found in the Sandhills area of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, but is possible on the outer coastal terraces of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The ground surface has little exposed soil. The community is not flood-prone, nor exposed to frequent fire. This association occurs at seepage areas where water infiltration is impeded by an impervious clay layer and therefore flows out where the hardpan intersects the soil surface - usually on a slope and often creating a streamhead. The community also occurs at streamsides of small blackwater streams. Soils are generally acidic and saturated throughout the year, and often are of the Torhunta (Typic Humaquept) and Johnston (Cumulic Humaquept) series.

Geographic Range: This forest is found along streams or seepages in the Fall-line Sandhills area and on the outer coastal terraces of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  GA, NC, SC




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: < Atlantic White-Cedar: 97 (Eyre 1980)
? Atlantic white cedar (66) (USFS 1988)
< IIA2b. Atlantic White Cedar Swamp Forest (Allard 1990)
= Streamhead Atlantic White Cedar Forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990)
< White cedar (Clewell and Ward 1987)

Concept Author(s): S. Landaal

Author of Description: S. Landaal

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 06-07-94

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990b. Silvics of North America. Volume 2: Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 877 pp.
  • Clewell, A. F., and D. B. Ward. 1987. White cedar in Florida and along the northern Gulf Coast. Pages 69-81 in: A. D. Laderman, editor. Atlantic white cedar wetlands. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 401 pp.
  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.
  • Frost, C. C. 1987. Historical overview of Atlantic white cedar in the Carolinas. Pages 257-263 in: A. D. Laderman, editor. Atlantic white cedar wetlands. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 401 pp.
  • Korstian, C. F., and W. D. Brush. 1931. Southern white cedar. Technical Bulletin 251. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 76 pp.
  • Laderman, A. D. 1989. The ecology of the Atlantic white cedar wetlands: A community profile. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological Report 85(7.21). 114 pp.
  • Landaal, S. 1978. Plant successional trends in selected Dismal Swamp stands of Chamaecyparis thyoides (L.) BSP (Atlantic white cedar.) Unpublished report to USDI Fish & Wildlife Service, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge.
  • McCrain, G. R., and B. H. Church. 1985. An analysis of past and present plant community patterns in Moores Creek National Battlefield along with associated impacts affecting distribution and restoration. Prepared by Resource Management Co., Raleigh, NC, under Purchase Order Number PX-5550-3-0062 for the USDI, National Park Service, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta, GA.
  • Moore, J. H., and J. H. Carter, III. 1987. Habitats of white cedar in North Carolina. Pages 177-190 in: A. D. Laderman, editor. Atlantic white cedar wetlands. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.
  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 1988. Silvicultural examination and prescription field book. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region. Atlanta, GA. 35 pp.
  • Wharton, C. H. 1978. The natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta. 227 pp.
  • Wharton, C. H., W. M. Kitchens, E. C. Pendleton, and T. W. Sipe. 1982. The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. FWS/OBS-81/37. Washington, DC.
  • Whitehead, D. R. 1972. Developmental and environmental history of the Dismal Swamp. Ecological Monographs 42:301-315.
  • ter Braak, C. J. F., and N. J. M. Gremmen. 1987. Ecological amplitudes of plant species and the internal consistency of Ellenberg''s indicator values for moisture. Vegetatio 69:79-87.