Print Report

G037 Magnolia virginiana - Gordonia lasianthus - Pinus serotina Swamp Forest Group

Type Concept Sentence: These mixed evergreen and deciduous forests of Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Magnolia virginiana, Nyssa biflora, Nyssa sylvatica, Persea palustris, and Pinus serotina, are found on poorly drained, organic soil flats and seepage-fed wetlands in dissected coastal plain landscapes from southeastern Virginia to eastern Texas.


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sweetbay - Loblolly-bay - Pond Pine Swamp Forest Group

Colloquial Name: Southern Coastal Plain Mixed Evergreen Swamp

Hierarchy Level:  Group

Type Concept: This group is found in the southern coastal plain region from southeastern Virginia to eastern Texas. It occurs on poorly drained, organic soil flats and seepage-fed wetlands in dissected coastal plain landscapes. It may also occur in poorly developed upland drainages and small headwater streambottoms, as well as on toeslopes. These areas are saturated by rainfall and seasonally high water tables without influence of river or tidal flooding. The vegetation is characterized by an overstory that generally includes some combination of Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Magnolia virginiana, Nyssa biflora, Nyssa sylvatica, Persea palustris, and Pinus serotina, although there is some variation according to latitude. Some associations may contain Chamaecyparis thyoides, but this species is not diagnostic of this group. Understory vegetation throughout the region consistently supports the vine Smilax laurifolia and there may be ferns, such as Osmunda cinnamomea, Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis, Woodwardia virginica, and Woodwardia areolata. Soils may be wet sands or mixtures of organic (peaty) and mineral soils, which are nutrient-poor. When these communities are associated with streams, they tend to be low-gradient, with narrow, often braided channels and diffuse drainage patterns. Fire is important, but the fire regime appears to be somewhat variable or unclear, because some of the characteristic trees are fire-intolerant (e.g., Magnolia), while others are fire-dependent (Pinus serotina). Fire-return interval is lengthened by the wetness of the soil.

Diagnostic Characteristics: This group contains floristically and structurally diverse wetland forests with open to closed canopies. The broad-leaved evergreen tree growth form is more dominant here than in other related types (i.e., ~Coastal Plain Hardwood Basin Swamp Group (G038)$$, ~Nonriverine Wet Oak Flatwoods Group (G130)$$), although not all examples will be so dominated. Other codominant growth forms include broad-leaved deciduous trees and evergreen needle-leaved trees. The component characteristic taxa are tolerant of groundwater seepage, but not long-hydroperiod flooding by deep water. Dominant taxa are typically strongly restricted to wetlands of the Southeast Coastal Plain. Hydrology includes wet flats and gentle slopes, with groundwater rather than overbank flooding being the source of the water.

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Some closely related southern Chamaecyparis thyoides- and Arundinaria-dominated associations also fit into this group. Tree and tall shrub pocosins are included here, but low shrub and herb pocosins are treated in ~Southeastern Coastal Pocosin & Shrub Bog Group (G186)$$. Baygalls are treated here.

Some authors have treated Persea palustris (of wetlands) and Persea borbonia (of uplands) as one taxon under a broadly conceived Persea borbonia. We recognize the two distinct taxa, following Godfrey (1988), Kartesz (1999) and Weakley (2008).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: Stands of this group are wetland forests with generally closed canopies and the characteristic presence or dominance of several broad-leaved evergreen tree species. The distinctive hydrology is strongly influenced by groundwater seepage.

Floristics: The vegetation of this group is dominated by woody plants, primarily trees. An open to closed canopy is usually present and consists of a mixture of acidic-tolerant wetland trees such as Acer rubrum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Magnolia virginiana, Nyssa biflora, Nyssa sylvatica, Persea palustris, and Pinus serotina. Some associations may contain Chamaecyparis thyoides, but this species is not diagnostic of this group. There is generally a dense shrub layer that is dominated by species shared with pocosins or baygalls, such as Arundinaria tecta (= Arundinaria gigantea ssp. tecta), Clethra alnifolia, Cliftonia monophylla, Cyrilla racemiflora, Ilex glabra, Leucothoe axillaris, Lyonia ligustrina, and Lyonia lucida, but includes some species which occur in other saturated wetlands, such as Morella caroliniensis, Persea palustris, Toxicodendron vernix, and Viburnum nudum. The vine Smilax laurifolia may be abundant. The herb layer, if well-developed at all, generally consists of large wetland ferns, such as Osmunda cinnamomea, Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis, Woodwardia virginica, and Woodwardia areolata, with Carex spp. There is some variation according to latitude, with southerly examples generally consisting of broad-leaved evergreen forests, while more northerly examples support more mixed evergreen-deciduous forests. In addition, broad-leaved evergreen species are especially pronounced in the shrub layer of southern examples.

Dynamics:  The evergreen seepage-influenced vegetation types included here are quite heterogeneous in composition and in the role of fire, as well as extensive in geographic range. The streamhead seepages of the Fall-line Sandhills region of North Carolina and northern South Carolina (EPA 65c), as well as related areas of Georgia, Florida, and southern Virginia are distinctive in being strongly fire-dominated, having Pinus spp. as a major canopy dominant, and having a flora consisting largely of pocosin species. A second set of associations ranging from South Carolina through the Gulf Coastal Plain has vegetation that suggests less influence by fire, including hardwood canopies and shrub layers that are primarily evergreen shrubs of saturated habitats, that share some other wetland species. A third set, from a wider variety of topographic settings throughout the region, has hardwood canopies and shrub and herb layers with less peatland affinities, more closely related to floodplain communities. Their flora suggests a minor role for fire. Fire is important, but the fire regime appears to be somewhat variable or unclear, because some of the characteristic trees are fire-intolerant (e.g., Magnolia), while others are fire-dependent (Pinus serotina). Fire frequency is lengthened by the wetness of the soil. This vegetation occurs in landscapes that had frequent fire under natural conditions, but the wetness sometimes limited fire spread, creating a less frequent fire-return interval. Natural fire intensity varies among alliances and associations, with some readily producing intense fire when they burn, while others probably experiencing only low-intensity fires because of low flammability. Persea palustris is suffering the effects of a beetle-borne fungus which is killing these trees in stands of this vegetation as well as upland maritime forests. This fungus (Ophiostoma sp.) is carried by the redbay ambrosia beetle (Xyleborus glabratus), introduced from Asia.

Environmental Description:  This vegetation is found on coastal plain terrain on sites saturated by seepage of shallow groundwater. Seasonal to permanent saturation combined with wildland fire of only moderate to low frequency and woody vegetation are the unifying characteristics of this group. Often, a small stream drains the site, but overbank flooding is a negligible influence. Some examples are on wet flats, some are in bottoms of ravines, but some are on sideslopes or flats at the base of slopes. Most examples are in sandy areas where rapid soil drainage in the surrounding landscape supplies the seepage. Soils within the group itself are generally mucky sands or clay, or deeper organic soils.

Geographic Range: This vegetation ranges from southeastern Virginia to eastern Texas, extending into central Florida and north in the interior to southern Arkansas and extreme southeastern Oklahoma.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AL, AR, DE, FL, GA, LA, MD, MS, NC, NJ?, OK, SC, TX, VA




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: GNR

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Bay Swamp (Ewel 1990b)
> Bay-Gallberry Holly Bogs (Ajilvsgi 1979)
> Baygall (FNAI 1990)
> Wetland Baygall Shrub Thicket (Marks and Harcombe 1981)

Concept Author(s): K.C. Ewel (1990b)

Author of Description: C.W. Nordman and M. Pyne

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-13-15

  • Ajilvsgi, G. 1979. Wild flowers of the Big Thicket, east Texas, and western Louisiana. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, TX.
  • Brooks, A. R., E. S. Nixon, and J. A. Neal. 1993. Woody vegetation of wet creek bottom communities in eastern Texas. Castanea 58:185-196.
  • Ewel, K. C. 1990b. Swamps. Pages 281-323 in: R. L. Myers and J. J. Ewel, editors. Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando.
  • FNAI [Florida Natural Areas Inventory]. 1990. Guide to the natural communities of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory and Florida Department of Natural Resources, Tallahassee. 111 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., J. Drake, S. Gawler, M. Hall, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, K. Schulz, J. Teague, M. Russo, K. Snow, and P. Comer, editors. 2010-2019a. Divisions, Macrogroups and Groups for the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. plus appendices. [in preparation]
  • Frost, C. C. 1987. Historical overview of Atlantic white cedar in the Carolinas. Pages 257-263 in: A. D. Laderman, editor. Atlantic white cedar wetlands. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 401 pp.
  • Godfrey, R. K. 1988. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of northern Florida and adjacent Georgia and Alabama. University of Georgia Press, Athens. 734 pp.
  • Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.
  • Johnson, Ann F. Personal communication. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee.
  • LNHP [Louisiana Natural Heritage Program]. 2009. Natural communities of Louisiana. Louisiana Natural Heritage Program, Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, Baton Rouge. 46 pp. [http://www.wlf.louisiana.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/page_wildlife/6776-Rare%20Natural%20Communities/LA_NAT_COM.pdf]
  • Marks, P. L., and P. A. Harcombe. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Big Thicket, southeast Texas. Ecological Monographs 51:287-305.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Schafale, Mike P. Personal communication. Ecologist, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Soil Conservation Service. 1990. Soil survey of Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana. Prepared by Martin, P. G., Jr., C. L. Butler, E. Scott, J. E. Lyles, M. Mariano, J. Ragus, P. Mason, and L. Schoelerman. USDA Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with USDA Forest Service, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, and Louisiana Soil and Water Conservation Commission. 193 pp. plus maps.
  • Van Kley, J. E. 1999a. The vegetation of the Kisatchie Sandstone Hills, Louisiana. Castanea 64:64-80.
  • Weakley, A. S. 2005. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia and Georgia. Unpublished working draft of 2005. UNC Herbarium / North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.