Print Report

CEGL004193 Spartina alterniflora - Lilaeopsis chinensis Salt Marsh

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Smooth Cordgrass - Eastern Grasswort Salt Marsh

Colloquial Name: Brackish Low Tidal Salt Marsh

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This association is a brackish, mid-tidal low marsh of larger tidal rivers along the mid- and north Atlantic coast. Spartina alterniflora is dominant, but occurs with various mixtures of species such as Bolboschoenus robustus, Schoenoplectus pungens, and Spartina cynosuroides, which may be locally prominent, especially as salinity decreases. Characteristic species in addition to Spartina alterniflora include Lilaeopsis chinensis, Bolboschoenus robustus, Polygonum punctatum, and Eleocharis parvula. Associated species that occur in low abundance can include Amaranthus cannabinus, Atriplex prostrata, Typha angustifolia, Bolboschoenus maritimus, Eleocharis halophila, Samolus valerandi ssp. parviflorus, Sagittaria calycina, and Crassula aquatica. Freshwater species increase as salinity decreases, such as Peltandra virginica, Bolboschoenus fluviatilis, Sagittaria latifolia, Leersia oryzoides, and Pontederia cordata. Substrate is mud or muddy, fibrous peat.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Floristically, this community differs from the other communities of this alliance in that it is brackish rather than saline, indicated by the presence of brackish indicators such as Lilaeopsis chinensis, Eleocharis parvula, and Limosella australis. It occurs on large tidal rivers (i.e., Connecticut River, Delaware River).

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This association is dominated by Spartina alterniflora. Bolboschoenus robustus (= Schoenoplectus robustus), Schoenoplectus pungens, and Spartina cynosuroides may be locally prominent, especially as salinity decreases. Characteristic species in addition to Spartina alterniflora include Bolboschoenus robustus, Lilaeopsis chinensis, and Eleocharis parvula. Associated species that occur in low abundance can include Amaranthus cannabinus, Atriplex prostrata (= Atriplex hastata), Typha angustifolia, Bolboschoenus maritimus (= Schoenoplectus maritimus), Eleocharis halophila, Samolus valerandi ssp. parviflorus (= Samolus parviflorus), Sagittaria calycina, and Crassula aquatica (= Tillaea aquatica). Freshwater species increase as salinity decreases, such as Peltandra virginica, Bolboschoenus fluviatilis (= Schoenoplectus fluviatilis), Sagittaria latifolia, Leersia oryzoides, and Pontederia cordata.

Dynamics:  Mid-tidal brackish marsh vegetation responds to interacting gradients of salinity and inundation. There is seasonal variation in inundation, with dramatic flooding events during the spring from snowmelt and precipitation in the upper watershed, which delay the growing season in these environmental settings (Barrett 1989). The brackish low marsh is regularly flooded by diurnal tides. Since the low marsh occurs adjacent to river and creek channels natural deposition occurs which builds natural levees. The riverbanks are freely drained and receive regular tidal flushing, which creates silty fibrous peat substrate. As brackish conditions diminish, species composition shifts to having more freshwater species, and the organic matter content in soils decreases.

Environmental Description:  This low brackish marsh occurs in the lower reaches of tidal rivers adjacent to the river channel subject to river flooding and annual ice-scour. It receives constant freshwater input from the upstream watershed. This association is regularly flooded by diurnal tides. Substrate is coarse, fibrous peat or mud.

Geographic Range: This association occurs along the north and mid-Atlantic coast from New Hampshire to South Carolina.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  CT, DE, MA, NC, NH, NJ, RI, SC




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3G4

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: 6907 is well within variability of 4193

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Spartina alterniflora - Lilaeopsis chinensis community (Metzler and Barrett 2006)
? Spartina alterniflora cover type (Ferren et al. 1981)
? Spartina alterniflora cover type (Caldwell 1990)
? Brackish Tidal Marsh (Rawinski 1984a) [formerly Southern New England and Gulf of Maine.]

Concept Author(s): Eastern Ecology Group

Author of Description: S.L. Neid and L.A. Sneddon

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 05-13-02

  • Breden, T. F. 1989. A preliminary natural community classification for New Jersey. Pages 157-191 in: E. F. Karlin, editor. New Jersey''s rare and endangered plants and animals. Institute for Environmental Studies, Ramapo College, Mahwah, NJ. 280 pp.
  • Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Second iteration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural Lands Management, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton.
  • Caldwell, F. A. 1990. A floristic and vegetation analysis of a freshwater-tidal marsh on the Merrimack River, West Newbury, Massachusetts. Master''s thesis, University of New Hampshire. 96 pp.
  • Eastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boston, MA.
  • Enser, R. W., and J. A. Lundgren. 2006. Natural communities of Rhode Island. A joint project of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Natural Heritage Program and The Nature Conservancy of Rhode Island. Rhode Island Natural History Survey, Kingston. 40 pp. [www.rinhs.org]
  • Ferren, W. R., Jr., R. E. Good, R. Walker, and J. Arsenault. 1981. Vegetation and flora of Hog Island, a brackish wetland in the Mullica River, New Jersey. Bartonia 48:1-10.
  • Lundgren, J. A. 1998. Natural communities of coastal Massachusetts: Inventory and assessment. Massachusetts Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Boston, MA.
  • Metzler, K., and J. Barrett. 2006. The vegetation of Connecticut: A preliminary classification. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Report of Investigations No. 12. Connecticut Natural Diversity Database, Hartford, CT.
  • Nelson, J. B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries, Columbia, SC. 55 pp.
  • Rawinski, T. 1984a. Natural community description abstract - southern New England calcareous seepage swamp. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA. 6 pp.
  • Reschke, C. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Latham, NY. 96 pp.
  • Schafale, M. P. 2012. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.
  • Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh. 325 pp.
  • Sneddon, L. A., Zaremba, R. E., and M. Adams. 2010. Vegetation classification and mapping at Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts. Natural Resources Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2010/147. National Park Service, Philadelphia, PA. 481 pp. [http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/caco/cacorpt.pdf]
  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.
  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2014. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 2.0. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/nhesp/http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]