Print Report

CEGL000962 Cercocarpus ledifolius / Festuca idahoensis Woodland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Curl-leaf Mountain-mahogany / Idaho Fescue Woodland

Colloquial Name: No Data Available

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: In Montana this type has been documented from the Beaverhead Mountains Section, where it occurs on moderate to steep, rocky and north-facing slopes of varying parent materials; elevations range upward from 1800 m (5900 feet) to at least 2745 m (9000 feet). It occurs on comparable settings in the Challis Volcanics and Idaho Batholith sections of central Idaho. In Montana this association has been sampled on steep cool slopes composed of granitic and metamorphic (schist) colluvium which weathers to shallow, poorly developed and excessively drained soils. It has been noted on sedimentary (quartzite and limestones) substrates as well and thus parent material is thought not to be a controlling factor. Cercocarpus ledifolius is dominant, growing as a small tree, ranging in height from 1.8-3.7 m (6-12 feet), depending in part on site quality and intensity of past browsing; Cercocarpus ledifolius cover also ranges widely (10-30% plus). Numerous other shrubs are present, including Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana, Artemisia frigida, Ericameria nauseosa, Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus, and Eriogonum microthecum, though their combined canopy cover does not exceed 5-10%. The herbaceous layer is usually sparse, with the combined canopy cover not exceeding 30%, of which most is xeric-adapted, cool-season grasses such as Pseudoroegneria spicata, Achnatherum hymenoides, Hesperostipa comata, and Poa secunda, any one of which may occur with higher canopy cover than the indicator species for the type, Festuca idahoensis (which needs to be well-represented, >5% canopy cover for type recognition). The ground surface is characterized by exposed soil, gravel and cobbles generally in excess of 70% cover, but in contrast to Cercocarpus ledifolius / Pseudoroegneria spicata of southerly exposures, these northerly exposures favor the development of an intermittent mat of mosses and lichens.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This association differs from ~Cercocarpus ledifolius / Pseudoroegneria spicata Scrub (CEGL000967)$$ by (1) having Festuca idahoensis present with at least 5% canopy cover (relaxing this criteria to only 1% if grazing is judged to be intensive), and (2) occurring on northerly aspects and not warmer insolation regimes. It generally occurs on rockier substrates (excessively drained) than either Artemisia spp.-dominated or forested environments, which are the major types in the landscape. Stands of this type are generally abruptly set apart from adjacent vegetation types or constitute an ecotone between types.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Cercocarpus ledifolius is dominant, growing as a small tree, ranging in height from 1.8-3.7 m (6-12 feet), depending in part on site quality and intensity of past browsing; Cercocarpus ledifolius cover also ranges widely (10-30% plus). Numerous other shrubs are present, including Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana, Artemisia frigida, Ericameria nauseosa (= Chrysothamnus nauseosus), Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus, and Eriogonum microthecum, though their combined canopy cover does not exceed 5-10%. The herbaceous layer is usually sparse, with the combined canopy cover not exceeding 30%, of which most is xeric-adapted, cool-season grasses such as Pseudoroegneria spicata, Achnatherum hymenoides (= Oryzopsis hymenoides), Hesperostipa comata (= Stipa comata), and Poa secunda (= Poa sandbergii), any one of which may occur with higher canopy cover than the indicator species for the type, Festuca idahoensis (which needs to be ''well-represented,'' >5% canopy cover for type recognition). The ground surface is characterized by exposed soil, gravel and cobbles generally in excess of 70% cover, but in contrast to Cercocarpus ledifolius / Pseudoroegneria spicata of southerly exposures, these northerly exposures favor the development of an intermittent mat of mosses and lichens.

Dynamics:  There is no known disturbance regime associated with perpetuation of this type; however, reproduction of Cercocarpus ledifolius has been noted to be episodic. Most stands constitute important winter range for deer and are heavily browsed, including the seedling and sapling size classes, which potentially could pose a threat to reproduction. On the other hand, this species is extremely long-lived (up to 400 years for Nevada specimens), affording ample opportunity to exploit a window of reproductive opportunity.

Environmental Description:  This association occurs on moderate to steep, rocky and north-facing slopes of varying parent materials; elevations range upward from 1800 m (5900 feet) to at least 2745 m (9000 feet). It occurs on comparable settings in the Challis Volcanics and Idaho Batholith sections of central Idaho. In Montana this association has been sampled on steep cool slopes composed of granitic and metamorphic (schist) colluvium which weathers to shallow, poorly developed and excessively drained soils. It has been noted on sedimentary (quartzite and limestones) substrates as well and thus parent material is thought not to be a controlling factor.

Geographic Range: This association occurs in the Beaverhead Mountains (M332E), Challis Volcanics (M332F), and Idaho Batholith (M332A) Sections of Bailey''s Middle Rocky Mountain Steppe-Coniferous Forest-Alpine Meadow Province (M332) (McNab and Avers 1994, Nesser et al. 1997), including the states of Montana and Idaho.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  ID, MT, NV, OR




Confidence Level: Low - Poorly Documented

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: No Data Available

Concept Author(s): S.V. Cooper

Author of Description: S.V. Cooper

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-26-97

  • Bourgeron, P. S., and L. D. Engelking, editors. 1994. A preliminary vegetation classification of the western United States. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Western Heritage Task Force, Boulder, CO. 175 pp. plus appendix.
  • Cooper, S. V., P. Lesica, R. L. DeVelice, and T. McGarvey. 1995. Classification of southwestern Montana plant communities with emphasis on those of Dillon Resource Area, Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 154 pp.
  • DeVelice, R. L. 1992. Classification of the plant communities of Beaverhead, Silver Bow, and Madison counties, Montana. Volume I (text). Prepared for the Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 35 pp.
  • Dealy, J. E. 1971. Habitat characteristics of the Silver Lake mule deer range. Research Paper PNW-125. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. 99 pp.
  • Dealy, J. E. 1975. Ecology of curl-leaf mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius Nutt.) in Oregon and adjacent areas. Unpublished dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 168 pp.
  • Dealy, J. E., D. A. Leckenby, and D. M. Concannon. 1981. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon. Plant communities and their importance to wildlife. General Technical Report PNW-120. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 66 pp.
  • Hall, F. C. 1973. Plant communities of the Blue Mountains in eastern Oregon and southeastern Washington. R6 Area Guide 3-1. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 62 pp.
  • Kagan, J. S., J. A. Christy, M. P. Murray, and J. A. Titus. 2004. Classification of native vegetation of Oregon. January 2004. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland. 52 pp.
  • MTNHP [Montana Natural Heritage Program]. 2002b. List of ecological communities for Montana. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena, MT.
  • McNab, W. H., and P. E. Avers, compilers. 1994. Ecological subregions of the United States: Section descriptions. Administrative Publication WO-WSA-5. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 267 pp.
  • Nesser, J. A., G. L. Ford, C. L. Maynard, and D. S. Page-Dumroese. 1997. Ecological units of the Northern Region: Subsections. General Technical Report INT-GTR-369. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 88 pp.
  • Schulz, K. A., and M. E. Hall. 2011. Vegetation inventory project: Great Basin National Park. Unpublished report submitted to USDI National Park Service, Mojave Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network. NatureServe, Western Regional Office, Boulder, CO. 30 pp. plus Appendices A-H.
  • Western Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Boulder, CO.