Print Report
CEGL001148 Alnus incana / Mesic Graminoids Wet Shrubland
Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available
Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Gray Alder / Mesic Graminoids Wet Shrubland
Colloquial Name: No Data Available
Hierarchy Level: Association
Type Concept: This shrubland association is a widespread community of limited extent in the western states of Idaho, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and Nevada. Stands occur in narrow to moderately wide floodplains on stream benches, in association with abandoned meanders, on islands and pointbars, and on hillside seeps. These shrublands are characterized by stands of medium-tall and tall, deciduous shrubs and a thick herbaceous undergrowth of wetland-indicator grasses, and little to no overstory tree canopy. Total shrub cover is usually over 50% and is dominated by Alnus incana, the diagnostic shrub. Other shrubs include Salix spp., Betula occidentalis, and Cornus sericea. The understory of undisturbed stands has a dense herbaceous cover including Glyceria spp., Calamagrostis canadensis, Elymus glaucus, Carex spp., and Equisetum spp. Heavily disturbed stands have abundant non-native grasses. In Nevada, Utah, southeastern Idaho, and Wyoming, this type is considered a grazing-induced community derived from ~Alnus incana / Mesic Forbs Wet Shrubland (CEGL001147)$$. However, several stands in Colorado are undisturbed and the undergrowth is dominated by native graminoid cover.
Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available
Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available
Classification Comments: Classification is based on data collected from throughout the range of the association. Some classifications have considered this a grazing-induced sere of the ~Alnus incana / Mesic Forbs Wet Shrubland (CEGL001147)$$ (Padgett et al. 1989, Manning and Padgett 1995). High-quality stands with a native understory are uncommon, but are reported in Colorado and Idaho, and are suspected in Wyoming. In Oregon, five Alnus incana plant associations (Alnus incana / Glyceria elata, Alnus incana / Calamagrostis canadensis, Alnus incana / Scirpus microcarpus, Alnus incana / Carex amplifolia, and Alnus incana / Carex pellita) were described and one or more may belong in this association.
Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available
Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available
Floristics: These shrublands are characterized by stands of medium-tall and tall, deciduous shrubs and a thick herbaceous undergrowth of wetland-indicator grasses, and little to no overstory tree canopy. Total shrub cover is usually over 50% and is dominated by Alnus incana, the diagnostic shrub. Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia dominates the upper canopy with 10-90% cover. Other shrubs occasionally present include Salix exigua, Salix monticola, Rubus deliciosus, Salix bebbiana, Salix drummondiana, Rosa woodsii, and Cornus sericea. Occasionally, trees may be scattered throughout the shrubland, or occur along one edge. Tree species include Abies lasiocarpa, Pinus contorta, Populus angustifolia, Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa, Populus deltoides, Populus tremuloides, Picea engelmannii, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Salix fragilis (Padgett et al. 1989, Manning and Padgett 1995, Kittel et al. 1999b, Carsey et al. 2003a).
The herbaceous layer is a thick carpet of grasses. Native graminoids include Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex aquatilis, Carex utriculata, Glyceria striata, Carex pellita (= Carex lanuginosa), Elymus glaucus, and Festuca rubra. Heavily disturbed stands are dominated by introduced, non-native grasses, including Poa pratensis, Agrostis stolonifera, and Bromus inermis. Forb cover is usually low relative to the amount of graminoid cover but can include a high variety of species, including Thalictrum fendleri, Mertensia ciliata, Mentha arvensis, Geranium richardsonii, Erigeron peregrinus, Cardamine cordifolia, Aconitum columbianum, and Caltha leptosepala (Kittel et al. 1999b, Carsey et al. 2003a).
The herbaceous layer is a thick carpet of grasses. Native graminoids include Calamagrostis canadensis, Carex aquatilis, Carex utriculata, Glyceria striata, Carex pellita (= Carex lanuginosa), Elymus glaucus, and Festuca rubra. Heavily disturbed stands are dominated by introduced, non-native grasses, including Poa pratensis, Agrostis stolonifera, and Bromus inermis. Forb cover is usually low relative to the amount of graminoid cover but can include a high variety of species, including Thalictrum fendleri, Mertensia ciliata, Mentha arvensis, Geranium richardsonii, Erigeron peregrinus, Cardamine cordifolia, Aconitum columbianum, and Caltha leptosepala (Kittel et al. 1999b, Carsey et al. 2003a).
Dynamics: Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia is a long-lived, early-seral species. It is one of the first species to establish on fluvial or glacial deposits as well as the spoils of placer mining (Viereck 1970, Van Cleve et al. 1971, Hansen et al. 1989, Chapin et al. 1994). After establishment, young stands of Alnus incana are continually flooded. As stands mature, the stems can slow flood waters and trap sediment. Fine-textured sediments accumulate on top of the coarser alluvial material, and the land surface eventually rises above annual flood levels. Flooding is then less frequent and soils begin to develop (Padgett et al. 1989).
Alnus incana is shade-intolerant (Viereck 1970, Chapin et al. 1994), and many mature stands in Colorado are restricted to streambank edges, possibly because these are the only sites where light can penetrate the neighboring overstory canopy. Alnus incana has been observed on high-gradient streams and is thought to require well-aerated water (Hansen et al. 1988b, Padgett et al. 1989).
Undisturbed Alnus incana stands may become dominated by Salix (willow) species or conifers (Hansen et al. 1989). In Alaska, thick stands of alders inhibit succession by competing with spruce for nutrients and light (Chapin et al. 1994). In Utah, Acer negundo (box-elder) often becomes the dominant canopy species on more xeric sites (Padgett et al. 1989).
Alnus incana fixes atmospheric nitrogen through a symbiotic relationship with the bacteria Frankenia and increases the ecosystem nitrogen supply with the deposition of nitrogen-rich leaf litter (Binkley 1986). The annual input of nitrogen to soils from alder species ranges from 10 to 150 times the amount deposited by atmospheric precipitation alone (Binkley 1986, Bowman and Steltzer 1998). Nitrogen rich detritus is an important source of nutrients for the aquatic ecosystem as well.
In Nevada, Utah, southeastern Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, the Alnus incana / mesic graminoid type is considered a grazing-induced community, derived from the Alnus incana / mesic forb plant association (Padgett et al. 1989, Manning and Padgett 1995, Jones 1992c). In Colorado, most stands of this plant association appear to be disturbed by improper grazing and have an abundance of non-native graminoid species. A few stands, however, appear undisturbed and have an undergrowth dominated by native grasses.
Alnus incana is shade-intolerant (Viereck 1970, Chapin et al. 1994), and many mature stands in Colorado are restricted to streambank edges, possibly because these are the only sites where light can penetrate the neighboring overstory canopy. Alnus incana has been observed on high-gradient streams and is thought to require well-aerated water (Hansen et al. 1988b, Padgett et al. 1989).
Undisturbed Alnus incana stands may become dominated by Salix (willow) species or conifers (Hansen et al. 1989). In Alaska, thick stands of alders inhibit succession by competing with spruce for nutrients and light (Chapin et al. 1994). In Utah, Acer negundo (box-elder) often becomes the dominant canopy species on more xeric sites (Padgett et al. 1989).
Alnus incana fixes atmospheric nitrogen through a symbiotic relationship with the bacteria Frankenia and increases the ecosystem nitrogen supply with the deposition of nitrogen-rich leaf litter (Binkley 1986). The annual input of nitrogen to soils from alder species ranges from 10 to 150 times the amount deposited by atmospheric precipitation alone (Binkley 1986, Bowman and Steltzer 1998). Nitrogen rich detritus is an important source of nutrients for the aquatic ecosystem as well.
In Nevada, Utah, southeastern Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, the Alnus incana / mesic graminoid type is considered a grazing-induced community, derived from the Alnus incana / mesic forb plant association (Padgett et al. 1989, Manning and Padgett 1995, Jones 1992c). In Colorado, most stands of this plant association appear to be disturbed by improper grazing and have an abundance of non-native graminoid species. A few stands, however, appear undisturbed and have an undergrowth dominated by native grasses.
Environmental Description: This mesic shrubland association occurs across much of the southern and central Rocky Mountains at 1710 to 3000 m (5600-9860 feet) elevation. Stands occur in narrow to moderately wide floodplains on stream benches, in association with abandoned meanders, on islands and pointbars, and on hillside seeps. Alnus incana tends to dominate narrow streambanks where stream gradients are relatively steep, or on more cobbly substrates than their willow neighbors in broad floodplain settings (Padgett et al. 1989, Manning and Padgett 1995, Kittel et al. 1999b, Carsey et al. 2003a). Stream channels can be steep and straight to highly sinuous (Rosgen''s Channel Type: A3, A4, F3) or moderately steep and sinuous (Rosgen''s Channel Type: B2, B3, B4, B6) (Rosgen 1996). Where this association occurs on pointbars, stream channels are low gradient (<1% gradient) and highly sinuous (Rosgen''s Channel Type: C5) (Rosgen 1996). Soils are mostly coarse alluvium but characteristically have silt loams or sandy clay loams at the surface with a high percentage of organic matter. Soils are shallow to moderately deep, 35-62 cm (15-30 inches) and become increasingly skeletal with depth. Most profiles have 10-50% mottles at 18-25 cm (7-10 inches) depth. One profile had gleyed mineral soils indicating saturated conditions (Kittel et al. 1999b, Carsey et al. 2003a).
Geographic Range: This plant association is a minor riparian type in Idaho, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and Nevada.
Nations: US
States/Provinces: CO, ID, NV, UT, WY
Plot Analysis Summary:
http://vegbank.org/natureserve/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.686776
Confidence Level: Moderate
Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available
Grank: G3
Greasons: No Data Available
Type | Name | Database Code | Classification Code |
---|---|---|---|
Class | 2 Shrub & Herb Vegetation Class | C02 | 2 |
Subclass | 2.C Shrub & Herb Wetland Subclass | S44 | 2.C |
Formation | 2.C.4 Temperate to Polar Freshwater Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Formation | F013 | 2.C.4 |
Division | 2.C.4.Nb Western North American Temperate Freshwater Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Division | D031 | 2.C.4.Nb |
Macrogroup | 2.C.4.Nb.5 Sitka Alder - Booth''s Willow / Northwest Territory Sedge Montane Marsh, Wet Meadow & Shrubland Macrogroup | M893 | 2.C.4.Nb.5 |
Group | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d Willow species - Alder species - Water Birch Riparian & Seep Shrubland Group | G527 | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d |
Alliance | A3771 Gray Alder - Green Alder Wet Shrubland Alliance | A3771 | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d |
Association | CEGL001148 Gray Alder / Mesic Graminoids Wet Shrubland | CEGL001148 | 2.C.4.Nb.5.d |
Concept Lineage: No Data Available
Predecessors: No Data Available
Obsolete Names: No Data Available
Obsolete Parents: No Data Available
Synonomy: = Alnus incana / Carex amplifolia Association (Crowe et al. 2004)
= Alnus incana / Mesic Graminoid Community Type (Padgett et al. 1989) [a grazing-induced sere.]
= Alnus incana / Mesic Graminoid Community Type (Manning and Padgett 1995) [a grazing-induced sere.]
= Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia / Mesic Graminoid Shrubland (Carsey et al. 2003b)
= Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia / Mesic Graminoid Shrubland (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia/Mesic graminoid (Kittel et al. 1999b)
= Thinleaf alder/Mesic Graminoids (Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia/Mesic Graminoids) Plant Association (Kittel et al. 1999a)
= Alnus incana / Mesic Graminoid Community Type (Padgett et al. 1989) [a grazing-induced sere.]
= Alnus incana / Mesic Graminoid Community Type (Manning and Padgett 1995) [a grazing-induced sere.]
= Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia / Mesic Graminoid Shrubland (Carsey et al. 2003b)
= Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia / Mesic Graminoid Shrubland (Carsey et al. 2003a)
= Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia/Mesic graminoid (Kittel et al. 1999b)
= Thinleaf alder/Mesic Graminoids (Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia/Mesic Graminoids) Plant Association (Kittel et al. 1999a)
- Binkley, D. 1986. Forest nutrition management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
- Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
- Bowman, W. D., and H. Steltzer. 1998. Positive feedbacks to anthropogenic nitrogen deposition in Rocky Mountain alpine tundra. Ambio 27:514-517.
- CNHP [Colorado Natural Heritage Program]. 2006-2017. Tracked natural plant communities. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. [https://cnhp.colostate.edu/ourdata/trackinglist/plant_communities/]
- Carsey, K., D. Cooper, K. Decker, D. Culver, and G. Kittel. 2003b. Statewide wetlands classification and characterization: Wetland plant associations of Colorado. Prepared for Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Denver, by Colorado Natural Heritage Program, College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 79 pp. [http://www.cnhp.colostate.edu/documents/2003/wetland_classification_final_report_2003.pdf]
- Carsey, K., G. Kittel, K. Decker, D. J. Cooper, and D. Culver. 2003a. Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins, CO.
- Chapin, F. S., III, L. R. Walker, C. L. Fastie, and L. C. Sharman. 1994. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecological Monographs 64(2):149-175.
- Coles, J., A. Tendick, J. Von Loh, G. Bradshaw, G. Manis, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2010. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2010/361. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.
- Crowe, E. A., B. L. Kovalchik, and M. J. Kerr. 2004. Riparian and wetland vegetation of central and eastern Oregon. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Oregon State University, Portland. 473 pp. [http://oregonstate.edu/ornhic/ publications.html]
- Hansen, P. L., S. W. Chadde, and R. D. Pfister. 1988b. Riparian dominance types of Montana. University of Montana Miscellaneous Publication 49. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, Missoula. 411 pp.
- Hansen, P., R. Pfister, J. Joy, D. Svoboda, K. Boggs, L. Myers, S. Chadde, and J. Pierce. 1989. Classification and management of riparian sites in southwestern Montana. Unpublished draft prepared for the Montana Riparian Association, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula. 292 pp.
- IDCDC [Idaho Conservation Data Center]. 2005. Wetland and riparian plant associations in Idaho. Idaho Conservation Data Center, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise. [http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/tech/CDC/ecology/wetland_riparian_assoc.cfm] (accessed 14 June 2005).
- Jones, G. 1992b. Wyoming plant community classification (Draft). Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. 183 pp.
- Jones, G., and S. Ogle. 2000. Characterization abstracts for vegetation types on the Bighorn, Medicine Bow, and Shoshone national forests. Prepared for USDA Forest Service, Region 2 by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming.
- Kettler, S., and A. McMullen. 1996. Routt National Forest riparian vegetation classification. Report prepared for Routt National Forest by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, A. McMullen, and J. Sanderson. 1999b. A classification of riparian and wetland plant associations of Colorado: A user''s guide to the classification project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO. 70 pp. plus appendices.
- Kittel, G., E. Van Wie, M. Damm, R. Rondeau, S. Kettler, and J. Sanderson. 1999a. A classification of the riparian plant associations of the Rio Grande and Closed Basin watersheds, Colorado. Unpublished report prepared by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Kittel, G., R. Rondeau, and A. McMullen. 1996. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the Lower South Platte and parts of the Upper Arkansas River basins, Colorado. Submitted to Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII. Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Fort Collins. 243 pp.
- Manning, M. E., and W. G. Padgett. 1995. Riparian community type classification for Humboldt and Toiyabe national forests, Nevada and eastern California. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region. 306 pp.
- Owns, T., project coordinator, et al. 2004. U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program: Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument. U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service. 390 pp.
- Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1989. Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho. Research Paper R4-ECOL-89-0. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
- Richard, C., G. Kittel, and S. Kettler. 1996. A classification of the riparian vegetation of the San Juan National Forest. Draft 1 report. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
- Salas, D., J. Stevens, and K. Schulz. 2005. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program: Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Technical Memorandum No. 8260-05-02. USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. 161 pp. plus Appendices A-L (733 pp.).
- Tendick, A., J. Coles, P. Williams, G. Bradshaw, G. Manis, A. Wight, G. Wakefield, and A. Evenden. 2010. Vegetation classification and mapping project report, Curecanti National Recreation Area. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR--2010/408. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. 797 pp.
- Van Cleve, K., L. A. Viereck, and R. L. Schlentner. 1971. Accumulation of nitrogen in alder (Alnus) ecosystems near Fairbanks, Alaska. Arctic and Alpine Research 3(2):101-114.
- Viereck, L. A. 1970a. Forest succession and soil development adjacent to the Chena River in interior Alaska. Arctic and Alpine Research 2(1):1-26.
- WNDD [Wyoming Natural Diversity Database]. No date. Unpublished data on file. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
- Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.