Print Report

CEGL005075 Prunus pumila - (Ptelea trifoliata) Dune Shrubland

Type Concept Sentence: No Data Available


Common (Translated Scientific) Name: Sandcherry - (Common Hoptree) Dune Shrubland

Colloquial Name: Sandcherry Dune Shrubland

Hierarchy Level:  Association

Type Concept: This shrub dune community is found on southern Great Lakes dunes or inland dune systems in the United States and Canada. Stands occur on stabilized foredunes. They are dominated by deciduous shrubs, with a relatively open canopy. Prunus pumila is a characteristic dominant, but Salix cordata, Salix myricoides, Physocarpus opulifolius, and Ptelea trifoliata may also be present. The ground layer may consist of open sand with sparse herbaceous vegetation. Herbaceous species include Ammophila breviligulata, Schizachyrium scoparium and others.

Diagnostic Characteristics: No Data Available

Rationale for Nominal Species or Physiognomic Features: No Data Available

Classification Comments: Stands of this type are often intermingled with open grassland-dominated parts of the dune. This type may be of limited spatial extent, and there is some concern about the practicality of tracking it on a dynamic dune system. Inland dunes along the Illinois River may contain this type (B. McClain pers. comm. 1996). Lake dunes covered by Juniperus horizontalis, Juniperus communis, and/or Arctostaphylos uva-ursi are placed in ~Juniperus horizontalis - Arctostaphylos uva-ursi - Juniperus communis Dune Dwarf-shrubland (CEGL005064)$$.

Similar NVC Types: No Data Available
note: No Data Available

Physiognomy and Structure: No Data Available

Floristics: Stands are dominated by deciduous shrubs, with a relatively open canopy. Prunus pumila is a characteristic dominant, but Salix cordata, Salix myricoides, Physocarpus opulifolius, and Ptelea trifoliata may also be present. The ground layer may consist of open sand with sparse herbaceous vegetation. Herbaceous species include Ammophila breviligulata, Schizachyrium scoparium and others (Chapman et al. 1989, Bakowsky and Lee 1996).

Dynamics:  Disturbances caused by lake storms can bury stands in sand.

Environmental Description:  Stands occur on stabilized foredunes.

Geographic Range: This shrub dune community is found on southern Great Lakes dunes or inland dune systems in the United States and Canada, ranging from Wisconsin to Michigan and Ontario.

Nations: CA,US

States/Provinces:  IL, IN, MI, ON, WI




Confidence Level: Moderate

Confidence Level Comments: No Data Available

Grank: G2Q

Greasons: No Data Available


Concept Lineage: No Data Available

Predecessors: No Data Available

Obsolete Names: No Data Available

Obsolete Parents: No Data Available

Synonomy: = Prunus pumila - (Ptelea trifoliata) Dune Shrubland (Faber-Langendoen 2001) [Lake Dune Sand Cherry Subtype]

Concept Author(s): D. Faber-Langendoen (2001)

Author of Description: D. Faber-Langendoen

Acknowledgements: No Data Available

Version Date: 11-19-98

  • Bakowsky, W. D., and H. T. Lee. 1996. Vegetation communities of southern Ontario (draft). Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre and Southern Region STTU, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. 87 pp.
  • Chapman, K. A., D. A. Albert, and G. A. Reese. 1989. Draft descriptions of Michigan''s natural community types. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI. 35 pp.
  • Faber-Langendoen, D., editor. 2001. Plant communities of the Midwest: Classification in an ecological context. Association for Biodiversity Information, Arlington, VA. 61 pp. plus appendix (705 pp.).
  • Homoya, M. A., J. Aldrich, J. Bacone, L. Casebere, and T. Post. 1988. Indiana natural community classification. Indiana Natural Heritage Program, Indianapolis, IN. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Hop, K., S. Lubinski, J. Dieck, J. Drake, and S. Menard. 2009. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI, and NatureServe, St. Paul, MN. 312 pp.
  • Hop, K., S. Menard, J. Drake, S. Lubinski, and J. Dieck. 2010c. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory Program: Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Michigan. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLKN/NRR-2010/201. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. 358 pp.
  • Kost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: Classification and description. Report No. 2007-21, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing. 314 pp. [http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/reports/2007-21_Natural_Communites_of_Michigan_Classification_and_Description.pdf]
  • Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: First approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
  • Midwestern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Minneapolis, MN.
  • ONHIC [Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre]. 2018. Unpublished data. Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada.
  • WDNR [Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources]. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management. PUB-SS-1131 2015. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison. [http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/landscapes/Book.html]
  • White, J., and M. Madany. 1978. Classification of natural communities in Illinois. Pages 311-405 in: Natural Areas Inventory technical report: Volume I, survey methods and results. Illinois Natural Areas Inventory, Urbana, IL.