Print Report

CEGL002024 Andropogon gerardii - Panicum virgatum - Helianthus grosseserratus Wet Meadow

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Big Bluestem - Switchgrass - Sawtooth Sunflower Wet Meadow

Colloquial Name: Central Wet-Mesic Tallgrass Prairie

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This wet-mesic tallgrass prairie community is found widely throughout the central midwestern United States. Stands typically occur in narrow draws of headwaters of small streams, depressions of terraces (sometimes uplands), and on floodplains of larger streams and rivers. The loamy soils are somewhat poorly drained and deep (100 cm or more). Standing surface water may be present for short periods in the winter and spring or after heavy rains. Fire was common in this community. There is a single layer of dominant graminoids intermixed with abundant forbs. Andropogon gerardii and Spartina pectinata can exceed 2 m in height in this wet-mesic community. Panicum virgatum is usually somewhat shorter but still greater than 1 m tall. Other typical plants found in this community in Missouri are Juncus interior, Tripsacum dactyloides, Helianthus grosseserratus, Potentilla simplex, Eryngium yuccifolium, and Carex bicknellii. Calamagrostis canadensis is more common northward. Species diversity does not tend to be as high as in more mesic grassland communities. Woody species can become more abundant in the absence of fire.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: This community has nearly been eliminated because of conversion to cropland. Although Kansas may be expected to have this community type, it is not recognized there (Lauver et al. 1999), and is included within mesic prairie (as done in the northern tallgrass prairie by Minnesota). The concept of this community is very broad, including both glaciated and unglaciated regions, because it was felt that the influence of alluvium overrode old Kansan glacial effects. Further divisions may be warranted. In Wisconsin, wet-mesic prairies on river terraces, e.g. Avoca Prairie on the lower Wisconsin River, may represent a wet-mesic sand prairie type, namely ~Andropogon gerardii - Calamagrostis canadensis Sand Wet Meadow (CEGL005177)$$.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: This community is an extensive grassland with a tree canopy of less than 10%. There is a single layer of dominant graminoids intermixed with abundant forbs. All of the dominant grasses are tall grasses. Andropogon gerardii and Spartina pectinata can exceed 2 m in height in this wet-mesic community. Panicum virgatum is usually somewhat shorter but still greater than 1 m tall. Other typical plants found in this community in Missouri are Juncus interior, Tripsacum dactyloides, Helianthus grosseserratus, Potentilla simplex, Eryngium yuccifolium, and Carex bicknellii. Calamagrostis canadensis is more common northward. Species diversity does not tend to be as high as in more mesic grassland communities (White and Madany 1978, Nelson 1985, MNNHP 1993, Lauver et al. 1999, Steinauer and Rolfsmeier 2003).

Dynamics:  Fire plays a role in the maintenance of this wet-mesic prairie, with an average fire frequency of every two to five years. Woody species can become more abundant in the absence of fire (Nelson 1985).

Environmental Description:  This community occurs in narrow draws of headwaters of small streams, depressions of terraces (sometimes uplands), and on floodplains of larger streams and rivers. The soil is somewhat poorly drained and deep (100 cm or more). The parent material is typically alluvium. In headwater draws loess, glacial till, or deeply weathered rock are likely to be the parent material. Surface water is often present after heavy rains and in the winter and spring.

Some stands occur on sandy outwash plains, lakeplains, and shallow swales. The soils are sands, loamy sands, and sandy loams. They are imperfectly or somewhat imperfectly drained. The soils often have a slowly permeable layer within the profile, a high water table, additions of moisture through seepage, or a combination of several of these conditions. They have deep, acidic, dark A horizons which are high in organic matter. There is faint evidence of gleying immediately beneath the A horizon (White and Madany 1978, Nelson 1985, MNNHP 1993, Lauver et al. 1999, Steinauer and Rolfsmeier 2003).

Geographic Range: This wet-mesic tallgrass prairie community is found widely throughout the central midwestern United States, extending from Indiana northwest to Minnesota, south to possibly Kansas and Arkansas, and east to possibly Kentucky.

Nations: US

States/Provinces:  AR, IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, OK, SD, WI




Confidence Level: Low

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2G3

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: At Milo Pyne''s suggestion this type now includes CEGL002022, which formerly described an unglaciated Andropogon gerardii - Panicum virgatum wet-mesic type in Oklahoma. Merged into the existing 2024.

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Andropogon gerardii - Panicum virgatum - Helianthus grosseserratus Herbaceous Vegetation (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Wet-Mesic Prairie Inland Subtype]
< ID4a. Bluestem Tallgrass Prairie (Allard 1990)
? T5A1aI1b. Panicum virgatum (Foti et al. 1994)
= Wet-mesic Tall-grass Prairie (Steinauer and Rolfsmeier 2003)

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: J. Drake and D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 03-03-94

  • Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.
  • Blair, W. F. 1938. Ecological relationships of the mammals of the Bird Creek region, northeastern Oklahoma. The American Midland Naturalist 20:473-526.
  • Blair, W. F., and T. H. Hubbell. 1938. The biotic districts of Oklahoma. The American Midland Naturalist 20:425-454.
  • Booth, W. E. 1932. The relation of plant communities to soil erosion in Cleveland County, Oklahoma. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
  • Booth, W. E. 1941. Revegetation of abandoned fields in Kansas and Oklahoma. American Journal of Botany 28:415-422.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Foti, T., M. Blaney, X. Li, and K. G. Smith. 1994. A classification system for the natural vegetation of Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 48:50-53.
  • Foti, T., compiler. 1994b. Natural vegetation classification system of Arkansas, draft five. Unpublished document. Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission, Little Rock. 8 pp.
  • Hladek, K. L., G. K. Hulett, and G. W. Tomanek. 1972. The vegetation of remnant shale-limestone prairies in western Kansas. Southwestern Naturalist 17(1):1-10.
  • Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lauver, C. L., K. Kindscher, D. Faber-Langendoen, and R. Schneider. 1999. A classification of the natural vegetation of Kansas. The Southwestern Naturalist 44:421-443.
  • MNNHP [Minnesota Natural Heritage Program]. 1993. Minnesota''s native vegetation: A key to natural communities. Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. 110 pp.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003-2005a. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota. Three volumes: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province (2003), The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (2005c), The Prairie Parkland and Tallgrass Aspen Parklands provinces (2005b). Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • Minnesota DNR [Minnesota Department of Natural Resources]. 2003. Field guide to the native plant communities of Minnesota: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul.
  • Nelson, P. 2010. The terrestrial natural communities of Missouri. Revised edition. Missouri Natural Areas Committee, Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
  • Osborn, B., and P. F. Allan. 1949. Vegetation of an abandoned prairie-dog town in tall grass prairie. Ecology 30:322-332.
  • Osborn, B., and W. H. Kellogg. 1943. Wildlife occurrence and habitat conditions in Roger Mills and Custer counties, Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 23:41-43.
  • Rice, E. L. 1952. Phytosociological analysis of a tall-grass prairie in Marshall County, Oklahoma. Ecology 33(1):112-116.
  • Rolfsmeier, S. B., and G. Steinauer. 2010. Terrestrial ecological systems and natural communities of Nebraska (Version IV - March 9, 2010). Nebraska Natural Heritage Program, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. Lincoln, NE. 228 pp.
  • Smith, D. D. 1981. Iowa prairie--An endangered ecosystem. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science 88(1):7-10.
  • Steinauer, G., and S. Rolfsmeier. 2003. Terrestrial natural communities of Nebraska. (Version III - June 30, 2003). Nebraska Natural Heritage Program, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln. 163 pp.
  • TNC [The Nature Conservancy]. No date (b). NPS/BRD Vegetation Mapping Program: Classification of the vegetation of Scotts Bluff National Monument. The Nature Conservancy, Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, MN, and International Headquarters, Arlington, VA. 65 pp.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • Weakley, A. S., K. D. Patterson, S. Landaal, M. Pyne, and others, compilers. 1998. International classification of ecological communities: Terrestrial vegetation of the Southeastern United States. Working draft of March 1998. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Southern Conservation Science Department, Community Ecology Group. Chapel Hill, NC. 689 pp.
  • Weaver, J. E. 1958a. Native grassland of southwestern Iowa. Ecology 39(4):733-750.
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.